When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Advertisements

SHS HUMANITIES ENGLISH, SOCIAL STUDIES, WORLD LANGUAGES COURSE SELECTION 2013.
Collaborating with Families: Partnering for Success
ESP410 Human Movement Pedagogy 3
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Poster-within-a-poster: Improving Male-female Communication Regarding Sexual Overtures Sarah Frost 1, Carol.
EPS 101 & FYE 101 Northern Arizona University. First Year Seminars... Freshmen Success hinges on:  Developing academic & intellectual competence  Establishing.
Taking Stock Of Measurement. Basics Of Measurement Measurement: Assignment of number to objects or events according to specific rules. Conceptual variables:
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Target Testing What is Target? An academic program Meets once a week Varied and differentiated units and activities Focuses on higher level.
Achieving Your Personal Best in Law School Professor Jeff Minneti Stetson University College of Law 1.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Grades: Their Effects on Students as Measures of Achievement.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Distance Learning through Technology Survey Summer 2002 Survey distributed to all exclusively on-line classes in Summer Survey was also mailed to.
Rubrics YOU can do this!. Rubric Achievement relative to a level of mastery (criteria) is compared  Need to know the criteria ahead of time  Need to.
WELCOME TO THE SESSION OF NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
The Impact of Assessing Technology Competencies of Incoming Teacher Education Students Rachel A. Vannatta Savilla I. Banister Cindy Ross Bowling Green.
. Cooperative Learning: Teamwork for Engineering Classrooms Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota March 1995 IEEE education society/ASEE electrical engineering.
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
6 th semester Course Instructor: Kia Karavas.  What is educational evaluation? Why, what and how can we evaluate? How do we evaluate student learning?
Ismaila Odogba Department of Geography and Geology The Impact of Collaborative Testing on Student Learning in an Introductory Level Geography Course INTRODUCTION.
S Data Ask the person directly about some aspect of personality. Two Examples: 1.Students respond to LOGO II items indicating their own self- perceptions.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Why Do Teachers Need to Know About Assessment? Danielle Lamarre Darcy Church Jason Howard Sarah Fearon.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Union Elementary School “Soaring Above and Beyond”
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Motivational Changes and Teachers Teaching Styles: Self Determination Theory Research Questions Self-Determination Theory: L2 Motivational Self System.
When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University.
AUTHOR Purdue University TITLE High School Students’ beliefs about Assessment in EFL context Hyun Jin Cho Educational Psychology, Purdue University Preliminary.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
Lack of Learning or Lack of Studying? An Inquiry into Low Exam Scores Katherine M. Sauer Metropolitan State College of Denver February.
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
Eli McGlothern Motivation. Sources Elliot Eisner “The Art and Craft of Teaching” 1983 emeritus professor of Art and Education at the Stanford Graduate.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Predicting Undergraduates’ Grades from the Survey of Academic Orientations and from the General Information Scholastic Test Prof. Hall P. Beck.
S&T Student Course Evaluations: Beyond Question 7 – Part 2 Dan Cernusca, Ph.D. Instructional Design Specialist Missouri University of Science and Technology.
Determination of Entrance Exam Scores as a Valid Predictor for Final Grade in BIOL 213 Through Data Visualizations ANGELA K. SHAFFER CDS301 DECEMBER 12,
Jeff Johnston Assistant Director, Center for Teaching Lecturer, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University Meeting the learning.
Undergraduate Students’ Perception of an Online Course in Music Appreciation Herschel V. Beazley Professor of Music (Retired) and Governor’s Teaching Fellow.
2009 Assessment of the Learning Edge Academic Program (LEAP) Tony M. Lentz & Talia Carroll.
Difference between an “A” student and a “C” Student ► They are always prepared for class. They always respond when called on. Their attention to detail.
Validity and Reliability Neither Valid nor Reliable Reliable but not Valid Valid & Reliable Fairly Valid but not very Reliable Think in terms of ‘the purpose.
Is Advanced Placement the right choice for me? North Forsyth High School.
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include:  Report student progress toward.
Learning About Your Motivation, Attitudes, and Interests Effective College Learning Jodi Patrick Holschuh * Sherrie L. Nist.
C+ Pass/Fail A A- 85% F S Unsatisfactory 67% D C B 93%
Grades: Their Effects on Students as Measures of Achievement.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Locus of Control Elenuel T. Genova Ph.D Student. Locus of control  Locus of Control defines the term as a theory in personality psychology referring.
Tone Ishiyama & Hartlaub (2002) Syllabus study Randomly assigned students a punishing or rewarding syllabus. – Punishing: “If for some substantial reason.
Participation in Math Class: The Effect on Student Achievement By: Nicolas Millet.
The Effect of Time Pressure on Cognitive Task Performance -This title was chosen because the study sought to see if time pressure had any effect on how.
Evaluation and Assessment Evaluation is a broad term which involves the systematic way of gathering reliable and relevant information for the purpose.
Survey of Academic Orientation Scores Predict Retention of College Freshmen Hall P. Beck Mary Francis Hill Appalachian State University William D. Davidson.
Competency Based Education Nancy Kusmaul Sarah Leupen Maria Manni Kal Nanes Eileen O’Brien Karen Watkins-Lewis.
Chapter 11 Intelligence “Just Think Mr. Thompson”.
Teaching Undergraduate Statistics without Math
Academic Success Center
Working with Students on Academic Probation: A Hands on Approach
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
Indiana University School of Social Work
Difference between an “A” student and a “C” Student
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Presentation transcript:

When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University of Tennessee at Knoxville Hall P. Beck Appalachian State University

Learning Orientation Items I find the process of learning new material fun. I enjoy classes in which the instructor attempts to relate material to concerns beyond the classroom. I browse the library even when not working on a specific assignment.

Learning Oriented Students Tend To: Display effective study skills. Exhibit above average reasoning skills. Have high levels of self motivation. Possess other positive educational attributes.

Grade Orientation Items I think that without regularly scheduled exams I would not learn and remember very much. I think that grades provide me a good goal to work toward. I try to find out how easy or hard an instructor is before signing up for a course.

Grade Oriented Students Tend To: Be inefficient in their study habits. Find little pleasure in reading. Have below average Scholastic Aptitude Test scores for their university. Receive poor grades.

LOGO F: Learning Orientation Items I think that students should be encouraged to cooperate rather than to compete. I design course assignments that encourage students to read outside my discipline. I encourage students to raise questions in class that are topic related but which also go beyond the scope of the tests which I prepare.

LOGO F: Grade Orientation Items Without regularly scheduled exams most students would not learn the material that I present. I emphasize in my conversations with students the importance of studying to obtain “good grades.” I think that college grades are good predictors of success in later life.

How Not To See

Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius

Purpose: Assess the Positive and Negative Values Attached to Learning and Grade Orientations From Three Perspectives Study 1: Students View Of Their Orientations Study 2: Students View Instructors’ Orientations Study 3: Instructors View Students’ Orientations

Study 1 Objectives To assess the extent that students are dissatisfied with their level of LO. To assess the extent that students are dissatisfied with their level of GO.

Study 1 Method Students indicate on the LOGO II the extent that the items are currently descriptive of them, providing current LO and current GO scores. Same students complete the LOGO II a second time as they would “ideally like to be,” yielding ideal LO and ideal GO scores.

Study 1 Measures Current LO score Ideal LO score Current GO score Ideal GO score

Study 1 Results

Why Are Students Dissatisfied With Their Orientations? Instructors prevent students from achieving their high learning oriented and low grade oriented ideals. Most instructors encourage grade orientation. Most instructors give scant attention to learning orientation.

Study 2 Objectives To determine if most students believe that instructors overly emphasize grade orientation and are unconcerned with promoting learning orientation in their courses.

Study 2 Method Participants 212 Appalachian State undergraduates enrolled in Introductory Psychology sections participated. Materials and Procedure Students completed LOGO II under standard instructions. They then completed the LOGO F twice, indicating how “they believed a typical ASU instructor would respond” and how they “would ideally like their instructors to respond.

Study 2 Methods On LOGO F students indicate how “they believe a typical ASU instructor would respond.” Students answer the LOGO F as they “would ideally like their instructors to respond.”

Study 2 Measures Typical Faculty LO score and Ideal Faculty LO score Typical Faculty GO score and Ideal Faculty GO score

Study 2 Results

Study 3 Objectives To determine if instructors would like for students to be more grade oriented. To test the hypothesis that instructors are unconcerned with promoting learning orientation.

Study 3 Method On LOGO II instructors indicate how “they believe a typical ASU student would respond.” Instructors answer the LOGO II as they “would ideally like their students to respond.”

Study 3 Measures Typical Student LO score and Ideal Student LO score Typical Student GO score and Ideal Student GO score

Study 3 Results

Learning and Grade Orientations From the Students’ Perspective Students are highly dissatisfied with their own orientations. They want to be more learning oriented and less grade oriented. Results of Study 2 are consistent with the premise that students believe instructors pressure them to be more grade oriented and less learning oriented than they desire.

Learning and Grade Orientations From the Instructors’ Perspective Many instructors are dissatisfied with the learning and grade orientations displayed by their students. Instructors want their students to be more learning oriented and less grade oriented.

Why Do Students and Faculty Misjudge One Another: A Lover’s Quarrel? Fundamental Attribution Error Need for Student-Instructor Dialogue Reactance