Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) with CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Western North Dakota Zhengwen Zeng and Peng Pei Department of Geology and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FutureGen in Illinois: Clean Energy for the Needs of Tomorrow John Mead SIU Research Center Robert J. Finley State Geological Survey FutureGen For Illinois.
Advertisements

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
FutureGen in Kentucky A slide show explaining a KGS preliminary assessment of geologic sequestration potential for future power plants in.
Carbon Capture and Sequestration Update APPA Energy & Clean Air Task Force April 26, 2010.
STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING
Carbon Sequestration Red Balansay ESS 315. What Is It? Also known as “carbon capture” A geoengineering technique for the long-term storage of carbon dioxide.
Field Demonstration of CO 2 Miscible Flooding in the Lansing-Kansas City Formation, Central Kansas Alan P. Byrnes (KGS, PM-BP1) Class II Revisited DE-AC26-00BC15124.
1 Convolutional Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling for CO 2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield, Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li Advisor: Dr. Christopher Liner.
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Julie A. LeFever North Dakota Geological Survey
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
Preformed Particle Gel (PPG) for Conformance Control
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
Geological and Petrophysical Analysis Of Reservoir Cores
Montana – North Dakota? Middle Member Bakken Play Julie A. LeFever North Dakota Geological Survey.
“RESERVOIR ENGINEERING”
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
Migration of Petroleum
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of the Morrow A Sandstone Thomas L. Davis & Robert D. Benson CSM Scott Wehner, Chaparral Energy, and Michael D. Raines.
The Potential Impacts of Co-produced Geothermal Waters Mid-cont. States with geothermal potential Water Produced in 2004 (kbbl) Total Water Production.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Geothermal Energy is the Ethical Energy Source for the Future Will Gosnold Dept. of Geology and Geological Engineering Donald Poochigian Dept. of Philosophy.
Motivation and aims  Framework: exploitation of the huge potential of CO 2 in EOR and development of reliable sequestration processes.  Global objective:
Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel © NERC All rights reserved CO 2 storage potential in India S. Holloway, A. Garg,
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Reservoirs
Defining the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector: Exploration, Production, and Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Western Climate Initiative – Oil & Gas Collaborative.
Dec.5, 2006 / Beijing China / 1. Dec.5, 2006 / Beijing China / 2 Sustainable Growth for Oil and Gas.
Darren Johnson Geological Survey Program South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources 20 th Williston Basin Petroleum Conference May 22nd.
2014 BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE national energy center of excellence August 8, 2014 DAVE CLARK – INTERIM PRESIDENT Department of Energy Quadrennial Energy.
Petroleum Engineering Presented by : Mostafa Khojamli November
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Visiting Geologists Program. Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Lawrence H. Wickstrom.
Carbon Capture & Storage(CCS)
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
Wyoming’s Energy Future: Creating Options Mark A. Northam, Director UW School of Energy Resources September 25, 2008.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module VII: Weyburn, Sask. Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
WOC 1 view on the focus and scope regarding CO 2 sequestration in WOC 1 (upstream sector) study area. (according to the experience of CO 2 problem study.
Subsurface Structural Trap. talk about how we find oil simulation to plan the drilling of a well Today’s Activity.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
University of Georgia Department of Geology GEOL 4320/6320 Petroleum Geology Migration of Petroleum.
Manitoba Oil Activity Review Bismarck, ND May 22, th Williston Basin Petroleum Conference.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
GEOLOGICAL STORAGE OF CARBON DIOXIDE A.K. Bhandari Advisor TPPC, Ministry of Mines International Workshop on Power Generation with Carbon Capture and storage.
Carbon Capture and Storage - can it make coal clean? Dr. Shannon Page Department of Environmental Management Lincoln University.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
Exploration Significance of Unconformity Structures on Subtle Pools Kongyou Wu, Ph. D Associate Professor China University of Petroleum.
Bode Omoboya 16 th May,  Introduction  Bakken Shale Case Study  Barnett Shale Case Study  Other Forward Modeling Projects.
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
Using Well Logs (e-logs) in the Petroleum industry Earth Science World.
Assesment of of CO 2 EOR & Sequestration Potential in Gulf Coast Reservoirs Mark H. Holtz, Vanessa Núñez López, and Caroline L. Breton.
Rock & Fluid Properties
Northern Great Plains Water Consortium (NGPWC) Bakken Water Opportunities Assessment Water Resource Opportunities Meeting Bismarck, ND December 10, 2009.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
CO2-Prophet model based evaluation of CO2-EOR and storage potential
Chapter 10 Groundwater (Cont’d) Groundwater Systems The average length of time that groundwater remains underground is several hundred years. Groundwater.
Coalbed Methane Assessment and Analysis of Produced Water Disposal Options, Northern Cheyenne Reservation, Montana Project FEW Shaochang Wo, Principal.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Underground Coal Gasification. Underground Coal Gasification.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module VII: Weyburn, Sask. Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Washington Hydrogeology Symposium April 14, 2015 | Tacoma, WA The Missouri Carbon Sequestration Project – A Model for State.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Study of the Niobrara Formation in the Borie Field Abdulaziz Muhanna Alhubil, Gabrijel Grubac, Joe Lawson, Rachael Molyneux & David Scadden.
Impacts of Oil Development on Land Cover of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Tanya Driver Dr. Kerry Hartman Fort Berthold Community College Abstract.
Status and Prospect on CO2 Capture and Sequestration in China
A New Coal-Permeability Model:
Unconventional Reservoirs
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Potential for Geological Carbon Sequestration using deep saline aquifers in the Illinois Basin GIS Term Project Julien Botto.
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Presentation transcript:

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) with CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Western North Dakota Zhengwen Zeng and Peng Pei Department of Geology and Geologic Engineering University of North Dakota

Outline Concept of UCG-EOR  Underground coal gasification (UCG) coupled with CO 2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) Introduction to the selected site  Lignite resources, oil production, topography and aquifers Site modeling work  Procedure, current results

Concept of UCG-EOR

Our Goals Generate power and/or syngas products via underground coal gasification to recover the huge, unmineable lignite resources in North Dakota Enhance oil recovery in nearby mature petroleum reservoirs using CO 2 from the underground coal gasification plants Sequester the CO 2 eventually in the deep oil reservoirs to reduce greenhouse gas emission

Site Screening for UCG-CO 2 EOR

Selected Site – Dunn County, ND (Fischer et al, 2005) 4 townships, 144 square miles Lignite in Fort Union Formation

Oil Production in the Selected Area Little Knife and many other fields are under the lignite resources in the selected area. Many fields are in water flooding phase (secondary production). There is big demand on CO 2 for tertiary EOR.

Oil fieldPool OOIP 10 6 bbl Cum. prod bbl Water inj. Start date Little KnifeMadison /7/1994 Blue ButteMadison /1/1968 Big StickMadison /9/1988 KnutsonMadison /6/2001 Rough RiderMadison /13/1997 T.R.Madison /19/2004 Candidate Oil Fields for UCG-CO 2 EOR

Aquifers in the Selected Area The lignite bearing formation (Fort Union) coincidences with the Lower Tertiary Aquifer. The aquifer consists of sandstone interbedded with shale, mudstone, siltstone, lignite and limestone. Aquifer is not highly permeable, but is an important source of water supply. This is a complex dual system. (Whitehead et al, 1996) (Fischer et al, 2005)

Aquifers in the Selected Area Contaminants transport mechanisms are advection, molecular diffusion and mechanical dispersion. Contaminants can be adsorbed on the coal and strata. Low-permeability sandwich layers can function as a filter and a seal to reduce spread of contaminants induced by UCG. Target: locations with high clay content. (Liu et al, 2007)

Modeling the Coal Seam and Adjacent Layers Harmon coal sub- zones in Fort Union Formation Lithological interpretation logs from US Geological Survey Oil & gas well logs from North Dakota Geological Survey (Flore et al, 1999)

Modeling the Coal Seam Screen oil wells with logs penetrating the coal seams (Fort Union) Find 38 wells with GR logs (144 sq. mile) Identify the formations: Lignite GR=5~10; Mudstone GR  20. Create model: –digitize  interpret  correlate  build model

Model result: Coal Seam and Topography

The Harmon Coal Seam Depth, ft Isopach, ft

Clay Content Clay content at 10 ft below the coal seam Coal seam

Clay Content Clay content at 30 ft above the coal seam Clay content at 10 ft above the coal seam

Summary Integrated lignite UCG-CCS-CO 2 EOR in Williston Basin, North Dakota is proposed. Candidate lignite and oil fields are screened. Hydrological and petroleum reservoir production conditions of the candidate fields are studied. Geology of the lignite and the clay seals above and beneath the coal seams are modeled.

Acknowledgements This research is funded by: US DOE through contracts of DE-FC26-05NT42592 (CO 2 Sequestration) and DE-FC26-08NT (Bakken Geomechanics); North Dakota Industry Commission with five industrial sponsors (Encore Acquisition Company, Hess Corporation, Marathon Oil Company, St. Mary Land & Exploration Company, and Whiting Petroleum Corporation) under contract NDIC-G ; North Dakota Department of Commerce together with Schlumberger, IHS and American Petroleum Institute through Petroleum Research, Education and Entrepreneurship Center of Excellence (PREEC) program. We greatly appreciate all the sponsors for their support!

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) with CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Western North Dakota Thanks Contact Info: