Linac Laser Notcher Status David Johnson and Todd Johnson PIP Meeting October 10, 2012 Beams doc 4237.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

Progress of the sub-harmonic bunching system (i.e. upgrading progress of BEPCII present bunching system) Pei Shilun for the SHBS team Accelerator center,
Simultaneous Four-Hall Operation for 12 GeV CEBAF Reza Kazimi November 2012.
Linac Laser Notcher David Johnson, Todd Johnson, Matt Gardner, Kevin Duel April PMG Meeting April 2, 2015.
CTF3 Laser Status Massimo Petrarca CLIC January
Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe.
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee October Injector Drive Laser Update 1 Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Bill White Drive Laser April 16, Drive Laser Commissioning Experience Reminder of requirements on Drive Laser.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Linac Laser Notcher Status David Johnson Todd Johnson, Vic Scarpine, Andrea Saewert, John Sobolewski PIP Meeting March 6, 2013 Beams Doc 4306.
Laser Notcher Status Dave Johnson, Todd Johnson, John Sobolewski, Kevin Duel, Andrea Saewert September 11,2013.
David Johnson, Todd Johnson, John Sobolewski, Fred Mach, Kevin Duel, Andrea Saewert February 11, 2014 Accelerator Physics and Technology Seminar.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Recent developments for the LCLS injector Feng Zhou SLAC Other contributors: Brachmann, Decker, Ding, Emma, Gilevich, Huang, Iverson, Loos, Raubenheimer,
David Johnson –APC -.  The Proton Improvement Plan is tasked with Booster upgrades which will increase the Booster throughput required for future operation.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
Nanoscale Cr 4+ – Doped Olivine Crystallites in Glass-Ceramics for NIR Optical Amplifiers and Lasers By: Fayette Colon Mentor: Mikhail Sharonov Assistant.
Laser Notcher Pulse Energy Requirements & Demonstration Experiment David Johnson, Todd Johnson, Vic Scarpine.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
PIP Linac Laser Notcher Overview & Plans David Johnson Todd Johnson, Kevin Duel, Fred Mach August 5, 2014 PIP Linac Laser Notcher System Installation Readiness.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska August 3, 2015 All-Experimenters Meeting.
Laser Notching Demonstration Experiment (Preliminary Results) David Johnson, Todd Johnson, Matt Gardner, Vic Scarpine, Rick Tesarek.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Simultaneous Delivery of Parallel Proton Beams with the EURISOL Driver
CTF3 photo injector laser status CERN 17 July 2009 CLIC meeting.
CTF3 Collaboration meeting – CERN, January 2007 Laser system schematic 22 44 1.55  s 200  s, 5-50 Hz 15 kW 10  J 270  s ~2332 pulses 370.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
ATF1/2 laser-wires Stewart T. Boogert on behalf of UK Extraction line laserwire collaboration A. Aryshev, G. Blair, S. Boogert, A. Bosco, L. Corner, L.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska January 7, 2013 All-Experimenters Meeting.
Laser Notcher Demonstration Experiment Dave Johnson, Todd Johnson, Matt Gardner. Rick Tesarek, Vic Sacrpine.
Advancement in photo-injector laser: Second Amplifier & Harmonic Generation M. Petrarca CERN M. Martyanov, G. Luchinin, V. Lozhkarev Institute of Applied.
Proton Improvement Plan Keith Gollwitzer January 5th, 2015 All Experimenters’ Meeting 11/5/2015Gollwitzer AEM.
V. Sonnenschein, I. D. Moore, M. Reponen, S. Rothe, K.Wendt.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
All Experimenters Meeting PIP Report Fernanda G. Garcia on behalf of PIP team 07/01/2013.
PIP Linac Laser Notcher Overview & Plans David Johnson Todd Johnson, Kevin Duel, Fred Mach August 5, 2014 PIP Linac Laser Notcher System Installation Readiness.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
David Johnson Jinhao Ruan, Jamie Santucci, Vic Scarpine, Ray Tomlin Presentation to PIP November 16, 2011.
D.E. Johnson, T.R. Johnson, K.L. Duel, M. Gardner, V. Scarpine, R.J. Tesarek Motivation Notching process in the Booster creates about 30-35% of the total.
Laser Notcher Status Dave Johnson PIP Meeting June 26,2012.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Brian Sheehy R&D ERL Laser and laser light transport Brian Sheehy February 17-18, 2010 Laser and Laser Light Transport.
Compressor Helium filled optional equivalent plane imaging laser beam dump hole in mirror for e-beam SSA and more.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
1 Junji Urakawa (KEK, Japan) at PosiPol2012, Under development of Quantum Beam Technology Program(QBTP) supported by MEXT from to
An H- stripping laser using commercial, diode-pumped Nd:YAG amplifiers Russell Wilcox Laser Stripping Workshop, April 11, 2011.
September 12-13, 2013 BNL Laser Profile, Energy and Space Charge Potential Monitor Deepak Raparia September 26, 2013.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
David Johnson, Todd Johnson, John Sobolewski, Kevin Duel, Peter Prieto, Andrea Saewert 13rd mini-Workshop on Laser Stripping.
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
E- source R&D update ILC source laser project Faraday rotation experiment A. Brachmann 05/07/07 SLAC R&D meeting.
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
MIT Compact X-ray Source
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Physics Design on Injector I
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Presentation transcript:

