on behalf of the BAT for HFrEF Study Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenter Disclosure Information
Advertisements

Long Distance Titration of Heart Failure Medications by Telephone Calls Anne E. Steckler, RN, Heba Wassif, MD, Kalkidan Bishu, MD, Gardar Sigurdsson, MD,
Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions.
Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.
Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions.
Update on PARADIGM-HF Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial John J.V.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides SEISMIC Trial The Safetyand Effects of Implanted (Autologous) Skeletal Myoblasts (MyoCell)
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Heart rate reduction with ivabradine and health related quality of life in.
Corlanor® - Ivabradine
Preliminary results from the C-Pulse OPTIONS HF European Multicenter Post-Market Study Holger Hotz, CardioCentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Antonia Schulz,
Between May 2013 and June 2014, we implanted the C-Pulse device in 7 male and 1 female patients with a mean age ± SD of 61.1 ± 9.4 years. Four had ischemic.
ICD FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION EVIDENCE REVIEW
Prognostic Value of Programmed Electrical Stimulation Among Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients Real-World Data from the Israeli National.
Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2004 Presented by Dr. Gust H. Bardy SCD-HeFTSCD-HeFT.
May 23rd, 2012 Hot topics from the Heart Failure Congress in Belgrade.
Mr. J is a 70 year old man with an ischemic cardiomyopathy who presents with class III CHF and significant dissatisfaction with his functional capacity.
Heart Failure Ben Starnes MD FACC Interventional Cardiology
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
SIGN CHD In Scotland in the year ending 31 March 2006 over 10,300 patients died from CHD and 5,800 from cerebrovascular disease, with.
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Assessment.
May 2005 EP Show The EP Show COMPANION and CARE-HF Eric Prystowsky MD Director, Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory St Vincent Hospital Indianapolis,
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Objective, design and baseline Swedberg.
Specialized Atrial Fibrillation Clinic reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation Jeroen ML Hendriks, MSc Robert.
Presenter Disclosure Information John F. Beshai, MD RethinQ Trial Results Disclosures Information: The following relationships exist related to this presentation:
1 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 European Society of Cardiology Congress 2012 Munich,
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
Target Study Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for advanced heart failure symptoms, impaired LV systolic function, and.
1 Chronic Treatment of Resistant Hypertension with an Implantable Medical Device: Interim 3 Year Results of Two Studies of the Rheos ® Hypertension System.
Entresto® (sacubitril & valsartan)
RALES: Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Purpose To determine whether the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone reduces mortality in patients with.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with severe chronic systolic.
SMMART-HF Surgery vs. Medical Treatment Alone for Patients with Significant MitrAl RegurgitaTion & Non-Ischemic Congestive Heart Failure Duke Heart Failure.
The Studies of Oral Enoximone Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure ESSENTIALESSENTIAL Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Congress 2005 Presented.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine T rial Michel Komajda and Karl Swedberg on behalf of the Investigators.
Influence of background treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on ivabradine's effects in patients with chronic heart failure Systolic Heart.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
Embargoed Until 3:45 p.m. ET, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2015
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
Eric J Robinson, M.D. Cardiologist April 25, 2015
Effect of Spironolactone on Diastolic Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction Effect of Spironolactone.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
The STAR Study. Cardiovascular Disease Antihypertensives The STAR Study Stent Placement in Patients with Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis and Impaired.
  Aldosterone Targeted NeuroHormonal CombinEd with Natriuresis TherApy – Heart Failure Trial ATHENA-HF Trial Javed Butler, M.D., M.P.H, M.B.A. On behalf.
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
Update on PARADIGM-HF Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial John J.V.
Effect of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition on Exercise
David M Kaye MD, PhD on behalf of the REDUCE LAP HF Investigators
These slides highlight a presentation at the Late Breaking Trial Session of the American College of Cardiology 52nd Annual Scientific Sessions in Chicago,
Revascularization in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction:
Update on PARADIGM-HF Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial John J.V.
Baroreflex activatie therapie
CVRx Baroreflex Activation Therapy:
O’Connor Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training as a Treatment Modality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Results of A Randomized Controlled.
ATHENA Trial Presented at Heart Rhythm 2008 in San Francisco, USA
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
INOVATE-HF Trial design: Patients with heart failure (HF) were randomized to device implant for vagus nerve stimulation (n = 436) versus optimal medical.
Surgical Experience and Long-term Results of Baroreflex Activation Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction  Fred A. Weaver, MD, William.
BAT for HFrEF Trial design: Patients with chronic systolic HF were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) or control.
Embargoed until 10:45 a.m. CT/11:45 a.m. ET Sunday, Nov. 11, 2018
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure:
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Surgical Experience and Long-term Results of Baroreflex Activation Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction  Fred A. Weaver, MD, William.
Presentation transcript:

on behalf of the BAT for HFrEF Study Group Baroreflex Activation Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure with a Reduced Ejection Fraction William Abraham, MD1, Michael Zile, MD2, Fred Weaver, MD3, Christian Butter, MD4, Anique Ducharme, MD5, Marcel Halbach, MD6, Didier Klug, MD7, Eric Lovett, PhD8, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen, MD9, Jill Schafer, MS10, Michele Senni, MD11, Vijay Swarup, MD12, Rolf Wachter, MD13, William Little, MD14; on behalf of the BAT for HFrEF Study Group 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; 3Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; 4Department of Cardiology, Immanuel Heart Center Bernau - Medical School Brandenburg, Bernau, Germany; 5Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 6Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 7Department of Cardiology A, University Hospital, Lille, France; 8Department of Research, CVRx, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 9Department of Medicine #, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany; 10Department of Statistics, NAMSA, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 11Cardiovascular Department, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; 12Department of Electrophysiology, Arizona Heart Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; 13Clinic for Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Göttingen and German Cardiovascular Research Center (DZHK), Göttingen, Germany; 14Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Background Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity contribute to heart failure symptoms and disease progression Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) results in centrally mediated reduction of sympathetic outflow and increased parasympathetic activity Preliminary observations suggest that BAT improves clinical status and outcomes in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)1 1Gronda E, et al. Eur J Heart Fail 2014; 16:977-983.

Integrated Autonomic Nervous System Response The Baroreflex as a Therapeutic Target Integrated Autonomic Nervous System Response Inhibits Sympathetic Activity Enhances Parasympathetic Activity Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation ↓ HR ↓ Remodeling ↑ Vasodilation ↓ Elevated BP ↑ Diuresis ↓ Renin secretion 3

BAT for HFrEF: Study Objective and Design Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CVRx neoTM Baroreflex Activation Therapy System in subjects with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction Design: Multi-national, prospective, randomized controlled trial Subjects randomized 1:1 to receive BAT plus optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone Enrollment in the US, Germany, Italy, France and Canada

BAT for HFrEF: Key Enrollment Criteria NYHA Functional Class III Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% Six-minute hall walk distance 150 - 400 m On stable optimal medical therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline assessment No restriction on QRS, concomitant devices*, or AF * ≥ 6 months of CRT therapy in patients with CRT

BAT for HFrEF: Trial Oversight Details Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Full review every 6 months Heart Failure Steering Committee Biweekly meetings Independent Clinical Monitors 100% source verification Clinical Events Committee Hospitalization adjudication Independent Biostatistician All statistical analyses Adverse Event Committee Adverse event adjudication

BAT for HFrEF: Subject Disposition Randomized 146 BAT 76 Med Mgmt 70 Activated 71 Withdrawn 5 “Activated” 69 Death 1 To receive a randomization assignment, the intended date of BAT initiation was identified as the “activation date” The activation date determined the schedule for all follow-up visits for both Med Mgmt and BAT group

BAT for HFrEF: Baseline Demographics Variable BAT (n=71) Med Mgmt (n=69) Race: Caucasian 82% 90% Gender: Female 13% 16% NYHA: Class III 99% 100% Age (years) 64 ± 11 66 ± 12 SBP (mmHg) 115 ± 18 119 ± 17 DBP (mmHg) 72 ± 11 73 ± 11 HR (bpm) 75 ± 12 LVEF (%) 24 ± 7 25 ± 7 eGFR (mL/min) 58 ± 21 59 ± 19 NT-pro BNP (pg/mL)* 1422 [455, 4559] 1172 [548, 2558] 6 Minute Hall Walk (m) 297 ± 79 308 ± 85 MN Living with HF QOL† 51 ± 21 43 ± 22 Number of Meds 4.8 ± 1.6 4.4 ± 1.9 Coronary Artery Disease 66% 68% History of Atrial Fibrillation 45% 44% Chronic Kidney Disease 34% 25% HF hospitalizations prior 6 Mo (days/pt/year) 7.0 ± 21 2.4 ± 9 *Median [IQR] †p≤0.05 between groups

BAT for HFrEF: Baseline Medications Variable BAT (n=71) Med Mgmt (n=69) Number of Meds 4.8 4.4 ACE/ARB 80% 81% Beta-Blocker 87% 85% Calcium Channel Blocker 6% 9% Digitalis 21% 10% Diuretic† 93% 78% Ivabradine 4% 2% MRA 59% 50% CRT 34% 30% ICD 89% 86% †p≤0.05 between groups

BAT for HFrEF: Primary Safety Endpoint System- or Procedure-Related Major Adverse Neurological or Cardiovascular Events (MANCE) at 6 months 97% Event-Free Rate 71 Subjects Implanted 2 Pocket hematomas (1 and 7 days from implant)

Other System- or Procedure-Related Complications No death, stroke, or cranial nerve injury All but one* occurred within 7 days of implant and recovered with no residual effect: General Surgical 2 Urinary retention / urinary tract infection 1 Pneumothorax due to improper subcutaneous needle placement 1 Cervical Neuralgia* Cardiovascular (All events began during or within 24 hours of implant) 2 Non-sustained atrial arrhythmias 1 Transient bradycardia 1 Transient hypotension 1 Transient worsening heart failure

BAT for HFrEF: Other Safety Observations BAT does not cause hypotension in patients with advanced heart failure No reports of symptomatic hypotension SBP significantly increased in BAT group; DBP unchanged BAT is compatible with co-existing cardiac rhythm management devices

BAT for HFrEF: Efficacy Endpoints Change from baseline to 6 months in New York Heart Association Functional Class Rank Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Quality of Life Score Six-Minute Hall Walk (6-MHW) Distance Serum Biomarker (NT-proBNP) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Hospitalizations (Days) for Worsening Heart Failure* *Baseline defined as 6 months prior to enrollment

BAT Significantly Improves NYHA Class

BAT Significantly Improves Quality of Life Score

BAT Significantly Improves 6-MHW Distance

BAT Significantly Reduces NT-proBNP Levels Non-parametric (median [IQR])

Effect of BAT on LV Ejection Fraction

Effect of BAT on Number of Hospitalization Days for Heart Failure Global Randomized Clinical Trial – HF Hospitalization Effect of BAT on Number of Hospitalization Days for Heart Failure Variable BAT (n=57) Med Mgmt (n=50) Difference Mean ± SE HF Hospitalization Days per Year 6 Months Pre-Enrollment 6.95 ± 20.7 2.40 ± 8.6 4.55 ± 34 6 Months Post Enrollment 0.67 ± 2.5 2.48 ± 7.4 -1.82* ± 1 Change from Pre to Post -6.28** ± 2.7 0.08 ± 1.7 -6.36** ± 3 Negative Binomial 6M Post 0.38 2.10 82% RR†* *p≤0.10; **p≤0.05 †RR – Relative Reduction adjusted for 6 months Pre-Enrollment Heart Failure Hospitalizations (Negative Binomial Model)

Concordance of Results Support BAT Efficacy in HFrEF Difference p value Favors NYHA (% impoved) 31 < 0.01 BAT MLWHF QoL Score (points) 20 <0.001 6-MHW Distance (m) 58 <0.01 NT-proBNP (pg/ml)* 342 0.02 LVEF (absolute %) 2.5 0.15 Hospitalization Days for Worsening HF (days/pt/yr) 6.4 0.05 * Median

BAT for HFrEF: Summary Baroreflex Activation Therapy is safe in HFrEF patients No system- or procedure-related deaths Few and short-lived complications; complication rate comparable to established HF device therapies No hypotension BAT significantly improves NYHA Class, quality of life score, exercise capacity, NT-proBNP, and possibly the burden of heart failure hospitalizations If these observations are confirmed in a larger study, BAT may offer a new addition for the treatment of advanced HFrEF patients

Baroreflex Activation Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure with a Reduced Ejection Fraction Manuscript online today at JACC Heart Failure http://heartfailure.onlinejacc.org