Event Name/Date Presented by: Name/Title/Organization Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Increasing Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Transmission Pipelines and Land Use: What needs to be accomplished and why? General Session --- November.
Advertisements

The State of Natural Gas Pipelines in Fort Worth.
Local Government Assessment of Pipeline Safety and Planning Issues Technical Assistance Grant Association of Washington Cities (AWC)
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Presentation to NACo Environment, Energy and Land Use Steering.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
1 Pipeline Security Presented to: Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 5, 2010.
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
Demonstration Grant PARTNERS FOR PIPELINE SAFETY WEB PAGES Develop interactive and informative webpage for residents, property owners, contractors and.
GulfSafe Notification System GULF
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Spill Response Plans – Why Are They Developed? Alan K. Mayberry.
Federal Agency Update – January 2009 Pipelines & Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Communications Task Team Status Danny Gibbs Spectra Energy / INGAA It’s.
113 East College Avenue, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida
Increased Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans, LA November 15, 2007.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TOOLS Jim Doherty Municipal Research & Services Center November 2006.
Model Urban Pipeline Initiative Panel Discussion Karen Edelstein Eastern Program Coordinator FracTracker Alliance Mayor’s Council.
Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety Pipeline Safety Trust November 15, 2007 Dan Kirschner Executive Director.
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance A Real Estate Symposium International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January 13-15,
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance Protecting Transmission Pipelines International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Please use Computer Audio. Turn on speaker and leave mic off. If landline is needed, inform using Q&A below and a # will sent. Handouts can be downloaded.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Glenn Archambault INTERSTATE GAS PIPELINE/ LANDOWNER/ 15 YEARS PIPELINES INFORMED PLANNING ALLIANCE BOARD MEMBER PIPELINE SAFETY TRUST MY FAVORITE HOBBY?
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 16, 2007 New Orleans, LA Presented by Jerry Kenerson.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Julie Halliday, Program Development DOT – PHMSA – OPS November 18, Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
Consultation zones To ensure communication using guidance from the Pipelines & Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Nov 4-5,
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
1 DCP Midstream 2008 School Campaign Jeannette Jones November 21, 2008 Pipeline Safety Trust – 2008 Conference New Orleans, LA.
1 Fire Planning Prevention and Preparedness 27 November 2013.
La Center, Washington: Balancing Pipelines and Populations 1.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
PIPA IMPLEMENTATION What’s Been Happening in Washington State?
Protecting Communities Co-Chairs Cathy Pratt- City of St. Peters Greg Ford- Williams Gas Pipeline;INGAA.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Steve Fischer.
Informed Planning Near Pipelines Brought to you by a Community Technical Assistance Grant from the U.S. Dept of Transportation.
Protecting Communities Task Team Update Las Vegas January 14, 2009.
Pipelines & Land Use Planning Tim Sweeney Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 3,
TRANSMISSION PIPELINE RISK REDUCTION OVERLAY DISTRICT using proposed guidance from the Pipelines & Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Pipeline Safety Conference.
Planning Zones to Protect People Near Pipelines Chuck Lesniak City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.
Pipeline Safety & Development Changes File # ZON Proponent Carl Weimer, Whatcom County Council Docketed Unanimously by the Whatcom County Council.
Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Chairman David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick Commissioner Ryan Sitton September 15-17, 2015.
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 November 3, 2006 David Knoelke API Public Awareness Committee Chair (BP Pipelines N.A.) Greater Public Involvement – What does that mean?
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
PROTECTING TRANSMISSION PIPELINES Protecting transmission pipelines is protecting the public -
An ordinance amending the County’s zoning and land use regulations to increase pipeline safety Adopted July 27, 2010.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Federal Guidance for Pipeline Rights-of-Way Daron K. Moore El Paso Pipeline Group November 16, 2007.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Kitsap County ▪ Jefferson County ▪ City of Bremerton Naval Base Kitsap ▪ Naval Magazine Indian Island
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Katie Hansen, Board of Directors Pipeline Safety Trust.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Introduction Pipeline safety awareness meetings in a presentation setting are nearing the end of their lifecycle and usefulness. Pipeline and utility.
Jim Doherty MRSC Legal Consultant
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TOOLS Jim Doherty Municipal Research & Services Center, Seattle November 2007.
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
Cities and PIPA Why Should We Participate? What Do We Need?
GulfSafe Notification System
Natural Gas is Moving Forward
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
PHMSA Update for the API RP1162 Rewrite Team
Presentation transcript:

Event Name/Date Presented by: Name/Title/Organization Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

Illustrated: Growth Along Pipeline in Washington State Land Development In Close Proximity to Pipelines

PIPA’s aim is to prevent…

Effects of Land Development in Close Proximity to Pipeline ROW

Greater Likelihood of Damage to the Pipeline

Higher Potential Consequences of Failure

PIPA Promotes Risk-Informed Land Use Planning and Communication

Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 …the Secretary [of Transportation] shall publish a report identifying practices, laws, and ordinances that are most successful in addressing issues of encroachment and maintenance on pipeline rights-of- way so as to more effectively protect public safety, pipeline workers, and the environment. and encourage Federal agencies and State and local governments to adopt and implement appropriate practices, laws, and ordinances, as identified in the report

Published September 2004 ( Recommendations to PHMSA: Develop risk-informed land use guidance. Involve all stakeholders Include expertise in risk analysis, risk communication, land use management, and developing regulations Ensure process is transparent, independent, and peer reviewed Refine the guidance over time Recommendations to transmission pipeline industry: Develop practices for specifying, acquiring, developing, maintaining ROW. Transportation Research Board Special Report 281

Land use planning and development can have a direct adverse impact on pipeline safety; people are put too close in close proximity to transmission pipelines. PIPA recommended practices can enhance pipeline safety through communication of risk information for land use planning and property development near transmission pipelines. Land Use Planning in Close Proximity To Transmission Pipelines

PIPA is a partnership of stakeholders whose purpose is to further enhance pipeline safety. ~ 130 stakeholder participated, representing: local, state, and federal government; property developers; pipeline safety advocates, realtors, pipeline operators. PIPA initial focus was to develop guidance and recommendations for land use planning and development near transmission pipelines. Current goal is to… Engage local governments to promote their awareness of and support their implementation of the PIPA recommended practices for land use planning and development near transmission pipelines. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

Initial PIPA effort performed by Task Teams: o Protecting Communities – Recommended practices for land use planning and development on lands adjacent to the transmission pipeline ROW o Protecting Transmission Pipelines – Recommended practices relating to land use and development activities on the pipeline ROW o Communication – Recommended practices for communicating information among pipeline safety stakeholders PIPA Task Teams

Consider existing practices, stakeholder needs and challenges. Use consensus process to develop recommended practices. PIPA Directive

PIPA Report Published Dec as a web-based document Printable – entire report or individual recommended practices. Sort by stakeholder audience taking action

Stakeholders Benefits and Risks Recommended Practices Appendices: o Model ordinance o Matrix of general acceptability/unacceptability of proposed land uses of ROWs o Technical information PIPA Report

PIPA Recommended Practices Identified with/directed to stakeholders: Local Government Property Developer / Owner Transmission Pipeline Operator Real Estate Commission Categorized to be implemented by stakeholder: Baseline (BL) –in preparation for future land use and development. New Development (ND) –when specific new land use and development projects are proposed.

BL01 Obtain Transmission Pipeline Mapping Data BL04 Adopt Transmission Pipeline Consultation Zone Ordinance BL16 Halt Dangerous Excavation Activities near Transmission Pipelines ND08 Collaborate on Alternate Use and Development of Transmission Pipeline ROW ND12 Reduce Transmission Pipeline Risk through Design and Location of New Roads ND23 Consider Site Emergency Response Plans in Land Use Development Examples - Recommended Practices for Local Government

National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) BL01 Obtain Transmission Pipeline Mapping Data

NPMS Public Viewer

Distance defined by local ordinance Pipeline Consultation Zone BL05 Define Transmission Pipeline Consultation Zone Local governments should define a “consultation zone” to provide a mechanism for communication between property developers/owners and operators of nearby transmission pipelines when new land uses and property developments are being planned. Absent site-specific information: 660’-1000’ Natural Gas Pipelines 1000’-1500’ Hazardous Liquid Pipelines

ND08 Collaborate on Alternate Use and Development of Transmission Pipeline ROW

ND23 Consider Site Emergency Response Plans in Land Use Development Consider: Access to shutoff valves Access for emergency response personnel/equipment Location/capacity of fire hydrants Potential ICS, triage, and staging areas

Examples - Recommended Practices - Operators BL09 Document and Record Easement Amendments BL12 Notify Stakeholders of Right-of-Way Maintenance Activities BL13 Prevent and Manage Right-of-Way Encroachment BL15 Enhance Damage Prevention Practices near High- Priority Subsurface Facilities BL16 Halt Dangerous Excavation Activities near Transmission Pipelines BL17 Map Abandoned Pipelines

BL08 Manage Land Records Easement Easement Amendment Encroachment Agreement Letter of No Objection Partial Release

BL15 Enhance Damage Prevention Practices near High-Priority Subsurface Facilities Examples: Pre-excavation meeting on site with the operator and contractor “Pot hole“ to verify utility locates or mark-outs. Operator onsite during all excavation.

BL16 Halt Dangerous Excavation Activities near Transmission Pipelines Transmission pipeline operators should have procedures and established contacts with local enforcement personnel in order to act appropriately to halt dangerous excavation activities that may damage their pipelines and potentially cause an immediate threat to life or property.

