Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Cheryl Anne Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars, Portland.
Preparing Grant Applications
(from 2003 workshop presentation on NSF funding mechanisms & proposal strategies)
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Securing Wellcome Trust Funding as an Established Researcher
Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.
Min Du Department of Animal Science How to develop a successful grant proposal.
How to write a research proposal (I) Yu-sun Chang Ext 5131 March 23, 2011.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Iron County Grant Writing Workshop August 20, 2003 By: Will Andresen Iron County UW-Extension.
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 29 Writing Proposals to Generate Evidence.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
A 40 Year Perspective Dr. Frank Scioli NSF-Retired.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
Career Development Applications: Perspectives from a Reviewer Christine Grella, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs CALDAR Summer Institute.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Cecelia McNamara Spitznas, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars,
Grant writing Ken Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
New Investigator and Early Career Grant Opportunities Dan Hoyt.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
National Science Foundation. Seeking Doctoral Dissertation Support from the National Science Foundation: Do’s and Don’ts Program Officer Political Science.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS: TOP 10 REVIEWER CONCERNS AND GOOD/BAD GRANTS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian,
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
WHERE TO FIND FUNDING FOR YOUR CLINICAL OR BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH PROJECT Scott D. Gitlin, M.D., F.A.C.P. American Society of Hematology December 6, 2003.
Selection and Formulation of Research Problem DR NORIZA MOHD JAMAL DEPT OF MANAGEMENT, FPPSM.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
Office of Extramural Programs GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Rebekah S. Rasooly, Ph.D. NIDDK/NIH.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Grant Writing for Success
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Why and When to Write a Grant. Karen E
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Identifying Programs and Contacting Program Directors
Grant Writing Information Session
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
R15 Academic Research Enhancement Awards (AREA) for PUIs: A mini-R01 Funding Research with Undergraduates Not at a PUI? Check out the analogous Research.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
Presentation transcript:

Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)

R01:Research Project Grant Program R03:Small Grant Program R15:Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R21:Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award R34:Clinical Trial Planning Grant Program NIH Research Project Grants (R series)

Used to support a discrete, specified, circumscribed research project NIH's most commonly used grant program All ICs support this program The research project grant program where early-stage investigator (ESI) status is considered during review Current parent FOA: PA R01 Basics

No specific dollar limit unless specified in the FOA Advance permission required if you request $500K or more (direct costs) in any year May request up to 5 years of support; generally awarded for 3-5 years R01 Basics—Budget and Award Duration

Your most important contact…Contact us early…and often! We can provide technical assistance ■ during application preparation ■ after review ■ after your award is made Tip 1: Identify a NIH Program Officer

Crafting a strong application will take more time than you anticipate, especially if this is your first NIH application. ■ Start early enough that you’ll have time to solicit feedback and revise before the deadline Organize ■ NIH information ■ Identify the appropriate funding announcement ■ Read the application guide (SF424R&R) ■ Read the FOA ■ Information from your institution ■ Gather your questions and get answers from trusted individuals Tip 2: Get Started…Well in Advance

Get Started: NIH Funding Information

Identify gap(s) in the field—a careful literature search can help Use NIH RePORTER ■ Identify funded NIH grants in your area ■ Identify ICs supporting related research ■ Assess if your topic area is already well-supported by an IC Draft a statement of long-term and short-term goals Formulate draft Specific Aims Clearly relate each Aim and experiment to your overall goal Tip 3: Develop your R01 Concept

NIH RePORT

Develop a compelling story line—make your research accessible Seek feedback ■ Good fit for an NIH Institute’s priorities? ■ Contact PO with draft Aims and current BioSketch and request an appointment to discuss your Aims ■ Contact us early enough that you’ll have time to revise in response to feedback ■ Interesting idea? ■ Novel idea? ■ Focused? ■ Feasible? ■ Preliminary data? ■ Realistic for time requested (not overly ambitious)? Tip 4: Combine Creativity with Pragmatism

Tip 5: Experimental Design Justify your proposed design and document its rigor ■ Provide a strong rationale for the design & independent variables chosen ■ Some Institutes have tailored guidance on their websites ■ Have you included all appropriate control groups? Will the experiments, as designed, test your hypothesis? Will the data be interpretable? Discuss limitations, possible pitfalls, alternative strategies Discuss expected/alternative outcomes and interpretations of your data

Tip 6: Less is Often More In a single application, over-ambition can diminish reviewer enthusiasm. ■ Focus your experimental plan. ■ Develop a tight set of essential studies. Develop one (or at most 2) high-quality applications at one time. ■ Submitting more applications doesn’t necessarily lead to greater success.

Tip 7: Keep the Funding Criteria in Mind Scientific Merit: impact score/percentile Program Relevance: is the project related to the mission of the funding Institute? Program Balance: are many similar projects already funded? Availability of Funds: does the funding Institute have sufficient resources at the time to make an award?

Tip 8: Some Do’s and Don’ts Do not submit prematurely or hastily. Don’t assume reviewers will know what you mean…be clear. Follow instructions and be detail-oriented. Be a “reviewer” of your own application. Get a fresh perspective (in-house critiques) well in advance of the deadline. Over-stated disease relevance can dampen enthusiasm-don’t oversell. Write clearly and cogently…clarity of presentation is important!

Tip 9: Last Words There are many urban myths; separate truth from myth by asking questions of appropriate individuals. Initiate a dialog with the most appropriate Program Officer. Be persistent. Be resilient…there will be bumps in the road. Contact NIH staff with questions.