For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review & Update of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Advertisements

Urban Low Impact Development English + Associates Owner Architect Construction EcoServices Storm-water Tank Contractor General Contractor T&T Construction.
Construction of Facilities Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting Construction Workshop, May 2, 2012.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Soils Well-designed systems capture sediment near the entrances Sediment loads vary by facility Regular visual checks are the key City of Portland Environmental.
Making Bioretention Work Sustainability for all the places between the buildings.
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6 th Edition.
What’s New in the Fifth Edition Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
UW LID Workshop Permeable Pavement Modeling June 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.
LID Site Design and Drainage Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Where are the regulations going? Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
 Development replaces permeable desert with impermeable roofs and pavement  Increases peak and total stormwater discharge  Classical approach: large.
Low Impact Development for Stormwater Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management in California Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Stormwater Management
Bioretention Design Getting the Details Right. Coordination of Plans Curb elevations, grade breaks, architectural plans consistent with delineation of.
Why and How; What’s Working and What Isn’t.  How Low Impact Development can mitigate effects of urban drainage  Applying design criteria for bioretention.
UVM-AWRA CHARRETTE: designing an alternative stormwater treatment technique W h a t I s a C h a r r e t t e? A Charrette is a cross-disciplinary workshop.
C.3 in MRP 2.0 What to Expect (as of March 17, 2015) Dan Cloak.
 An adequate drainage system for the removal of surface and subsurface water is vital for the safety of aircraft and for the long service life of the.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 16
Implementing MRP Provision C.3 Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
6 th Edition CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012.
Inspecting Construction of Bioretention Facilities Carlton Thompson and Jeff Cowling.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual Public Workshop Design Elements for BMPs January 19, 2011.
To Meet NPDES Retention and Hydromodification Management Requirements Tom Dalziel Program Manager, Contra Costa Clean Water Program Dan Cloak Dan Cloak.
Bioretention Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Design of Infiltration Practices
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
Vegetated Filters Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
Dan Cloak, P.E. 18 September 2007 to achieve water quality benefits in Contra Costa County Implementing Low Impact Development.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 11. Storm Water Runoff Storm water runoff is the precipitation which seeps into the ground if precipitation occurs faster.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
The Green Corridor Project
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
For Bioretention Facilities Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Hydrograph Modification Management in Contra Costa County Dan Cloak, P.E. Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Low Impact Development for Compliance with NPDES Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management Requirements in Contra Costa County Tom Dalziel, Assistant.
For Bioretention Facilities Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Low Impact Development [presenters name] [presentation date] Integrated Management Practices Controlling Stormwater Quality and Quantity using.
Post-Construction Requirements Design Challenges Dan Cloak, P.E.
Sizing Stormwater Control Facilities to Address Stream-Bank Erosion Control Anthony M. Dubin, PE Brown and Caldwell Anthony M. Dubin,
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
ASCE LID Conference LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington November 17, 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
 Holds water in the landscape so it infiltrates (drain) into the ground.
Analyzing a Development Site for Low Impact Development design.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
~ Respecting Water ~ Innovative Water Conservation and Management on the San Francisco State University Campus Presented by: Phil Evans Director, Campus.
Dubin Environmental Consulting Santa Barbara County Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator Introduction and Instructions (Beta Test Version) 12/13/2013.
City of Clarksville Storm Water Management Manual Revisions 2014.
SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION VAULTS: PUTTIN’ WATER IN IT’S PLACE OBJECTIVES Water Flow In Vaults STRENGTH ANALYSIS SEDIMENTATION AND INFILTRATION SLOPE FUNCTION.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Modeling Low Impact Development Techniques and Detention Basins in SWMM CEE 6/5460 David Rosenberg.
Central Coast Region Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator
Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Central Coast Region Stormwater Control Measure Sizing Calculator
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
MIDS Calculator Use - Intermediate
What we have developed is…
Presentation transcript:

For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program

 Principles for LID Site Design  Drainage Management Areas Delineation Definition Self-treating and Self-retaining DMAs DMAs draining to Integrated Management Practices  IMP Selection and Design  Setting up Calculations Using the IMP Calculator

Paved or Roof Area

 Mimic natural hydrology  Disperse runoff  Keep drainage areas small  Don’t concentrate runoff  Don’t allow run-on from landscaped or natural areas

DMA 1 DMA 2 DMA 3DMA 4

Landscaped Natural Paved DMA-5 DMA-7 DMA-6 DMA-8

Landscaped Natural Paved DMA-5 DMA-7 DMA-6 DMA-8 Possible IMP Locations Municipal Storm Drain

 DMA-8 Self-treating? Self-retaining? Drain to IMP?

 Self-Treating Drain directly to storm drain system  Self-Retaining Retain first inch of rainfall without producing runoff  Drain to IMP Use runoff factor to account for contribution Best choice may depend on slope and relative elevation

Use a curb to avoid run-on from self-treating areas Grade self-retaining areas to drain inward. Set any area drains to pond 3"-4" Consider that adjacent roofs or paved areas could drain to self- retaining areas (not to exceed 1:1) To storm drain

Option to combine DMAs if they have identical runoff factors (for example, roofs and paving) and drainage is routed to the same location. Carefully follow grade breaks and roof ridges to delineate DMAs

 Consistency with grading, paving, and architectural plans Some municipalities require the stormwater compliance exhibit be drawn over a screen of the grading plan  Sufficient head to ensure drainage across the DMA and from the DMA to the receiving IMP  Follow-through in final design and during construction

 Integrated Management Practices  Bioretention facilities Applicable to most sites  Flow-through planters Bioretention without infiltration Use on elevated plazas and near foundations  Dry wells and infiltration basins Good solution where soils are highly permeable  Cisterns and vaults Used in combination with bioretention

 Treatment only Sized to 4% of equivalent impervious area Design to ensure entire treatment area is flooded prior to overflow Class 2 perm layer provides some storage Underdrain discharges directly to storm drain A 18"

 Treatment + Flow Control A, V 1 and V 2 12" surface depth and 18" deep gravel layer Design flexibility if same volumes are achieved Orifice limits maximum underdrain discharge Page 50

Native soil, no compaction. Rip to loosen. Class 2 perm (Assume 40% porosity for calculation of V 2 ) Min. 12“ or as needed to achieve V 2 Min. 18“ Specified soil mix 3" max. mulch if specified in landscape plans Min. 6" or as needed to achieve V 1 Curb cut (or curb inlet if needed to ensure runoff capture) 4" min. dia. SDR 35 or equiv. sweep bend and cleanout min. 2" above overflow level 4 " min. dia. SDR 35 or equiv., perforations facing down Top of Gravel Layer TGL Bottom of Gravel Layer BGL Top of Soil Layer TSL Overflow structure 24" min x 36" min. concrete drop inlet or manhole with frame and atrium or beehive grate, ¼ “ openings Schedule 80 (no perforations) seal penetration with grout Male threaded pipe end with cap center- drilled to specified orifice dia. (Omit cap for treatment- only facilities.) 24" 6" To storm drain or approved discharge point Notes: No liner, no filter fabric, no landscape cloth. Maintain BGL. TGL, TSL throughout facility area at elevations to be specified in plan. Class 2 perm layer may extend below and underneath drop inlet. Preferred elevation of perforated pipe underdrain is near top of gravel layer. See Appendix B for soil mix specification, planting and irrigation guidance. See Chapter 4 for factors and equations used to calculate V 1, V 2, and orifice diameter. Install all plantings to maintain TSL at or below specified elevation Cobbles or splash block Adjacent pavement Moisture barrier if needed to protect pavement or structures Bioretention Facility Cross-section Not to Scale Large diameter closed perforated pipes or arches may augment storage to achieve V 2 Walls as needed to establish constant rim elevation around perimeter of facility Page 76

 Treatment + Flow Control A and V Page 85

Page 92

A V A V Page 89

Landscaped Natural Paved DMA-5 DMA-7 DMA-6 DMA-8 Possible IMP Locations Municipal Storm Drain

Landscaped Natural Paved DMA-4 DMA-5 DMA-6 DMA-8 Possible IMP Locations Municipal Storm Drain 1300 SF 1050 SF 4000 SF 5570 SF 7025 SF 9350 SF

Landscaped Natural Paved DMA-5 DMA-7 DMA-6 DMA-8 Possible IMP Locations Municipal Storm Drain 1300 SF 1050 SF 4000 SF 5570 SF 7025 SF 9350 SF

 Self-retaining Area  Area Draining to Self-retaining Area DMA NameSquare Feet DMA DMASquare Feet SurfaceRunoff Factor Receiving DMA Receiving Area DMA-11300Roof1.0DMA-89350

 Areas Draining to IMPs DMAAreaSurfac e Runoff Factor Area  Runoff Factor Soil Type DMA-21050Roof D DMA-41300Roof DMA-77025Paved IMP Sizing Factor Rain Adjust Factor Min Area or Volume Proposed Area or Volume A V1 V2 Orifice Size:

 Areas Draining to IMPs DMAAreaSurfaceRunoff Factor Area x Runoff Factor Soil Type DMA-21050Roof D DMA-41300Roof DMA-77025Paved IMP Sizing Factor Rain Adjust Factor Min Area or Volume Proposed Area or Volume A V V Orifice Size:

IMP SF Natural Paved DMA-5 DMA-7 DMA-6 DMA-8 Municipal Storm Drain 1300 SF 1050 SF 4000 SF 5570 SF 7025 SF 9350 SF

 Areas Draining to IMPs DMAAreaSurfaceRunoff Factor Area x Runoff Factor Soil Type DMA-21050Roof D DMA-41300Roof DMA-77025Paved IMP Sizing Factor Rain Adjust Factor Min Area or Volume Proposed Area or Volume A V V Orifice Size:0.6 in.

A = 1400 SF V 1 = 400 CF V 2 = 475 CF 475/0.4 = 1188 CF Gravel 3.4 in 10.2 in