Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
Advertisements

Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Signed on December 1973 and provides for the conservation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or significant portion of their.
The Function of Riparian Reserves for Terrestrial Species: What was the Intent? Martin G. Raphael.
Consultation Under the Endangered Species Act Garwin Yip, NOAA Fisheries Service, Southwest Region.
Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Roadless Area Conservation: National Forest System Lands in Idaho Proposed Rule www. roadless.fs.fed.us State of Idaho.
The Northwest Forest Plan The Northwest Forest Plan An Overview.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service CRITICAL HABITAT AND MILITARY LANDS.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
Habitat Reserves 1.What are they? 2.Why do we need them? 3.How do we design them?
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
NAASF State Lands Management Committee Meeting November 4-6, 2014 Indianapolis, Indiana Northern Long-eared Bat: Conservation Challenges and Options for.
Intersection of the Magnuson Stevens Act with the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act Roger Williams University School of Law November.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act Overview
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
PACIFIC REGION U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE JANUARY 13, 2010 BULL TROUT Proposed Critical Habitat.
Summary of Implementation and Findings for the Green Diamond NSO HCP Since Program 2.Status of Surveys 3.Demographic/Density Studies 4.Data Available.
Proposed Revised Critical Habitat & Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Experimental Removal of Barred Owls April 2012 Northern Spotted Owl Recovery.
Population Dynamics of the Northern Spotted Owl Reasons for Listing, Current Status, and Recovery Strategy May 8, 2014.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
Direction for Fire Management in Land Use Plan Revisions.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Application Landscape Ecology in Forest Management: A Glass Half Empty? Thomas Spies USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
Predictive Modeling of Northern Spotted Owl Home Ranges Presented by Elizabeth Willy USFWS File Photo.
Species Listing and Critical Habitat Regulations Endangered Species Act.
Endangered Species Act Counterpart Regulations for National Fire Plan Projects Bureau of Land Management Forest Service June 9, 2004.
ASSESSING AND MANAGING WILDLAND RECREATIONAL DISTURBANCE Stephen J. DeMaso, Fidel Hernández, and Leonard A. Brennan Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute,
Managing Tree Species Diversity for Forest Resilience and Adaptability Andy MacKinnon - Research Ecologist -Coast Area Provincial Ecologists Nanaimo BC.
Forestry in the 2008 Farm Bill and Associated Federal Acts Craig McKinley NREM, OSU-Stillwater.
Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
Michael Paul Nelson and Chelsea Batavia Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society Oregon State University Actively Managing in Stands >80: Using argument.
Chapter 43 Global Ecology and Conservation Biology.
23 Landscape Ecology and Ecosystem Management. 23 Landscape Ecology and Ecosystem Management Case Study: Wolves in the Yellowstone Landscape Landscape.
Chapter 4 Ecosystems: How They Change. Population Dynamics: Population Growth curves (p83):  J-curves, also known as exponential growth, could result.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Most supported using voluntary conservation incentives for candidate and at-risk species Most supported using voluntary conservation incentives.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
Wildlife Protection Adapting to Change NASF Annual Meeting Lake Tahoe, California September 16, 2015 Lisa Allen Missouri State Forester.
Outside Large Blocks, Inside & Outside Critical Habitat Management Hypothesis Highest timber production yields. Produces uniform stand conditions. Shorter.
Recovery Planning Advances Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Northwest Environmental Summit October 20, 2005.
Conservation Biology and Restorative Ecology. What matters most in an ecosystem: BIODIVERSITY Genetic diversity Species diversity Ecosystem diversity.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Consultation In Federal Land Management Agencies American Chemical Society National Meeting Boston, Mass. August 2015.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
Reconciling Northern Spotted Owl Critical Habitat and Principles of Conservation Planning Brian Woodbridge, Jeffrey Dunk, Nathan Schumaker, Elizabeth.
Natural Variability as a Management Paradigm
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
Introduction to the Clean Water Act And Water Quality Regulation
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Presentation transcript:

Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White (FWS) 1

2

The goal of our critical habitat designation is to aid in the conservation of the spotted owl through the conservation and restoration of the ecosystem and ecosystem processes upon which the species relies. Critical habitat is designed to support three of the four Recovery Criteria (Revised Recovery Plan): Recovery Criterion 1 – Stable Population Trend Recovery Criterion 2 – Adequate Population Distribution Recovery Criterion 3 – Continued Maintenance and Recruitment of Spotted Owl Habitat 3

The physical and biological features/primary constituent elements (PBFs/PCEs) provide the spotted owl with the environmental conditions required for its conservation and survival. So our goal is to retain and restore those elements to provide for spotted owl conservation Habitat for: -nesting/roosting -foraging -transience/colonization) 4

Special Management Considerations A) Conserve older stands that contain the conditions to support northern spotted owl occupancy or high-value northern spotted owl habitat as described in Recovery Actions 10 and 32 5

