WJTSC 10-1 USG Interagency Working Group 31 March 2010

Agenda 0800 – 0815 Welcome and Introductions Mr. Gary Quay, JS J-7 0815 – 0900 Training for Integrated Ops Mr. Frank DiGiovanni, OSD (R&T) 0900 - 0930 Information Sharing Mr. Bill Barlow, OSD (NII) LTC Bob Klein, OSD (P) 0930 – 0950 ACC’s ANGEL THUNDER Lt Col Patrick Pope, ACC/A3J 0950 – 1000 National Intelligence Support Team Maj Roland Sarino, NIST 1000 – 1015 BREAK 1015 – 1040 R&S FY 10/11 TEE Mr. Eric Halzel, DoS S/CRS

Agenda 1040 – 1045 Interagency Logistics Symposium CDR Novak-Tibbet, TRANSCOM 1045 – 1130 UN Office for the Coordination of Mr. Fred Polk, UN OCHA Humanitarian Affairs Mr. Michael Marks, UN OCHA 1130 – 1200 Center for Complex Operations Mr. Dale Erickson, CCO 1200 – 1300 LUNCH 1300 – 1320 JTIMS Discussion Mr. Gary Quay 1320 – 1340 Status of FY 11/12 Support Requests Mr. Rob Webster 1340 – 1410 Future Focus of Working Group Mr. Gary Quay 1410 – 1430 Standing Issue Mr. Gary Quay

Agenda 1430 – 1445 BREAK 1445 – 1600 New Issues Mr. Gary Quay 1600 – 1615 Training for Integrated Operations Mr. Gary Quay 1615 – 1630 Working Group Wrap up / Closing Remarks Mr. Gary Quay 1630 – 1700 COCOM /Services Breakout Mr. Gary Quay

Goals Share information and build relationships Identify our integrated operations training roles Define purpose and goals of this WG Determine disposition of standing issue Identify and Discuss Potential New Issues Discuss Way-ahead

Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs. Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks. Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.” Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

Integration of Interagency Partners Issue 07-001: Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events. Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value. End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations. POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps. 2. Develop potential mitigation strategies. OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB 1st Quarter FY 10 FY 09 SEP 09 Feb 10 MAR 10 FY10 FY 11 Implement process for FY 10/11 Year end assessment Initiate Process for FY 11/12 Publish Draft FY 10/11 Plan Update at WJTSC 10-1 Complete POA&M Interagency Process Effectively Supports DoD Exercises 7

Training for Integrated Operations Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements. Discussion: DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training. End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense. POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal. OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB AD HOC Efforts JFCOM IW IA Requirements Div Solutions Div COCOMs S/CRS USDA NTC 10th Mtn Div CTCs USMC OIF OEF Camp Atterbury Muscatatuck FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10/11 FY 12 Assess Readiness Impact Complete Strategy Complete CJCSI Develop METS Develop TCOI Portal DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 8

National Rehearsal Program Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP. Discussion: Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD) Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP

National Rehearsal Program Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context POA&M Establish whole of government community of interest Establish series of IPRs Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11 Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners MAR 10 APR 10 MAY 10 JUN 10 JUL 10 MAR 11 2012 Identified issue Develop concept brief Establish community of interest AW 11 Senior level CDC Initial strategic level MA and COA Dev NLR 11 (AW 11) pilot COA decision

Training for Integrated Operations - What We’ve Done Where We’re Going Mr. Frank DiGiovanni ODUSD(Readiness)

Information Sharing – Update Mr. Bill Barlow OASD (Networks & Information Integration) LTC Bob Klein ODASD (Partnership Strategy & Stability Ops)

Air Combat Command’s ANGEL THUNDER Lt Col Patrick Pope ACC/A3J

National Intelligence Support Team Maj Roland Sarino, NIST

BREAK

2010 Interagency Logistics Symposium CDR. Novak-Tibbet USTRANSCOM

UN Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination: Response Operations and Training Mr. Fred Polk & Mr. Michael Marks UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

LUNCH

Reconstruction & Stabilization FY10/11 Training, Exercises, Experiments Mr. Eric Halzel DoS, S/CRS

Provincial Reconstruction Team Lessons-Learned Project Mr. Dale Erickson Center for Complex Operations

Joint Training Information Management System Mr. Gary Quay

Fy11/12 is first cycle for use as system of record JTIMS Fy11/12 is first cycle for use as system of record COCOM use (positive/issues) Services use Reports JS J-7 use Quality of information HQ vs. AOR support

