Flexible AC Transmission Systems: Placement, Control, and Interaction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Committee Representatives Annual Report December, 2012
Advertisements

Interline Unified Power Quality Conditioner
Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) Overview and Applications
Professor Sung-Yeul Park
GREDOR - GREDOR - Gestion des Réseaux Electriques de Distribution Ouverts aux Renouvelables Real-time control: the last safety net Journée de présentation.
1 July 2001 SMES Modeling and Simulation Benchmarking Paulo F.Ribeiro Calvin College / BWX Technologies, Inc.
Campus da FEUP Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto Portugal T F © 2009 Decentralised Energy Systems.
NAA MULTILEVEL INVERTERS (MLI)  Main feature  Ability to reduce the voltage stress on each power device due to the utilization of multiple.
NSF Workshop, Washington DC, Nov 2003_ R Harley 1 Summary of EPRI-NSF Workshop held in Playacar, Mexico, April 2002, on GLOBAL DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF.
Application of Power Electronics
Presented by: Bikram Choudhury Regd. No. : Department of Electrical And Electronics Engineering FACTS Devices For Smart Grid 2 July 2015.
A Presentation On….. 1.
Per Unit Representation Load Flow Analysis Power System Stability Power Factor Improvement Ashfaq Hussain.
Flexible AC Transmission Systems 台灣科技大學電機系 楊宗銘. What is FACTS? The FACTS technology is a collection of controllers, which can be applied individually.
KING FAHAD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLUEM & MINERALS DEPARTMENT OF ELECICAL ENGINEERING EE-306 PROJECT REACTIVE POWR PREPARE BY Yasre Ahmed Saleh ID#
Power Quality Improvement of Distributed Generation Integrated Network with Unified Power Quality Conditioner Supervised by Malabika Basu Michael Conlon.
High Voltage Power Electronics Technologies for Integrating Renewable Resources into the Grid RenewElec Workshop Carnegie Mellon University October 22,
Power Converter Systems
Flexible AC Transmission System Overview
Master in Advanced Power Electrical Engineering © Copyright 2005 Techno-economic aspects of power systems Ronnie Belmans Dirk Van Hertem Stijn Cole.
The SEC Power Forum Wolfgang Braun CEO Energy Transmission Middle East, SIEMENS Session IV: Opportunities in Transmission & Distribution Related Industries.
Year 2006 Report “Better” Managed and Controlled Transmission Grids using Advanced Technological Concepts Aty Edris EPRI Power Delivery & Markets
THE TRES AMIGAS SUPERSTATION Southwest Renewable Energy Conference Santa Fe, NMSeptember 16 th 2010 UNITING THE NATION’S ELECTRIC POWER GRID.
POWER FACTOR CORRECTION
Connection of Wind Farms to Weak AC Network Marian Piekutowski Hydro Tasmania, Australia 30 May 2013.
THE TRES AMIGAS SUPERSTATION IIEA - Dublin October 8, 2010 UNITING THE NATION’S ELECTRIC POWER GRID.
1 The Tres Amigas SuperStation VLPGO November 2011.
Optimization for Operation of Power Systems with Performance Guarantee
THYRISTOR BASED FACTS CONTROLLER
23/04/2017 TITRE PRESENTATION 1.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Dynamic Response of Distributed Generators in a Hybrid Microgrid
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Smart Grid Protection in China Wu Guopei Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau Guangdong Power Grid, China.
September 25, 2012 Planning Working Group - PLWG Sub-Synchronous Resonance Protection & Mitigation John Adams Principal Engineer.
SLIDE 1 ISSUES AND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES WITH CONNECTION OF WIND FARMS TO WEAK AC NETWORKS June 2013 PRESENTED BY BABAK BADRZADEH.
THE TRES AMIGAS SUPERSTATION ABB Western Utility Executive Conference September 28, 2010 UNITING THE NATION’S ELECTRIC POWER GRID.
Review of Series Compensation
A common 400 Hz AC Power Supply Distribution System for CMS FEE. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab. F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
UNIT-VIII COMBINED COMPENSATORS
UNIT-VII Static Series Compensators
Natural Faults Mariesa Crow & Bruce McMillin
TECHNICAL PAPER ON SIMULTANEOUS AC-DC POWER TRANSMISSION
Power Quality By Using FACTS. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHAT IS FACTS? FOR WHAT PURPOSE FACTS ARE USED? BASIC TYPES OF FACTS CONTROLLERS BENEFITS OF UTILISING.
Overview OF MULTI Mega Watt WIND TURBINES and wind parks
CLOSED LOOP SPEED CONTROL OF DC MOTOR WITH PWM TECHNIQUE
1 PEBB-based Power Electronic Systems to Support MVDC Studies Herbert L. Ginn III, Mississippi State University.
RECENT TRENDS IN POWER SYSTEMS
1 The Tres Amigas SuperStation Low Carbon Summit October 22, 2011.
Utilize Distributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC) to Compensate Unbalanced 3-phase Currents in Transmissions Systems By UNDER THE GUIDENCE OF.
EMERGING FACTS CONTROLLERS
Unified Power Flow Controller
Flexible AC Transmission FACTS-Technology and Novel Control Strategies For Power System Stability Enhancement Mohamed Shawky ElMoursi Supervisor Prof.
 The common type of wind power generators are squirrel cage induction generator (SCIG),doubly fed induction generator (DFIG)  For more secure and.
Auto Transformer Current Flow. Principles of Auto Transformers H X H0/X0.
1 3 Earths will be required by 2050.
A Project Review On POWER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN GRID USING STATECOM
Energy Storage Systems For Advanced Power Applications
I. CVETKOVIC, D. BOROYEVICH, R. BURGOS, C. LI, P. MATTAVELLI
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
Overview of Flexible AC Transmission Systems
IG BASED WINDFARMS USING STATCOM
M.KARTHIK (10F41D4307) Under the esteemed guidance of
Series Connected Controllers
Wen Cai Supervisor: Dr. Babak Fahimi December 04, 2015
Transmission Solutions
Five level diode clapmed inverter
APPLICATIONS Reference: Textbook-Chapter 6,8 & 9 'Power Electronics',C
A Symmetrical Hybrid Power Flow Controller
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
Presentation transcript:

Flexible AC Transmission Systems: Placement, Control, and Interaction Mariesa L. Crow University of Missouri-Rolla EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Flexible AC Transmission Systems Alternating current transmission systems incorporating power electronics-based and other static controllers to enhance controllability and increase power transfer capability EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

“Without fundamental research in this area, very little use will be made with full confidence of the real opportunities offered by FACTS devices. For the time being we only have limited examples, entirely based on simulation, which demonstrate that fast regulation of reactive compensation on a transmission grid could be very useful in the future. Because of this, there may exist an immediate danger of uncoordinated system-wide fast regulation via FACTS devices which could become detrimental to system integrity under certain operating conditions.” Marija Ilic, “Fundamental engineering problems and opportunities in operating power transmission grids of the future” Int'l Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 207-214, June 1995. EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Constraints on Useable Transmission Capacity Dynamic: Transient and dynamic stability Subsynchronous oscillations Dynamic overvoltages and undervoltages Voltage collapse Frequency collapse EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Static: Uneven power flow Excess reactive power flows Voltage capability Thermal capability EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

FACTS Controllers Static VAR Compensator - SVC Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator - TCSC Thyristor Controlled Phase Angle Regulator - TCPAR Static Synchronous Compensator - StatCom Solid State Series Compensator - SSSC Unified Power Flow Controller - UPFC EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

SVC EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator (TCSC) EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

StatCom shunt device lower rated components since only carry a fraction of the line current impacts bus voltage and reactive power support EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

SSSC series device must have higher rated transformer and devices impacts active power flow EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