B) Actively manage forests to restore ecosystem health where necessary and appropriate 1. Focus active management in younger forest, lower quality owl habitat, or where ecological conditions are most departed from the natural or desired range of variability. 2. Avoid or minimize activities in active northern spotted owl territories (or the high- quality habitat within these territories). 3. In moist forests on Federal lands, follow NWFP guidelines as informed by the Revised Recovery Plan and focus on areas outside of LSRs (i.e., matrix). 4. In dry forests, follow NWFP guidelines and focus on lands in or outside of reserves that are most ‘‘at-risk’’ of experiencing uncharacteristic disturbance. 5. We encourage land managers to consider a stronger focus on ecological forestry in areas where commercial harvest and restoration are planned. (p.71882) 6

7

Special Management Considerations at a greater landscape scale (p ) The recovery of the northern spotted owl therefore requires both protection of habitat and management where necessary to provide sufficient high-quality habitat to allow for population growth and to provide a buffer against threats such as competition with the barred owl. Conservation and recovery of the species is dependent in part on development of additional habitat to allow for population growth and recovery. Therefore, portions of the habitat mosaic in some subunits designated as critical habitat within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time of listing consist of younger or partially harvested forest. These are essential for the conservation of the species because they are capable of developing the PCEs that support nesting, roosting, or foraging by northern spotted owls that will be necessary for population growth. (p ) 8

Consultation Effects Determinations We encourage the level one consultation teams to tailor this scale of the effects determination to the localized biology of the life-history needs of the northern spotted owl (such as the stand scale, a 500-ac (200-ha) circle, or other appropriate, localized scale). (p ) Effects analyses should consider the spatial and temporal implications of projects. 9

Integration with the NWFP The designation of areas as critical habitat does not change land use allocations or Standards and Guidelines for management under the NWFP. Active adaptive forest management within critical habitat – Most importantly, this approach is compatible with the ecosystem-based approach of the Northwest Forest Plan. (p ) Our discussion of potential management considerations for the northern spotted owl are intended to be fully compatible with the objectives and Standards and Guidelines of the NWFP as informed by the conservation guidelines presented in the 2011 Revised Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (USFWS 2011) to provide a means whereby the ecosystems on which northern spotted owls depend will be conserved. (p ) 10

Integration with the NWFP(cont) All BLM and Forest Service lands identified as northern spotted owl critical habitat in this rule fall under the NWFP, and should be managed consistent with its standards. With barred owls now sharing the range of the northern spotted owl, conservation of northern spotted owls outside NWFP reserved areas is increasingly important for species recovery. …we fully recognize the ecological functions and land management goals of the different land use allocations as outlined under the NWFP. 11

12

Application of the Concepts in CH Rule (and Recovery Plan). avoiding older, more structurally diverse stands, using different prescriptions in dry, mixed, and moist forest areas based on developing resistance, resilience, habitat enhancement, or timber production. Not treating CH as a reserve, but approaching actions in CH with varying existing conditions and management needs. Application of the Concepts in CH Rule (and Recovery Plan). avoiding older, more structurally diverse stands, using different prescriptions in dry, mixed, and moist forest areas based on developing resistance, resilience, habitat enhancement, or timber production. Not treating CH as a reserve, but approaching actions in CH with varying existing conditions and management needs.

Scale and intensity questions remain when planning projects within CH: Why this, why here, why now? Developing context for stand level management within the existing landscape Analysis of effects is variable among districts– sometimes effects are analyzed at the scale of a habitat element as opposed to habitat or considering effects to Critical Habitat co-extensive with the effects on NSO 14

Integration with the NWFP

ESA Critical Habitat – Area required to provide for the conservation (survival and recovery) of the species. Federal actions cannot result in the Destruction or Adverse Modification of designated critical habitat. NWFP responsive to two primary needs The need for forest habitat The need for forest products 16

17 The NWFP S&Gs create a framework of minimum and maximum limits for allowable management within each land allocation. Management activities must fit within the framework. ” BLM and the FS must operate within the NWFP framework, while not violating their section 7 requirements to avoid destruction/adverse modification. Federal agencies also have ESA section 7(a)(1) responsibilities to “utilize their authorities in furtherance of the purposes of this Act by carrying out programs for the conservation of endangered species and threatened species….”

CH designation is not an absolute prohibition on management that would adversely affect Critical Habitat. “Adverse effects on …. constituent elements or segments of critical habitat generally do not result in….adverse modification determinations unless that loss, when added to the environmental baseline, is likely to result in significant adverse effects throughout the species’ range, or appreciably diminish the capability of the critical habitat to satisfy essential requirements of the species.” (ESA Consultation Handbook) 18

The inherent flexibility of the NWFP and implementing LRMP/RMPs will allow forest management that is not inconsistent with the guidance, recommendations, and purpose described in the Critical Habitat rule – To a point. 19

20