Linac Laser Notcher Status David Johnson and Todd Johnson PIP Meeting October 10, 2012 Beams doc 4237

Basic Components Pulse Generator/timing system Laser systemupdate Beam shapingupdate Optical cavityupdate Vacuum interfaceupdate Control system (LabView?) Reduce losses in Booster tunnel generated by the creation of the Notch  Create notch at 750 keV Utilize photo-neutralization (laser system to match temporal structure of H- Prototype for fast bunch by bunch chopping system Reminder: The purpose of the Linac Laser Notcher:

Location Status Initial concept utilized 400 MeV area. – Required significant beam line changes – Required new H0 absorber (beam dump) Back in April decided to focus on 750 keV Laser Notcher

MS co-op (John Sobolewski) started looking at potential designs of the vacuum system interface. To be continued at a low level effort by MS (co- op)/University collaboration, or other resource. AR viewport To reduce laser power: create laser pulse to match spatial and temporal structure of H- beam And increase interaction time for photo-neutralization through use of zig-zag cavity. 9.6 mm 1.1 mm Laser Beam RFQ flange Bellows 1.92” (48.7 mm) Max Plan View Laser dump 29.7 mm 9.5 mm Cavity diameter mm Cavity length mm HR mirrors Register the mirror holder to end of RFQ flange Rectangular beam pipe 750 keV Notcher Insert Concept (In flange option)

Expected Beam Dimensions Phase space simulation at end of RFQ (figure 4.40 of 750 KeV Upgrade Plan) Trace 3D back calculation of beam size at exit of RFQ based upon emittance measurement at 178 kW power August 9, 2012 CY Tan. Laser beam vertical profile (1/e 2 ) ~ 5 mm. Initial design assumed that the vertical laser beam dimension of 1 cm. Beam measurements indicate vertical laser size could be reduced to 6 mm This is a variable parameter in the beam shaping optics.

