OPEN ACCESS, INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES, SPARC Bülent Karasözen ANKOS 4th. SELL Meeting Napoli, May, 14th, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.
Enlighten: Glasgows Universitys online institutional repository Morag Greig University Library.
SN22: Introduction to Open Access Publishing for Research Administrators and Managers.
Royal Holloway Information Services Welcomes the ICT4D partners December 2007.
Learning Services. edgehill.ac.uk/ls Zoe Clarke and Yvonne Smith The Digital Researcher: Trends in Open Access Publishing.
Electronic Publishing and Open Access
OPEN ACCESS, INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES, SPARC Bülent Karasözen 4th Sell Meeting Napoli, May , 4th Sell Meeting.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
What do we mean by Open Access? Open Access articles are: Universally accessible via the Internet, without subscription barriers Licensed so as to allow.
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
Survival in Uncertain Times Library Materials Costs Exploding Lois Schultz April 22, 2003.
Open Access Journals - The Gold Route to Open Access Francis Jayakanth National Centre for Science Information Indian Institute of Science Bangalore –
C. Tenopir 1 Scholarly Publishing at the Crossroads Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Learn more about Open Access Breakfast meeting at BMC March 30th 2010 Aina Svensson and Karin Meyer Lundén Electronic Publishing Centre, Uppsala University.
1 Electronic Journals What Are You Really Getting ? Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
OPEN ACCESS 101 WHAT EVERY FACULTY, RESEARCHER, AND STUDENT SHOULD KNOW Yuan Li Scholarly Communications Librarian Princeton University Library.
Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.
Highlights from the Open Access Timeline (1) 1971, Project Gutenberg launched on the Internet (originally as an FTP site). There are now 18,000 free books.
Introduction to Open Access Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
1 William Y. Arms Cornell University April 4, 2003 Free Access to Information Today Who Benefits? What are the Risks? Who Pays?
SciX: WP 1. WP1 tasks Literature study Current and future web business models and payment systems Formal process model (as is) Repository and e-journal.
ARMA 6 th June Costs and payment of open access article processing charges.
Open Access to Scholarly Communications Open Access Scholarly Communication Workshop Vilnius, Lithuania February 2005.
Open Access: Resources for All Library Types Heather G. Morrison BC ELN / BCLA Information Policy Committee Beyond Hope Conference, Prince George, B.C.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
EINIRAS 2004 Open Access – The New Internet Enabled Business Model for Scientific Publishing Professor Bo-Christer Björk Swedish School of Economics and.
IST Towards Open Access – which are the barriers to change Bo-Christer Björk Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration Helsinki,
New Crossroads Transitions & Transformations Science Librarians in the 21st Century Mary M. Case University of Illinois at Chicago.
Oliver Bridle RSL Amanda Burls Primary Care Ruth Birth Law Library Sally Rumsey Bodleian Bodley’s “Republic of [Open] Letters” W. Horstmann, A. Ptak- Danchak,
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek WSU Libraries Learning Break December 14, 2006 Issues and Actions and Alphabet Soup.
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS Mary L. Van Allen 21 September 2005 Open Access Journals and citation patterns International Seminar on Open Access for Developing.
Open Access: An Introduction Edward Shreeves Director, Collections and Content Development University of Iowa Libraries
Open Access to Scholarly Communications eIFL Open Access Workshop Poznan, Poland September 21, 2006.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION SPARC EUROPE Scholarly Communication in the 21 st Century –the Impact of New.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION SPARC EUROPE The Next Information Revolution – Can Institutional Repositories.
© 2010 Koninklijke Bibliotheek – National Library of the Netherlands Open Access: Present Pitfalls and Future Scenarios Bas Savenije, Director General.
Open Access Ayesha Abed Library BRAC University October 30, 2011.
Open Access Catherine Boden, Health Sciences Liaison Librarian David Fox, Head of Monographs Presentation to the Musculoskeletal Journal Club College of.
1 SPARC: Partnering for a New Scholarly Communication System ACRL STS Program Chicago, IL July 10, 2000 Julia Blixrud SPARC Assistant.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION SPARC EUROPE The Next Information Revolution – Can Institutional Repositories.
Open Access: The revolution in academic publishing Henry Hagedorn Editor, Journal of Insect Science Department of Entomology and Office of Scholarly Communication.
What is happening 'Free Access' 3. The Position of SPARC Raf Dekeyser.
Digital/Open Access repositories Paul Sheehan Director of Library Services DCU HEAnet National Networking Conference Athlone 11 th November 2005.
Open Access The Lingo, The History, The Basics, and Why Should We Care.
1 Strategies to Change the Nature of Scholarly Communication University of Hawaii 16 December 2003 Honolulu, HI Julia C. Blixrud SPARC.
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Kay Vyhnanek Faculty Senate Library Committee Presentation April 5, 2007 The Ongoing Transformation.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION An initiative of the Association of Research Libraries Gaining Independence through.
Pricing and Paying for Scientific Information during a Period of Transition Madeleine McPherson
Networked Information Resources SPARC, E-prints & Open Access initiatives.
 A Primer for Higher Education in disseminating Management Research Data Arnold Mwanzu Rodney Malesi.
Open Access - an introduction, Aleppo, December Open Access – an introduction Ian Johnson.
Open Access Publishing and the role of the Royal Society of Chemistry Ljubljana, Symposium Open Access and Licensing Options In Academic Libraries 1 st.
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION SPARC EUROPE Two Roads, One Destination: The Interaction of Self Archiving.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Open Access to Scholarly Communications: An Introduction OPEN ACCESS (OA) AND INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY (IR) : NEW MODELS FOR SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Maseru,
Open Access Defined An Introduction by Patti McCall.
Bo-Christer Björk Open Access publishing – a Finnish perspective Prof. Bo-Christer Björk HANKEN chairman of the FinnOA working group.
Overview of Open Access SASLI Open Access Conference Pretoria, South Africa July 2004.
Open Access (OA) : a summary for 2006 Joanne Yeomans CERN Scientific Information Group (Presentation for the CESSID students 12 th May 2006)
Open Access 101: What is open access and how is it changing scholarship? Prepared by Andrew Wesolek, Scholarly Communication Librarian Open Access Week,
Open Access to Scholarly Publications A Brief Introduction.
TRENDS IN E-PUBLISHING
Opening access to quality research materials
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
John Cox Associates Ltd
Presentation transcript:

