SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.

Advertisements

Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.

PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…

Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka (University of Tokyo) page 1 11 Sep 2007.

MC fake muon Mar. 12, 2008 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University) 1.

Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.

Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.

ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.

Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.

Some D0 Meeting November 2003 Muon Isolation Studies Ken Johns University of Arizona.

Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.

Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,

1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.

22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.

Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 

Generation of Radiative B-Decays Decay Channels Bs  Phi + Gamma Bd  K * + Gamma Gareth Brown, RAL PPD5/10/06 Thanks to, Bill, John, Monica and Julie.

Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.

Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.

March 13, 2002 Daniel Whiteson L3 tracking - muons! Daniel Whiteson LBL.

Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.

25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.

Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.

28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.

Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.

K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE Giuseppe Lo Re INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy, March 2002.

Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura.

Tracking Variable Study Follow up Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma.

A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.

Moore/MUID validation with The MOORE group.

Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.

Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.

C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |

Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.

Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.

Use of the D0 Central Preshower in Electron Identification John Gardner University of Kansas APS April 6, 2003.

 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.

VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu

Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.

Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.

Eff. determination WANG Zheng Mar Feb.2008WANG Zheng2 The method  Eff. Determined from MC sample.  Eff. Determined from data. Object id/efficiency:

Status of GMSB photons analysis Shilei Zang Bernadette Heyburn, Uriel Nauenberg University of Colorado, Boulder SUSYBSM WG3/WG4.

1 Review BDT developments Migrate to version 12, AOD BDT for W , Z  AS group.

Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.

Feb. 4,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)

Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction

Modified HEEP ID for Z’ SUSY Search

Study of Gamma+Jets production

Arana Lecce group.

Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees

Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs

Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec

Tracking Variable Study

 discrimination with converted photons

Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification

Samples and MC Selection

Feb. 25,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)

K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment

Presentation transcript:

SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction

Gen Muons from SUSY particle decay REC Muons frpm not SUSY particle decay REC Muons BAD matching (DR > 0.1) with a GEN Muon REC Muons not matching with a GEN Muon Eta Phi

Pt Gen Muons from SUSY particle decay REC Muons frpm not SUSY particle decay REC Muons BAD matching (DR > 0.1) with a GEN Muon REC Muons not matching with a GEN Muon

Gen Muons from SUSY particle decay REC Muons frpm not SUSY particle decay REC Muons BAD matching (DR > 0.1) with a GEN Muon REC Muons not matching with a GEN Muon Et Isol Cone 0.45 Et Isol Cone 0.1

Gen Muons from SUSY particle decay REC Muons frpm not SUSY particle decay REC Muons BAD matching (DR > 0.1) with a GEN Muon REC Muons not matching with a GEN Muon x-y distance of closest approach

Fake ratio = # (BAD + NOLINK) / # RECONSTRUCTED Eff = # (GOOD REC Muons) / # GEN Muons NO cuts EtIsol(0.1)<40 GeV EtIsol(0.1)<20 GeV EtIsol(0.1)<10 GeV EtIsol(0.1)<5 GeV Muons from SUSY particle decay in SU1 sample Muons from not SUSY particle decay in SU1 sample Muons in JET SAMPLES (J1-J8)

A0 < 0.4 A0 < 0.2 A0 < 0.1 A0 < 0.05 No Cuts A0 < 0.4 A0 < 0.2 A0 < 0.1 A0 < 0.05 No Cuts Muons from SUSY particle decay in SU1 sample Muons from not SUSY particle decay in SU1 sample Muons in JET SAMPLES (J1-J8)

Reconstructed Muon Efficiency Eta Phi Inefficiency

GEN Muons GEN Muons not double counted REC Muons REC Muons Best Chi2 MS-ID Match REC Muons GEN Muons

Reconstructed Muon Efficiency Vs EtaReconstructed Muon Efficiency Vs Phi Tot

Reconstructed Muon Efficiency Vs Phi Barrel Reconstructed Muon Efficiency Vs Phi Endcap

ALL GEN Opposite Sign Muons ALL REC Opposite Sign Muons GEN Muons decaying just from SUSY particles End-points: GeV (L) GeV (R)

GEN Muons decaying just from SUSY particles -- ZOOM End-points: GeV (L) GeV (R)

Pt Resolution

Missing Et GEN Missing Et REC Missing Et (Final = All contributions are taken into account)

SUM Et GEN SUM Et REC SUM Et

PHI Missing Et GEN PHI Missing Et REC PHI Missing Et

N Rec Jets N Thruth Jets

GEN ETA JETS in SU1 REC ETA JETS in SU1 Efficiency JETS Reconstruction Vs ETA in SU1

Pt TRUTH Jets Pt REC Jets

Et Jets Resolution

DR distribution Jet MC-REC Matching

is the sum of the four jets more energetics plus missing et (without cuts in jets pt)

is the sum of the four jets more energetics plus missing et (by requiring at least a jet with pt >100 GeV and three jets with pt > 50 GeV)

Jet Samples (J1-J8)

ALL REC Muons ALL REC Muons matching with a GEN Muon (no cut in DR) REC Muons matching with a GEN Muon & DR<0.1 REC Jets

ALL REC Muons ALL REC Muons matching with a GEN Muon (no cut in DR) REC Muons matching with a GEN Muon & DR<0.1 REC Jets