Through a Lens, Darkly: An Innovative Hubble Survey to Study the Dark Universe Marc Postman Space Telescope Science Institute HotSci August 2010 MACS 2129-0741.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Through a Lens, Darkly: An Innovative Multi-cycle Hubble Treasury Program to Study the Dark Universe Marc Postman Space Telescope Science Institute Science.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble An HST Multi-Cycle Treasury Program designed to place new constraints on the fundamental components.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
Lensing of supernovae by galaxies and galaxy clusters Edvard Mörtsell, Stockholm Jakob Jönsson, Oxford Ariel Goobar; Teresa Riehm, Stockholm.
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2006 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 6.
Weak-Lensing selected, X-ray confirmed Clusters and the AGN closest to them Dara Norman NOAO/CTIO 2006 November 6-8 Boston Collaborators: Deep Lens Survey.
Strong Lensing in RCS-2 Clusters Matt Bayliss University of Chicago Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Great Lakes Cosmology Workshop 8 – June 2, 2007.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
On the Distribution of Dark Matter in Clusters of Galaxies David J Sand Chandra Fellows Symposium 2005.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
1 Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn Revealed in the First Year of the Hubble Frontier Fields Initiative Dr. Gabriel Brammer (ESA/AURA, STScI) Hubble Science Briefing.
Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker Springel Advisor : Volker Springel 3rd Biennial Leopoldina.
“CLASH”: A Multi-Cycle Treasury Program to Study the Dark Universe Marc Postman Space Telescope Users Committee November 2, 2010 MACS z = 0.57.
Adam G. Riess Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute The History of Cosmic Expansion from Supernovae Near and Far.
A Short Talk on… Gravitational Lensing Presented by: Anthony L, James J, and Vince V.
Observational Constraints on Galaxy Clusters and DM Dynamics Doron Lemze Tel-Aviv University / Johns Hopkins University Collaborators : Tom Broadhurst,
Constraining Dark Energy with Cluster Strong Lensing Priyamvada Natarajan Yale University Collaborators: Eric Jullo (JPL), Jean-Paul Kneib (OAMP), Anson.
Jennifer Lotz Hubble Science Briefing Jan. 16, 2014 Exploring the Depths of the Universe.
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Supernova cosmology: legacy and future Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Constraining cluster abundances using weak lensing Håkon Dahle Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Full strength of (weak) Cluster lensing Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli Collaborators: Keiichi Umetsu, Narciso Benitez, Dan Coe, Holland Ford,
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Exploring Dark Matter through Gravitational Lensing Exploring the Dark Universe Indiana University June 2007.
Francisco Javier Castander Serentill Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE/CSIC) Barcelona Exploiting the.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7 Lecture 4.
Testing the Shear Ratio Test: (More) Cosmology from Lensing in the COSMOS Field James Taylor University of Waterloo (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) DUEL Edinburgh,
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Welcome to the First CLASH Science Team Meeting September 20 – 21, 2010 Granada, Spain.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
High-Redshift Galaxies in Cluster Fields Wei Zheng, Larry Bradley, and the CLASH high-z search group.
Full strength of (weak) Cluster lensing
Gravitational Lensing Analysis of CLASH clusters Adi HD 10/2011.
Constraining Cosmography with Cluster Lenses Jean-Paul Kneib Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille.
The effects of the complex mass distribution of clusters on weak lensing cluster surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
WAVE GOODBYE TO COLD DARK MATTER ENOCH LEUNG (HKU) PROF. TOM BROADHURST (UPV/EHU) DR. JEREMY LIM (HKU) Hong Kong Astrophysical Society Annual Meeting 14.
Garth Illingworth (UCO/Lick Obs & University of California, Santa Cruz) and the HUDF09 team AAS January 2010 Washington DC Science with the New HST The.
How Different was the Universe at z=1? Centre de Physique Théorique, Marseille Université de Provence Christian Marinoni.
Gravitational Lensing
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies Michael Balogh University of Waterloo.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Cluster Lenses & High Redshift Clusters (MACS) A Status Report Jean-Paul KNEIB Observatoire Astronomique Marseille Provence, Marseille, France H. Ebeling,
A Search for High Redshift Galaxies behind Gravitationally Lensing Clusters Kazuaki Ota (Kyoto U) Johan Richard (Obs.Lyon), Masanori Iye (NAOJ), Takatoshi.
Study of Proto-clusters by Cosmological Simulation Tamon SUWA, Asao HABE (Hokkaido Univ.) Kohji YOSHIKAWA (Tokyo Univ.)
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters Drew Newman Newman et al. 2009, “The Distribution of Dark Matter Over Three Decades in Radius in the Lensing Cluster Abell.
Chapter 20 Cosmology. Hubble Ultra Deep Field Galaxies and Cosmology A galaxy’s age, its distance, and the age of the universe are all closely related.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Team Discussion: CLASH DATA RELEASE PLAN September 2013 London.
The Dark Side of the Universe L. Van Waerbeke APSNW may 15 th 2009.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Cosmology with Supernovae
Presentation transcript:

Through a Lens, Darkly: An Innovative Hubble Survey to Study the Dark Universe Marc Postman Space Telescope Science Institute HotSci August 2010 MACS z = 0.57 HST/ACS image (Ebeling et al.)

Fundamental Questions That Remain Unanswered or Unverified How is dark matter distributed in cluster & galaxy halos? –How centrally concentrated is the DM? Implications for epoch of formation. –What degree of substructure exists? And on what scales? –How does the DM distribution evolve with time? –What correlations exist between the distribution of baryonic matter and DM? 12.5 Gyr “Millennium” simulation of DM Springel et al Mpc

When was the epoch of first galaxy formation? –What are the characteristics (mass, “metal” abundance, star formation rates, global structure) of the most distant galaxies in the universe (t U < 800 Myr)? –What was their role in ionizing the intergalactic medium? –What role do massive black holes play in their formation? Fundamental Questions That Remain Unanswered or Unverified Young galaxies (z ~ 7) Oesch et al. 2010

Why is the expansion of the universe accelerating? –Is it something other than Λ? –What are the parameters of the dark energy equation of state? –What is the time derivative of the equation of state? –How standard are our “standard” candles (cosmic distance indicators)? Need better measurements of systematic effects at large lookback times. Fundamental Questions That Remain Unanswered or Unverified w = P / ρc 2 w = -1 (cosmo constant) w ≠ constant; scalar field e.g. Quintessence, k-essence Is w a f(z)? w(z) = w o + w a z/(1+z) (e.g., Linder 2003) 1 + z w

CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble An Hubble Space Telescope Multi-Cycle Treasury Program designed to place new constraints on the fundamental components of the cosmos: dark matter, dark energy, and baryons. To accomplish this, we will use galaxy clusters as cosmic lenses to reveal dark matter and magnify distant galaxies. The galaxy clusters are chosen based on their smooth and symmetric x-ray surface brightness profiles: “simpler” lenses to model and minimizes lensing bias. All clusters have masses ranging from ~5 to ~30 x M SUN. Redshift range covered: 0.18 t U > 6.3 Gyr). Multiple epochs enable a z > 1 SN search in the surrounding field (where lensing magnification is low). This will allow us to improve the constraints on both the time dependence of the dark energy equation of state and on the amplitude of systematic errors in cosmological parameters.

Abell 209Abell 383 coreAbell 611Abell 963Abell 2261CLJ MACS MACS MACS MACS MACS MACS RXJ Cutouts of x-ray images of 23 of the 25 CLASH clusters from Chandra Observatory RXJ RXJ MS-2137 core RXJ RXJ MACS MACS RXJ MACS RXJ All clusters have T x > 5 keV z_med ~ 0.4

