LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 1 OPERA status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus F. Juget Institut de Physique Université de Neuchâtel Neutrino-CH meeting, Neuchâtel June
Advertisements

Neutrino Oscillation Appearance with OPERA Amina ZGHICHE Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.
OPERA experiment T.Toshito (Nagoya univ. Japan) for the OPERA collaboration Apr
3/1/05 Status of the SHBD for the NUMI OPERA exposure D. Autiero IPN Lyon  Reminder about the proposed setup for the SHBD  Status of the sub-detectors.
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
Status of OPERA N. Naganawa (Nagoya University) Flavor physics.
Kouji Narita Nagoya University, Japan CHORUS collaboration Study of charm production in neutrino interactions.
Umut Kose Neutrino interaction location in the OPERA Experiment New Development of Flavor Physics, , Tennomaru, Gamagori Nagoya University.
The OPERA Experiment 12 th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors (IPRD10) 7-10 June 2010, Siena, Italy Jonas Knüsel Albert Einstein.
Hybrid emulsion detector for the neutrino factory Giovanni De Lellis University of Naples“Federico II” Recall the physics case The detector technology.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
DONUT Reinhard Schwienhorst DOE review 7/28/1999.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Status and the preliminary results of the OPERA experiment V.Tioukov (INFN, Napoli) on behalf of the OPERA collaboration V. Tioukov QFTHEP11, Sochi.
The OPERA long baseline neutrino experiment: status and first results Luigi Salvatore Esposito Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso on behalf of the OPERA.
A. Chukanov On behalf of OPERA collaboration JINR, Dubna TAUP 2011, Munich, 5-9 september, 2011.
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tsutomu FUKUDA ( Nagoya University ) On behalf of the OPERA Collaboration NNN10, 14 Dec 2010, Toyama International.
ICHEP 2004, Beijing H. Pessard/ OPERA - 1 The OPERA experiment CNGS long-baseline program in Europe  Search for  appearance in a  beam: prove   
The OPERA experiment Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus Collaboration: Belgium (IIHE(ULB-VUB) Brussels), Bulgaria (Sofia University),
MTM Bologna, 17/6/ 2005 We know that in Nature there are three kinds of neutrinos and in particular atmospheric neutrinos show a deficit of  This effect,
1 RUN 2008 OPERA events: Status Report M. Ieva on behalf of Bari Emulsion Lab OPERA Collaboration Meeting, April 1st - 5th, 2009.
1 The OPERA emulsion detector for a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment H.Shibuya Toho Univ., Japan K.Hoshino, M.Komatsu, K.Niwa Nagoya Univ.,
Caren Hagner, Universität HamburgDESY Seminar, OPERA and its Tau Neutrino Candidate  Neutrino mass, mixing and neutrino oscillations  OPERA.
September 11th, 2006LNGS and the Neutrinos from CERN OPERA 1 OPERA O scillation P roject with E mulsion-t R acking A pparatus.
R. ZimmermannDortmund, April OPERA physics motivation - CNGS physics motivation - CNGS OPERA detector OPERA detector ν τ appearance ν τ appearance.
OPERA Experiment, Brick Finding Program A. Chukanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research ISU, 12 th February, 2007.
Status of the OPERA experiment Akitaka Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of the OPERA collaboration  CC event with charm production Candidate (Data)
Tsutomu Fukuda Nagoya University, JAPAN
Status and results from OPERA Tomoko Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of OPERA Swiss groups of Bern and ETHZ.
The OPERA neutrino oscillation experiment Paolo Strolin University and INFN, Napoli.
OPERA Status Report D. Autiero, IPN Lyon (on behalf of the OPERA Collaboration) Introduction Running in Analysis results A first tau candidate.
Operation of and results from OPERA Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University CHIPP Plenary meeting Lausanne, EPFL-LPHE September
First neutrino events in the OPERA emulsion target Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University for the OPERA collaboration Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak interactions.
Status of the OPERA Neutrino Oscillation Experiment 5-8 January 2010, Cracow, Poland Sergey Dmitrievsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna on.
 eutrino oscillations in the CNGS  beam The experimental challenge of direct detection of appearance through CC events The long-baseline era and the.
Hamburg Björn Wonsak 1 First results and status of the OPERA experiment Focussed on the electronic detector, especially the presicion tracker (PT)
   The European Long Baseline Program Les Houches, 21 June 2001 Dario Autiero CERN/EP Many thanks to A. Rubbia for providing material about ICARUS.
Neutrino Oscillations Studies with the Opera Experiment
Studies of Charmed Particle Production and Decay in the CHORUS Experiment Emiliano Barbuto University of Salerno and INFN (Italy) For the CHORUS Collaboration.
1 NuFact’01 WG1 : Neutrino Oscillation Physics May 24-30, 2001 An appearance experiment to search for  -  oscillations in the CNGS beam CNGS1 O scillation.
Search for  appearance via neutrino oscillations in the  CNGS beam with the OPERA experiment Amina ZGHICHE For the OPERA Collaboration (LAPP-Annecy.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Recent results of the OPERA search for       oscillations T. OMURA On behalf of The OPERA Collaboration 1/17 Belgium ULB Brussels Croatia IRB Zagreb.
OPERA Experiment, Brick Finding Program A. Chukanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, 25 th January, 2007.
Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – v3.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
NBI2006 Starting OPERA data-taking with the CNGS beam D.Autiero IN2P3/IPN Lyon 5/9/2006.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
HEP Conference 2009, Krakow, PolandH. Pessard / 1 Henri Pessard / LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the OPERA Collaboration) Status of the OPERA neutrino experiment.
Electromagnetic shower reconstruction with emulsion films in the OPERA experiment F. Juget IPH Université de Neuchâtel On behalf of the OPERA collaboration.
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tomoko Ariga on behalf of the OPERA collaboration A. Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics LHEP, University.
Nuclear emulsions One of the eldest particle detectors, still used in particle physics experiment (CHORUS, DONUT, OPERA) for its unique peculiarities:
Current Status of The OPERA Experiment
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Experience from Antoine Cazes, nuFact’08 Valencia
More results from the OPERA experiment
Status of the OPERA experiment
OPERA Stato dell’esperimento Run 2007
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
OPERETTE TEST BEAM EXPERIMENT :
Bari emulsion lab: status report
Neutrino and Charm Physics with CHORUS
Presentation transcript:

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 1 OPERA status

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 2 uOPERA experiment: from detector construction to a working apparatus n Practical running update uPast neutrino runs n Detector target filling n uData collection and analysis n Statistics n Prospects uAfter April 6 L’Aquila seism OPERA French groups Annecy LAPP: D. Duchesneau, J. Favier, H. Pessard, A. Zghiche Lyon IPNL: D. Autiero, T. Brugière, A. Cazes, L. Chaussard, Y. Déclais, J. Marteau, E. Pennacchio, T. Tran Strasbourg IPHC: M. Dracos, C. Jollet, A. Meregaglia Outline:

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 3 OPERA: Direct observation of ν τ appearance CERN LNGS 730 km OPERA Long baseline experiment in Europe Nuclear emulsion techniques OPERA CNGS : 17 GeV  beam from CERN to Gran Sasso From SPS: 400 GeV/c Cycle length: 6 s Extractions: –2 separated by 50 ms Pulse length: 10.5  s Beam intensity: – proton/extr. Expected performance: –4.5  pot/year  SK (1998): atmospheric neutrino anomaly interpretable as    oscillation  CHOOZ: no  → e oscillation  SK  disappearance oscillation signal confirmed by K2K and MINOS Gran Sasso underground laboratories: 1400 m rock overburden

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 4 Experimental signature: tau neutrino CC detection  CC interaction      + N   + X oscillation      B. R. ~ 17% h   n(  o )B. R. ~ 50% e    B. R. ~ 18%        n(  o ) B. R. ~ 14%    -- Decay “kink”  -- cc  oscillation -- c  ~ 87  m no-oscillation (≈ 600  m of path) (with ≈ 35% of Non-Scaling QE and 65% DIS) (with ≈ 11% of Non-Scaling QE and 89% DIS)

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 5 Pb Emulsion layers  1 mm ECC concept (Emulsion Cloud Chamber): 1 mm thick Pb layers interleaved with emulsions films (2 emulsion layers  m thick poured on a 205  m plastic base ) emulsion support 12.5cm 10.2cm Track reconstruction accuracy in emulsion:  x  1 µ m   1 mrad One “BRICK” : - 57 emulsion films - 56 Pb plates - a box with a removable pair of films CS 10 X 0 Changeable Sheet Doublet (CSd) 8, 6 Kg To reach O(Kton) mass, the OPERA lead–emulsion high granularity target is segmented into modular units called bricks The OPERA way to detect the tau kink bricks ~1.25 Ktons

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 6 20 m 10 m Super Module 1 Super Module 2 electronics racks Muon Spectrometer Target TARGET TRACKERS 2 x 31 scintillator strips walls X-Y strips/wall WLS fiber readout 64-channel H7546 PMT channels 0.8 cm resol. ε ≅ 99% rate ≅ 20 p.e. INNER TRACKERS 990-ton Fe dipole magnets (B= 1.55 T) instrumented with 22 RPC planes (streamer mode) 3050 m 2,  ~1.3 cm spatial resol. ε ≅ 96% (geometrical) HIGH PRECISION TRACKERS 6 drift-tube layers/spectrometer spatial resolution < 0.5 mm Veto Drift tubes RPC ECCs scint. strips BRICK WALLS 53 walls filled with bricks 2850 bricks/wall BMS Brick Manipulator system The detector Detector construction: Sept spring 2007 Target Trackers neutrino trigger brick localization RPC + drift tubes in spectrometers: muon ID, momentum, charge

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 7 uCNGS-LNGS synchronization based on GPS. Present precision 100 ns (could be improved up to 10 ns) uDAQ live-time >99%. Live-time during CNGS 98.9% uDirection and momentum reconstruction for CNGS event uCharge and momentum reconstruction for cosmics OK (Negligible cosmics bg.) OK In progress OPERA performance as on-line detector

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / Gran Sasso Approval End of civil engineering End of construction Commissioning Elect-det only bricks bricks OPERA CNGS CNGS runs u2006: short pilot run No bricks. Stop due to horn cooling. u2007 (24 th September – 20 th October): x pot. Only ~3.6 nominal days: radiation shielding problems. 38 interactions in the bricks (32±6 expected) u2008 (June 18th-November 3rd): x pot events on time ~1700 interactions in bricks 0.7  events expected 2008 first time long physics run, poor CNGS performance at beginning, better at the end (more CNGS cycles)

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 9 CNGS Run 2008: 18 June- 03 Nov 2008 Total: 1.78·10 19 pot 18kV cable repair MD PS magnet exchange, septum bakeout MD SPS timing fault: vacuum leak & magnet exchange CNGS maintenance SPS extraction line: Magnet ground fault MD CNGS maintenance Nominal: pot/yr Beam to CNGS, LHC, FT, MD Beam to CNGS, LHC, FT Beam to CNGS, MD

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 10 After the LHC accident, further increase of the intensity for OPERA (duty cycle 37.5%  83%). SFTPRO3xCNGSLHC MD 4 x CNGS2xCNGS MTE/ CNGS LHC

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 11 uTrigger + event selection “on time” with CNGS uBrick finding reconstruction algorithm applied to electronic data to select the best candidate brick to contain the neutrino interaction vertex uBrick removed by the Brick Manipulation System (BMS) and exposed to (frontal) X-rays to make an alignment reference between CSd and brick uCSd detached from brick, films developed and analysed in one of the CS Scanning Stations, in Europe (LNGS) or in Japan (Nagoya) uIf a TT-predicted track is found in the CSd, the brick is exposed to (lateral) X-rays beam and to cosmic rays for sheets alignment. Brick is disassembled and emulsion films developed and sent to one of the scanning labs uTracks found in the CSd are searched for in the most downstream film of the brick and followed (scan-back procedure) uA volume scan around the neutrino interaction point is performed and the neutrino vertex is located OPERA data taking flow Several ancillary facilities have been validated at nominal speed only in 2008 Brick assembly, manipulation, DB tracing, emulsion development and assoc. logistics were big engineering enterprises…

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 12 uPrediction of the brick where interaction occurred uExtraction of Bricks at the rate of CNGS events uAlignment and development of Changeable Sheets uScanning of the Changeable Sheets uIdentification of the primary vertex uKinematic reconstruction and decay search Part. validated (*) Fully validated In progress (**) (*) Extr. of 1° brick nearly completed. 2° in progress. (**) First results on a subsample of ~200 events OPERA performance as hybrid detector

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 13 Preliminary Check sample of extracted 1° bricks with CS scanned: 700 events (full stat. results will follow) Tracks found in the CS: 60% 1 st Brick finding (correct for dead material and CS efficiency): 70% (OK!) Expectation after 2 nd extraction: 80% (check with real data in progress) Manca plot Brick finding Brick extractions End of CNGS run Up to 25 bricks per shift

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 14 MC independent test of track finding efficiency in CS in a subsample of fully located event (  sb ~ 90%) OK! BrickCSd LNGS (Italy) NAGOYA (Japan) LNGS Scanning of Changeable Sheets

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 15 ‘data collection’ from emulsions In progress: vertex efficiency with large statistics Backscattering studies charm topologies search Vertex finding and decay search Test sample ~200 fully rec. events seems OK, full results need some more months.  … 2 1 CSd CSd general scan: 50 cm 2 around TT prediction angular range ±400 mrad alignment by Xray marks (10  m accuracy) Scan back: alignment using cosmic ray tracks (2  m accuracy) stopping point Volume Scan: 1 cm 2, 10 plates  track IP Multiplicity

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 16 NCCCTotal Bricks scanned CS to brick connected Vertices located in the brick Passing through Vertices in the dead material2911 PRELIMINARY Analysis April 3 rd 2009 Vertex location summary, 2008 run At least 1 CS track connected in brick: 96% Located events: 77% Passing through (wall misidentification): 6% Interactions in dead material: ~ 2%

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / pair opening angle 10 mrad E  = 157 MeV low p track A beautiful   CC ECC level

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 18 A charm candidate Kink PRELIMINARY e.m. showers vertex signature already evident in the CS  The charmed hadron is “inside” the hadronic jet and back to back with the muon Charm search 8 candidates found for 10 expected in a sample of ~550  CC

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 19 kink angle = rad Decay length = 3247 μm p(daughter) = GeV p t = 796 MeV p t MIN = 606 MeV (90% CL) The charm decay kink Secondary Vertex (1 prong decay) ‏

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 20 uA strong earthquake (M I =6.3) hit the L’Aquila area on April 6 th at 03:32 am. u295 died, 1170 were hurt at L’Aquila and surrounding villages uThe quake epicenter was only at 8.8 km depth, causing strong damages in a limited area. Many houses collapsed, 10 to buildings were damaged. 50K people are homeless. u38K people still lived in tents last week, either homeless of fearing aftershocks (that lasted more than 2 weeks). uLNGS laboratories, ~20 km away, have no apparent damages. OPERA seems intact, although geometric measurements should be done to check its structure and alignment. uThe most important problem for the lab is the situation of the staff. LNGS will officially reopen on May 5 th. uThose dramatic circumstances will translate into some delay, all activities being stopped for 1.5 months: brick extractions and (re)insertions, CS scanning -> 2008 brick analysis are affected. Consequences of the April 2009 L’Aquila seism

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 21 Detector target filling situation Mar 07 July bricks were produced and installed in the detector until July 2008 Target preparations for new bricks, produced after the recovery of the lead production chain (damaged by an explosion in 2008) were loaded to complete the OPERA target. Remain to be inserted: 2500 bricks -In preparation of the 2009 run, from February to April, the OPERA target was under a reshuffling operation needed to replace CS films in about bricks (10% of the whole target). About 8200 remain to be re-inserted. -About 300 candidate bricks from 2008 run remain to be extracted (2 nd brick extraction).

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 22 uIn 2008, after a difficult startup, OPERA got from CNGS a significant integrated intensity (~ p.o.t.) was OPERA first real physics run. uThe construction of OPERA is complete; all sub-detectors and ancillary facilities are fully operative. u4 months after the end of the data taking, most of the analysis chain has been validated. uThe last steps, vertex and kinematic analysis of the full sample, will be completed in a few months. uFollowing the L’Aquila earthquake in April, CERN is awaiting a green light of OPERA to start the 2009 CNGS operation, hopefully with very little delay. uOPERA needs as many pots as possible soon to succeed in its physics program. Conclusions

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 23 The End

LPNHE Paris, April 28 th, 2009GDR NeutrinoH. Pessard / 24 Expected background:  Charmed particles produced in  CC and NC interaction uHadron re-interactions in lead  Large angle scattering of muons produced in  CC events   0 misidentification Full mixing, 5 years run, 4.5x10 19 pot / year and target mass = 1.3 kton Occurs if primary muon is not detected and possible wrong charge measurement of secondary muon. Muon ID is a crucial issue  -  µ -  e- -  e  -  h  -  3h Background: Signal  m 2 = 2.5 x eV 2  - decay channels 0.75 ALL10.4  (%) BR  (%)          x BR =10.6% Physics potential