Examples - Recommended Practices for Developers/Public ND04 Coordinate Property Development Design and Construction with Transmission Pipeline Operator ND09 Provide Flexibility for Developing Open Space along Transmission Pipeline Rights-of-Way ND11 Reduce Transmission Pipeline Risk through Design and Location of New Parking Lots and Parking Structures ND15 Plan and Locate Vegetation to Prevent Interference with Transmission Pipeline Activities ND24 Install Temporary Markers on Edge of Transmission Pipeline Right-of-Way Prior to Construction Adjacent to Right-of-Way

ND11 Reduce Transmission Pipeline Risk through Design and Location of New Parking Lots and Parking Structures

ND24 Install Temporary Markers on Edge of Transmission Pipeline Right-of-Way Prior to Construction Adjacent to Right-of-Way

BL18 Disclose Transmission Pipeline Easements in Real Estate Transactions Example - Recommended Practices Real Estate Commissions

PIPA Communication Team & Goal NAPSRCynthia Munyon PHMSAJulie Halliday PHMSASteve Fischer NAHBDebbie Bassert NACoJim Philipps NACoJames Davenport NLCJulia Pulidindi PSTCarl Weimer PSTRebecca Craven CGAErika Lee RCPAmber Pappas INGAASusan Waller INGAADwayne Teschendorf API/AOPLGina Greenslate API/AOPLTerri Larson AGAPhil Bennett AGALydia Meiqs CYCLAHerb Wilhite Engage local governments to promote their awareness of and support their implementation of the PIPA recommended practices for land use planning and development near transmission pipelines.

Stakeholder team assembled to: Develop communication material Raise awareness about the RPs through speaking engagements and education Encourage all stakeholders to implement the RPs Focus on and support local governments with higher levels of risk due to land use and development near transmission pipelines Next Steps for PIPA

PIPA Resources

Purpose: to make grants to local communities and organizations for technical assistance related to pipeline safety issues (includes implementing PIPA RPs) Solicitation will be posted Dec.- Jan and close Feb Awards to be made by September 2012 Local governments can sign up for alerts on to be notified when the solicitation is published Help spread the word to local governments. Federal Technical Assistance Grants

Examples of PIPA Related TAG Grants  Mapping of transmission pipelines  Implementation of a pipeline overlay district  Adoption of a consultation zone and planning area ordinance.  Creation of a web site with information and marketing materials for local public officials to assist in their introduction of the Consultation Zone idea (RPs BL04 & BL05)  Production of a communications plan to educate property owners about responsibilities regarding pipelines and easements, how to identify integrity issues related to the pipeline operations, and the importance of a vegetation management program.

TAGs will be posted Dec./Jan

National discussion about risk - Building Safe Communities: Pipeline Risk and its Application to Local Development Decisions Local risk is site-specific and pipeline dependant (e.g. diameter, pressure, wall thickness, product transported). Communities have varying levels of risk tolerance. What are the potential risks to building next to a pipeline?

PIPA Website

Municipal Research and Service Center of Washington (MRSC) Planning Near Pipelines Web Site Presentations: Part 1: "Informed Planning Near Pipelines," by Carl Weimer, Executive Director, Pipeline Safety Trust Part 2: "PIPA and the Recommended Practices," by Jim Doherty, MRSC Legal Consultant

Steps Local Governments Can Take Identify transmission pipelines in your jurisdiction Compare PIPA RPs with current practices Assess PIPA RPs to determine the benefit of implementing in your jurisdiction Work with developers/public and operators to implement RPs Contact the PIPA Communication Team for more information Apply for a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Add the PIPA logo to your organization’s website

Steps Operators Can Take Compare PIPA RPs with current company procedures Assess operator’s current practices to determine the benefit of implementing PIPA RPs Work with local governments and property developers/owners to raise awareness of and to implement PIPA RPs Meet with emergency response representatives to review existing pipelines for access as described in ND 23 Consider Site Emergency Response Plans in Land Use Development Add the PIPA logo to your company website

Steps Property Developers/Owners Can Take Compare PIPA RPs with current procedures Assess practices to determine the benefits of implementing RPs Work with local governments and operators to raise awareness of and to implement PIPA RPs Review Appendix D: Proposed Land Uses for Transmission Pipeline ROW Add the PIPA logo to your company website

PIPA Implementations Local Governments Operators

Brookings County, SD – Transmission Pipeline Risk Reduction Overlay District X X

Whatcom County, WA Consultation Zone Ordinance No high-occupancy, hard to evacuate buildings (schools, hospitals, nursing homes, etc) within 500’ of transmission pipelines Consultation Zone of 500’ Protect easements during construction Verify use of one call.

Austin, Texas Municipal Code Land Use Development Austin, Texas Municipal Code Land Use Development “Use requiring evacuation assistance” prohibited within 500’ of pipeline New construction within 200’ of pipeline must meet enhanced building code No structures or excavation within “restricted pipeline area” within 25’ of pipeline Residential lot less than 1 acre cannot include a “restricted pipeline area”

Operator Guides & Door Hangers

API Guidelines for Property Development Similar to document prepared independently by many gas transmission and liquid pipeline operators Describes unacceptable ROW uses Setbacks for specific structures, roads, and vegetation Measures setbacks from center of pipeline

Thank you for your time and interest in pipeline safety! Contact Name for more information contact info Questions?