The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 7: The Legal and Legislative Response

Section 72 Goals This section of the curriculum will help you to understand:  Changes in the legislative response to juvenile sex offenders in recent decades;  The application of federal registration and community notification laws to juvenile sex offenders at the state level;  The presence of sexually violent predator/civil commitment laws that apply to juveniles offenders; and  Some of the concerns about applying these laws to juvenile offenders without consideration of how they impact juveniles in a different way than their adult counterparts.

Section 73 Legal Trends in the Disposition and Management of Juvenile Offenders Reductions in the lower age by which youth could be tried as adults Elimination of the strict confidentiality guidelines for some juvenile court records and proceedings The establishment of mandatory minimum sentence structures for juvenile crimes The reduction of judicial discretion in the juvenile and family courts

Section 74 Confidential Information These states permit the public release of juvenile records without qualifying restrictions.

Section 75 Confidentiality Waivers These states permit the public release of juvenile records if the youth has committed a certain offense.

Section 76 Record Sealing These states require that certain records never be sealed, expunged, or destroyed.

Section 77 Open Hearings These states permit or require juvenile delinquency hearings to be open to the public.

Section 78 No Minimum Age District of Columbia These states have no minimum age at which a judicial waiver, concurrent jurisdiction, or statutory exclusion provision can be applied to juveniles.

Section 79 Cases Excluded From Juvenile Court These states have mandatory waivers for cases that meet certain criteria.

Section 710 Cases Waived to Adult Court These states have automatic waivers to adult court for a certain category of cases.

Section 711 Cases Waived to Adult Courts Delinquency cases waived to adult criminal courts increased 71% between 1985 and In 1996, 73% of juvenile sex offenders transferred to criminal court were sentenced to prison and received an average maximum sentence of 105 months.

Section 712 History of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Statutes In 1990, Washington made changes in their penalties for sex offenders, including: Civil commitment Registration Community Notification In 1991, Minnesota passed a sex offender registration act. In 1995, New Jersey enacted community notification legislation.

Section 713 History of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Statutes (Continued) In 1994, Congress passed the Jacob Wetterling Act, which required all states to create sex offender registries. In 1996, Congress signed the Megan’s Law Amendment, which required all states to conduct community notification. In 1998, Congress passed a law that called for the creation of a National Sex Offender Registry (NSOR). The purpose of NSOR is to assist in tracking sex offenders as they move between states.

Section 714 Goals of Community Notification and Registration Laws These laws were originally developed to: Deter potential sex offenders Reduce instances of reoffending among known sex offenders Provide law enforcement with information on known sex offenders Share information with the public about sex offenders residing in their communities

National Chronology of Sex Offender Registration and Megan’s Law Legislation Pre Year State Legislation Enacted Number of States Enacting Legislation Registration Megan's Law

Section 716 Concerns About Applying Registration and Notification Laws to Juvenile Offenders The “labeling” effect these laws have on youthful offenders can be detrimental. There is an absence of research on the efficacy of these laws as they relate to juveniles. Some states do not differentiate which offenses trigger registration and community notification requirements for juvenile offenders.

Section 717 Concerns About Applying Registration and Notification Laws to Juvenile Offenders (Continued) Juveniles may be subject to the same requirements as adults, but are not always afforded the same procedural safeguards. Juvenile sex offenses may be underreported or not adjudicated as sex crimes to avoid triggering notification and registration requirements. Registration and notification are resource intensive and sometimes applied without considerations for offenders’ risk levels.

Section 718 Juveniles Required to Register These states require juveniles adjudicated of a sex offense in juvenile court to register.

Section 719 Separate Registration Laws for Juveniles These states have separate registration laws for juvenile and adult sex offenders.

Section 720 Minimum Age for Registration These states define a minimum age at which juveniles must register.

Section 721 Youngest Age at Which Juveniles Must Register North Carolina law applies to juveniles who were at least 11 years of age when they committed the offense, and deemed a danger to the community. Indiana law applies to juveniles who were at least 14 years of age, and deemed likely to be repeat offenders. South Dakota law applies to juveniles who were at least 15 years of age. Ohio, Idaho, and Okalahoma registration laws apply to juveniles 14 years of age and older.

Section 722 Termination of Registration These states have enacted juvenile procedures and/or age limits terminating juvenile registration requirements after a certain time following conviction.

Section 723 Specialized Approaches to Juvenile Registration: Texas Law Un-registration Juvenile courts release adjudicated sex offenders from registration requirements. A hearing is held to weigh the protection of the public versus the harm to juveniles and their families. De-registration Judges terminate registration requirements for juveniles who are already registered. Non-public registration Courts order information on registered juvenile offenders not to be disclosed to the public and to be used only by law enforcement personnel to conduct criminal investigations.

Section 724 Specialized Approaches to Juvenile Registration: Oregon Law Juveniles can petition the court and apply for relief from registration two years after the expiration of their supervision period. Youths apply for relief through the District Attorney’s Office or Juvenile Court. A court hearing is scheduled to hear evidence.

Section 725 Nature and Maintenance of Juvenile Sex Offender Registry Information In order to balance the interests of juveniles and the “right to know”: Idaho maintains a separate registry for juvenile offenders that is only accessible to the public upon request. In Michigan, information on registered juvenile offenders is available only to law enforcement until the juvenile is 18, at which time their names are made public. Missouri maintains juveniles’ information in a court database to which there is limited access.

Section 726 Issues with Registering Juveniles When deciding who maintains the registry and what information is provided, consider: The nature and type of information that will be collected. Implications of providing public access to traditionally confidential juvenile records. The potential to inadvertently expose victims.

Section 727 Juveniles Subject to Community Notification These states have community notification laws that include provisions for juveniles.

Section 728 Additional Concerns With Applying Notification Laws to Juveniles In addition to the considerations already mentioned: Potential social stigma – can damage prosocial links to peers and the community. Stress of notification can exacerbate poor coping skills and take the youth’s attention away from treatment and other endeavors related to his successful reintegration back into the community.

Section 729 Specialized Approaches to Juvenile Notification: Alabama Law Juveniles are not subject to automatic community notification, but are required to receive treatment and register upon release. Prior to release, an assessment is conducted to determine juveniles’ risk of reoffending. If notification is deemed necessary, each case is assessed to determine the most effective and judicious use of notification.

Section 730 Civil Commitment Laws Designed for individuals who suffer from significant mental health difficulties and pose a danger to themselves or others. Are civil procedures that allow for commitment to a secure mental health facility. These laws are intended to target the most repetitive of dangerous sex offenders. Civil commitment laws are commonly known as sexually violent predator (SVP) laws.

Section 731 Concerns With Applying Civil Commitment Laws to Juveniles Recidivism rates of juvenile sex offenders are low. Adult oriented dispositions, such as civil commitment, can impact the outcomes with juvenile sex offenders. Aggregating groups of antisocial individuals and placing youth with predatory adults is problematic.

Section 732 Concerns With Applying Civil Commitment Laws to Juveniles (Continued) Diagnosis may be broad and may fail to limit the scope of civil commitment to the most dangerous offenders. The high prevalence of co-occurring mental health needs among juveniles may qualify many of these youth for civil commitment. The ability (or inability) of mental health experts to predict with accuracy that an individual is likely to recidivate is cause for concern when considering prolonged commitment.

Section 733 SVP Civil Commitment Laws These states have civil commitment laws in place.

Section 734 A Sample of State Civil Commitment Laws Arizona and Florida only consider offenders 18 years of age and older eligible for civil commitment. In Illinois, Washington, and Wisconsin, juveniles of any age are subject to the law. Florida, Illinois, South Carolina, and Wisconsin apply the law to juveniles and adults. Pennsylvania authorizes civil commitment of juveniles “aging out” of the system who have a mental abnormality that increases their risk to reoffend. Washington permits civil commitment of juveniles who are deemed a high risk to the public.

Section 735 Summary There has been a trend in recent years to impose “get tough” legislative measures on juvenile sex offenders. These laws can result in potential unintended consequences for juveniles, their families, and victims of juvenile perpetrated sexual assault. The potential impact of these laws when applied to juvenile sex offenders should be considered prior to implementation.