Online Learning Update Karl Nelson Director, Digital Learning Dept, OSPI May 9, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools 2011 Legislative Session Summary Report District Advisory Council May 12 th 2011.
Advertisements

Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
WASBO, May 2006OSPI1 Alternative Learning Experiences - Overview of Amended Rules - Martin Mueller,OSPI,
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
Tyler School Solutions Course Setup – Missouri State Reporting A supplement to the District Subjects Overview Quick Sheet Revised 09/18/14.
University of North Carolina General Administration Policy: The Code/Policy Manual Responsible: UNC General Administration University Policy Responsible:
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Mississippi Department of Education Office Of Curriculum and Instruction 1 Curriculum and Instruction Updates Management Information Systems Data Conference.
Alternative Learning Experience Workgroup As you arrive, use a sticky note to write one question/comment or concern you have about ALE.
LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
Michigan High School Graduation Requirements Implications for Curriculum and Instruction April, 2006.
Escambia County School District. Q.1.7 Increase the graduation rate as measured by the Federal Uniform Rate. Year District State % 70.6%
Jennifer Dodd 1/20/15 College Credit Plus. Participating Institutions Ohio Public secondary schools must participate Ohio Private secondary schools may.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
Hannah Frankel High School Articulation Analyst
State Oversight of Online Learning Programs Leslie St. Pierre Manager of Online Providers Digital Learning Department, WA OSPI.
Alternative Non-traditional Education Programs Update 8/18/20151 Jerry Randolph Alternative Education Program and Magnet Schools Office of Education Support.
What Needs to Be in Place for High-Level Learning-- Meeting the Needs of High Potential Students With Appropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices!
[Presentation by] [Date] [INSERT DISTRICT LOGO]. Table of Contents Big Picture: How Does It All Connect? Keystone Exams: The 33% Option Keystone Exams:
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Virtual Education Reporting Presented by: Sally Roberts, Educational Policy Consultant Florida Department of Education 1.
Review of Online Courses and Programs (as requested in SSB 5410) Karl Nelson
Graduation Conversation Doug Kosty Assistant Superintendent, Office of Learning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Cristen McLean Operations.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Providing Options and Opportunities. GaDOE Instructional Technology Goal Improve and continue to develop/implement world class instructional technology.
Cindy Hunt, Government and Legal Affairs Manager Oregon Department of Education.
Virtual Education Reporting Presented by: Sally Roberts, Educational Policy Consultant Florida Department of Education.
Legislative Updates FAMIS Legislative Update Acceleration Options in Public Education - HB 7059 Digital Learning - HB 7063 School Improvement.
Reporting Industry Certifications and Career & Professional Academies Tara Goodman Tara McLarnon Division of Career and Adult Education.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
JLARC Study of Alternative Learning Experience Programs Interim Report February 8, 2005 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee Robert Krell, JLARC.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
Region 6 Fall Meeting Concord, North Carolina November 24, 2014.
Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC) and Personal Curriculum (PC) Update FEBRUARY 6, 2015.
Lewis River Academy Multi-District Provider Status
Berkeley County School District’s Proficiency- based Learning System Dr. Kevin O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent September.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Credit Recovery and Credit Advancement Presentation By Andy Meadows Education Specialist and Robin Nelson Coordinator Instructional Services.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Major Policy Discussion Achieving the Goals of 60x30TX: College Readiness and Dual Credit April 28, 2016 College.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards Westfield Public School District August 23, 2016.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Rules Waived - Part I Pupil Accounting Practices – Part II
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Middle School Acceleration Opportunities
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.
Homeschool and Online Academy Report
Updates on Dual Credit Policies and Processes
Curriculum Development Updates
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
Dr. Larisa Harper Director, College Credit Plus
KEEP2 Debriefing February 4, 2016
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Laurens County Adult Education
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Online Learning Update Karl Nelson Director, Digital Learning Dept, OSPI May 9, 2012

ONLINE LEARNING RULE CHANGES

Recent Changes to WAC Aligns rules with ESHB 2065 – Used definitions from 2065 – “Multidistrict” changes Adjusts approval cycle timing – Old: Applications due Sept. 1 – New: Applications due February 1 (starting 2013) – Why? Easier scheduling Shorter time between cycle and effective date

Recent Changes to WAC New criteria change process: – Draft changes posted Oct. 1 – Feedback due Nov. 1 – Final criteria/process posted by Jan. 1 Removed the “district responsibility” section (.011)

OSPI PROVIDER APPROVAL

Beginning with the school year… …school districts may claim state basic education funding, to the extent otherwise allowed by state law, for students enrolled in online courses or programs only if the online courses or programs are: – Offered by an approved multidistrict online provider; or – Offered by a school district online learning program if the program serves students who reside within the geographic boundaries of the school district, including school district programs in which fewer than ten percent of the program's students reside outside the school district's geographic boundaries; or – Offered by a regional online learning program where courses are jointly developed and offered by two or more school districts or an educational service district through an interdistrict cooperative program agreement.