Burst mode seed pulses to Fiber Amplifier followed by Free Space Amp 1 =1064nm 120 mW CW SW=0.1 nm 10 GHz Mach-Zehnder Modulator Pulse Generator Amplifier, Timing PM Fiber L ins ~5dB L i ~1.8dB 15 Hz Pockels cell Updated 10/3/2012 Generate 24 us burst at 15 hz TRANSPORT BEAM SHAPING OPTICS & OPTICAL CAVITY Fiber Pre-Amp Fiber Amp 1 Fiber Amp 2 Free Space Amp Output modulator/Input fiber pre-amp: MHz pulses (1.25 ns pulse), 458kHz burst EPEPP P 200 * P 450 * FPA IN26 pJ21 mW5.3 mW1243uW FPA OUT G= 20 dB 2.6 nJ2.1 W0.53 W14.3 mW FA 1 IN1.8 nJ1.4 W0.44 W 10 mW FA 1 OUT G=23 dB 360 nJ288 W972W2.0 W FA 2 IN300 nJ240 W60 W1.6 W FA 2 OUT G=11.5 dB 4.2 uJ3.4 kW1.1 kW23 W FSA IN4.0 uJ3.1kW 795 W22 W FSA OUT G=27-29dB 2.0 mJ 3.1 mJ 1.6 MW 2.5 MW 400 kW 630 kW 11 kW 17 kW Clean up filter Isolator Line filter Free Space Grumman CEO DPSS OEM Diode + TC controlled *Notch 12 bunches -> 60 ns 10 notches/linac pulse

The Plan (as of today) Due to lack of major M&S funding for FY13, we accelerated purchases (with available FY12 funding) planed for FY13 and moved the schedule forward. To date we have purchased: – Seed laser and controller – Modulator system (borrow pulse generator) – First 2 stages of fiber amplifier system *** – Fiber to free space port – Beam shaping optics (532 nm and 1064 nm) – Optical cavity components (532 nm and 1064 nm) What would we like to accomplish this year (FY13) ? – Certify operation and parameterize the following: Optical Pulse Generator 1 st two (of three) stages of the fiber amplifier system Beam shaping and transport optics with 532 nm laser Beam shaping and transport optics with the output of the (1 st 2 stages) fiber amplifier system (IR) Prototype optical cavity (532 nm in fluorescent cell) Optical cavity with IR – Demonstrate 15 Hz burst of the MHz and 458 kHz QCW laser pulses with Pockels cell.

Beam shaping and optical cavity tests

Test setup In order to evaluate the uniformity of the laser beam profile in the transverse cavity, a dye cell was employed. Water in a clear container is weakly doped with a fluorescent dye which absorbs 532nm from the test laser and re-emits at longer wavelengths, allowing any scattered portions of the primary beam to be filtered out and rejected from the analysis.

Two initial approaches: Fill aperture with a “staircase” of overlapping elliptical gaussian beams to present a uniform optical field to the ion beam. Utilize a “PiShaper”; an optical device which converts a gaussian profile beam to one with a flat-top profile, to produce a vertically uniform beam which fills the aperture.

Dye cell test setup Laser & Telescopes Dye Cell Analyzing camera

Telescopes The test optics consist of two variable magnification cylindrical telescopes and the PiShaper device. The PiShaper function depends critically on proper input beam characteristics, so the first telescope is used to deliver an appropriately sized elliptical beam to the PiShaper. The second telescope is used to expand the 6mm output of the PiShaper to any desired vertical size up to 25mm.

532nM laser First telescope PiShaper Second telescope Dye Cell

Dye cell detail

Response of the dye was tested to ensure linear behavior with varying primary beam intensity

Aligning cavity mirrors in the dye cell with unexpanded beam

Profile of unexpanded staircase trajectory (Spiricon camera with 600nM lowpass filter)

Beam expanded vertically with first telescope (no PiShaper) and propagated in the overlapping staircase configuration

Resulting profile of staircase configuration (Spiricon camera w 600nM lowpass filter)

Beam expanded through both telescopes and processed with PiShaper

Profile of overlapping PiShaper output (Spiricon camera with 600 nM lowpass filter)

Single pass expanded PiShaper beam (Fine adjustment of the input beam parameters will reportedly remove much of the observed structure.)

Conclusions Variable beam shaping telescopes performed as expected. The PiShaper is very sensitive to input conditions. Additional tuning is needed to take full advantage of this device. Both methods of producing a vertically uniform optical field in the zig-zag cavity showed promising results.