Using Data to Improve Adult Ed Programs Administrators’ Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Outcomes At the end of the training session, participants will have an in-depth knowledge of state and local student accountability standards, understand.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Bridging Project Vermont Reads Institute at UVM. Consultants  Nancy Woods, Coordinator  Pam Chomsky-Higgins  Sue Biggam  Loralyn LeBlanc  Gayle Moskowitz.
Using Data to Improve Schools One child at a time……….. The Educator’s Role Pamela M. Kastner National Board Certified Teacher.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
MED  Problem of the Day: SEND +MORE MONEY.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Data-Driven Change: Tools to Improve Campus-wide Retention Derek Price, DVP-PRAXIS LTD Vincent Tinto, Syracuse University/Pell Institute for the Study.
McLendon and Polis1 An Administrator’s Guide to Assessment: A Menu of Assessment Options for MAERS and Instructional Guidance.
Supporting K-12 Mathematics Intervention Presenter: Jameson Rienick, Mathematics Project Specialist
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Timberlane Regional School District
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Katie McDermott. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers The Maryland Technology Consortium has developed Maryland Teacher Technology Standards,
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MID YEAR REPORT SCHOOL YEAR.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 INSERT.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Using Effective Performance Evaluation Practices in Support of Continuous Improvement.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
Empowering a Learning Community Transforming Our Adult Education World NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Goals: Empower a professional.
Implementation and Management of Using ICT for Learning and Teaching LE ANH PHUONG Hue University of Education, Vietnam.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Data Team Experience
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Workshop for Literacy Correctional Education Week 1.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Using Data to Improve Adult Ed Programs Administrators’ Workshop

Workshop Objectives Participants will be able to understand the data- driven decision making process. Participants will be able to identify what types of data can be collected. Participants will be able to identify what data reports are most useful to teachers and administrators. Participants will be able to identify what major barriers hinder the data collection process. Participants will be able to analyze data report examples.

What is Data-Driven Decision Making? Data-driven decision making is the process of making choices based on appropriate analysis of relevant information.

Why use data to make decisions? More access to better information enables educational professionals to test their assumptions, identify needs, and measure outcomes. Administrators and teachers are using data-driven decision making to: provide more individualized instruction to students track professional development resources identify successful instructional strategies better allocate scarce resources communicate better with parents and the community.

What data should we collect and use to make decisions? There is an abundance of information stored. Examples are: student records student assessment human resources student progress special education curriculum management.

What data reports are most useful to instructors?  TABE or CASAS test results for entire class  Student attendance information  Teacher developed test results for entire class  Progress reporting information for class  Student retention information for class  Student performance gains (LCP/OCP) for class

What data reports are most useful to administrators?  TABE or CASAS test results for program area  Student attendance information for all programs  Progress reporting information for all programs  Student retention information for programs/school site  Student performance gains (LCP/OCP) for programs and for school  Cost effectiveness of program (Income versus cost of salaries, fringe, supplies, equipment)

Administrators use all types of data: attendance enrollment student performance (LCP’s, OCP’s) student/teacher/parent satisfaction surveys. Test results are used to assess progress, allocate resources, and create school improvement plans. Information is organized numerically rather than alphabetically. The information includes objective descriptions of data, visual displays of information, and query tools. What common data report formats are most useful to administrators?

What are the major barriers to using data based decision-making? Lack of training Interoperability—systems that are unable to share or exchange data Lack of understanding of what to do with the data Absence of clear priorities on what data should be collected Failure to collect data in a uniform manner Outdated technology systems Low quality data – inaccurate or incomplete Timing of data collection

What are the major misconceptions about effective use of data in decision making? Build it and they will use it. Teachers need to know how to analyze data and use query systems. Test scores determine the quality of a school and the student’s education.

What is necessary for the systematic use of data for decision making? Collection, integration and dissemination of data Analysis and reporting of data Process and procedures for acting on the data Review Analysis Planning

Schools need both organizational and individual capacity for improvement: Leadership Professional development. Administrators need training with the opportunity to apply skills learned using their own institutional data. Dialogue with peers keeps the process going. School-based training for faculty and staff is necessary. Instructors need training in different instructional strategies to apply when the data shows that traditional methods are not working. What types of skills are needed to implement systemic data processes?

Who are the key decision makers at the school site who should be involved in the data-driven decision making process?  Administrators are the change agents at the school site.  Administrators model data use and encourage it by sharing the benefits and successes.  Site-based specialists or support teams assist administrators and teachers with data mining and analysis.

Who are the key decision-makers at the classroom level who should be involved? In addition to using data for determining instruction, teachers can engage students in the decision making process by helping them: view appropriate reports; set learning goals; make decisions about how to meet their goals.

Where do we begin? The process: Develop a leadership team Collect various types of data Analyze data patterns Generate hypotheses Develop goal-setting guidelines Design specific strategies Define evaluation criteria Make the commitment

What information does our institution need to make decisions that will improve student achievement? What learning strengths and weaknesses are evident in the data? Which groups or subgroups of students are having difficulty learning? What instructional changes might improve student learning? What professional development is need to improve student learning? What materials and equipment are needed to support changes in instruction?

Example 1 – Making decisions based on data A school examines its student performance results and finds: As a whole, the school is doing better in reading than in math Students are doing better in basic computation than in problem solving As a subgroup, Hispanic male students perform the lowest on grades and tests at most grade levels

Example 1- continued Using this information, the school improvement team decides to find the following: An instructional intervention that specifically addresses basic math computation Interventions that have been especially effective in improving the performance of Hispanic male students

Example 1 - continued Professional development is planned to provide instruction on the new intervention: Staff development days are planned for teachers to learn the new intervention before it is implemented. Regular short meetings are planned to give teachers time to discuss their efforts and troubleshoot problems while implementation occurs in the classroom.

Example 2: FCAT Classes NameCourseDaysLCP Earned Credit Earned Pre- Class Score Post- Class Score GradeESELEP MariaIntensive Reading T/R BNo MaribelIntensive Reading T/R BNoYes KasieIntensive Reading T/R AYesNo ElysiaIntensive Reading T/R BNo EricIntensive Reading T/R BNoYes ThordisIntensive Reading T/R ANoYes Totals/ Average

Example 3 – Budget Data Across Sites SiteFee Support Enrolled FS Percent Enrolled 9-12 Enrolled 9-12 Percent Enrolled Grades 30/31 Enrolled Grades 30/31 Percent Enrolled Total Enrollment BudgetCost per Student ACE %29125%71562%1,145 $619,537 $541 ACE 2 889%32233%56758% 977 $682,826 $698 ACE %36044$32740% 821 $481,238 $586 ACE 4 122%16627%43871% 616 $460,099 $746 ACE %18124%38751% 760 $619,698 $815 Totals/ AVG 56513%1,32031%2,43456%4,319 $2,863,398 $677

Example 4 – Co-Enrolled Completion/Retention Semester II Course TitleEnrollmentLCP’s EarnedStudents with no LCP’s Percent Completing Percent Not Retained to Completion English I %33% English II 85363%37% English III 92722%78% English IV %88% Totals/ Averages %67%

Data Review Other types of information teachers may want to review: Student records with demographic data (LEP, ESE, grade level completed, courses taken, GPA) FCAT scores TABE scores Other test records

More Data Review Administrators may collect and analyze other reports: Class attendance School surveys – satisfaction or quality surveys Individual program/class surveys of satisfaction or delivery of services Student exit surveys W-26 reports (high school students withdrawing to attend postsecondary programs)

Let’s Review the DATA! Using the handouts provided, break into small groups and discuss the data presented on each handout following directions provided. What assumptions can be made about the data presented? Did the data serve to confirm ideas you had already pondered? What other types of data could you collect about your program(s)?

References/Links Data-Based Decision Making – Resources for Educators. Deve4060 D3M: Helping schools distill data. ysis.html The Toolbelt: A collection of data-driven decision-making tools for educators.