OPEN ACCESS, INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES, SPARC Bülent Karasözen ANKOS 4th. SELL Meeting Napoli, May, 14th, 2004

Problems with traditional journals Serial crises, gap between the proportion of the literature that libraries can access and the information that researchers need to be effective(D.Prosser) Internet, WEB, digital publishing Birth of consortia, journal bundling, licensing Second ‘serial crises’ : librarians can not cancel under- used journals from the bundle(D. Prosser) ‘Permission crises’: legal and technological barries; copyright, lisensing agreements (P. Suber) Continue to work with sub-optimal solutions

Access from desktop, searching, altering services, reference linking, Crossref Changes in scholary communication, new business models International dissemination and impact of research results, peer review, quality control Functions of journals: registration, certification, awarness,archiving Open Archives Inititaive(OAI) standarts ensures registration, awarness, archiving Peer reviewed Open Access(OA) journals Self archiving in institutional repositories, on author’s WEB pages Changes in Scholary Communication

OA journals Wide distribution, wide impact Increase of the profle of the authors, their institutions No subscription income reqires new financial models Cost associated with the peer review process: –Authors(their institutions) pay the publication charge –Blackwell: $2.400, $Elsevier: , Nature: $ –BioMed Central: $525, Public Library of Science: $1.500 Moving from paying for acess(subscrition) to paying for dissemination

Publishing papers now* Researcher Publisher Reader Subscription/ Pay-per-View Library Agent — Money Flow Information Flow *Helen-Doyle, PLOS, ALA Midwinter, 2004

open access* Researcher Publisher Reader $ Library Information flow Publishing is the final step in a research project *Helen-Doyle, PLOS, ALA Midwinter, 2004

