Performance Measures December 2012. Reduction In Out-of-Home Care Shows the reduction of clients in out-of-home care. Contract goal for 6/30/2011 is to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
1 Circuit 10 – Central Region CBC Performance and Quality Improvement Meeting Scheduled for Wednesday, August 20 th, 2014 at 10 a.m. Data for Week Ended.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Florida’s IV-E Waiver Mary I. Armstrong, Ph.D. Cathy Sowell, L.C.S.W. Svetlana Yampolskaya, Ph.D September 6, 2012.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
Safety Methodology Implementation Status December 2, 2014.
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
State of New Jersey. Quick Context Lawsuit in 2004, revised in 2006 to MSA Reporting on 250 measures, including placement stability Started by “focusing.
Child Welfare Practice Model
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Memo Series Overview  Requirements  Frequently Asked Questions  Reports  Reporting to the Federal Government Did Wisconsin Make the target.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
Department of Children and Families Autism Services Jan Nisenbaum Deputy Commissioner Clinical and Professional Services.
Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
The Child Welfare System An Introduction Child Welfare in Numbers Nationally, an estimated 896,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
PFSF Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey Results
School Minder Director Erwin McEwen Illinois Department of Children & Family Services
Department of Children and Families - Fiscal Update WHSFMA Conference May 7, 2014 John Tuohy, DCF Regional Operations David Harkins, Title IV-E Coordinator.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Financial Section Training FY2006.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 G-FORCE MEETING October 23, 2008 ON THE ROAD TO GREATNESS!
NC Child Welfare Data State Fiscal Year 2012 (7/1/11-6/30/12) 132,031 unique children were assessed for reports of child abuse, neglect & dependency Approximately.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Tom Pierce State of Florida Department of Children and Families Office on Homelessness COSCDA Session ESG Performance Standards September 17, 2013.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Community-Based Care: An Examination of Practices and Outcomes Cathy Sowell University of South Florida Svetlana Yampolskaya University of South Florida.
1 PERMANENCY FOR CHILDREN Division of Family & Children Services July G-Force Meeting July 30, 2009.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families POLICY, PROTOCOLS, PRACTICE + PARTNERSHIPS SUSAN R. SMITH CHIEF OF QUALITY AND PLANNING CHILD FATALITY.
ADOPTION ASSISTANCE ANALYSIS October 13, COMPARISON OF PERCENT OF CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR ADOPTION BY CURRENT, PROPOSED AND ALTERNATE CRITERIA SFY.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
The comparability of Australian statutory child protection activity data: Making sense of differences across Australian states and territories Prue Holzer,
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
“ EDUCATION IS THE LIFELINE FOR FOSTER STUDENTS” Child Welfare and Early Learning Partnership with Region 2 Children’s Administration King County Offices.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Annual report 2016 Family Preservation Family Reunification
National State Auditors Association
Group Care in Florida’s Child Welfare System
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee
Broward Quality Performance Review
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Lisa Litchfield| SSIS Worker Mentor Coordinator
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Presentation to the Senate Finance Article II Workgroup
Presentation transcript:

Performance Measures December 2012

Reduction In Out-of-Home Care Shows the reduction of clients in out-of-home care. Contract goal for 6/30/2011 is to reduce the number of children to no more than 629. The 2012 goal is 572. FSFN Report: Children & Young Adults Active by Primary Worker. Count Total Out of Home Care column by Unit for both graphs. Shown in two graphed areas – overall reduction and separated by type of placement to show increases and decreases in each placement type. Shelter homes & Facilities rolled into Foster homes July 2009.

Out-of-Home Care

Caseload Number Trends Shows the current numbers of clients in the three groups listed. FSFN Report for In Home and Out of Home numbers: Children & Young Adults Active by Primary Worker. Count Total Out of Home Care column by Unit. PKIDS Report for Prevention/Diversion numbers: Active Diversion Clients From PKIDS report filtered to remove duplicates and remove adults 18 and older. While we see a decrease in out-of-home children we should see an increase in the prevention and diversion cases. This shows that we are keeping more children at home because of the prevention and diversion actions.

