Sensitivity Mark Wieringa Australia Telescope CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
Advertisements

Basics of mm interferometry Turku Summer School – June 2009 Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory, Sweden.
Arecibo 40th Anniversary Workshop--R. L. Brown The Arecibo Astrometric/Timing Array Robert L. Brown.
Jeroen Stil Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Calgary Stacking of Radio Surveys.
NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Arecibo, July 2005
IUCAF SUMMER SCHOOL 2002 MITIGATION TECHNIQUES MITIGATION FACTORS - what is it? what is it good for? by Klaus Ruf.
Ray Norris, Jamie Stevens, et al. Deep CABB observations of ECDFS ( Extended Chandra Deep Field South )
SKADS: Array Configuration Studies Implementation of Figures-of-Merit on Spatial-Dynamic-Range Progress made & Current status Dharam V. Lal & Andrei P.
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
SIW 2003 The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri 1.The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope 2.The Compact array antenna.
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop May 2003.
Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate source emission from other sources… (directional gain… dynamic.
Radio Astronomy Overview 9 May 2005 F.Briggs, RSAA/ATNF Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001.
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
The Future of the Past Harvard University Astronomy 218 Concluding Lecture, May 4, 2000.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 20 Sep 2006.
Panorama of the Universe: Daily all-sky surveys with the SKA John D. Bunton, CSIRO TIP, Ronald D. Ekers, CSIRO ATNF and Elaine M. Sadler, University of.
Radio Telescopes. Jansky’s Telescope Karl Jansky built a radio antenna in –Polarized array –Study lightning noise Detected noise that shifted 4.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
OVSA Expansion Pipeline Imaging. Log-spiral array: “uv” distribution Left: sampling of Right: inner region of spatial Fourier plane sampled spatial Fourier.
Array Design David Woody Owens Valley Radio Observatory presented at NRAO summer school 2002.
CSIRO; Swinburne Error Recognition Emil Lenc University of Sydney / CAASTRO CASS Radio Astronomy School 2012 Based on lectures given previously.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Interferometry Basics
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Mosaicing Tim Cornwell.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank July 2009.
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
November 2009, Lunch talk The most compact E configuration for the EVLA. L. Kogan, G. Stanzione, J. Ott, F. Owen National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro,
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Sensitivity Joan Wrobel.
Survey Quality Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville. Survey Qualities Leiden 2011 Feb 25 Point-source detection limit S lim Resolution Ω s Brightness sensitivity.
Stability of Maximum S/N Beams CSIRO ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Aidan Hotan | ASKAP Deputy Project Scientist 4 th March 2014 SKA Workshop on Calibration.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
ATCA synthesis workshop - May ATCA – Calibration at mm wavelengths Rick Forster University of California, Berkeley Hat Creek Radio Observatory Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland.
Which dipoles to use to optimize survey speed? –What tapering? –Trade-off between sensitivity, FOV and low side-lobe levels –Station beam stability, pointing.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 26 th - 30 th Aug 2013 Photometer Extended Source Photometry Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE.
Radio Interferometry and ALMA T. L. Wilson ESO. A few basics: Wavelength and frequency  -1 temperature max (mm) ~ 3/T(K) (for blackbody) Hot gas radiates.
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
CABB Data Reduction Review Summary of recommendations Dave McConnell June 2011.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
Academia Sinica National Taiwan University AMiBA System Performance Kai-yang Lin 1,2 and AMiBA Team 1,2,3 1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Fundamental limits of radio interferometers: Source parameter estimation Cathryn Trott Randall Wayth Steven Tingay Curtin University International Centre.
By Ya Bao1 Antennas and Propagation. 2 By Ya Bao Introduction An antenna is an electrical conductor or system of conductors Transmission - radiates electromagnetic.
Observing Strategies at Millimetre Wavelengths Tony Wong, ATNF Narrabri Synthesis Workshop 13 May 2003.
Molecular Clouds in in the LMC at High Resolution: The Importance of Short ALMA Baselines T. Wong 1,2,4, J. B. Whiteoak 1, M. Hunt 2, J. Ott 1, Y.-N. Chin.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 High Dynamic Range Imaging Craig Walker.
Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy AMiBA SZ Science AMiBA Team NTU Physics Figure 4. Simulated AMiBA deep surveys of a 1deg 2 field (no primary.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
Pulsar luminosity distribution in 47-Tuc Tim Connors, Vacation student University of Sydney.
The Allen Telescope Array Douglas Bock Radio Astronomy Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Socorro, August 23, 2001.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 High Dynamic Range Imaging Craig Walker.
GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band Jagadheep D. Pandian Cornell University.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2011/09/22): Single dish systems Theory: basic properties, sky noise, system noise, Aeff/Tsys,
Lecture 14. Radio Interferometry Talk at Nagoya University IMS Oct /43.
AAVS1 Calibration Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium
Phased Array Feeds SKANZ 2012 John O’Sullivan
Lecture 15 Deconvolution CLEAN MEM Why does CLEAN work? Parallel CLEAN
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Bob Zavala US Naval Observatory
Instrument Considerations
Deconvolution and Multi frequency synthesis
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity Mark Wieringa Australia Telescope CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science