UPFC combination of StatCom and SSSC may control voltage, impedance, and angle impacts active and reactive power flow in line EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

UPFC Topology EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Placement and Coordination of FACTS Devices EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Is there a one-size-fits-all controller? time Long-term Control Power Flow control FACTS scheduling Economics Dynamic Control System oscillation damping Voltage stability FACTS “ringing” Local Control Control target acquisition Power electronics topology Modulation strategies time Is there a one-size-fits-all controller? EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Steady-State Power Flow Control UPFC SSSC TCSC TCPAR These devices can affect active power flow EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Approaches Sensitivity analysis Where  is the change in power transfer capacity in response to an addition of t compensation in line i-j with admittance bij+j gij and b and g are sensitivity parameters EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Optimization (optimal power flow) with genetic algorithms to minimize some cost function Generation costs Congestion Problem is nonlinear, non-smooth, and non-convex EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Max-flow (graph theory) uses forward and backward labeling from source to sink to dynamically determine line flows EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Issues and Challenges Dynamic Coordination of FACTS settings Security Economics Droop Hierarchical or local control of FACTS? EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Dynamic Control transient stability improvement inter-area oscillation damping voltage collapse avoidance subsynchronous resonance mitigation Each control objective will (possibly) require a different FACTS placement EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Issues Most dynamic control development has concentrated on SMIB or very small two-area systems How is control implemented in a large nonlinear interconnected dynamic network? FACTS-FACTS interaction FACTS-generator interaction Hardware/field verification limited EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Challenges to FACTS Implementation Unbalanced operation Harmonics Integration of Energy Storage (BESS, SMES, flywheels) Power electronic topologies Power electronics devices EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

StatCom/BESS voltages active power EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

SSSC/BESS voltages active power EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Summary Responses voltages active power EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Issues Most work considers only: Simplified topologies UPFC = variable impedance StatCom = PV bus Three-phase balanced operation No harmonics Simulation based Isolated performance (no interactions) EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Cascaded Converter Advantages Disadvantages Use fewer components to achieve the same number of levels Has modularized circuitry which makes packaging possible Does not have balancing problem when with batteries Disadvantages Needs separate DC sources for active power conversion EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Diode-Clamped Advantages The harmonic content decreases as the number of levels increases, thus reducing the size of filters Efficiency is high since devices are switched at the fundamental frequency It is easy to realize bi-directional active power flow with a BESS or other energy storage system Disadvantages: Requires a large number of high power clamping diodes if the number of levels is high A high voltage rating is required for the blocking diodes There is potentially a voltage balancing problem EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Food for thought EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

time Long-term Control Power Flow control FACTS scheduling Economics Dynamic Control System oscillation damping Voltage stability FACTS “ringing” Local Control Control target acquisition Power electronics topology Modulation strategies time EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Conventional eigenvalue analysis cannot predict the high frequency self-modes of the several FACTS devices embedded in a large power system network. High frequency control interactions among the several FACTS devices must be checked using an EMTP-type program A promising technique is based on the use of high frequency eigenvalue calculation using Generalized Switching Function Models for the different FACTS devices under consideration. EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Series controllers low loop impedance - the series controllers may experience a very strong interaction, and therefore these controllers must be designed in a coordinated way - the main linking variable among the series controllers is the ac current high loop impedance - no control interactions may be expected among series controllers EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

HVDC HVDC converters embedded in a large network will not experience control interactions if the transference impedances between their commutation busbars are high. This means that, in this case, the dc control design of each station can be based exclusively on the Short-Circuit Ratio (SCR) at its ac connection point. EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

SCADA systems Dedicated SCADA systems will have to be developed if global control of multiple FACTS controllers is desired. Currently available SCADA systems have a refresh rate of 1 second (maximum). This is sufficient for steady-state control dispatch of FACTS controllers. However, this is completely inadequate for dynamic control, especially if we consider that high frequency modes (10-100 Hz) may occur on FACTS assisted power systems EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization

Discussion EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization