Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners (ELLs) Christopher Bell, Hong Duong, Sheryl Hoilette EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies and Methods
Advertisements

Dr. Deborah Gober and Dr. Anna Wan Columbus State University
So, What IS a Standards-based
- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU SPRING 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Using in K-1 Presented By: Dianna Bowling Andrea Edes Chanh Yip Tek.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Beginning Special Education Teachers: Career Ready! Dr. Yvonne Hefner.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Effective Use of Instructional Time Jane A. Stallings Stephanie L. Knight Texas A&M University.
Common Core Mathematics Implementation Kindergarten January 6, 2014.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
MODULE 4 – Topic 403 Intervention Analysis Toolkit for Learners who are Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Module 4: Effective Instructional Practices.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
Website I can not live without books. Thomas Jefferson 1.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Celebrate Our Rising Stars Summit VI “Preparing ELLs to Succeed in the 21 st Century” Teaching Learning Collaborative (TLC) Classroom Teacher Project.
Eileen Gilbert’s MAT Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation Spring 2014 Website "Always remember your are braver than you believe, stronger than.
English Language Learners Modifications Needs Assessment Presenter Yanira Alfonso, EDS ESOL Teacher Hopkins Elementary.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
Briar Hill School Data Summary Fall Student Diversity: ESL, Special Education Based on 194 students % of Population Gifted 5% Other Mild/moderate.
Christy Battle, Lindsay Simpson, Vince Farrugia EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia Gwinnet College School of Education Fall 2012 BEST PRACTICES.
Differentiated Supervision Option D.I. Make and Take It.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
Standards-Based Education
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
Michael Bohannan National University Domain B: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING.
Literacy Strategies for AIG Readers March 6, 2015 Dana Gillis Mount Mourne IB School, Iredell-Statesville Schools A Race to the Top Initiative NC Department.
Creating a Literacy-Rich Environment Jennifer Hanson Autumn Hendry Candice Holmes Michelle Ryland EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia Gwinnet College.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
CCSS in the Classroom Melina Reeves EDU695: MAED Capstone Professor Shannon O'Day January 15, 2015.
ESE 697 Students Guide - snaptutorial.com snaptutorial.com For More Tutorials
Differentiated Classrooms October 23, 2015 FL Mason.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Incorporating Interactive Note Taking to Increase Writing Performance in the Elementary Grades Jamie Benson, Amanda McDaniel, Jordan Raper, Lizzie Vaughn.
ESE 697 Entire Course (Ash) For more course tutorials visit  ESE 697 Week 1 DQ 1 Aligning Instruction with Common Core State Standards.
Benefits of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Classrooms 2 nd grade student Theo * *name changed.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Welcome! Taylor County Schools Student Assistance Team School Level Training September 2017.
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
How to Increase Academic Performance
Integrating Instructional Strategies: Overview of ISLES
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
DEVELOPING TEACHING SKILLS IN PE (GED3043)
Magothy River Middle School
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Writing in Math Using Interactive Note Taking
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
ESL 433 N Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
ESL 433 NCompetitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ESL 433 N Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
ESL 433 N Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
ESL 433 N Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners (ELLs) Christopher Bell, Hong Duong, Sheryl Hoilette EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia Gwinnet College School of Education Spring 2013

Introduction Need: How implementing differentiated instruction can benefit English Language Learners (ELLs) Causes: Exercise precision in identifying student needs and provide for the individualized instructional needs of all students, Mill Creek High School. All students at Ferguson Elementary will increase their academic performance through differentiated and guided math instruction, Ferguson Elementary School. Trip Elementary school will continue to increase student academic achievement in math to meet or exceed targets through continued best instructional practices including targeted instruction and lesson study in math, Trip Elementary School Solution: To help implement differentiated instruction first teachers need to identify what differentiated instruction is and is not, teachers need to identify the best way for differentiating instruction for ELLs.

School Improvement Plans: Mill Creek High School, Ferguson Elementary School, and Trip Elementary School Analysis of School Improvement Plan: Based on the plans from our schools they all seemed to focus on making sure that all learners are able to learn by using individualized instruction or differentiated instruction. These plans indicated that it was important for all learners to be able to learn. Topic Selection: We selected differentiated instruction because all of our school improvement plans identified that individualized instruction or best practices should be used to help meet student needs. We also thought it was important to focus on ELLs because Gwinnett County is known for its large population of minority students. Benefit: This would beneficial to our schools because it would assist our schools to implement differentiated instruction that benefits ELLs as well as all learners. This action research plan analyzes how differentiated instruction is useful with all grade levels.

Description of Action Plan First off we choice a topic by finding matching goals from our LSPI goals from Mill Creek High School, Trip Elementary, and Ferguson Elementary. We researched and found four peer reviewed articles and two articles on differentiated instruction for English Language Learners (ELL) We listed strategies of differentiated instruction in the classroom that can be used from elementary to high school.

Relevant Literature Bauwens, J., & Simonelli, S. (2003). Differentiating instruction. Student Support, 4(2), Stanford, B., & Reeves, S. (2009). Making It Happen: Using Differentiated Instruction, Retrofit Framework, and Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 5(6), Ford, Karen, (2011). Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners. Retrieved from Brighton, C., Brimijoin, K., Callahan, C. M., Conover, L. A.,Hertberg, H.,Moon, T. R.,…Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27 (2-3), Patton, J. & Hoover, J. (2005). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for english- language learners with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40 (4), Buteau, G., & True, M (2009). Differentiating instructional strategies to support English language learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 44 (2), 23-25

Presentation of Findings/Artifacts What did you find out as a result of research? Differentiated is all about changing either the content, the process, or the product. What did you choose to display and why? We choose to display strategies for implementing differentiated instruction for ELL’s in the classroom.

Feedback and Conclusions

We Learned THESE Lessons Lessons Learned: (What lessons did you learn? How can you use this? Or did other things happen that altered your final outcomes?) Meaning to Us as Educators: (How has this experience been meaningful to you as a developing professional teacher leader?) Things We Would Do Differently Next Time: (Include next steps as well as what you would add or modify in the process.)

Executive Summary Need Identified: (Include a brief summation of the goals of LSPIs) Artifacts Developed: (What did you present to your schools ?) Feedback: (Summarize the reactions of other Educators) End Result / Impact: (Explain the impact or result of the work done)

Credit; Appreciation; Thanks