© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 1 Software System Upgrades Responding to a Necessary Evil Warren Mills, CEO Advantiv, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Needs Assessment A brief overview of needs assessment in the context of using ID to plan instructional programs.
Advertisements

12 August 2004 Strategic Alignment By Maria Rojas.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Project Kickoff PeopleSoft Financials Implementation April 2, 2014.
Planning for Enterprise Systems
Chapter 2 The Analyst as a Project Manager
Migration MIGR-02. David Cervelli Managing Consultant Strategic Systems Group (SSG) June 2007 Preparing for an Implementation.
Panorama Consulting Group LLC ERP Assessment, Selection, and Planning SAMPLE APPROACH.
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
4. 2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process Objectives  Explain the elements of project management and the responsibilities of a.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
CHAPTER 9: LEARNING OUTCOMES
Avoiding Common Project Management Pitfalls – A Guide for Super PMs Yvette Soliz Rivers, PMP Director, Project Management November 14, 2012 Disaster Averted!
1 Walk-in slide. 2 How to Manage a System Upgrade The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of Conversions David Cervelli Managing Consultant April 25, 2006.
VENDORS, CONSULTANTS AND USERS
MDR Implementation: Drivers & Challenges Julie Smiley Director, Product Management for BioPharma Akana PhUSE SDE - May 14, 2015 Introductions.
6  Methodology: DMAIC Robert Setaputra. PDCA / PDSA PDCA / PDSA is a continuous quality improvement tool. PDCA is introduced by Shewhart. PDSA is Deming’s.
Charting a course PROCESS.
UMT and Microsoft Presenting Tips and Tricks Basics What’s new in Microsoft Project 2010 Brian Feder, MBA, PMP Senior Vice President UMT Consulting Group.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4.1.
Copyright Course Technology Chapter 14: Executing.
Copyright Course Technology 1999
Introduction to RUP Spring Sharif Univ. of Tech.2 Outlines What is RUP? RUP Phases –Inception –Elaboration –Construction –Transition.
Moving into Design SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 6 TH EDITION DENNIS, WIXOM, AND ROTH © 2015 JOHN WILEY & SONS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 Roberta M. Roth.
The rSmart Group Kuali Days Successful Financial System Implementation Indianapolis April 11,
Lessons Learned – Keys to a Successful Implementation Atlanta OAUG January 21, 2005 Atlanta, Georgia.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4.1.
1 ISA&D7‏/8‏/ ISA&D7‏/8‏/2013 Systems Development Life Cycle Phases and Activities in the SDLC Variations of the SDLC models.
Action Planning Assess, Plan and Perform Melissa Spears Business Advisory Services.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Chapter 3 Systems Planning and Selection 3.1.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
Project Scope Management Project management Digital Media Department Unit Credit Value : 4 Essential Learning time : 120 hours.
Roadmap to successful ECM implementation Kateřina Divišová British Chamber of Commerce
Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi February 2007 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Selection Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi
Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
Project Life Cycle.
Assessing the influence on processes when evolving the software architecture By Larsson S, Wall A, Wallin P Parul Patel.
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
1 TenStep Project Management Process ™ PM00.9 PM00.9 Project Management Preparation for Success * Manage Quality *
1 66 1 Six Sigma – Basic overview. 2 66 2 WHAT IS THIS SIX SIGMA ? A Philosophy A Statistical Measurement A Metric A Business Strategy make fewer.
Getting Everyone "On Board" for a Major IT Project Presentation to CUMREC MAY 16, 2002 Warren Mills, CEO Copyright Advantiv, Inc This work is the.
Unit 8.2: Effective Implementation Planning HIT Implementation Planning for Quality and Safety Component 12/Unit 81 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Information System Project Management Lecture Five
Microsoft Office Project 2007 Advanced Tips & Tricks Keith Wilson, Executive/Senior Consultant Project Management Practice Inc.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
PPTTEST 12/26/ :41 1 IT Ron Williams Information Technology Management Project Management.
SAM for SQL Workloads Presenter Name.
PLANNING AND DECISION- MAKING IN AN ORGANIZATION Business Management Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Managing Multiple Projects Steve Westerman California Department of Motor Vehicles Steve Young Mathtech, Inc.
Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition.
© 2015 IHS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Genstar Capital Acquires IHS Operational Excellence & Risk Management Business Ensuring the Success of Global EMIS Projects.
THE VALUE (SUPPLY) CHAIN STRETCHES FROM THE BEGINNING OF YOUR SUPPLIER’S SUPPLY CHAIN THROUGH ALL OF YOUR PROCESSES THAT CREATE VALUE FOR YOUR CUSTOMERS.
DecisionDirector® EIS Project Kick-Off Presented to: Foothill-De Anza CCD March 2007 Dan Miller, Founder Advantiv Solutions, LLC.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Business Cases Ruben Riestra - Inmark
Dynamics 365 for Wholesale Ditribution Readiness Assessment
GBA 573 Final Project By Robert Ferschen
By Jeff Burklo, Director
System Review – The Forgotten Implementation Step
Managed Content Services
Copyright Course Technology 2001
Today’s Agenda Dealing with Vendors Consultants Contracts
Presentation transcript:

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 1 Software System Upgrades Responding to a Necessary Evil Warren Mills, CEO Advantiv, Inc.

