Race to the Top Finalist Interview State of Tennessee Leadership Team March 16, 2010 Washington, D.C. 8/17/20151.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Arizona’s Race to the Top State Finalist Presentation Washington, DC August 11, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
SAU # WELCOME TO THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
T3: Turnaround Teacher Teams. T3 Program History The T3 Initiative began in 2009 as a policy proposal from Teach Plus’s first cohort of 16 Teaching Policy.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Academic Distress Commissions July 14, Outline Introduction to Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs) Integration of Commissions into Statewide System.
MT. SAC REGIONAL CONSORTIUM FOR ADULT EDUCATION Overview of AB86 Consortium Information.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
1 Race to the Top Assessment Program General & Technical Assessment Discussion Jeffrey Nellhaus Deputy Commissioner January 20, 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.
A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.
RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist,
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Excellence for All Children State of the Schools Knox County Schools January 19, 2012.
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
Catalyzing Reform Presenting Team Bret Schundler Commissioner Andy Smarick Deputy Commissioner Willa Spicer Assistant Commissioner Rochelle Hendricks Assistant.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Race to the Top Update November 17, 2009.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations July 30, 2015 CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Tennessee STEM Innovation Network STEM for all students Tennessee STEM Innovation Network.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Washington College Access Network Landscape of Education Reform in Washington State March 28, 2011.
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Implementing Race to the Top
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Current Education Legislation Update
Presentation transcript:

Race to the Top Finalist Interview State of Tennessee Leadership Team March 16, 2010 Washington, D.C. 8/17/20151

The Tennessee Story 8/17/20152

Sustaining Real Reform … We Are All Going There Together  Bipartisan and statewide political support  100% of districts and 93% of unions signed on  Urban and rural districts leading the innovation  Strong multi-sector leadership across the state  All gubernatorial candidates have pledged to implement and support  Significant philanthropic & business support We have launched this work. We invite you to invest and be part of its success. 8/17/20153

We Demonstrate Commitment Protected education focus and investments → Annual full funding of Basic Education Program → Longstanding investment in data → Statewide strategy for early childhood education → College- and career-ready standards for all through the Tennessee Diploma Project → Charter schools & innovation → “First to the Top” legislation 8/17/20154

Courage to Make Change Senate Bill 5: First to the Top Act  Enacted significant reform for educators, schools, and postsecondary education in special legislative session  Set a framework for teacher & principal evaluation with 50% being based upon student achievement data (where available)  Created an Achievement School District to clarify and provide authority for state takeover of lowest-performing schools  Set in place a college completion agenda that includes performance- based funding  Much of this was part of the Tennessee plan before Race to the Top. The funding opportunity provided an incentive for timely action. 8/17/20155

We Build On Success  Ambitious and achievable plan built on a strong foundation  Accelerates goals of the Tennessee Diploma Project: college- and career-readiness for all students  Shared priority for Tennesseans This is not a pilot project. It is a comprehensive roadmap for transformational reform for the entire state. 8/17/20156

Making It Happen  First to the Top Oversight Team → Based on the Office of Tennessee Recovery Act Management model → Across multiple agencies → State and local → Measurement for results  Tennessee Department of Education → Realigning the department for the work ahead → Creating Race to the Top Implementation Centers → Partnering with the U.S. Education Delivery Institute  Working with experts from Tennessee and across the country  Ongoing research and evaluation component built into the proposal to inform decision-making 8/17/20157

Sustainable Across Time & Politics It’s how we do business in Tennessee:  Build sustainable policies and programs with a broad base of support  Support statutory change in a bipartisan fashion, with many champions  Create collaborative structures to advocate for solutions (SCORE, Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee, College & Career-Ready Policy Institute Leadership Team, etc.) Tennessee is the place to get things done. 8/17/20158

Standards & Assessment 8/17/20159

We Are Making Progress, And We Can Accelerate … Leaders are committed to reaching student achievement goals. GOAL: All students college- and career-ready 8/17/201510

 A national leader → American Diploma Project → Governor co-chairs Achieve → College & Career-Ready Policy Institute  College & career-ready policies for all students → Standards, assessment, accountability → Alignment to postsecondary education → College completion agenda in place Our goal: all students college- and career-ready. 8/17/ Leading In High-Quality Standards & Assessment

STEM: Raising the Bar  STEM skills critical to economic development  Significant STEM assets already exist → Oak Ridge National Laboratory managed by University of Tennessee and Battelle → Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) → STEM centers at postsecondary institutions  TN STEM Innovation Network will bring assets together to share and learn in partnership with Battelle, ORAU, and the Ohio STEM Learning Network; and to develop more opportunities for teachers and students 8/17/201512

Ahead Of The Curve  Will adopt Common Core Standards in July → Close alignment with Tennessee’s existing standards → Allowing for smooth transition  Leading role in Common Core Assessment Consortia → Already committed to college- and career-ready anchor assessment 8/17/201513

Realizing the Power of Data 8/17/201514

Data To Support Instruction  Tennessee Value Added Assessment System (TVAAS)  Nation’s first value-added system  Student academic achievement and growth data available at the district, school, and teacher level  Fully functional & statistically reliable student growth model already in place (since 1992!) We don’t have to build it. Our goal is to use the robust data we have more effectively. 8/17/201515

Using Data Can Transform Teaching & Learning  Statutory limitations on data use removed  Already in 2010: data dashboards and educational data access are now available to every teacher in the state  Longitudinal Data System plan calls for view of the child → Links horizontally & vertically to agencies across government → Links to value-added data → Links to “dashboard” for educators → Presents opportunity for educators and others to see the full set of supports and/or challenges a student faces that could affect learning  Professional development will focus on effective use of data to enrich and improve instruction & student learning 8/17/201516