SPARC (The Scholary Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition ) Founded in 1998 by ARL (Association of Research Libraries) Over 200 libraries and consortia are members SPARC Europe founded by LIBER in 2002 Create Change, new systems of scholary communication Declaring independence SPARC’s programs –Alternatives –Leading Edge –Scientific Communities

SPARC’s Publisher Partners Biomedcentral, 59 OA journals, in Italy 6 cancer institutes have a partnership BioOne, aggregation of the bioscience journals Public Library of Science, Plo’s Biology, Medicine Columbia Earthspace Crystal Growth and Design, Organic Letters, ACS Documenta Mathematica Economics Bulletin Project Euclid Journal of Insect Science Journal of Machine Learning Research MIT CogNet Directory of Open Access Journals, supported by OSI, 550 OA journals Indian Academy of Sciences, 11 journals

The Wellcome Trust analysis on the potential cost of publishing* Analysis of publishing, ,646 papers Total funding £1.5 billion Assume papers cost £1500 Costs of publishing represent 1.7% costs of research Open Access and the Competitive Market-Place *Helen-Doyle, PLOS, ALA Midwinter, 2004

Institutional Repositories More than 100 institutional repositories National initiatives: SHERPA in UK, DARE in the Netherlands Eprints.org, Subject specific repositories: Ginsparg’s High Energy Physics electronic repository, arXiv D-Space-MIT CERN Caltech OA search engines OAIster searches through almost electronic items in over 200 repositories Average number of downloads for articles: –ScienceDirect: 28 –BioMedCentral: 2.500

Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities Publish your articles in an open-access journal whenever a suitable one exists today (currently 500, <5%)Publish your articles in an open-access journal whenever a suitable one exists today (currently 500, <5%) andand Publish the rest of your articles in the toll-access journal of your choice (currently 23,500, >95%) and self-archive them in your institutional open-access eprint archives.Publish the rest of your articles in the toll-access journal of your choice (currently 23,500, >95%) and self-archive them in your institutional open-access eprint archives.

Scientific Information Exchange (SciX) ProjectSciX The Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration(HANKEN) A fully operational subject-specific repository Studying the scientific publishing process and the effects of different, alternative business models on the life-cycle costs of the process The model currently contains twenty-two interconnect schemas with sixty-four separate activities Barriers to the introduction of open access publishing models are being investigated Open access would substantially lower a lot of the transaction costs throughout the process (both of publishers, libraries and readers)

A diagram from the Scientific Publishing Life-Cycle Model being developed in the SciX project

A classification of different types of barriers for increased open access publishing and their relative importance Open access Journals Subject- specific repositories Institutional repositories Legal framework-*** IT-infrastructure*** Business models****** Indexing services and standards**-*** Academic reward system***** Marketing and Critical mass********

The most Popular Areas for Open Access Journals Scientific domainNumber of journals Medicine36 Mathematics36 Education27 Law20 Sociology16 Economics16 Computer Science15 History14 Biology12 Information Science11

The Impact of OA Journals Citation Study by ISI 200 OA journals are covered 148 OA journals from natural sciences are analyzed w.r.t Impact Factors The data across all categories is normalized The journals ranking highest by Impact Factor are thus in the highest percentiles OA journals’ ranks in their respective categories vary Does the fact of open access change the pattern of citation? OA journals have similar citation pattern to other journals

Criticism U.K. Parlliaments’s Science and Technology Select Committee’s hearing in its inquiry into scientific publishing on March 1st 2004 STM publisshers, Blackwell, Elsevier, Nature: the cost per article download goes down; five years ago $ 14, in 2003 $3, it is predicted to go down below $2 The Royal Society predicts, if authors pay, extra $3.5 mlllion of funding is needed each year ScienceDirect: OA’s author-pays model risks penalising UK because British researchers produce disproportionately high number of articles every year: UK spends 3.3 % of World’s journal subscritions and produce 5 % of all articles published globally