Education Adjustment Program Verification Current September 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
Advertisements

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Review of Criteria for the EAP Disability Category of Intellectual Impairment (II) 2009 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
The Acronyms of Student Services- I&RS, IEP, and 504
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Faculty and Staff Training: Special Education, ELL, Confidentiality, 504, De-Escalation/Restraint and Homeless Education Sharon Murphy Jones, Administrator.
Disability Access Route to Education Schools Presentation.
Disability Access Route to Education Schools Presentation.
Review of DETA Criteria for Physical Impairment. education adjustment program Department of Education, Training and the Arts Key Issues The working party.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification of Barriers to Learning
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Review of DETA Criteria for Hearing Impairment. education adjustment program Department of Education, Training and the Arts Key issues for the Review.
MARCH 2012 PUBLIC SCHOOLS NSW Module 2: Learning and support teams Every Student, Every School.
Queensland Studies Authority Quality-assurance processes.
Responding to Inspection Findings
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
Education Adjustment Program. Current October 2009 Setting the EAP Context The Education Adjustment Program (EAP) is part of the systemic response to.
Learning projects An overview. Learning projects A learning project allows a learner to design and undertake an independent and unique short program of.
Computing Science CPD Presentation Internal Verification of National 4 and National 5 Units.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
By Christina D. Ghio, Esq. The Law Office of Christina D. Ghio, LLC 1.
February Overview of Procedures Identification / Parent Permission Diagnosis Verification Registration on Database EAP Profile Resource Distribution.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Enrolment in State Primary, Secondary and Special Schools EGPA (2006) Implementation and New Policies and Procedures Workshop – November 2006.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
9/24/15.  The SAT will replace the ACT in Michigan in March of  Today’s 11 th graders will be the first cohort to take the SAT this spring. 
DISABILITY SUPPORT SERVICE PRESENTATION TO PROSPECTIVE MATURE STUDENTS 15 JANUARY 2009 BY ELIZABETH WALSH DISABILITY OFFICER NUIGALWAY.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
 What is special education?  How does a student qualify for services?
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Health and Food Technology CPD Presentation Objectives This presentation will help you to : understand the purpose of Verification prepare for Verification.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
CONTEXT AND RESPONSIBILITIES Special Education. Legislation for the education of children with Special Needs US: Federal legislation (IDEA) Canada: Provincial.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING Review of Criteria for EAP Disability Categories of: Autism Spectrum Disorder Intellectual Impairment and Speech-Language.
Profiles Key Principles. What is a profile? A profile is a snapshot of a child or young person’s best achievements at a given point in time. It is one.
New IEP Process and Product Preschool Special Education Conference Series #3 May 22, 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical.
History CPD Presentation The Verification Process and Making Assessment Decisions.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2009 Review of Criteria for the EAP Disability Category of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING Common Components across the EAP Disability Categories of: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Impairment and Speech-Language.
A Child with Deaf-Blindness ECEA Disability Category, Definition and Eligibility Criteria March 2013.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
NCCD 2016 What do I need to know? What do I need to do?
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Determining Access.
Verification Guidelines for Children with Visual Impairments
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
LO2 - Be Able to Design IT Systems to Meet Business Needs
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Assignment 1 SEPTEMBER 2017.
ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR WORK & LIFE (ESfWL)
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

Education Adjustment Program Verification Current September 2012

Education Adjustment Program The Education Adjustment Program supports schools to: understand and meet their obligations to make reasonable adjustments for students with disability identify students (from Prep-Year 12) who meet criteria for the EAP categories report the education adjustments they are making to meet the teaching and learning needs of these students.

EAP Categories Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Hearing Impairment (HI) Intellectual Impairment (II) Physical Impairment (PI) Speech-Language Impairment (SLI) Vision Impairment (VI)

EAP Process Identification Obtain & record parent permission to start process Diagnosis / Specialist Assessment Verification of Disability Register student on database (AIMS) EAP Profile completed and submitted Validation Step 1 Quality Assurance Points Recognised Specialists Statewide Verifiers Principal authorises accuracy Validation process Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Adjustments

Criteria All EAP categories have two criteria: –Criterion 1 relating to impairment –Criterion 2 relating to activity limitations and participation restrictions for the student at school resulting from the impairment.

EAP Criteria Criterion 1 Impairment + Criterion 2 Activity limitations/ participation restrictions = Disability Adapted from: World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (WHO, 2001)

Disability: ICF Model

Verification Verification is the process of confirming that a diagnosis or specialist assessment and the associated activity limitations and participation restrictions meet DETE criteria for one or more of the six EAP categories.

EAP Criteria The impairment (medical condition or other impairment in structure or function at the level of the body) may be diagnosed or identified by either an authorised specialist external to DETE, or an authorised specialist internal to DETE. Associated activity limitations and participation restrictions in an educational context relate to accessing and participating in the curriculum and life of the school. This is the impact of the impairment in the educational context which requires significant education adjustment.

Identification: Information gathering Education adjustments are made as part of the daily teaching and assessment processes and become more refined as teachers get to know their learner Parents are a key source of information to assist in data-gathering Data-gathering processes need to be in place to check that the education adjustments are targeting barriers to learning.

Consent If it is known or suspected that the difficulties a student is experiencing may be related to a disability, informed parent consent must be recorded using the EAP Consent Form (EAP 1) before progressing through the steps of the EAP. Consent Form (EAP 1)

Criterion 1 Diagnosis or specialist assessment of the impairment is required from the relevant specialists listed for each EAP category. Autism Spectrum Disordera registered paediatrician, psychiatrist or neurologist Hearing Impairmentan audiologist or otolaryngologist (ear, nose and throat specialist) Intellectual Impairmenta guidance officer/psychologist and senior guidance officer Physical Impairmenta registered medical specialist (e.g. paediatrician, neurologist, orthopaedic surgeon, geneticist or rheumatologist) Speech-Language Impairmentan Education Queensland speech-language pathologist Vision Impairmenta registered ophthalmologist or in cases of cerebral vision impairment, a registered paediatrician or neurologist

Criterion 2 Description of activity limitations and participation restrictions is required from members of the school team using all the information gathered. The evidence required varies according to the EAP category. These requirements are outlined in the Education Adjustment Program Handbook and also on the EAP Verification forms for each EAP category. Education Adjustment Program HandbookEAP Verification forms

Criterion 2 Teachers may need to consult with a variety of specialists to identify the most appropriate adjustments available to support a student in: accessing curriculum achieving core-learning outcomes and participating in the life of the school.

Criterion 2 For the purposes of EAP, significant education adjustments: may benefit all/other students, but are essential for the identified student to access and participate in the intended curriculum need to be specific and targeted to address the needs arising from the identified impairment for the individual student include the range, breadth, frequency and complexity of adjustments that are required.

Verification Forms All EAP Verification Forms have 3 sections toEAP Verification Forms be completed: Part A Student Details Part B Evidence supporting Verification of Disability Part C Principal Request for Verification of Disability

Verification Forms The school principal requests verification and in doing so confirms that: processes are in place to support the student within the school all documents for verification are complete parent consent has been documented on the EAP Consent Form (EAP 1) relevant actions have taken place on Adjustment Information Management System (AIMS).Adjustment Information Management System (AIMS) This is documented in PART C of each EAP Verification Form.

Verification Forms The original EAP Verification Forms are kept at the school Copies are sent to: The EAP Verification Team 141 Merton Road Woolloongabba QLD 4102 For verifications in II and SLI, forms and processes must undergo local quality assurance before being sent to the Verification Team

Verification Processes The required documentation is received by the EAP Verification Team and is assigned to the relevant statewide verifier. The statewide verifier considers the information according to the DETE criteria. If the statewide verifier requires any further information, the relevant school or district personnel are contacted.

Verification Decisons The verification decision, as recorded on AIMS, will be either (a) Verified, or (b) Rejected: a) Verified –Request accepted as meeting criteria with no review required. –Request accepted as meeting criteria with review required for Criterion 1 and/or Criterion 2 by a specified date. –Request for removal from an EAP category accepted (verifying an end date on AIMS). b) Rejected –Request not accepted as meeting DETE criteria. –Request for removal from EAP category is not accepted (i.e. the end date is rejected on AIMS).

Review of Verification At the time of verification, the statewide verifier will determine: whether a review is required the criteria to be reviewed (Criterion 1 and Criterion 2 or Criterion 2 only) the review date.

Review of Verification The following are considered when deciding if a review of verification is required: age stage of schooling individual impairment information described activity limitations and participation restrictions.

Further Information EAP Website dex.html