…You get the picture.

 Samsung “slavishly” copies the iPad design in their new tablet  Patent infringement claims inflated from a minor 3 to over 200, catching the Spokesman of Samsung off-guard  Which means Samsung cannot file a defense against the claim until mid-May

 Samsung produces the A4 and A5 processors (among other bits) found in some Apple Products.  If Samsung stopped producing them then Apple would not be able to make select products  But this would also mean that Samsung would lose a large part of their income (?)

 In April, 2011, Samsung stated that Apple had infringed on 10 patents  3G  Wireless technology

 Apple, but can this really be considered a win?  German court bans the sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in all EU countries except for the Netherlands.  The ban, however, was not based on Apple’s claim that Samsung was infringing on certain patents, but rather "the appeals court based its decision on a violation of German unfair competition law,“  h.htm#D2a h.htm#D2a

GALAXY TAB 10.1 IPAD 3  1 GHz dual-core processor  16 GB and 32 GB  Expandable up to 32 GB with microSD card  10.1 inch PLS TFT Display  1024x600 pixels (149ppi)  3MP camera with LED flash, autofocus, geo-tagging, 720P video capture  9.7mm thickness  19.9 ounces  3G Models would also offer 1GB RAM, Bluetooth 3.0 connectivity, and 21 Mbps HSPA+ connectivity  A6 – quad-core processor (made by Samsung)  9.7 inch LED backlit IPS TFT, retina display  2048x1536 pixels (170ppi)  5MP camera  1080P or 720P Video quality of 60 fps

 samsung-patent-wars/ samsung-patent-wars/  s s

 We already know that Apple is really dissatisfied with Google’s android  Samsung’s Tablet runs on android  Samsung supplies Apple with items crucial to their products  So why would Apple want to start a war with a provider?