Beginning with the school year… “…school districts may claim state funding under RCW 8A , to the extent otherwise allowed by state law, for students enrolled in online courses or programs only if the online courses or programs are offered by an online provider approved under RCW 28A by the superintendent of public instruction.” (RCW 28A ) “…alternative learning experience online programs must be offered by an online provider approved by the superintendent of public instruction under RCW 28A to meet the definition in this section.” (RCW 28A )

Does my program need approval? Question 1: Are you offering online courses? An online course is one where: – More than half of the course content is delivered electronically using the internet or other computer-based methods, and – More than half of the teaching is conducted from a remote location through an online course learning management system or other online or electronic tools. Yes:Go to question 2… No: Approval not needed.

Does my program need approval? Question 2: Does your program meet the definition of an “online school program”? An “online school program” is a school or a program that offers: – Online courses (or grade-level coursework) that meet the definition of an “online course,” and – A sequential program – a set of courses or coursework that may be taken in a single school term or throughout the school year in a manner that could provide a full-time basic education program if so desired by the student. Students may enroll in the program as part-time or full-time students. No:Go to question 3… Yes:Program is subject to approval.

Does my program need approval? Question 3: Is it your organization offering the online courses? The organization that “offers” the course is the one that provides all of the following: – the course’s teacher for the purpose of instruction, – the course content, and – the online learning management system. Yes:Organization is subject to approval. No:Organization is not subject to approval.

Who doesn’t need to be approved? District programs using courses “offered” by another approved provider. – The school must not meet the “online school program” definition. – Example: a high school that offers individual courses from an OSPI-approved course provider

Affiliate approval Allow a program to use multiple approved providers. The program must assure OSPI that they will not: – Modify the content or instruction of the approved provider’s offerings, – Offer to its students any online course offerings provided by any non-approved online providers. If an approved provider is rescinded, program must discontinue use of provider. Program can develop courses. Homegrown offerings must go through approval process. Program must still be accredited.

Single district providers… Rule changes to address this coming Summer 2012… Stay tuned…

Spring 2013 Timeline Jan. 1Applications Available Feb. 1Deadline for submission Feb.-JuneInitial review and appeals JuneApproved provider list updated

Providers Approved during Fall 2011 (Blue providers = grandfathered providers) Advanced Academics The American Academy Apex Learning Brigham Young University Independent Studies – Instructor-guided Courses EdisonLearning Federal Way Internet Academy Greenways Academy OASIS Alternative School Spokane Virtual Learning

Providers Approved during Spring 2012 Accelerate Education Everett OnlineHS.net Ignite Education Peninsula Internet Academy Walla Walla HS

Approved Providers digitallearning.k12.wa.us/approval/providers

ANNUAL REPORT

Student and Course Totals 18,649 students took at least 1 online course – ALE annual average headcount: 11,254 Annual average FTE: 8, % non-resident students (headcount) 146 schools reported an online enrollment – 89 districts reported an online enrollment – 60 online school programs in 55 districts

Online Student Demographics Female students slightly over-represented: – 53.0% online compared to 48.2% statewide White students over-represented: – 73.1% online compared to 60.6% statewide Fewer students in special education: – 5.6% online compared to 13.8% statewide Large number of “at-risk” students Large number of part-time homeschooled students: – 5.7% online compared to 0.6% statewide – 93.5% of online PT homeschooled students were enrolled at WAVA Most are K-8 students

Student Grade Level (Headcount)

Online Courses Taken

Assessment Results Online students meet standard at a lower rate than the state average – Reading: 3.3% lower – Writing: 8.6% lower – Science: 15.9% lower – Math (MSP): 19.2% lower – Math (EOC): 22.2% lower

Completion Rate, % of online high school courses were completed 96.8% of non-online high school courses were completed Methodology: – Based on CEDARS grade history data for high school courses only – The completion rate is the percentage of total enrollments where the student was not marked as withdrawn (“W”) or no credit (“NC”), and for which the student received a final grade.

Pass Rates, OnlineNon-Online C- or better57.9%82.9% D or better72.2%91.8% (Based on CEDARS grade history data for high school courses only.)

Grades, 2010–11

Credit Recovery Of students who… – Failed a face-to-face course prior to , and – Took an online course with the same course code in …Two-thirds successfully earned credit in the online course. Caveats – 1,073 students – Course codes were optional prior to

Withdrawal Rates 12 th grade students who took at least 1 online courses in : – 49.6% had successful outcome (graduation, completion of program) – Compare to 69.1% non-online students with same outcome High number of students dropping out or at risk to drop out: – “Still enrolled”, “Unknown”, “Transfer”

Factors? Proficiency-based grading in online courses Inconsistencies in grading policies At-risk students are often drawn to online learning Student selection and support

GETTING STARTED WITH ONLINE LEARNING

A twelve step program…

1. Identify the goals(s) you are seeking to achieve 2. Identify who will have responsibility for developing and overseeing the plan 3. Define the mission and scope of the online learning program 4. Assemble an advisory team of stakeholders 5. Research the requirements for online learning programs 6. Decide the model of online learning to be provided

7. Determine criteria for selecting online courses/provider 8. Select provider of online courses 9. Determine strategies for student support 10. Determine strategies for administrative support 11. Review your Policies and Procedures 12. Plan for evaluation, monitoring, and revision

DLD

We can help… Technical assistance w/ online learning & ALE Model policies and contracts DLD course catalog and registration system – 800+ courses from 11 approved providers – State-wide contract – Streamlined billing and registration – Training and support – Coming soon: teacher data for CEDARS

Q&A