Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL OF INTERNAL AUDITING October 31, 2007.
Advertisements

Seekonk Board of Assessors
Campus Improvement Plans
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
PROVINCIAL FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING OF THE GOVERNMENT WIDE 5-YEAR LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIC AGENDA 14 SEPTEMBER 2007 PROVINCIAL FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING.
The Chula Vista Model October 15-17, 2003 DIF Roundtable.
The coming storm: Managing Roanoke’s Stormwater Infrastructure Challenges Solutions for Roanoke’s future.
Special Committee of the Whole Preliminary Draft 2009 Operating, Capital and Reserve Budget FOR DISCUSSION Monday, December 15, 2008.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
1 Property Taxation Reform in Macedonia - Towards 2005 Presentation to the World Bank Workshop on “ “ Innovations in Local Revenue Mobilization” June 22,
Proposed Governing Document Revision Updated April, 2011.
Financial Policies: Policy Development Reserve Policies Capital Asset Management Policies October 3, 2013.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.
Impact Fee Analysis: Maintaining the Public’s Trust.
City of Shorewood 2013 Budget Truth-in-Taxation Hearing December 3, 2012.
“Keeping your money in your pocket, where it belongs.” Chart of Accounts Update Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers - New Clerk Academy March 13, 2014.
Economic Incentive Plan and Impact Fee Update Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 7, 2012.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
1 P.AG. KENYA PASTORS & STAFF PROVIDENT FUND. DUTIES OF A SCHEME ADMINISTRATOR.
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
2010 Legislative Highlights For Redevelopment (Community Development and Urban Renewal) J. Craig Smith Kyle C. Fielding S mith | H artvigsen, PLLC 215.
Road Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011 Transportation Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011.
Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.
LOCAL GOVT. FINANCE: An Introduction to CAPITAL PLANNING Alan Probst, Local Government Specialist Local Government Center University of Wisconsin – Extension.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
THE CONTINUED EFFECT OF IMPACT FEES PAT WALKER, PAT WALKER CONSULTING MATT ROJAS, SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP Arrested Development.
SUMMARY OF FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 21,
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
History & Update of the City of Fort Worth Employees’ Retirement Fund Presented by Laetitia Brown, Senior Assistant City Attorney, Department of Law May.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
Department of Public Works FY 2015 Operating Budget May 19, 2014.
City of Port Moody Draft Financial Plan Tuesday, February 26 th, 2013.
2013 Proposed Budget Compensation Review Budget Review and Adoption Schedule 2 October 15 -Transmittal of 2013 Proposed Budget October 22 -Department.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Implementation of Housing Element Update of Housing Element City Council Meeting Tuesday, September 24, 2013.
OAK RIDGE NORTH IMPACT FEES. Overview 1.Introduction 2.Schedule/Process 3.Land Use Assumption 4.Capital Improvement Plan Water Wastewater 5.Impact Fees.
Stormwater Utility City of Rowlett
City Services Auditor Charter Appendix F Discussion
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
Fund Accounting Overview
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Delavan 2017 Budget.
Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Project Goals Leverage one of our unique CSU Dominguez Hills assets—our underutilized land—to advance the university mission and increase student success.
Seekonk Board of Assessors
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Preliminary Draft 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets
Financial Status Update & FY Proposed Biennial Budget
City of Santa Paula Water and Sewer Rate Study Results Public Workshop
Audit.
Updating the Transportation Impact Fee – The Proposed Calendar and Public Input Process Town Council Meeting March 15, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014

Action Requested Today Mayor and Council direction is requested regarding: The fee adoption timeline presented which requires a June 30th special M/C meeting and moving the M/C October 7 th meeting to October 9 th Selection of the biennial audit option for program monitoring At the June 30 th meeting, staff will provide a more detailed presentation of the LUA & IIPs, including the recommended new fees.

Development (Impact) Fees A funding mechanism to help cover the cost of facilities and infrastructure needed to serve new development Considered a development regulation, not a tax, therefore must have beneficial nexus to new development Can only be used to expand facilities; may not be used for repair, replacement, operation or maintenance of existing facilities

State Law Changes – SB 1525 City required to re-do program; new requirements challenging to implement and administer –Requirement for precision in growth projections by benefit district and matching revenues to project plans –Review and update of land use model, growth projections and project plans every 5 years or more frequently as needed –Refund to developers if funding not spent within 10 years –Expanded tracking and reporting requirements

Process to Comply with SB 1525 Phase 1 Changes made in January 2012: Eliminated public facilities fee Reduced police and fire fees due to removal of public safety training academy as eligible “necessary public service”

Process to Comply with SB 1525 Phase 2 Conduct & Post Required Land Use & Infrastructure Studies –Land Use Assumptions (LUAs) 10 year projection: 73,000 new people, 31,000 new housing units, and 48,000 new jobs Plan Tucson & PAG data used to distribution these to benefit districts –Infrastructure Improvement Plans for Streets, Parks, Police and Fire Updated asset inventory and valuations (current level of service) Identified projects from current CIP, IIPs, and unmet needs Align 10 year project plan with projected growth and revenue by district Complete Fee Adoption Process

Fee Adoption Process May 1 Required studies (LUA & IIPs) were posted (wait 60 days until public hearing) June 30 Public Hearing on LUA & IIPs (wait days prior to adoption) Aug 5 Mayor and Council adopt LUA & IIPs Aug 10 Post Notice of Intent and Draft Ordinance (wait 30 days until public hearing) Sept 9 Public Hearing on Fee Studies and Ordinance (wait days until adoption) Oct 9* Adopt Fee Studies and Ordinance *special meeting date (wait 75 days until effective date) Dec 23 Fee effective date

Fee Collection Gap Aug 1 – Oct 9 No impact fees charged; grandfathering as described in next slide Oct 9 - Dec 23No impact fees charged; new fee not effective for 75 days Dec 23 forwardNew fees charged

Grandfathering Provision

Comparison of Current vs. Proposed Impact Fee Program We will still have 4 fee categories (streets, parks, police, fire) We will maintain same 5 benefit districts (collection/expenditure) for streets and parks, and citywide districts for police and fire There will be no discount in the central benefit district for the streets fee In infill areas, multi-modal facility expansion included in streets IIP Fees will be assessed on a rooftop/unit basis rather than sq. ft. basis for residential The program will be more costly to administer; this can be recovered through administrative fee

Program Monitoring Options Advisory Committee vs. Biennial Audit –Minimum 5 member committee appointed by Mayor and Council (50% from real estate, development and building industry -- one from homebuilding) –Committee provides written comments on IIP progress, program implementation and need for updating IIP, and LUA to City annually –City responsible for establishing committee procedures and determining meeting schedule, staffing the committee, providing information to committee –Will delay fee adoption by 2-3 months –Certified audit every 2 years by qualified professional –City responsible for procuring auditor, providing information to auditor, posting audit on website and conducting Public Hearing w/in 60 days of posting –Selected by majority of other cities in AZ

Action Requested Today Mayor and Council direction is requested regarding: The fee adoption timeline presented which requires a June 30th special M/C meeting and moving the M/C October 7 th meeting to October 9 th Selection of the biennial audit option for program monitoring At the June 30 th meeting, staff will provide a more detailed presentation of the LUA & IIPs, including the recommended new fees.