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 2 Presentation Overview 1.Forces driving need to upgrade 2.Typical reactions 3.Decision criteria 4.Requirements for upgrade success 5.Risk reduction with DecisionDirector 3.0

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 3 Advantiv, Inc. Founded in 1997 –Dan Miller –As Marketect Help Colleges and Universities with the selection process for new ERP solutions –Used in over 50 campuses Assist Vendors in Product Definition Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 4 Frequent Reasons for Change Lack of support for current version –Vendor forcing the upgrade –Expense of supporting older technology New functionality required –To save money –To remain competitive

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 5 Frequent Reactions to Change “Didn’t we just install that system?” “I just learned the system!” “It can’t be that difficult….just run some CD’s” “It will cost… HOW MUCH?” “It will take… HOW LONG?”

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 6 Upgrades create Opportunities Review business practices Consolidation of processes Move toward standards Add functionality –CRM –Data “dashboards”

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 7 Areas of Assessment 1.Stakeholder satisfaction 2.Usage by system module 3.Areas for efficiency improvements 4.Customization to convert to vendor standard 5.Readiness: Cost, schedule, staff, stakeholder support Make the decision as quickly as possible Involve as many stakeholders to ensure decision acceptance

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 8 Requirements for Success 1.Shared understanding of vision, scope, and impact 2.Detailed understanding of organizational requirements 3.Senior leadership sponsorship 4.Realistic budget and strong financial controls 5.Strong project management Consider outside help 6.Stakeholders with realistic expectations 7.Communication and documentation of all decisions

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 9 The Stakeholder Solution

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 10 How it Works

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 11 DecisionDirector 3.0 – cont. Built on best practices Easy to use – Web-based; users trained in 20 minutes No installation - Hosted Scalable – Unlimited users, unlimited input Flexible –all customizable

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 12 Forum Example – Brainstorming

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 13 Forum Example: Information Gathering and Voting

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 14 KnowledgePacks: Table of Contents Example These numbers indicate the number of functional requirements or related statements for each module with the KnowledgePack.

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 15 KnowledgePacks: Content Example

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 16 KnowledgePacks - Available as of 3/1/2003 Financial Management Systems Human Resource Management Systems Student System/ERP for Higher Education Advancement/Fundraising Grant Management Information Access Data Warehousing IT Requirements Fleet Management Room Scheduling Furniture Document Management Internet Portals CRM

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 17 ROI in Typical Assessment Project Phase Decreased data collection time by 40% Decreased data analysis time by 25% Reduced design stage of project by 30% Reduce costs by 20%-40%

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 18 Benefits Reduced risk –Less scope creep from clearly defined expectations and deliverables –User adoption because of early project engagement Reduced costs –Fewer meetings, less travel –Faster to project benefits Accelerate and improve decision making process –5X more people involved –Senior Administration visibility

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 19 Current Projects Pace University Case Western Reserve University University of Texas - Arlington Bowling Green State University University of Kentucky Temple University Wisconsin Independent Colleges and Universities California Community Colleges

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 20 Sometimes No Choice

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 21 Act… Don’t Dither

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 22 The Stakeholder Challenge … DecisionDirector 3.0 can help.

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 23 Questions ?????

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 24 Model for Stakeholder Engagement Success = Technology + Implementation + Stakeholder Expectations 100%33% 33% 33%

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 25 When to Use – System Assessments 1.Define Initiative 2.Determine Critical Path 3.Have/Need Analysis 4.Finalize Action Plan

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 26 When to Use – System Selections 1.Define Requirements 2.Collect Vendor Responses 3.Evaluate Vendor Responses

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 27 When to Use – System Implementations 1.Determine Readiness 2.Re-Validate Project Charter 3.Define Data and Process Model 4.Stakeholder Acceptance Plan

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 28 When to Use – System Verifications 1.Verify Functionality 2.Verify Training/Usage 3.Assess Stakeholder Satisfaction

© 2003 Advantiv, Inc. 29 When to Use – System Enhancements 1.Ongoing Idea Collection 2.Determine Customer Interest 3.Action Plan