DoD FY11/12 Interagency Support Requests Mr. Rob Webster

Future Focus of Working Group Mr. Gary Quay

WJTSC USG Interagency Working Group Purpose: Ensure DoD events promote an integrated operations approach Promote interagency coordination and collaboration that improves civilian and military training and exercising for integrated operations Improve the realism and quality of DoD exercises and experiments Ensure DoD events meet the exercise and operational needs of interagency partners and DoD Identify training and exercise issues and Plans of Action & Milestones Organizations Invited to Attend: USG Interagency Partners - Services OSD - Combat Support Agencies Joint Staff - National Guard Bureau Combatant Commands

Purpose. - What should be the focus. - What can we accomplish Purpose - What should be the focus? - What can we accomplish? - Who should attend Benefit to IA Partners - How can the WG benefit/assist IA Partners? - Is this forum appropriate for USG issues? Benefit to DoD - How can the WG assist the DoD attendees? Venue - Would a change increase attendance? - Couple with other conference? - Location?

Standing and New Issues Mr. Gary Quay

Integration of Interagency Partners Issue 07-001: Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events. Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value. End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations. POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps. 2. Develop potential mitigation strategies. OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB 1st Quarter FY 10 FY 09 SEP 09 Feb 10 MAR 10 FY10/11 FY 12 Implement process for FY 10/11 Year end assessment Initiate Process for FY 11/12 Publish Draft FY 10/11 Plan Update at WJTSC 10-1 Complete POA&M Interagency Process Effectively Supports DoD Exercises 28

Integration of Interagency Partners – WJTSC 10-2 Identify and analyze participation gaps. How many agencies and departments did you invite to be part of the training audience for your events? What academics could not be accomplished because a member of the IA did not participate? What experimentation could not be completed because the IA community could not provide the required subject matter expertise? What training objectives were not achieved because you did not have IA participation? - For COCOMs, how many exercises conducted in the past year involved either the J5, JIACG, POLAD, SDA, SEA, or other imbedded interagency partners to help identify IA requirements and assisted in the invitation of IA participants? 2. Mitigation strategies. 29

BREAK

Training for Integrated Operations

Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs. Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks. Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is defined as “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.” Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

Conference Theme Discussion Training for Integrated Operations Background: DODD 1322.18 defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks. Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest: What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training? What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training? What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training? Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives? 33

Training for Integrated Operations Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements. Discussion: DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training. End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense. POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal. OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB AD HOC Efforts JFCOM IW IA Requirements Div Solutions Div COCOMs S/CRS USDA NTC 10th Mtn Div CTCs USMC OIF OEF Camp Atterbury Muscatatuck FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10/11 FY 12 Assess Readiness Impact Complete Strategy Complete CJCSI Develop METS Develop TCOI Portal DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 34

Example of Integrated Operations Battle Space UN Agencies UNICEF WFP UNDP For-profit NGO ICRC BCT NGO UNHCR NGO Donor Donor Local NGO Disaster Tourist NGO USG/Embassy NGO Other Governments Host Country Government Red Cross For-profit NGO For-profit BCT Journalists Disaster Tourist 35

Synchronizing USG Efforts GOOD TRAINING 10TH MTN SSI S/CRS USJFCOM USDA CTCS SYNCRONIZED & INTEGRATED SERVICES USAID CAMP ATTERBURY COCOMS NTC MUSCATATUCK 36

Missed Civ-Mil Training Opportunities H OM E S T A T I O N A C A D E M I C S S T E A D Y S T A T E C I V M I L T N G C I V S T O M I L I T A R Y E V E N T S M I L T O F S I & MU S C A T A T U C K Army Afghanistan Regional Provincial District Integrated Operations USMC Issue: - BG Abrams, NTC Commander, would like to have Afghanistan bound civilians participate in NTC training - Similar issue with 10th Mtn SSI to have imbedded IA during pre-deployment and into deployment - OIF - GEN Modern's opening remarks/comments during CTC/AAB VTC between USF-I and the CTCs-- -Good job by CTCs in preparing BCTs for deployment to date. Need to replicate all players at CTCs--PRTs, NTM, USAID, UNAMI, CJSOTF, etc. - Interagency participation is a problem common among Services and COCOMs - This brief limited to Afghanistan pre-deployment Background Today: - Political decisions drive civilian training for OEF and OIF - OEF training is not synchronized or integrated - All civilians going to Afghanistan get three weeks at FSI and train at Camp Atterbury (Muscatatuck); none go to NTC DoS mission is to get boots on the ground in Afghanistan ASAP minimum training has been acceptable to DoS there is no compelling case for civilians to participate in DoD events There are indications SRAP and Embassy Kabul will support training changes - Civilians (FSOs) participate in OIF training at NTC Supported by DoS NEA-I and US Embassy Baghdad This group does not attend training at Camp Atterbury Civ Separate Tracks Result In Missed Opportunities for Integrated Training Prior to Deployment - Need to leverage all opportunities to train together at existing venues - Need to develop common operating picture by sharing vignettes and story lines

