Hydraulic Routing in Rivers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
Advertisements

Use of a hydrodynamic model to
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Tributary Junctions
Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Describe the HEC-River Analysis System (RAS) Model Utilize HEC Geo-RAS to import data into.
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
Geographic Information Systems : Data Types, Sources and the ArcView Program.
Flood Analysis of Scioto River Using HEC-RAS/GIS Converting HEC-2 Data for HEC-RAS /ArcView GIS Analysis and Inundation Mapping (A pilot using Big Darby.
HEC-RAS.
BUILDING STRONG ® South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting January 29, 2014 South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting.
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
“Rosillo Creek Flood monitoring and mapping in San Antonio-Texas, an Emergency Management point of view” Part II (and what can we do about this for Onion.
Modeling Drop Structures in HEC-RAS Version 3.1
CH 7 - Open Channel Flow Brays Bayou Concrete Channel Uniform & Steady
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling with ArcGIS
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Interface data models Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 GIS Geo Database Arc Hydro data model Geographically Integrated Hydrologic Modeling Systems.
Solution of the St Venant Equations / Shallow-Water equations of open channel flow Dr Andrew Sleigh School of Civil Engineering University of Leeds, UK.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
David Ramirez, P.E. Senior Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center Slidell, LA Real-Time Operation of HEC-RAS at the Lower Mississippi River.
DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS Jason Christian, P.E. National Flood Workshop October 24-26, 2010 – Houston, Texas PROBABILISTIC FLOODPLAIN.
Feb 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.11 Slides adapted from HEC Unsteady Flow Course Unsteady Flow Course.
Hydrologic Modeling David R. Maidment, Oscar Robayo, Venkatesh Merwade, Carlos Patino, Nate Johnson, Sergio Martinez, Tim Whiteaker, Dan Obenour Center.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
NWS FLDWAV ANALYSIS TOOL
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Basic Input Lecture 3 Presented by:
CRWR-FloodMap ArcView Digital Elevation Model HEC-HMS Flood discharge HEC-RAS Water surface profiles ArcView Flood plain maps CRWR-PreProAvRAS Digital.
HEC-RAS 3.0 Input Data and Demo Presented By: Kevin Donnelly.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
Current Arc Hydro Functionality
March 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Other Features of HEC-RAS- part 2 Cross Section Interpolation Multiple Plans Supporting Pictures.
Mathematical Background
HEC-GEORAS on a small stream in North Branch, Clear Creek Zhihao Wang Sep 2011.
Floodplain Delineation of Unsteady Flow Using HEC-RAS Final Presentation Presented By: Kevin Donnelly.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
1 Triangulated Irregular Network Node Edge Face. 2 3D Structure of a TIN.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Floodplain Analysis with ArcGIS Model Builder
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Arc Hydro and hydrologic models
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Surface Water Virtual Mission Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Kostas Andreadis, and Doug Alsdorf Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS,
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Logan River Floodplain Mapping Kedric Curtis, Josh Hogge, Jordan Jarrett, Jared Justensen 4/25/2015 CEE 6190 Photo credit:
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Integrating ArcHydro and HEC Models by David R
Week 1.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Hydrologic River Routing
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
HMS-RAS Integration Strategy/Workflow Brushy Creek Example Dean Djokic, ESRI 22 March 2012 What’s New in ArcGIS 8.3.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling with ArcGIS
Presentation transcript:

Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 3-1 to 3-13 http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documentation/HEC-RAS_4.1_Users_Manual.pdf

Flood Inundation

Floodplain Delineation The channel and floodplain are both integral parts of the natural conveyance of a stream. The floodplain carries flow in excess of the channel capacity. The greater the discharge, the greater the extent of inundation. …. Because of its devastating nature, flooding poses serious hazards to human populations in many parts of the world. “The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973” required the identification of all floodplain areas in the United States and the establishments of flood-risk zones within those areas.

Steady Flow Solution

One-Dimensional Flow Computations Cross-section Channel centerline and banklines Right Overbank Left Overbank

Flow Conveyance, K Left Overbank Channel Right Overbank 𝐾= 1.49 𝑛 𝐴 𝑅 2/3 𝑜𝑟 𝐾= 1.49 𝑛 𝐴 5/3 𝑃 2/3 𝑄= 1.49 𝑛 𝐴 𝑅 2/3 𝑆 𝑓 1/2 𝑜𝑟 𝑄=𝐾 𝑆 𝑓 1/2

Reach Lengths (1) Floodplain Lch Rob Lob Floodplain (2) Left to Right looking downstream