Data Will Inform Preparation Programs & Tenure  Removes the prohibition on using teacher effect data until data from three complete academic years are obtained – so that this information can inform tenure granting decisions  Authorizes teacher effect data to be shared with SBE- approved teacher preparation programs of the individual teacher, if it does not personally identify the particular teacher 8/17/201517

Adding & Growing Capacity All of our proposed investments in making our data useful for teachers are designed to: → Add short-term expert capacity to implement, train, and coach → Create tools, networks, and innovations that remain long after the grant period → Build long-term capacity of Tennesseans to manage reform and increase student achievement This is designed to improve student achievement in financially sustainable ways. 8/17/201518

A Learning Agenda For The Nation  Tennessee Consortia for Research Evaluation and Development (TN CRED) → Brightest researchers from within Tennessee and across the country → Research all reform elements in the proposal → Ongoing data and reporting to inform implementation & understand outcomes → Funded through the proposal as well as grants  TN CRED will be a link to national researchers  Already coordinating grants and IES opportunities Tennessee’s research will help the entire country learn what works for students and what doesn’t. 8/17/201519

Focus on the Lowest-Performing Schools 8/17/201520

Changing Business As Usual  Desire and passion to pursue change  Deep investment, partnerships, and governance changes for the lowest- performing schools  New statutory mechanisms and supports to keep struggling schools from falling further  Changes in the way funds are leveraged to accomplish goals and decide who will provide support to certain schools 8/17/201521

Pyramid Of Intervention 8/17/201522

Focus Schools  Schools in second year of School Improvement  Serious intervention to prevent these schools from being chronic low-performers  Schools remain with district and will be served with Tennessee’s existing school improvement resources (Exemplary Educators, etc.) 8/17/201523

Renewal Schools  Designed to keep schools on the edge from falling further – to renew them in their communities  Drawn from the categories of Corrective Action and Restructuring 1, or from schools that fall into either the lowest 5% in achievement OR Restructuring 2  A mix of 18 urban, small-city, and rural schools expected in this category in  Schools remain with district but must choose a certified partner to build capacity and/or implement turnaround model → State will issue RFI to solicit high-quality capacity-building, model, and turnaround partners, with $300,000 in RTTT funds per school annually → District can choose only from the high-quality providers to work with these schools based on individual school and district fit → Must provide the level of autonomy the chosen partner requests to conduct their work 8/17/201524

Achievement School District (ASD)  Drastic action for schools in the lowest 5% in achievement AND in Restructuring 2 & beyond  13 schools in major urban districts expected in  Commissioner has the authority to take over schools → Place them in a “virtual district” under the direction of the ASD Superintendent → ASD Superintendent will report directly to Commissioner → May contract with entities to operate → Significant authority and resources to support the work → Structured planning and possible return to home district if successful  Collaborative of five national partner organizations will work with ASD Superintendent and Commissioner to run the schools 8/17/201525

Make It Happen For Students In Tennessee  Hungry for change, motivated to help students achieve  Ready to do the work  Can serve as a benchmark for the nation  Committing resources will make a greater impact here than anywhere in the country Tennessee thrives when every student is college- and career-ready. Investing can make it happen faster. 8/17/201526

Teachers & Leaders 8/17/201527

Theory Of Change: Teachers At The Heart Of Boosting Student Achievement 8/17/201528

Teacher & Principal Evaluation  The creation of Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee (TEAC) to build new teacher & principal evaluation instruments to be adopted by SBE  Requires annual evaluation of all teachers & principals and that personnel decisions be based in part on evaluations, including: → Promotion → Retention → Tenure → Compensation 8/17/201529

Teacher & Principal Evaluation  50 percent of the evaluation criteria developed must consist of student achievement data, as follows: → 35 percent of the evaluation criteria: TVAAS or some other comparable measure of student growth, if TVAAS data not available → 15 percent of the evaluation criteria: other measures of student achievement selected from list of measures developed by TEAC & adopted by the SBE  Other mandatory criteria include: → Review of prior evaluations → Personal conferences to include strengths, weaknesses and remediation → Relative to teachers only: classroom or position observation followed by written assessment → Relative to principals only: additional criteria pursuant to the principal’s employment contract 8/17/201530

Alternative Compensation  LEAs to submit proposed salary schedules to be approved by the commissioner & SBE as an alternative to the state base salary schedule. Such alternative schedules shall: → Be subject to collective bargaining where applicable → Not reduce the salary of a teacher employed by the LEA at the time of the adoption of the salary schedule → Be subject to appropriation by the governing body empowered to appropriate the funds 8/17/201531

Districts At Work Already  State following innovative districts → The Benwood Initiative in Chattanooga → TAP Model in Knoxville → Memphis Teacher Effectiveness Initiative  Districts learning from and networking with each other to accomplish reform → Nashville Teacher Effectiveness Initiative → CLASS → AIMS → Southwest Tennessee Rural Consortium 8/17/201532

Professional Development For All Teachers To Help Students Achieve  Common Core Standards  Use of data dashboard early warning system  Data use for instruction, evaluation, professional development, and compensation systems at the local level  Teacher & principal evaluation instrument and value- added assessment  Data training for using Teacher Working Conditions survey These are statewide investments that will pay dividends well into the future. 8/17/201533

The Tennessee Plan  Rigorous standards & assessments  Longstanding commitment to data  Strategy for turnaround schools  Focus on great teachers & leaders 8/17/201534

Get the best return on your investment. Invest in Tennessee. 8/17/201535