Multiple Facilities Will Be Used HST 524 orbits: 25 clusters, each imaged in 16 passbands. (0.23 – 1.6 μm) Chandra x-ray Observatory archival data (0.5 – 2 keV) Spitzer IR Space Telescope archival data (3.6, 4.5 μm) SZE observations to augment existing data (sub-mm) Subaru wide-field imaging (0.4 – 0.9 μm) GTC, VLT, and Magellan Spectroscopy HST 524 orbits: 25 clusters, each imaged in 16 passbands. (0.23 – 1.6 μm) Chandra x-ray Observatory archival data (0.5 – 2 keV) Spitzer IR Space Telescope archival data (3.6, 4.5 μm) SZE observations to augment existing data (sub-mm) Subaru wide-field imaging (0.4 – 0.9 μm) GTC, VLT, and Magellan Spectroscopy

CLASH: An HST Multi-Cycle Treasury Program ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in yellow, WFC3/IR FOV in red, WFC3/UVIS in blue. Cluster Pointings Footprint of our 2 ORIENT survey: The area of the complete 16-band coverage in the cluster center is 4.07 square arcminutes (88% of the WFC3/IR FOV). SN search cadence: 10d-14d, 4 epochs per orient Lensing amplification small at these radii

Clusters as Cosmic Telescopes Strong Lensing Basics: Galaxy cluster mass density deforms local space-time Pure geometrical effect with no dependence on photon energy Provides large areas of high magnification (μ ~ 10) Amplifies both galaxy flux and size while conserving surface brightness Shows multiply-imaged background galaxies Tradeoff: Dilution of the source-plane area (~1/μ) Strong Lensing Basics: Galaxy cluster mass density deforms local space-time Pure geometrical effect with no dependence on photon energy Provides large areas of high magnification (μ ~ 10) Amplifies both galaxy flux and size while conserving surface brightness Shows multiply-imaged background galaxies Tradeoff: Dilution of the source-plane area (~1/μ)

CLASH: An HST Multi-Cycle Treasury Program Simulation of dark matter around a forming cluster (Springel et al. 2005) WHERE R IS THE RESULTING SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF THE DARK MATTER MAP R   Einstein N Arcs Deep HST image of massive cluster (6.5 Million Light Years)

CLASH: An HST Multi-Cycle Treasury Program Mag distn of multiply lensed arcs in A1689 and CL0024 With 16 filters, 80% photo-z completeness is reached at AB ~26 mag and useful high redshift information is available for ~6 times as many objects than would be possible solely from spectroscopically acquired redshifts. Will yield photometric redshifts with rms error of ~2% x (1 + z) for sources down to ~26 AB mag. Spectroscopic redshifts Photometric redshifts Why 16 filters? Arcs in A1689 and CL0024

Abell 1689 Coe et al Gravitational lensing analysis reveals dark matter structure HST Image of Cluster Reconstructed Mass Surface Density Region of Reliable Reconstruction DM substructure resolution in this map is ~23 kpc. DM substructure resolution for typical CLASH cluster will be ~30 – 40 kpc.

Density Profile of Dark Matter Halos  (r)  = r(r + r S ) 2 r x(x + 1/c) 2 1 x = Other forms also used, e.g., Einasto: ρ(r)  exp(-Ar α ) Shapes of DM halos in LCDM simulations all exhibit a steeper slope as radius increases with a roll-over defined by a characteristic scale or central concentration, c. c Mass t U ρ NFW (1997) Profile

Both Strong & Weak Lensing Measurements Needed for Good Constraints Both strong AND weak lensing measurements are needed to make accurate constraints on the DM profile. Not only to span required physical scale but also to remove mass-sheet degeneracy. CLASH data will allow us to definitively derive the representative equilibrium mass profile shape and robustly measure the cluster DM concentrations and their dispersion as a function of cluster mass and their evolution with redshift. ΛCDM Theory LCDM prediction from Duffy et al. 2008Umetsu et al. 2010

Some (lensing-biased) clusters appear over-concentrated Simulated Observed Abell 1689 Strong LensingWeak Lensing Oguri et al predicted lensing bias Comerford & Natarajan 2007 Best fit to data shown here

Possible explanations for high observed concentrations Lensing selection biasLensing selection bias –Significant (25-50%) but probably not sufficient –CLASH will be free of lensing bias Baryons and adiabatic contractionBaryons and adiabatic contraction –Probably not a major effect in clusters (Duffy et al. 2010, Mead et al. 2010) … but needs to be checked. Halo fitting procedure in simulationsHalo fitting procedure in simulations –Hennawi et al find ~30%+ higher concentrations Clusters formed sooner than in simulationsClusters formed sooner than in simulations –Early Dark Energy?