Energy Head Loss

Velocity Coefficient, 

Solving Steady Flow Equations Q is known throughout reach All conditions at (1) are known, Q is known Select h2 compute Y2, V2, K2, Sf, he Using energy equation (A), compute h2 Compare new h2 with the value assumed in Step 2, and repeat until convergence occurs (A) h2 h1 (2) (1) 𝑆 𝑓 = 𝑄 𝐾 2

Flow Computations Reach 3 Reach 2 Start at the downstream end (for subcritical flow) Treat each reach separately Compute h upstream, one cross-section at a time Use computed h values to delineate the floodplain Reach 1

Floodplain Delineation Ideally should have Two D Models…... A floodplain delineation process determines inundation extent by comparing water levels with ground surface elevations. We start with a DTM or topomap. > Water levels are computed based on cross-sections. During normal condition, flow remains within the main channel, but > during flood, water spill over the bank. In these cases it’s important to extent cross-section over the floodplain. > We then bring back water levels on the topomap. > Extent water levels until hit contour of higher elevations. > Finally delineate floodplain following the contours. The accuracy largely depends on water levels and in turns on the cross-section used for computation.

Momentum Equation Steady, uniform flow Steady, non-uniform flow Unsteady, non-uniform flow

HMS-RAS Integration Strategy/Workflow Brushy Creek Example Dean Djokic, ESRI 22 March 2012 What’s New in ArcGIS 8.3

Lecture Overview Approach to integrated H&H model development Upper Brushy Creek – GeoHMS/HMS development Flood modeling for area of interest – GeoRAS/RAS development

HMS-RAS Integration Overview What’s New in ArcGIS 8.3

Integration Approach Mix of planning, GIS, and H&H modeling operations – not a push button operation. Types of integration Modeling support (preparing data for model input) e.g. land use/soils/CN or rainfall processing – Arc Hydro or general GIS data processing Linked GeoHMS GeoRAS Integrated DSS

Integration Approach (2) Key steps: Plan (roughly) hydrologic and hydraulic model layouts – flow exchange locations e.g. location of HMS modeling elements and RAS cross-sections Identify sources of precipitation input into the hydrologic model and techniques for their incorporation into the dataset e.g. Nexrad rainfall Develop GeoHMS model (and precipitation sub model) Finalize and run HMS model and generate results (DSS) Develop GeoRAS model Finalize and run RAS taking HMS results as input Feedback between HMS and RAS is manual e.g. modification of time of concentration or routing parameters

Integration Planning Identify where outputs from one model (HMS) become input to the second one (RAS) Place hydrologic elements (subbasins, reaches, junctions) to capture flows at points of interest (confluences, structures) Place hydraulic elements (cross-sections) at points of interest Identify/specify element naming conventions between the two models (persistent or transient names)

Precipitation Sources Identify sources of precipitation input into the hydrologic model and techniques for their incorporation into the dataset Point (rain gage) Polygon (Nexrad cells) Surface (TIN/grid)

Develop GeoHMS model Follow all principles in development of a hydrologic model In addition, take into consideration integration planning aspects developed earlier Placement of flow exchange points Naming conventions Incorporate precipitation submodel Develop Arc Hydro time series for the final subbasin delineation and export to DSS Export to HMS

Meteorological Component Arc Hydro Develop a custom “gage” for each subbasin or for each rainfall observation element with corresponding weights for subbasins. Export the time series for the subbasin “gage” from Arc Hydro time series data structure into DSS Arc Hydro to DSS transfer DSS

Finalize and Run HMS Complete HMS model with any additional parameters including meteorological model and control specifications Follow all principles in HMS model development (calibration, etc.)

Finalize and Run HMS (2) Do the final run and generate results (DSS) HMS View DSS View

Develop GeoRAS model (pre-processing) Follow all principles in development of a hydraulic model for element placement (confluences, structures, …) In addition, take into consideration integration planning aspects developed earlier Naming conventions (add name of the HMS element to the cross-section that will get the element’s flows) Export to RAS

Finalize and Run RAS Complete RAS model with any additional parameters including initial and boundary conditions Follow all principles in RAS model development (calibration, etc.)

Finalize and Run RAS (2) Do the final run and generate results (export to sdf file)

Process RAS results in GeoRAS Construct the floodplain based on the results in the sdf Review the results with respect to spatial integrity (extents of cross-sections, ineffective flow areas, disconnected flood areas, …) Clean results Revisit RAS

GIS – HMS – RAS Feedback At present it is manual and at discretion of modeler GIS – H&H interaction H – H interaction Visualization in both pre and post-processing – not just a “pretty picture” Fly-over in preprocessing (GeoHMS and GeoRAS) Identification of data problems Modeling element placement Post-processing (GeoRAS) Validity of element placement