Jurisdiction Marine Pollution International Fishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Maritime Law Enforcement. 2 INTRODUCTION Naval Forces as economic & effective law enforcement units Risk of Excessive Use of Force Avoided by –law enforcement.
Advertisements

Dr Douglas Guilfoyle Faculty of Laws, University College London
MANAGEMENT OF THE UK MARINE AREA: THE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONTEXT Robin Churchill, University of Dundee.
The Law: Current legal regime regulating the laying and protection of submarine cables and its implementation Vladimir Jares Division for Ocean Affairs.
Institute of Marine & Environmental Law University of Cape Town
THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION BY SEA AND THE RIGHT OF INNOCENT PASSAGE: Deficiencies - Deadlocks of the Existing Framework In Ensuring Coastal.
POLICING AFRICA’S SEABORDERS Henri Fouche Tshwane University of Technology.
Law of the Sea: Navigating Boundaries Idaho State Bar Int. Law Section Anastasia Telesetsky.
Port Reception Facilities Curtis A Roach Regional Adviser (Caribbean) International Maritime Organization FIRST HEMISPHERIC CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL.
1 A&BS in Relation to Marine Genetic Resources Prof. Dr. Alexander Proelß hydrothermal systems.
Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution. Developments in the International Legal Framework.
Maritime security in the context of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Presentation to AU Commission Meeting of Experts on Maritime.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 24
The Law of the Sea, p.179ff follow along with 1982 UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) (entered into force 1994). Note: The Deep Sea.
1 Law of the Sea: Navigation & Overflight Rights.
Jurisdiction Over Vessels   Nationality of Vessels   Problem of Registration of Convenience or lack of registration.   All states have the right.
“The Untouchables” Organised Crime in International Waters Admiralty and Maritime Law Seminar.
16 SEPTEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS.
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
Global Marine ProgrammeThe World Conservation Union Proactive environmental planning for emerging shipping routes in Arctic waters Julian Roberts Programme.
BASIC OCEANS TOPIC BACKGROUND Rich Edwards Baylor University National Policy Topic Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially.
MARPOL 73/78 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 thereto. Technical regulations.
MR MAWETHU VILANA ACTING DIRECTOR-GENERAL 29 JULY 2014 MR MAWETHU VILANA ACTING DIRECTOR-GENERAL 29 JULY 2014 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
Molly Lachlan and Adam. Principals of International Environmental Law States may not allow their territory to be used in a way that is prejudicial to.
Particularly Sea-Sensitive Areas and Marine Protection Zones. A Controversial Issue that needs Interpretation Dr. Aristotelis B. Alexopoulos BCA College.
IMPACTS AND CONCERNS Dr K Sumser-Lupson Capt. J Titahena
“Safety in the North”, Alta August 2010 Svalbard’s Maritime Zones The (lack of) jurisdiction of Norway over foreign maritime activities in the waters.
 Arctic Sunrise incident (2013)  Eco-protesting by Greenpeace International: since 2010 Greenpeace is conducting a campaign ‘Save the Arctic’ aimed.
By Wan Mariam Wan Abdullah Marine Pollution. Introduction by man, directly or indirectly of substances or energy into the marine environment (including.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 27 International legal framework for environmental maritime crime: UNCLOS, IMO and MARPOL.
1 GOOD GOVERNANCE Today, we will discuss: what good governance means in the environmental enforcement context; creative enforcement measures which contribute.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche UniSalento Room R 27 Judicial Training and research on EU crimes against environment and maritime pollution.
UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNCLOS I: 1958, Geneva, Switzerland UNCLOS II: 1960, Geneva, Switzerland UNCLOS III: 1973, New York.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005.
Ole Kr. Fauchald Characteristics of the marine environment n The character of the marine environment as an ”open access resource” ä The resulting.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC SERVICES 13 FEBRUARY 2008 BY NOSIPO SOBEKWA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF.
INTERTANKO ATHENS TANKER EVENT THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Jonathan Hare Skuld Colin de la Rue Ince & Co April 2005.
Panagiotis Sergis * The Protection of Offshore Energy Installations under the Law of the Sea and the SUA Protocol.
Assessing the Impact of Ballast Water Guidelines, Technologies and State Awareness on the Shipping Industry Tim Wilkins: Ballast Water Management, London.
Political Boundaries Ms. Patten UNCLOS III United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea  Opened for signature December 10, 1982 in Jamaica 
MARITIME DELIMITATION. 33 Territorial waters: internal waters territorial sea Zones that a coastal nation having sovereign rights: contiguous zone exclusive.
COMNAVMETOCCOM-COUNSEL 1 LAW OF THE SEA ROB YOUNG, COUNSEL.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
By Julia Skyhar. -Draft year: International treaty -Goal: to establish a legal order for the seas and oceans which will facilitate international.
South China Sea Fishing Disputes 2/15/2016.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 8: Sewage and Garbage.
Law of the Sea. Resources - Mineral Resources - Oil - Gas - Fish - Renewable Energies Environment - Pollution - Dumping - Special Protected Areas Transport.
The Law of The Sea. Doctrines  Res nullius: Freedom of the sea, all countries may lay claim on territories of the open sea  Grotius: No ocean can be.
Law of the Sea Kanwal Naqvi. Also called the Law of the Sea Convention or the Law of the Sea treaty, it is the international agreement that resulted from.
International Strait EEZ, Continental Shelf & Delimitation of EEZ / Continental Shelf.
Dabney P. Hegg Senior Professional Staff U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
9th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law – South Africa Nengye LIU, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Ghent University Prevention.
10.1 AUSTRALIA’S PLACE IN THE WORLD. EEZ: Exclusive Economic Zone Australia has the third largest EEZ in the world A nautical mile is.
What to Expect in the Maritime Policy in the 111th Congress
MARPOL.
Trends in Arctic Governance
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
Managing the world’s oceans
33CFR158 COA.
Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC)
MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION
Law of the Sea.
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
12/04 Bellringer +5 sentences
Characteristics of the marine environment
Regulating ship waste from a European perspective
A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT
Presentation transcript:

Jurisdiction Marine Pollution International Fishing

Why the Oceans Matter 70% of the earth is covered in seas – Food source – Pollution assimilation – especially CO2 – Shipping and transportation We know very little about the oceans

Jurisdiction Background principle – Freedom of the seas Historically = free passage/ free fishing “tragedy of the commons” – Customary limitation: territorial seas 3 miles from coast “cannon shot rule”

Jurisdiction Continental shelf – After World War II – United States asserted jurisdiction over natural resources and seabed of contiguous continental shelf – Other countries followed Creeping jurisdiction + increasing disputes – UN Conference on the Law of the Sea 1958

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – 1982 signed – 1994 entered into force – (but many elements were already customary law by then!)

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Ports – Territorial Seas – Contiguous Seas – Exclusive Economic Zones – High seas

Jurisdiction

UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Ports = internal waters Full national authority (with limited exceptions)

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Territorial Seas = baseline to 12 nautical miles Baseline = coast/harbor walls – Subject to dispute Coastal state authority – = almost complete authority – Subject to right of innocent passage

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Contiguous Seas = 12 to 24 nautical miles “Limited” coastal authority Except – Customs – Fiscal – Immigration – Sanitary legislation and regulations

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Exclusive Economic Zones = Cover 30% of seas, 90% of commercial fisheries, and almost all minerals Coastal states have sovereign right to explore, exploit, conserve and manage natural resources – May pass laws exercising these rights – May board, inspect and arrest crews on ships violating the laws

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Exclusive Economic Zones = Coastal states shall ensure the conservation and utilization of their living marine resources States shall take measures to prevent and reduce pollution States shall avoid activities under their jurisdiction that cause damage to other States and their environments

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Exclusive Economic Zones = But, in preventing pollution in their own jurisdiction, States shall avoid interfering with activities carried out by other States in their exercise of their rights

Jurisdiction

UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – Territorial v. EEZ jurisdiction – tension Coastal state has regulatory jurisdiction over all sources of pollution in its territorial waters In EEZ, pollution regulations must comport with generally accepted international standards – typically based on technical standards set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Ship could be in compliance with IMO standards in EEZ, but violate State standards once in territorial waters

Jurisdiction UNCLOS – Jurisdiction – High seas – beyond 200 nautical miles No national jurisdiction

Jurisdiction Innocent passage – All jurisdictional zones are subject to “innocent passage”= transit passage of vessels on the sea

Jurisdiction Innocent passage – Qualifications Innocent passage does not protect – Any act of wilful and serious pollution in contravention of international law or – Any fishing activities Coastal state may adopt laws limiting right in regard to conservation of living marine resources, preservation of environment, and control/reduction of pollution – But not based on design, construction, crew or equipment, unless based on international standards

Jurisdiction Coastal states v. flag states – Coastal states = countries with actual coastal territory Have jurisdiction over ships when ships are in their territorial seas – Flag states = countries that license vessels to operate Have jurisdiction over ships that fly their flags Does not matter who owns the ship or what the nationality of the crew is – only relevant thing is the flag May create problems if dealing with “flags of convenience”

Oil Pollution

Oil pollution Oil pollution = most pervasive problem – 3,200 tankers per day – Huge: largest supertanker = 600,000 tons of oil Line of fuel trucks 320 kilometers long

Oil Pollution: The Notorious Spills Amoco Cadiz

Oil Pollution: Operational Discharges If oil and ballast tanks are the same, emptying tanks will discharge oil – 0.4% of total cargo = 400 tons per voyage

Oil Pollution: Operational Discharges

Oil pollution impacts Impacts vary depending on type of oil – Different chemical compounds – Natural seeps are different from refined oils Bacteria eat oil from natural seeps – Location, species, depth, etc., all matter

Oil Pollution Early Treaties International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of Sea by Oil (OILPOL) – First – no discharges within 50 miles of coast – Then – no discharges unless Proceeding en route Discharge = less than 1/15,000 of capacity Rate = less than 60 liters per mile Distance = more than 50 miles from land – Neither worked

Oil Pollution Treaty: MARPOL 73/78 Covers operational discharges, spills, and unintentional releases

MARPOL 73/78 General requirements – States will establish international rules and standards – “flag states” shall adopt laws for the prevention and reduction of pollution from vessels flying their flags – Coastal states may adopt regulations to prevent pollution May apply them to vessels during innocent passage, so long as they don’t hinder innocent passage

Oil pollution MARPOL – 3 elements – Mandatory discharge standards – Construction, design, equipment, and manning specifications (CDEM) – Navigation standards

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – 3 elements – Mandatory discharge standards = limits on discharges Operating procedures for washing tanks and ballast water Port States must provide reception facilities

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – 3 elements – Construction, design, equipment, and manning specifications (CDEM) New ships must have segregated ballast tanks Other requirements for filters New ships need double hulls

Design Standards: Example

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – 3 elements – Navigation standards in special areas Special areas – oceanographical/ecological condition – Need special protection and standards – Examples: Mediterranean Sea, Baltic Sea, Black Sea, Red Sea, Gulf – No discharge allowed

Does MARPOL 73/78 work?

MARPOL 73/73 MARPOL – Compliance – Specific tanker standards – Reporting and documentation requirements

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Specific tanker standards Tankers > 150 tons Ships > 400 tons Must get International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate – shows that ship meets technical standards Surveys at least every 5 years + intermediate inspection IOPPs issued by international classification societies – Not States – Is this good or bad?

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Specific tanker standards If ship doesn’t meet applicable standards and ship owner/operator does not take corrective action, IOPP withdrawn and Port state notified

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Reporting and documentation requirements Oil Record Book – Records every ballasting/discharge – Loading of oil – Transfer of oil – Etc.

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Certification societies Private companies Often have different standards What risks? – Pseudo-IOPPs

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Oil book and self-reporting What risks? What opportunities?

MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL – Compliance – Oil book and self-reporting What risks? – Would you report every time you drove over the speed limit? What opportunities? – Passengers – garbage discharges – Crew – “magic pipes”

MARPOL 73/78 – “Magic Pipe”

Oil Pollution: Sources of Spills

Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states Flag states – Vessel is part of a flag state’s territory or nationality – Flag states can enforce against flagged vessel’s violations Except coastal state authority is more powerful in territorial seas

Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states Coastal states – May use territorial authority to enforce against flagged vessels in their territorial seas, so long as they don’t infringe on innocent passage

Oil pollution enforcement: flag states v. coastal states Port states – Jurisdiction based on presence of vessel in port Port v. Coastal: – Coastal state jurisdiction – if pollution occurs in coastal waters, state acts as coastal state – If the only connection is based on ship’s presence, then state acts as port state

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL IOPP certificates – Port state may inspect to verify a valid IOPP exists – Port state may detain ship until ship can proceed to sea without presenting unreasonable threat of harm to marine environment if clear grounds for believing ship doesn’t conform to IOPP or that IOPP is not valid, Clear grounds for believing master or crew is not familiar with procedures – If ship doesn’t have IOPP, ok to inspect

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Coastal states may detain and institute legal proceedings if ships violate rules and cause “major damage or threat of major damage” – If violation happens in territorial waters, coastal state may enforce – Otherwise, coastal state must pass along findings to flag State for enforcement Except: history of non-enforcement

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Flag states – If violation alleged, flag state may Find vessel not guilty No action b/c insufficient evidence No action for “other and unspecified reason” Give a warning Levy a fine Take other unspecified actions

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Flag states – Enforcement by Flag state preempts coastal or port State, except: If discharge caused major damage to coastal State If flag State has a history of non-enforcement

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Flags of Convenience – Ship owners often register vessels in countries known for weak enforcement – 30% of world’s shipping carried by ships operating under Liberia or Panama flags Can employ foreign crews for cheap wages Corporate laws allow anonymity = prosecution is difficult

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Flags of convenience – remedies? – Port state inspections + detention until repairs made – Port states may enforce violations outside of the EEZs – i.e., on the high seas Coastal states may enforce for violations within EEZs

Oil pollution enforcement: MARPOL Flags of convenience – remedies? – Limits on detention May detain ship to inspect and enforce But may not “unduly detain”