More categories for our mental maps  How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rationalism and empiricism
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
 French philosopher, mathematician and physical scientist (optics, physics, physiology)  Father of Early Modern Rationalist Philosophy  Early Modern.
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
1 From metaphysics to logical positivism The metaphysician tells us that empirical truth-conditions [for metaphysical terms] cannot be specified; if he.
Newton and psychology Thanks to Newton, scientists and philosophers know that the world is controlled by absolute natural laws, so the inconsistencies.
EmpiricismEmpiricism. Concept Empiricism All concepts from experience; none innate Hume: “... all our ideas are nothing but copies of our impressions,
Or Is your science safe? Virtue: Tentative Skepticism Deductive reason & Maths Vice: unsupportable intuitions that provide foundations of deduction.
Chapter 9 Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. How did Hume influence Kant? What is the distinction between the noumenal and the phenomenal worlds? What are.
Idealism.
Kant, Transcendental Aesthetic
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
HUME 1 BEHOLD THE RADICAL EMPIRICIST. David Hume Historian Economist Psychologist Philosopher.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
 Derives from Greek words meaning Love of Wisdom.
Perception & Truth Is it true that: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,” --that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. (Keats, “Ode on a Grecian.
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
Seeing the “story” of ideas….
Chapter 8 HUME. How does the mind/body problem reveal a partial incoherence within Cartesian metaphysics? In what ways does David Hume turn away from.
Theories of Perception: Empirical Theory of Perception Berkeley’s Theory of Reality Direct Realism Moderate Thomistic Realism.
Descartes & Rationalism
Rationalism and Empiricism
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 1 of 2) Text source: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, sectns. 1-21,
Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Theories of Knowledge.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
David Hume ( ) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Revised, 11/21/03.
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Idealism PowerPoint. What is Idealism??? Some philosophers hold that if we push our investigation of matter far enough, we end up with only a mental world.
A tree falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
What is an example of a secondary quality?
1 John Locke’s Theory of Knowledge ( ). 2 Empiricist All knowledge is derived from experience.
1. 2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge ( ) Scottish Empiricist.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Religious Studies Hume: empiricism and the Fork. Religious Studies Empiricism Hume is an empiricist. This means that he thinks all knowledge comes a posteriori.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
PHIL 200B ● Today – Locke's Essay concerning human understanding ● Method ( ) ● Locke's Empiricism – Against innate ideas/principles. – Ideas of.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Do we directly perceive objects? (25 marks)
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Presentation transcript:

More categories for our mental maps

 How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand our place in the world, likewise impacts what we will count as knowledge.  This delicate dance of ideas gives rise to a broad range of theories that play a critical role in virtually every form of life.

 Rejects the notion that justification must obey logic or reason. Varieties of irrationalism include: ◦ Nihilism – asserts the impossibility of knowledge. ◦ Mysticism – magical or divine sources provide knowledge... ya just know it in your gut!

 Rationalists' arguments, begin largely on the basis of deductive reasoning from first principles or clear and distinct ideas.  But where do these first ideas come from? ◦ a priori or innate ideas that are ◦ not derived from sense experience.  Are they ‘hard wired’ in the species or  Preexisting in ‘minds’ (whatever that may be)?

 Empiricists - proceed inductively on the basis of sensory experience. ◦ e.g. color, sound, smell, texture, etc. ( though there is disagreement on what to include in this list.)  It is probabilistic rejecting absolute certainty.  It asserts that Synthetic a posteriori claims, matters of fact, can describe reality, e.g., “The cat is on the mat”. While,  Analytic truths that are a priori and necessary add no new information about the world., e.g., “three plus two is five.” is tautological.

 Asserts that something, the world, directly causes perceptions.  And the world is as it is whether or not it happens to cause a perception. ◦ e.g. There would still have been an Australian continent even if it had never been inhabited.

 Asserts that there exists absolutely no world causing perception.  All argument to the opposite conclusion are found uncertain or unconvincing.

 This indirect Realism asserts that some object of perception, sense data, participates in causing perception,  While individual perceivers, provide an interpretation of the raw data giving rise to experience.  The world is identical to neither perception nor experience.  The world is invariant whether or not it happens to cause a perception. ◦ e.g., There might still have been an Australian continent even if it had never been discovered. But it would be impossible to know it.  However, experience need not be invariant. ◦ e.g., One may experience Australia as a land of muted grays on approaching from afar at night or as of vivid blue greens landing in Darling Harbor at noon.

 Asserts that there exists levels of reality.  Forms are most perfectly real and include ◦ The form of objects of science, e.g. Mathematical entities independently exist at a high level.  There would be numbers whether or not there had ever been people that count. ◦ The form of the objects of art, e.g. Beauty  There would be beauty independent of works of art. ◦ The form of the good,,e.g. virtues  The individual acts of humankind are mere resemblance of goodness itself. ◦ etc.

 Asserts that something, the mind, causes perceptions (Nothing can be like an idea but another idea) and,  the world seems or is as it is only in so far as minds cause perception. ◦ e.g. Australia would not have been a continent if it had never been inhabited (or at least held in the mind of the gods.). It could not possibly have had a prior existence at all.

 A kind of empiricist view (knowledge arises through sensation) according to which  One rejects material substance ◦ If nothing can be like an idea but another idea material substances are an unnecessary redundancy.  Rejects the common sense notion of cause. ◦ If “x happens y must happen” is only contingent and only probable – not a necessary connection. Since the connection in not a matter of sensation nor logically necessary it is just nonsense – a psychological prejudice. (the problem of induction.)

 Referring is always referring to phenomenon, i.e. "appearances", as opposed to noumena, the object of thought.  Shares close affinities with sense idealism. But, is neutral or hostile to mental causation.  On some versions, the essential claim of Phenomenalism is that the content of propositions about so called material objects can be entirely specified in sense-datum terms.