Training for Integrated Operations Exercise Participation Who coordinates training within civilian agencies (CRC & non-CRC) Who acts as training audience and who develops exercise How are civilian training objectives developed Are the COCOM JELC and Service training cycles structured to facilitate integrated training Do Army and USMC unit training venues accommodate civ-mil training Is the military taking advantage of training at civilian venues How does DoD determine civilian agency priorities and interests How do does the USG identify civ-mil integration requirements and interests Are contracted role players adequately replicating current civilian agency issues/operations Who pays for civ-mil integrated operations training AD HOC Efforts JFCOM IW IA Requirements Div Solutions Div COCOMs S/CRS USDA NTC 10th Mtn Div CTCs USMC OIF OEF Camp Atterbury Muscatatuck 38

Training for Integrated Operations Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated operations training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements. [DODD 1322.18] Discussion: DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct integrated operations with non-DOD partners Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common integrated operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training. End State: Integrated operations training events achieve USG national security objectives. POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD training strategy that reflects the operating environment, particularly for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy. 2. Press for a national strategy. 3. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 4. Review mission essential tasks and validate with interagency partners. 5. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 6. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal. OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB AD HOC Efforts JFCOM IW IA Requirements Div Solutions Div COCOMs S/CRS USDA NTC 10th Mtn Div CTCs USMC OIF OEF Camp Atterbury Muscatatuck FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10 FY10/11 FY 12 Assess Readiness Impact Complete Strategy Complete CJCSI Develop METS Develop TCOI Portal DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 39

National Rehearsal Program

National Rehearsal Program Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP. Discussion: Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD) Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP

National Rehearsal Program Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context POA&M Establish whole of government community of interest Establish series of IPRs Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11 Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners MAR 10 APR 10 MAY 10 JUN 10 JUL 10 MAR 11 2012 Identified issue Develop concept brief Establish community of interest AW 11 Senior level CDC Initial strategic level MA and COA Dev NLR 11 (AW 11) pilot COA decision

Conference Theme Discussion Training for Integrated Operations Background: DODD 1322.18 defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks. Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest: What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training? What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training? What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training? Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives? 43

Questions??

Working Group Wrap Up & Closing Remarks Mr. Gary Quay

DoD COCOM & Services Breakout Mr. Gary Quay

How Can JS J-7 Better Support How Can JS J-7 Better Support? TCOI Portal Quarterly Status Reports Requirements Process Cycle ??

Requirements Process Cycle 4th Quarter 1st Quarter WJTSC Publish and Distribute 2-year DOD Interagency Participation Plan and Interagency Participation Plan VTC Collect DOD Requirements 2 years out VTC Source Requirements Develop DOD Interagency Participation Plan Present Plan to EXCOM WJTSC Present DOD opportunities to Interagency for fill Review interagency requests for support Lock 2-year requirements 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter

BACK-UP

Topic 3: National Level Rehearsal Concept UNCLASSIFIED Topic 3: National Level Rehearsal Concept Full DoD/IA NSC Oversight CT focus Real INTEL CT Objectives Requirements Senior JS / OSD and IA Combatant Commands SecDef/CJCS Approval NSC Oversight Presidential Policy Directive (commensurate with DHS NEP IP) AW 11 NLR Currently Nonexistent AW 10 Full DoD Partial/Episodic IA CMX 6.2 AW 10 SLS CMX 6.1 CMX 6.0 CEP Domestic / HD focus No IA for OCONUS CT Universal Adversary Natural Disasters NLE 09 NEP NEP Partial/Episodic GCC No IA Limited JS AF 09 AW 08 IF 09 JEP 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes/Definitions AW – Exercise ABLE WARRIOR JEP – Joint Exercise Program NEP – National Exercise Program AF – Exercise ABLE FOCUS CEP – Chairman’s Exercise Program NLE – National Level Exercise (part of NEP) IF – Exercise INTERNAL FOCUS CMX – Crisis Management Exercise NLR – National Level Rehearsal SLS – Senior Leadership Seminar UNCLASSIFIED 50 50 50

