Statewide System of Support Services and Programs Greg Alexander, Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements


AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
Parents as Partners in Education
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Reframing Family and Community Engagement Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration May 21, 2012 through May 29, 2012 Title I Technical Assistance Session School Level Parental.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Parent Involvement in the Title I Law Title I State Parent Advisory Council (SPAC) PAFPC Conference April 3-6, 2011.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Your Elementary School September  Title I is short for the Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Reauthorized.
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 3 Competition April 26, 2012 Gina Scroggins Director, School Turnaround.
I DAHO S TATEWIDE S YSTEM OF S UPPORT (SSOS) NNSSIL Webinar – Addressing the Needs of All Students through School Improvement September 12, 2012 Steve.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Priority School District Capacity Review Process and Results Oklahoma State Department of Education March 29, 2012.
Annual Title 1Workshop “Getting Parents Involved in Education” September 1, 2015 The purpose of this workshop is to inform Parents of their rights under.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Parental Involvement Staff Training
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Statewide System of Support Services and Programs Greg Alexander, Director

Statewide System of Support “You don't change performance without changing the instructional core. The relationship of the teacher and the student in the presence of content must be at the center of effort to improve performance. If you can't see it in the classroom, it's not there." — Richard Elmore, Harvard University Greg Alexander Director, Statewide System of Support

District and School Improvement The Improvement Plan should embody a plan that is comprehensive, highly structured, specific and focused primarily on the school's instructional program. The plan should incorporate strategies based on scientifically based research that will strengthen the core academic subjects in the school and address the specific academic issues that caused the school to be identified for school improvement. Shasta Oswald Coordinator, Statewide School Improvement Programs WISE Tool

District/School Improvement continued Schools and Districts will hold the Improvement status of through Schools and Districts that had Improvement Plans due in have plans due in Change: Plans are due November 1 st, which is within 90 days of when data will be distributed*. Revisions and Monitoring in February. Focus Schools will have an interview with SDE designee prior to December 31.

Fall Tour for Improvement Why should School and District Improvement teams come to the Fall Tour? Participants will know new submission requirements and new deadlines. Participants will write one high quality SMART Goal. Participants will have assessed and created a plan for one indicator in a way that is aligned with the SMART Goal. Participants will understand how to monitor planned indicators. Participants will understand the characteristics of a high quality district/peer review process based on the state’s compliance checklist and rubric.

Fall Tour Continued Fall Tour Dates –September 8 th Region 3, The Riverside Hotel –September 9 th Region 3, Nampa Civic Center –September 10 th Region 4, Hilton Garden Inn, Twin Falls –September 11 th, Region 5/6, Shoshone Bannock Hotel and Event Center –September 22 nd, Region 1/2, Best Western Plus, Coeur d’Alene Inn School Leadership Teams for Schools Identified as AMO Continuous or Continuous need not Attend Registration for the Fall Tour is open. Send school teams of 4-5 and a district team.

Idaho Superintendents’ Network ISN The network is comprised of committed superintendents who work together to develop a cohesive and dedicated leadership community focused on teaching and learning. Topics for discussion include: Research-based best practices for District Leaders Working effectively with local School Boards Learning from Highly Effective Superintendents Aligning with Legislators and Community Leaders Developing relationships with SDE personnel Status of Task Force Recommendations Greg Alexander Director, Statewide System of Support

Educator Effectiveness (Teacher and Administrator Evaluation) The purpose of these evaluation systems is to recognize, promote and help develop effective and successful educators. Idaho's approach to evaluation is all about cultivating and celebrating excellence, and ensuring that those who excel also thrive in their workplaces, and remain in education. Lisa Colon Educator Effectiveness Coordinator

Network of Innovative School Leaders (NISL) "Leading and Learning“ The Network of Innovative School Leaders (NISL) is a project developed by the Idaho State Department of Education (SDE) Statewide System of Support Team to support the work of building level administration in improving outcomes for all students by focusing on the quality of instruction. NISL is a professional learning community that will focus on increasing the effectiveness of the Instructional Core. Principals will participate in various learning and networking opportunities related to leading through results-oriented change. Kimberly Barnes System Improvement and Turnaround Leadership Coordinator

Multi-Tiered System of Support (RTI) Multi-tiered framework that promotes school improvement through high quality, standards-based instruction and evidence based interventions to maximize student achievement and behavior.

Idaho Building Capacity - IBC To provide scaffolded support designed to assist Local Education Agencies in building their own internal capacity to sustain their school improvement efforts and ultimately sustainable improved student achievement. Deb Long Coordinator - North (Regions 1 & 2) Lori Furgerson Coordinator – Southwest (Region 3) Deb Pfost Coordinator – East (Regions 5/6) Norma Bailey Coordinator – South (Region 4) Plus several Capacity Builders (CB’s) in each region

Family and Community Involvement The term "parental involvement" means the participation of parents in regular, two-way, meaningful communication involving student academic learning and other school activities, including ensuring – That parents play an integral role in assisting their child’s learning; That parents are encouraged to be actively involved in their child’s education at school; That parents are full partners in their child’s education and are included, as appropriate, in decision-making and on advisory committees to assist in the education of their child; and The carrying out of other activities, such as those described in section 1118 of the ESEA. [Section 9101(32), ESEA.]" Jill Mathews Family and Community Engagement (FACE) Coordinator

School Improvement Grant School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (Title I or ESEA), are grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) that SEAs use to make competitive subgrants to local educational agencies (LEAs) that demonstrate the greatest need for the funds and the strongest commitment to use the funds to provide adequate resources in order to raise substantially the achievement of students in their lowest- performing schools. Schools identified as Priority Schools and receive a Focus Visit each year. (Focus Schools that apply and receive the grant will also have a Focus Visit each year.)

Focus Visit This process uses research-based standards and indicators to assess local educational agencies (LEAs) in the areas of academic and organizational performance as outlined in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) and has been named Patterns of Practice School Review. Idaho State Department of Education has taken the foundational work and research of the Patterns of Practice School Review and developed a model specific to Idaho’s districts and schools needs. This model is called Instructional Core Focus Visit.

Statewide System of Support Have a great year!