Clusters with high concentrations and early formation times may be giving us hints of “Early Dark Energy” Grossi & Springel 2009 Ω EDE = a few percent at z ~ 10 ΛCDM (Ω DE ~20x lower) Dark energy suppresses the growth of structure. In EDE models, cluster growth was suppressed earlier. So clusters must have started forming earlier to achieve the abundances observed today.

We expect to find dozens of bright (m 7 galaxies Lensing greatly enhances the ability to detect distant galaxies The blue and red solid curves show the expected number of z=8 and z=10 galaxies, respectively, to be discovered behind our 25 clusters as a function of magnitude in the detection band (F110W at z=8 and F140W at z=10). A significant advantage of searching for high-z objects behind strongly lensing clusters is that the lens model can also be used to discriminate between highly- reddened objects and truly distant, high-z objects as the projected position of the lensed image is a strong function of the source redshift. Survey Limit

Abell 1703 z = 0.26 R E ~ 35” Abell 1703 z = 0.26 R E ~ 35”

A1703 WFC3/IR z-dropouts ■1 orbit each in WFC3/IR F125W (J) and F160W (H) 5+ z-dropout candidates! (some may be multiply- imaged) Typically μ ~ Brightest candidate: z ~ 6.9, H160 ~ 24.3 AB (brightest z ~ 7 candidate known) ■1 orbit each in WFC3/IR F125W (J) and F160W (H) 5+ z-dropout candidates! (some may be multiply- imaged) Typically μ ~ Brightest candidate: z ~ 6.9, H160 ~ 24.3 AB (brightest z ~ 7 candidate known) Bradley et al (in prep) 435 nm 475 nm 555 nm 625 nm 775 nm 850 nm 1.25 μm 1.6 μm 435 nm 475 nm 555 nm 625 nm 775 nm 850 nm 1.25 μm 1.6 μm

HST: 23 SNe Ia at z>1 Find Past Deceleration, Confirms Dark Energy+Dark Matter Model GROUNDGROUND SPACESPACE Riess et al. 2004, 2007 z>1 is a particularly important regime for testing “astrophysical contamination” of SN cosmology signal, such as dust or evolution. Also key for constraining dw/dz.

HST & WFC3-IR, Gateway to SNe Ia at z>2 Two MCT HST programs (CLASH + CANDELS) will detect SNe Ia at 1.0 < z < 2.5. They will provide a direct test of systematics in matter- dominated universe (e.g., Riess & Livio 2006). MCT HST LIFETIME CURRENT MCT 1.25 μm z = 1.5 z = 1.8 z = 2.1 Δ mag (vs. w o = -1, w a = 0) Assuming a mixed SN delay time distn (~50% prompt, ~50% 2-3 Gyr): expect CLASH to find 10 – 20 SNe at z>1; and ~6 with z > 1.5, doubling the known number of hi-z SN

Concluding Comments CLASH observations with HST to begin this fall. 25 clusters will be observed over the course of cycles (~3 years): 10, 10, 5. Represents a major observational initiative to constrain the properties of DM, high-z galaxies, and advance our understanding of DE. Mass calibrators for cluster cosmology surveys. Immediate public access to all HST data. High-level science products will be released on a regular schedule, including compilations of x- ray, IR, sub-mm, and spectroscopic data. CLASH observations with HST to begin this fall. 25 clusters will be observed over the course of cycles (~3 years): 10, 10, 5. Represents a major observational initiative to constrain the properties of DM, high-z galaxies, and advance our understanding of DE. Mass calibrators for cluster cosmology surveys. Immediate public access to all HST data. High-level science products will be released on a regular schedule, including compilations of x- ray, IR, sub-mm, and spectroscopic data.