Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Surface Mine Safety Regulation 25 PA Code Chapter 209.
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
WYOMING WATER & ENERGY LAW NPDES Permitting Issues Kara Brighton Hageman & Brighton, P.C. Cheyenne, WY.
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
2009 City of Bozeman Storm Water Update
Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Pennsylvania Mine and the Snake River Task Force.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Connecticut Remediation Programs Elsie Patton Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
THE COST AND LEVEL OF SERVIC E PRESENTED BY: COURTNEY REICH, AICP ECOLOGICAL PLANNING GROUP Stormwater Management Programs for Local Governments.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Coastal Stormwater Supplement Training.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
The Evolution of Mining Reclamation and Regulation in the San Juan Mountains Mark Walker Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) Program May 29, 2015.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
The Use of Environmental Management Systems in Permitting Decisions National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 May 10, 2006 Christine Steagall SC Department.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
Past and Present Efforts. History – Early acid rock drainage and wetlands investigations 1989 – US Forest Service Special Use Permit for pilot.
Regional Water Availability Rulemaking Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission February 8, 2007 Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission.
HANNAH WALKER RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
Part 6 – Special Legal Rights and Relationships Chapter 34 – Environmental Law Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands: EPA Perspective.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 7D Methylmercury Open Water Workplan.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Not all changes will be discussed please view all regulations at
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
The Dalles, Industrial Certification Northwest Aluminum Company The Dalles, Oregon Douglas C. MacCourt Ater Wynne LLP US German Bilateral Working.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
NCACC Environmental Steering Committee Legislative Update October 2013.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
STATE OF ALASKA PERMITTING PROCESS
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Department of Environmental Quality
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Water Quality Credit Trading
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Fayetteville, NC August 14, 2018
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Nikisi Lesufi Senior Executive Chamber of Mines
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Presentation transcript:

Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex 4 May 2006 David Bowers

Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex (UBMC) Historical Overview Agency Involvement Current Activities Areas of Concern Questions

Heddleston Mining District includes the Anaconda, Carbonate, Mike Horse, and Paymaster mines. Mines were mostly silver and lead operations that had only sporadic activity from 1890s to 1960s.

Mike Horse Mine was the “flagship” of the mines in the area Height of operations occurred during the 1940s as a war effort mine – lead and zinc Includes a tailings impoundment known as the Mike Horse dam A 1975 breach of the impoundment dam released approximately 200,000 cubic yards of metal-bearing tailings downstream

Historical Overview Early Regulatory History 1991 – Under legislative action, the regulatory authority for the UBMC was transferred from the Department of State Lands to the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences (MDHES) 1992 – MDHES noticed Asarco and Arco as potentially liable persons 1993 – With agreement from the Director of MDHES, Asarco and Arco began a five-year voluntary interim remedial action program at the UBMC 2000 – After a petition by Asarco, temporary water quality standards for the UBMC were implemented 1991 – Comprehensive Environmental Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) Program

Historical Overview 1993-1998 – Voluntary Interim Remedial Actions Attempted to address critical sources of contamination related to the various mines in the UBMC Conducted without DEQ approval All work plans, design documents, etc. were submitted to DEQ for review and comments. However, based on the 1993 agreement between DEQ and Asarco/Arco, these Interim remedial action work plans, design documents, etc. did not require DEQ approval. Therefore, Asarco/Arco proceeded at its own risk.

Mine waste removal to three constructed repositories

Construction of Mike Horse Repository

Adit-discharge flow control

Plugging Mike Horse Adit

Adit-discharge treatment system

Current Agency Involvement - State DEQ Comprehensive Environmental Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) Program Water Quality Protection – Temporary Water Quality Standards Permitting and Compliance – Montana Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) permits Planning and Prevention – Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) Legal Unit Comprehensive Environmental Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) UBMC is a State Superfund Site Water Quality Protection – Temporary Standards Temp Standards includes an Implementation Plan to cleanup areas of the UBMC that are impacting State waters Permitting and Compliance – Montana Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) permits Permits for adit discharge treatment systems Planning and Prevention – Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) TMDL performed for the Blackfoot River Headwaters Identified the Temp Standards IP as a major component to meet TMDL objectives for the area Legal Unit Asarco Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Litigation against Asarco and Arco Asarco Trust Fund Coordination

Current Agency Involvement - Federal United States Forest Service (USFS) Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with Asarco to develop an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for the Mike Horse dam and USFS land containing mine waste at the UBMC Department of Justice (DOJ)/Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asarco Trust Fund – determine annual funding allocations for various sites across the US EE/CA: non-time critical removal under CERCLA, the Federal Superfund program administered by the EPA USFS – Important to stress that AOC for remedial actions has not been negotiated. The USFS and Asarco have signed an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) but the AOC only covers the development of an EE/CA. Another AOC or modification of the one in place will be required to actually implement the removal actions on federal lands.

Current Activities Temporary Water Quality Standards Asarco petitioned the Board of Environmental Review (Board) in 1999 to adopt temporary standards for: A portion of Mike Horse Creek A portion of Beartrap Creek A portion of the Blackfoot River The Board adopted the temporary standards for the UBMC in 2000 the implementation plan, UBMC Temporary Standards currently run through 2008 IP details: A progressive series of site delineation/condition assessments and remedial actions to remove mine wastes from the floodplain. Surface and ground water chemical monitoring of the petitioned streams and biological monitoring at a site near the downstream extent of the temporary standards. Although the temporary standards do not apply to the tailings impoundment, several impoundment studies were identified to be conducted including: Geotechnical stability evaluation of the dam Design and construction of an emergency spillway Dam seepage studies Impoundment sediment sampling

Current Activities Temporary Water Quality Standards Implementation Plan (IP) Actions Initiated or Completed Initial delineation and mapping of floodplain mine waste Removal of mine waste piles at the upper Mike Horse Annual water treatment system operation, maintenance, and enhancement Annual work plans and monitoring reports Work performed under the IP is currently funded by the Asarco Trust and Asarco corporate funds Submittals were not always timely

Areas of Concern Temporary Standards Implementation Plan No one event is the cause for the slow progress and schedule deficiencies Concurrent actions have complicated the execution of the Implementation Plan (IP) Asarco’s recent corporate history has impacted the IP Limited funding (Trust Fund) has impacted the IP Concurrent Actions – Actions by DEQ and the USFS that are not directly part of the Temp Standards have complicated the planning and execution of the IP Asarco’s Recent Corporate History – The purchase of Asarco by Grupo Mexico in 2003 and Asarco’s bankruptcy in 2005 added additional constraints and uncertainty to the IP Limited Funding – The Trust Fund (a result of the Grupo Mexico purchase) administered by the US DOJ has limited the annual funding for work proposed in the IP

Areas of Concern Specific Issues regarding the IP Schedule Inability to meet required deadlines for annual data summary reports and annual work plans Numerous removal and reclamation activities have not been completed according to the IP schedule Lower Mike Horse Creek (2003), Beartrap Creek (2004), Flosse and Louise (2004), Upper Blackfoot River drainage (2005), Stevens Gulch (2006) Unlikely that cleanups targeted for USFS land can be completed under the Temporary Standards framework Lower Mike Horse Creek

Areas of Concern Mike Horse Dam Stability USFS Dam Stability Report recommends removing the dam from operation Emergency Action Plan has been developed for the interim EE/CA for the dam and tailings impoundment is scheduled for completion in August 2006

Board of Environmental Review Options Option 1: No Action – Keep Present Plan and Schedule Possible outcomes include: Temporary standards will expire 31 May 2008 Unknown amount of work will be completed Treatment system discharge permit must be revised to meet DEQ-7 standards after 2008 Federal and State Super Fund activities continue at own pace, including Mike Horse Dam removal/reclamation

Board of Environmental Review Options Option 2: Modify the Plan and Schedule Possible outcomes include: Revision of implementation plan and schedule would likely only include Asarco owned lands Renewal of the treatment system discharge permit will require minimal modification Federal and State Super Fund activities continue at own pace, including Mike Horse Dam removal/reclamation Revision challenges: Much of the mine waste removal and stream stabilization is located on USFS land and is tied to the Mike Horse Dam removal/reclamation. It will proceed at own pace regardless of IP schedule. Again, it is unlikely that cleanups targeted for USFS land can be completed under the Temporary Standards framework.

Board of Environmental Review Proposal Option 3: Initiate Rulemaking to Rescind ARM §17.30.630(2) Possible outcomes include: Reissue treatment system discharge permit to meet DEQ-7 standards (B-1 Classification) Federal and State Super Fund activities continue at own pace, including Mike Horse Dam removal/reclamation Treatment system discharge permit would include a compliance schedule Two compelling facts Most of the remaining work found in the current IP is located on USFS land. As previously stated, it is highly unlikely that cleanups targeted for USFS land can be completed under the Temporary Standards framework. Both State and Federal Agencies will proceed with the cleanup at the UBMC regardless of the Temporary Standards status.

Montana Department of Environmental Quality Questions? David Bowers Site Response Section Montana Department of Environmental Quality Phone: 841-5063 dbowers@mt.gov