Joint Staff J-7 Roles & Responsibilities Focal point for DOD entities for U.S. Government Interagency participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments Focal point for U.S. Government Interagency Community for DOD participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments Standardize the request and sourcing process Collate requirements from both DOD and the U.S. Government Interagency Community Present opportunities to Interagency Community Identify gaps

DOD Interface With Interagency Partners FY 09 will be the transition year FY09 Activities: Planning is in progress; JS J-7 will facilitate coordination of FY09 support as needed DOD will develop interagency processes and relationships with interagency partners DOD will identify and present FY10/11 USG Interagency event opportunities to interagency partners JS J-7 will coordinate interagency requests for DOD support JS J-7 will publish Interagency Participation Plans

Interagency Participation Plan Joint Staff J-7 will prepare an Interagency Participation Plan to present DOD events to interagency partners for consideration Plan Attributes: Common language Integration of role of Interagency Management System components, Essential Tasks lists, Major Mission Elements, other agency specific considerations Sufficiently detailed to provide clear training objectives Engages interagency partners early in the Joint Event Life Cycle Conveys mutual benefits of interagency participation and facilitates interagency selection of events for participation Unclassified

Exercises and Training (U) UNCLASSIFIED Exercises and Training (U) LTC Curtis Hubbard J7/9 E&I, Exercises 24 MAR 10 UNCLASSIFIED 54

Purpose (U) Receive approval and/or guidance on the USSOCOM training / exercise framework (Topic 1) Provide “National Level Rehearsal” Concept and receive guidance (Topic 2) 55 55 55

Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework 56 56 56

Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework (U) 1 X ABLE WARRIOR annually (J7/9) 1-2 X ABLE FOCUS annually (J7/9) 2 X Senior leader seminar/Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals (CTER) (J7/9) Quarterly outreach to Combatant Commands and JS/OSD (J35) 1 X National Level Exercise (J7/9) Must be CT related and support USSOCOM objectives Next potential event: FY 12 (Cyber) 1 X GCC ELLIPSE (minimum) with response cell (J7/9) 1 X support to other CT exercise with response cell (J7/9) CMX(s) (J7/9) 2 X monthly internal USSOCOM battlestaff training events (J35) Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events (J35) 2 X Semi-Annual Exercise Conferences for ELLIPSE scheduling (J7/9) 57 57 57

Training / Exercise Proposed Schedule (U) ABLE WARRIOR: 7-11 Mar 11 (National Level Rehearsal) ABLE FOCUS: 23-27 Aug 10 Scenario: LeT/Commonwealth Games Inclusion of GCC action officers in the exercise control group GCC ELLIPSE with USSOCOM response cell Recommendation: Support ELLIPSE with EUCOM Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals: Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games) Feb 11 (prior to start of ABLE WARRIOR) Senior outreach visit to USNORTHCOM (prior to NLE 10 in May) CMX 11: 13 Apr 10 (CJCS participation) CMX 10: 14 Jun 10 (CJCS participation) Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events: Jun, Sep, and Dec 10 58 58 58

Topic 2: National Level Rehearsal Concept 59 59 59

National Level Rehearsal (Background) (U) A “National Level Rehearsal” program does not currently exist CMX 6 series identified the requirement to rehearse national level processes to disrupt and/or respond to a CT event PR/AWGSE 10 Senior Leader Seminar (SLS) identified the requirement for a “National Level Rehearsal Program” Senior DoD/interagency participation required Rehearsal should be validated at the National Security Council level Chairman’s Exercise Program garners ad hoc and episodic interagency participation (not a “forcing function”) National Level Exercise Program (DHS lead) has not / cannot meet “National Rehearsal” requirements as defined in the SLS Consequence Management / HD focus vs. OCONUS disrupt / respond Universal Adversary vs. “Real world” threat streams Not flexible (themes planned on 5 year cycle) Majority of NLE scenarios focus on natural disasters vs. terrorism 60

National Level Rehearsal (NLR) (U) ABLE WARRIOR 11 should be elevated to “National Level Rehearsal” status and receive whole of National Security apparatus participation NLR aspects National Security Council directed objectives Strategic / National Command Post Exercise DoD supported event as Executive Agent Interagency partnered in the development and execution process Principal/Deputies, Undersecretaries and CDRs participation Flexible and scaleable to current threat streams and most likely/most dangerous enemy courses of action Annual execution Intermediate events (SLS, CTER, TTX, Seminars) Requirements Codified similar to National Exercise Program Implementation Plan (DHS) and/or Presidential Policy Directive 61

Recommendations (U) Approve Training / Exercise framework and associated calendar Approve and request JS to prioritize/schedule CTER 10 in Sep 10 JS provide “top-down” message to all GCCs Approve concept to begin planning for ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal 11 as a pilot program Request JS J-3 to direct applicable JS equities to initiate National Level Rehearsal program development Request JS to designate USSOCOM as Supported Commander for planning and execution Establish NLR as a Global Synchronization Conference topic Initiate Commander to Commander discussions in preparation for SECDEF and CJCS briefs Initial dates: 7-11 Mar 11 62 62 62

BACKUP 63 63 63

USSOCOM Exercise Program Concept (U) Internal USSOCOM TSP Training/Exercises Battlestafff AOs (weekly/monthly training ) ESC/SOSTs (quarterly training) ABLE FOCUS External GCC Battlestaff Training/Exercises Outreach training teams USSOCOM support to GCC exercises (ELLIPSE, event or AOR specific) ABLE FOCUS + (GCC support to USSOCOM internal exercises) JS/OSD and IA Senior Engagement CMX, CT BOD, J2/J3 conferences, OPS DEP, etc. AOR specific/unique event exercises (Commonwealth Games, Olympics, etc.) USG senior leader seminars, support to IA exercises, IA observes DoD exercises ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal Prioritized equivalent exercise as NLE; focused on national CT framework and USG actions Whole of government senior participation (NSC, IA, JS, OSD and GCCs) using real world intelligence Includes SLS series with senior whole of government participation 64

AW National Level Rehearsal *Timeline (U) UNCLASSIFIED APR 10 MAY 10 JUN 10 JUL 10 AUG 10 SEP 10 CMX 11 Observe NC (NLE 10) CMX 10 & ESC event ABLE FOCUS CTER 1 & ESC event GSC EUCOM ELLIPSE OCT 10 NOV 10 DEC 10 JAN 11 FEB 11 MAR 11 GSC ESC event CTER 2 AW National Level Rehearsal CMX: Crisis Management Exercise NLE: National Level Exercise AF: ABLE FOCUS AW: ABLE WARRIOR ESC: Executive Steering Committee *Notes 2X Monthly AO / TSP training events not included Quarterly GCC/JS/OSD/IA outreach events not included UNCLASSIFIED 65

Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsal (CTER) Concept (U) The initial SLS event supporting FY 11 ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal CTER 10 execution window: Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games) JS directed SLS event to ensure full participation Senior DoD and Interagency participation is a requirement JS maintains lead on achieving senior participation (Chairman’s prioritized event) “Real world” threat streams 66

CTER 10 Concept (U) Two day event Participants: OSD/JS, Combatant Commands, NCTC and IA Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal Focus: Global mission analysis based on real world threat streams; rehearse CONPLAN 7520-09 DoD TSP collaboration processes and FRO refinement Level: O6 and below action officers Time: Eight hours Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours) Focus: IA and DoD senior leader CT plans and policy discussions referencing Day 1 analysis, CMX and SLS outputs Level: Principal/Deputies (if available), Undersecretaries, Commanders and Directors Time: Two hours Scenario: TBD based upon participants and scope 67 67 67

Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal CTER 10 Objectives (U) Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal Rehearse Global Disrupt planning and CONPLAN 7520-09 DoD TSP collaboration processes Provide DoD and Interagency senior leadership timely and appropriate analysis of the strategic situation and response options Brief results to USSOCOM J3 Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours) Review Day 2 Global Mission Analysis Brief Review/discuss current authorities, disrupt triggers and the CT Strategic Framework (reference CMX 6 series and AW SLS outputs) Improve TSP procedures within DoD and Interagency to ensure unity of effort during planning, and assist in the refinement of global counter options to inform senior USG decision-making Discuss and provide guidance for the ABLE WARRIOR Nation Level Rehearsal planning effort 68 68 68