Utilizing Mind-Maps for Information Retrieval and User Modelling Joeran Beel, Stefan Langer, Marcel Genzmehr, Bela Gipp 1www.docear.org Doc – The Academic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search Engine Optimization for the Research Librarian, or How Librarians Can Beat Spammers at their own Game Melissa Gasparotto Librarian for African and.
Advertisements

How to Create an Annotated Bibliography. What is an annotated bibliography?  It gives an account of the research that has been done on given topic 
WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS Puvaneswary Murugaiah. INTRODUCTION TO WRITING PAPERS Conducting research is academic activity Research must be original work.
Effective Keyword Search in Relational Databases Fang Liu (University of Illinois at Chicago) Clement Yu (University of Illinois at Chicago) Weiyi Meng.
“ The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine ” Presented by Ahmed Khaled Al-Shantout ICS
Search Engines and Information Retrieval
T.Sharon - A.Frank 1 Internet Resources Discovery (IRD) Classic Information Retrieval (IR)
Basic IR: Queries Query is statement of user’s information need. Index is designed to map queries to likely to be relevant documents. Query type, content,
Relevance Feedback based on Parameter Estimation of Target Distribution K. C. Sia and Irwin King Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Chinese.
Best Practices for Website Design & Web Content Management.
Modern Information Retrieval Chapter 1 Introduction.
Basic IR Concepts & Techniques ChengXiang Zhai Department of Computer Science University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
1.Introduction 2.3 Body Paragraphs 3.Conclusion WHAT ARE THE KEY COMPONENTS OF AN ESSAY ?
SIEVE—Search Images Effectively through Visual Elimination Ying Liu, Dengsheng Zhang and Guojun Lu Gippsland School of Info Tech,
Academic Research to Support Arguments.
Query Relevance Feedback and Ontologies How to Make Queries Better.
Citation Recommendation 1 Web Technology Laboratory Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
IL Step 1: Sources of Information Information Literacy 1.
1 Information Filtering & Recommender Systems (Lecture for CS410 Text Info Systems) ChengXiang Zhai Department of Computer Science University of Illinois,
Lemur Application toolkit Kanishka P Pathak Bioinformatics CIS 595.
Graph-based Algorithms in Large Scale Information Retrieval Fatemeh Kaveh-Yazdy Computer Engineering Department School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Web Search. Structure of the Web n The Web is a complex network (graph) of nodes & links that has the appearance of a self-organizing structure  The.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 27 How Internet Searching Works.
How to begin writing research papers. GETTING STARTED.
Information Retrieval Models - 1 Boolean. Introduction IR systems usually adopt index terms to process queries Index terms:  A keyword or group of selected.
1 Information Retrieval Acknowledgements: Dr Mounia Lalmas (QMW) Dr Joemon Jose (Glasgow)
Proposal for Term Project J. H. Wang Mar. 2, 2015.
Website Organization Knowing how it all fits together Having overall picture of site Determine holes in design or poorly structured pages For most, Organization.
Guide: DR. R. BALASUBRAMANI Assistant Professor Department of LIS Bharathidasan University Tiruchirappalli.
Research Paper Recommender System Monica D ă g ă diţ ă.
Math Information Retrieval Zhao Jin. Zhao Jin. Math Information Retrieval Examples: –Looking for formulas –Collect teaching resources –Keeping updated.
1 Automatic Classification of Bookmarked Web Pages Chris Staff Second Talk February 2007.
You Are What You Tag Yi-Ching Huang and Chia-Chuan Hung and Jane Yung-jen Hsu Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering Graduate Institute.
Course grading Project: 75% Broken into several incremental deliverables Paper appraisal/evaluation/project tool evaluation in earlier May: 25%
Relevance Feedback Hongning Wang What we have learned so far Information Retrieval User results Query Rep Doc Rep (Index) Ranker.
Web Image Retrieval Re-Ranking with Relevance Model Wei-Hao Lin, Rong Jin, Alexander Hauptmann Language Technologies Institute School of Computer Science.
Comparing and Ranking Documents Once our search engine has retrieved a set of documents, we may want to Rank them by relevance –Which are the best fit.
GUIDED BY DR. A. J. AGRAWAL Search Engine By Chetan R. Rathod.
Indexing of Tables and Figures: Scientists’ Reaction Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Chapter 8 Evaluating Search Engine. Evaluation n Evaluation is key to building effective and efficient search engines  Measurement usually carried out.
Search Engines By: Faruq Hasan.
Modern Information Retrieval Presented by Miss Prattana Chanpolto Faculty of Information Technology.
Modern information retreival Chapter. 02: Modeling (Latent Semantic Indexing)
Performance Measures. Why to Conduct Performance Evaluation? 2 n Evaluation is the key to building effective & efficient IR (information retrieval) systems.
Information Retrieval
Advantages of Query Biased Summaries in Information Retrieval by A. Tombros and M. Sanderson Presenters: Omer Erdil Albayrak Bilge Koroglu.
Web Search and Text Mining Lecture 5. Outline Review of VSM More on LSI through SVD Term relatedness Probabilistic LSI.
L&I SCI 110: Information science and information theory Instructor: Xiangming(Simon) Mu Sept. 9, 2004.
1 Adaptive Subjective Triggers for Opinionated Document Retrieval (WSDM 09’) Kazuhiro Seki, Kuniaki Uehara Date: 11/02/09 Speaker: Hsu, Yu-Wen Advisor:
 “look again" (re + view) at what others have done  describes theoretical per­spectives and previous research findings regarding the problem.
Search Engine Optimization. Search engine market share Feb-2013: Search engine market share Ref:
A System for Automatic Personalized Tracking of Scientific Literature on the Web Tzachi Perlstein Yael Nir.
Relevance Feedback Hongning Wang
CS798: Information Retrieval Charlie Clarke Information retrieval is concerned with representing, searching, and manipulating.
Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval System: A Survey Tao Huang Lin Luo Chengcui Zhang.
Introduction to Information Retrieval Introduction to Information Retrieval Lecture 10 Evaluation.
Crawling When the Google visit your website for the purpose of tracking, Google does this with help of machine, known as web crawler, spider, Google bot,
Data mining in web applications
Proposal for Term Project
Map Reduce.
Best SEO Tips to Make Your Website Stand Out. SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION It is essential that you implement Search Engine Optimization strategies to make.
Lecture 10 Evaluation.
Graduate Students Workshop
A Comparative Study of Link Analysis Algorithms
Skills in Information Retrieval
TDM=Text Mining “automated processing of large amounts of structured digital textual content for purposes of information retrieval, extraction, interpretation.
Lecture 6 Evaluation.
Magnet & /facet Zheng Liang
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Retrieval Utilities Relevance feedback Clustering
Presentation transcript:

Utilizing Mind-Maps for Information Retrieval and User Modelling Joeran Beel, Stefan Langer, Marcel Genzmehr, Bela Gipp 1www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

1. Introduction to mind-maps 2. Ideas for utilizing mind-maps beyond their original purpose 3. Prototype for mind-map-based user modeling  2www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

   3www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

   4www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

1. Introduction to Mind-Maps 5www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 6www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 7www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 8www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 9www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 10www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 11www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 12www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 13www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 14www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

  15www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 16www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 How to utilize mind-maps beyond their original purpose?  17www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

2. Ideas for Mind-Map based IR Applications And An Analysis of the Feasibility 18www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Search Engines for Mind-Maps  Document Indexing / Anchor Text Analysis  Document Relatedness  Document Summarization  Impact Analysis  Trend Analysis  Semantic Analysis  User Modelling  19www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Anchor Text Analysis / Website Indexing  Document Relatedness / Distance Analysis  Semantic Analysis  User Modeling  20www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Dozens of mind-mapping tools  2 million active mind-mapping users  5 million new mind-maps every year  300,000+ public mind-maps  21www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 22www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Analysis of 19,379 mind-maps  Number of nodes per mind-map  Average = a few dozen  Maximum = a few thousand  63.88% contain no links,  Those who contain links, contain typically only few  Ideas requiring links are less feasible  Text-based ideas are feasible  23www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Up to 61% acceptance for user modeling and recommendations  Around 10% acceptance for other ideas  User modeling is the most feasible idea  24www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

3. User Modeling Prototype A Research Paper Recommender System 25www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 ? 26www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

  Recommend books that we assume to be relevant for researchers  Content Based Filtering   Terms of the last modified node (Recs on each modification)   : Terms of the last modified node (Recs every few days)   : All terms of the last modified mind-map   : All terms of all mind-maps  27www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 28www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Strong differences depending on the approach  Overall, reasonable CTR, despite the trivial approaches  29www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

 Strong differences depending on the specific parameters (for the „All Mind- Maps“ approach)  30www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite

   31www.docear.org Doc – The Academic Literature Suite