Caseload Number Trends

Caseload Number Trends By Circuit – Circuit 3 and Circuit 8 Shows the current numbers of clients in the three groups listed. FSFN Report for In Home and Out of Home numbers: Children & Young Adults Active by Primary Worker. Count Total Out of Home Care column by Unit. PKIDS Report for Prevention/Diversion numbers: Active Diversion Clients From PKIDS report filtered to remove duplicates and remove adults 18 and older. Counted by county to determine circuit with all non- catchment counties being added to Alachua total. This months report included 53 prevention and diversion clients listed in counties outside of our catchment area caused by FSFN last case open status. These were included in the Alachua County area (circuit 8) count.

Caseload Number Trends Circuit 8 Circuit 8 includes Alachua, Baker, Bradford, Gilchrist, Levy and Union counties.

Caseload Number Trends Circuit 3 Circuit 3 includes Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, Taylor and Suwannee counties.

M01 - No Maltreatment During Services The percentage of children not abused or neglected during services will be at least 95%. FSFN Report: Abuse During Services Statewide By Unit. Divide Total All Children - # No abuse, etc. by Total All Children - Total Served.

M01 - No Maltreatment During Services

M02 - Maltreatment During Out of Home Care No more than 1% of children served in out-of-home care shall experience maltreatment during services. FSFN Report: Abuse During Services By Perpetrator Statewide by District by Unit

M02 - Maltreatment During Out of Home Care

M03 - Re-entry into OOH Care DCF Dashboard/ FS302 % of children removed within 12 months of prior reunification. Note: These are children that were reunified with the caregiver that they were removed from, and were then currently removed again within the 12 months period. The PSF figure of is incorrect for 1011Q1. The state is in the process of reposting but as of 6/15/11 has not done so.

M03 - Re-entry into OOH Care

M04 – Time to Reunification The percentage of children reunified who were reunified within 12 months of the latest removal shall be at least 76%. FSFN Report: Children Reunified within 12 Months by Unit. Divide Number Reunified within 12 months - Rolling 12 Months by Number Reunified within period - Rolling 12 Months

M04 – Time to Reunification

M05 - Percent of Adoptions Finalized within 24 months The percentage of children with finalized adoptions whose adoptions were finalized within 24 months of the latest removal shall be at least 32%. FSFN Report: Children Adopted within 24 Months District by Agency. Divide Monthly - Number of Children Adopted within 24 Months by Monthly - Number of Children Adopted

M05 - Percent of Adoptions Finalized within 24 months

M07 - Adoptions Finalized Goal for was 157. We exceeded that goal. Goal for was 170. We exceeded that goal. Not only did we meet our goal for 09-10, we exceeded it by 32 adoptions. Goal was 160. This graph charts the percentage complete in relation to the elapsed time period. 100% means we are on target to meet 170 finalizations by the end of the FY. FSFN Report: Adoptions Finalized by Month & Cumulative SFY by Agency SFY To Date Cumulative Total

M07 - Adoptions Finalized

M06 - In OOH Care More than 12 Months No more than 392 children will be in out of home care 12 months or more. FSFN Report: Children in Out-of-Home Care by Time in Care by Unit.

M06 - In OOH Care More than 12 Months

M08 - Children Seen 100% of children under supervision who are required to be seen each month shall be seen each month. FSFN Report: Children Seen Not Seen Number and Percent by Unit - Monthly. Divide Total Number of Children Seen by Total Children - (Reason Not Seen = Other)

M08 - Children Seen

Placement Moves Percentage of clients with 2 or fewer placements, since removal, in care for 12 months or less. PSF and the Statewide total are listed. The contract goal for FY is 86%. FSFN report: Children Served in Out -of-Home Care - Length of Removal by Number of Placements Statewide by District by Agency –Rolling year %<=2 placements since removal Children in care<12 months.

Placement Moves

Shelters – Intakes-Investigations Shelters – This data set are an actual representation of cases transferred to Case Management Services from Protective Investigations. Numbers for shelters are compiled by the AA for Gainesville from Case Transfer Data. Investigations Received – This report allows management to monitor the amount of incoming intakes each month and their type. The report identifies particular districts, counties or units that are receiving the greatest volume of intakes. FSFN report: Child Investigations Received by Intake Sequence Type Statewide by District by County – This report does contain special conditions. As of February 2011.

Shelters – Intakes-Investigations

Ages of Children in Care for Partnership for Strong Families The pie charts show the percentage of ages for children in care. First in total then divided by in- home and out-of-home care categories. FSFN data obtained from Business Objects- Primary children to Services for PFSF.

Ages of Children in Care

Ages of Out-of Home vs. In-Home

End of Performance Measures