Take-home messages Ultimate signal to noise depends on many things the source, the array configuration, bandwidth, integration time, quality of the telescope, the observing conditions, the calibration, the field (crowded/strong source/empty) See the Observing Characteristics Calculator

Overview Units System temperature and sources of noise Basic sensitivity – point-source and brightness Imaging settings and resolution effects mm considerations Other figures of merit Ways to increase the sensitivity Practical limitations on sensitivity Claiming confidence in detections

Units of source strength Intensity or brightness Brightness temperature Flux density e.g., 3C catalogue units are Janskys Haslam 408 MHz image units are Kelvin

Planck’s Law 1 October How much power can we collect from the Sun? Brightness or Intensity in W/m 2 /ster/Hz given by: Power in Watts:

Rayleigh-Jeans approximation For Planck’s Law simplifies to Known as the Rayleigh Jeans approximation

Assuming the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation is valid, at a given frequency, the source brightness can be associated with an equivalent blackbody temperature. Brightness temperature is a convenient way of measuring the strength of diffuse emission, particularly for thermal sources. Brightness temperature

Flux density Flux density is the brightness integrated over some solid angle Radio astronomers use the units 1 Jy = W/m 2 /Hz, 1mJy, and 1μJy

Units of images Clean (deconvolved+restored) image has units of Jy/beam – a brightness distribution. For an extended source, the peak value will depend on the resolution. For an unresolved source, the peak value will equal the flux density of that source Images before restoration have units of flux density (“Clean component images”, MEM images) Dirty images (before deconvolution) have ill-defined units – except for unresolved sources. Use with caution!

Review Intensity and brightness Brightness temperature Flux density Units of CLEAN, dirty images and “clean component” images.

System noise Unwanted power (noise) makes its way into the detection system through a number of ways Noise power from the receiver itself Noise power from ohmic losses in the optics path Noise power from spill-over – the hot ground (~300 K) refracting into the receiver Noise power from the atmosphere Most important at high freq. Noise power from the sky! CMB Galaxy

These noise powers can be represented by an equivalent blackbody temperature (Rayleigh-Jeans approx) or temperature of a resistor The sum of all these is known as the system temperature System noise (cont)

Atmosphere/sky contribution

Noise in a visibility measurement System Gain in Jy/Kelvin ATCA: K~13 Jy/K for cm bands to ~30 for 3 mm Effective collecting area Correlator efficiency

Visibility Noise

Image noise For arbitrary weighting of the visibilities in forming an image, the variance in an image pixel is If all visibilities are given the same weight, and all visibilities have the same variance

Image noise Sensitivity a measure of the weakest detectable radio emission E.g., this image: 5-σ sensitivity of 50 µJy/beam 1 σ = rms noise (or standard deviation) of the image. This assumes: Noise is Gaussian Noise is uniform Are these good assumptions?

To minimise noise level “Natural weighting”: weight by (in Miriad use sup=0 options=systemp) To mimimise rms sidelobe levels “Uniform weighting”: weight by inverse of local uv sampling density function (default in Miriad ) Compromise – “robust” weighting, superuniform weighting Uniform weighting typically has a few times higher noise levels than natural weighting. Robust weighting is often a good compromise. Use robust=0 as first try Why weight visibilities differently …

Resolved out ? To see extended sources you need compact configurations Large array – Sensitive to compact sources Small array – Sensitive to extended sources : SB sensitivity

Tapering to enhance sensitivity The array configuration must be chosen to match the spacings of interest in the source structure. If long spacings contain no signal of interest, then they are just contributing noise. Better to weight them down. Optimum detection sensitivity is achieved with a “matched filter”. Tapering is a simple approximation to a matched filter.

Brightness sensitivity The brightness temperature sensitivity for Synthesised beam solid angle Clean image rms (Jy/beam)

At high frequencies, atmospheric opacity can be significant Effect of attenuation of signal can be incorporated in “above atmosphere” system temperature The system temperature is an effective system temperature being the “physical” system temperature divided by the atmospheric attenuation. mm Observations

3mm system gain Dish efficiency becomes a function of elevation, temperature, wind etc. Maximum efficiency is at an elevation of 60 degrees.

Figures of merit Raw sensitivity a deep image of a small area. Survey speed flux limited survey of a large area. Maximise number of detections detect as many sources as possible. Transient detection maximise the chances of catching a transient going off.

Sensitivity of a synthesis array (of n identical antennas ) ATCA/CABB 2 GHz 5.5GHz τ = 10 m σ= 91 µJy/beam τ = 12 h σ= 11 µJy/beam τ = 30 x 12 h σ= 2 µJy/beam The theoretical noise “The thermal limit” Best image rms we can expect

How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) CABB does this by increasing the number of bits in digitization Increase the correlator efficiency

How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) New receivers Approaching limit at most frequencies Increase the correlator efficiency Reduce the system temperature

How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) Expensive for existing arrays ASKAP and SKA are going this way Increase the correlator efficiency Reduce the system temperature Increase number of antennas

How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) Expensive: cost ~ D 3 Most dishes close to optimum efficiency Increase the correlator efficiency Reduce the system temperature Increase number of antennas Increase area or area efficiency

How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) Write better proposal Some large surveys close to practical limit Diminishing returns ASKAP soln: phased array feed observe more sky at once gives more time per pointing Increase the correlator efficiency Reduce the system temperature Increase number of antennas Increase area or area efficiency Increase integration time

Primary goal of CABB RFI limits at low freq How to increase the sensitivity (i.e., reduce σ) Increase the correlator efficiency Reduce the system temperature Increase number of antennas Increase area or area efficiency Increase integration time Increase bandwidth

So why doesn’t every image reach the “theoretical limit”? Dynamic Range Confusion

Dynamic range Usually defined as peak flux in the image divided by the rms in an `empty’ region of the image. Dynamic ranges of 100’s are common Dynamic ranges of 10 5 have been achieved with great care e.g., rms =10 µJy/beam, peak = 1 Jy/beam Cygnus A

Dynamic range limited by incomplete uv coverage Missing uv information means that the solution is unconstrained in some regions of the image i.e. the imaging algorithm can “invent” sources. This often limits the sensitivity of snapshot images For deep surveys, ATCA with MFS can get close to “complete uv coverage” Current deep surveys generally have good (but not perfect) uv coverage Central gap – trouble with extended emission Outer cutoff – trouble with (strong) barely resolved sources Not yet clear if this will be a serious limit for deep surveys.

Dynamic range limited by calibration errors Selfcal can correct antenna-based gain errors requires strong sources in the field depends on quality of model (deconvolution) What about gain errors that vary across primary beam? In 2006, CDFS/ELAIS observations were limited at about σ ~ 20 µJy by a combination of effects such as these. Work in progress (Emil Lenc) to fix this Latest: proper modelling of problem sources in uv data gets rid of most of the sidelobes

Confusion (1) A problem affecting deep surveys of compact radio sources Not really an issue when imaging extended structure Not often a problem above 10 GHz (small beam & FOV, less sensitive) Given a sufficiently sensitive observation, sources will start to overlap. Eventually, every beam will be filled with a source. Image noise will increase This is the confusion limit, and depends on beam size and astrophysical source distributions. For the ATCA at 20 cm, fundamental confusion limit = 0.05 µJy/beam

Confusion (2) Beam confusion Sources are closer together than the instrumental resolution Fundamental (non-instrumental) confusion sources themselves overlap, cannot be separated by ANY instrument, regardless of beam size Sidelobe confusion noise added to image because of sources in sidelobes (even with perfect calibration).

Confusion (3) A commonly adopted rule of thumb is that only 1% of beams should contain a source For the ATCA at 20 cm with 6km array S instrumental ~ 20 µJy/beam We have already passed this point.

This image has ~ independent beams, so Gaussian noise would suggest 50 peaks > 3σ ~1 peak > 4σ No peaks > 5σ In practice, probably several noise peaks > 5σ Most astronomers will not “believe” anything at about this level. The trouble is: noise in synthesis images is NOT Gaussian! So Normal distribution statistics do not apply Deciding what level to “believe” (1)

Deciding what level to “believe” (2) So what level of source do you believe? Problem is not trivial, and a simple cut-off is unlikely to be useful.

Deciding what level to “believe” (3) Radio-astronomical noise is strongly non-Gaussian And yet, quoting an rms noise is still regarded as a useful rule- of-thumb guide to sensitivity. E.g. 10-σ detections are probably OK! Other techniques: Look at the statistics of “negative sources” Look at the statistics of sources in the V image Compare with other wavelengths, or use other information Use cross-identifications with shifted data Use simulations

Recap Units – Jy, K, Jy/beam Sensitivity – how to calculate Sensitivity – how to improve Image noise Practical limits: DR, Confusion Interpreting images – confidence in detections Acknowledgements This talk is based on earlier talks on this topic by Bob Sault and Ray Norris