Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Advertisements

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
David S. Adegboye, PhD Professor of Biology Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & SACS Liaison University Professional Conference August 18,
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
Introducing the Planning Process Dr. Cathy Fleuriet, Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness Dr. Lisa Garza, Director, University.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Faculty/Staff QEP Focus Groups Monday, February 18, 2013.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
Developing Administrative and Educational Support Outcomes and Methods of Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment Beth Wuest.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Moving the Masses: Building a Collective Approach to Outcomes Assessment Beth Wuest, Director Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza, Director.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
San Antonio College SAC SCORES: PROGRAM ASSESSMENT Presented By: Dr. Kris Clark Cynthia Price, M.A Dr. Franc Solis.
Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Using WEAVEonline Jeanne Butler,
What’s New in SACS Reaffirmation Ephraim Schechter September 23, 2004 Western Carolina University.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
Institutional Effectiveness Building on MUSC Excellence.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SACS COC (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges) Overview and Update.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges.
Administrative and Educational Support Outcomes: Reporting Results, Taking Action, and Improving Services Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Planning and SACS Stephen Riter Roy Mathew The University of Texas at El Paso.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Western Carolina University Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Revised 2/19/07 Institutional Review Milestones FIU Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS (Leadership Orientation June 2008) Quality Enhancement Plan.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Quality Enhancement Plan and SACS Reaffirmation
Renewing Commitment to Outcomes Assessment: Practical Means to Attaining University-wide Participation Dr. Beth Wuest, Director Academic Assessment and.
Welcome! Session Recording
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Accreditation follow-up report
Presentation transcript:

Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment

Workshop Goals To become more knowledgeable about the assessment of learning outcomes including appropriate methods of assessment more aware of the value of outcomes assessment competent at collecting and reporting the results of student learning outcomes adept at identifying and implementing appropriate action plans to improve student learning familiar with the website for the reporting of outcomes and outcomes assessment

Background In Spring of 2006 All academic programs submitted 5 to 8 learning outcomes with two methods of assessment for each outcome Workshops were conducted to provide faculty with a working knowledge to develop outcomes and to select appropriate methods of assessment

Background In Fall of 2006 A series of workshops were conducted to provide a working knowledge to select and develop appropriate methods of assessment Academic programs implemented initiatives for achieving their learning outcomes

“Just as diagnosis without treatment is not very helpful to a sick patient, assessment without analysis and action can do little for an institution.” -- Braskamp, 1989

Expectations In Spring of 2007 Academic programs are expected to report the results of each of their assessment methods an action plan for each outcome based on their assessment results Chairs and Deans will approve learning outcomes assessment results and action plans

Expectations In Academic Year 2007 – 2008 Programs will revise and submit student learning outcomes implement action plans for improving student learning continue with assessment activities submit assessment results and action plan

Linkages to Other University Assessment Academic Program Review (APR) Department, College and University strategic planning Program and University accreditation Program-specific accreditation University-wide accreditation by SACS

SACS Influence Focus of SACS reaffirmation is on outcomes Changes in process from previous reaffirmation cycles Outcomes Driven Compliance Report and Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Review by off-campus team Follow-up visit by on-campus review team

SACS Influence 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs (including student learning outcomes for educational programs) and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results. (Institutional effectiveness)

Outcomes and Methods Outcomes What are outcomes? Why are outcomes important? Methods Why multiple methods? Why the emphasis on direct methods?

Results Relate to Methods Address Outcomes Provide Indicators for Improvement Demonstrate student success

Results Process Collecting Data Quantitative vs. qualitative Sampling Analyzing Data Maintaining Data

Action Plan Purpose Lead to continuous improvement Enhance effectiveness of program Provide for efficiency use of resources Aid in promotional efforts

What ifs… What if our outcomes aren’t as clear as we would like them to be? What if our methods of assessment aren’t as clear as we would like them to be? What if we failed to collect the appropriate data? What if our methods of assessment don’t really work? What if our results don’t really tell us anything?

Outcomes Assessment Website The Outcomes Assessment Website serves as a university-wide repository for academic, educational-support, and administrative outcomes.

Outcomes Assessment Website Access Organization Use How to enter outcomes and methods How to enter results and action plan How to view plans and results

Review of Outcomes Assessment Internal Assessment Committee Chairs Deans External by SACS Reviewers Off-site review On-site questioning to verify process and improvement

Re-cap of Process Identify/Revise Outcomes Select/Revise Methods of Assessment Develop/Revise Curriculum and Instruction Assess Student Learning Create & Implement Action Plan Define/Revise Mission & Goals

questions and comments

For assistance, contact… Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment 150 JCK Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment 1080 JCK