DEMOSAT MISSION TEAM LITTLE STAR Tully Baetz Raymond Dao Caleb Ogg 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AnaSonde Assembly. What is the AnaSonde? *Reads temperature, pressure, and humidity data from the atmosphere *After it is sent into the atmosphere, it.
Advertisements

BalloonSat Construction Ideas and Suggestions. What is a BalloonSat? Functional Model of a Satellite Carried by Balloon to at Least 60,000 Feet Operates.
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
SOLAR TRACKER PROJECT. INTRODUCTION: Solar tracker is a system that is used to track sun light to increase the efficiency of electricity gained from solar.
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Thomas Buck, Kyle Garner, Alexandra Jung, Quinn Mcgehan, Mark Sakaguchi, and Scott Taylor Team Solkraft Critical Design Review 10/7/2010.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
Adam Archuleta Katie Cartee Logan Farley Patrick Klein Kamron Medina Catherine Villa TEAM INFINITY AND BEYOND LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW Fall 2011 Rev C
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team Delta Special Recon Ops Launch Readiness Review Taylor Boe Andrew Gilbert Bobby Stillwell Emily Howard Grace Harsha Andrew Buckner November 11, 2008.
Flight Club Critical Design Review Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams October 14, 2008.
Metropolitan State University Isaac Hamilton Jordan Gallegos Christopher Olson McMillan Miskin Daniel Koch Thomas Mindenhall Cody Overcash March 27, 2009.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Critical Design Review Cameron Comeau, Katie Brissenden, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Aram Podolski, Hannah Williams 06OCT2009.
Team Mate Launch Readiness Review Jason Schelz, Will Hakes, Emma Mossinger, Ethan Long, Brendon Barela, Amelia Weller 11/02/10.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Teamo Supremo Final Presentation Kristen Brenner Kim Fornall Ahna Isaak Nick Martinez Wes Roos Bart Tofany RevD
Team Thumbs Up Launch Readiness Review Nick Lenk Eddie Cyrus Brian Inglis Chase Prichett Greg Nelson Jake Varey 11/11/08.
Chouinard, John Getz, Jennifer Hewitt, Lisa Kim, Elise Salmons, Patrick Silva-Ortiz, Carlos.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Foam Core Class #05 Foam Core Class #05.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Launch Readiness Review Katie Brissenden, Hannah Williams, Aram Podolski, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Cam Comeau November 5,
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) Additional AVR Modifications For BalloonSat Flight Additional AVR Modifications For BalloonSat Flight.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN TUCKER JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN.
Team Dionysus Launch Readiness Review Elise Kowalski, Michael Beach, Josh Tiras, Chris Konciljia, Alijah Smith, Becca Seigel November 5, 2009.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
CDR Presentation. - Team T.E.N.’s objectives are to fly Ralph with all the systems functioning properly. This includes the boom arm, radiation badge,
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Speed of Sound Experiment CDR Team BalloonWorks March 29 th, 2012.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Payload Presentation June 29, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Hang Seven Launch Readiness Review Lucas Migliorini, Becca Lidvall, Paul Smith Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil Desai, Abby Caballero, Sierra Williams.
Team Victorious Secret Final Presentation Crawford Leeds Jacob Broadway Tanya Hardon Devan Corona Dylan Reed November 29, 2011.
1 Thermal Investigation for Accurate Temperature Measurement Team TCTJ Truc Le Cedric Toguem Jonathan Newman.
VUCIRO 3 A Balloon Project by: Team Tartive. Group Members Christopher Zanca:  Project Management  Software  Electrical Design Rachael Drella:  Science.
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Space Cadets Ali Javed Ravneet Singh Ravneet Singh Brock Couvillion Dean Slama Dean Slama Temperature, Pressure, Humidity, and Imaging Characteristics.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Josh Hignight – Project manager and software development Jason Rollins – Responsible for electrical work including.
PACER Summer Program High-Altitude Thermodynamics Profile and Clarity Experiment (HATPaC) Johnte Bass, Herman Neal, Matthew Ware.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Critical Design Review The University of Northern Colorado GoGreenSAT Jessica Gage, Max Woods, Brent Hill, Ryan Marshall, Zach Sears Feb
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Space Monkeys Conceptual Design Review Project Curious George Michael Bartek, Jacob Blakely, Katelynn Finn, Katie Fletcher, Lance Markovchick, Michael.
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
An introduction to PIC’s for KS3 and KS4. Mr Rooks Hetton School.
Scott Luisi, Abe Fark, Trent Quick, Jack Szmanda, Tom Valkenberg AEM 1905, 11/20/2008.
The PV Cell Cell, Module & Array.
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Team TWSS Launch Readiness Review
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

DEMOSAT MISSION TEAM LITTLE STAR Tully Baetz Raymond Dao Caleb Ogg 1

Mission Statement The DemoSat Project shall test several components of the ALL-STAR mission in order to reduce risks in those areas. Mission Objectives Compare the performance of epoxied and traditionally soldered solar cells by measuring output current and voltage. To test the ALL-STAR Star Tracker. 2

Mission Success Criteria Solar Cells Success is defined as measuring identical IV curves for both strings in identical pairs. That is, the epoxied solar cell measurements are in agreement and likewise for the soldered cells. Star Tracker Success is defined as detection of multiple stars in a single image. This is required if Star Tracker is to have a chance of identifying star arrangements. Success is also dependent on functionality and undamaged condition of Star Tracker after payload is recovered. Payload Recovery Payload must be recovered for data analysis 3

Structure Overview Foam Core Exterior 1 cm thick on each wall 1/8 in thick acrylic skeleton plates in interior Helps component interface and mounting Mounting points and holes for components/stand-offs Aids structural integrity Provides strength for flight tube assembly Flight String Assembly ¼ in inner diameter tube for flight string Washers and Metal Clips used for security of assembly 4

Final Acrylic Frame One edge panel removed Ease of access Mass constraints Attachment of components interface Holes added for stand-offs Baffle Created and interfaced Tooth and Grove design Added Structural Integrity 5

Assembled View (Labeled) 6 Photodiode 1 Photodiode 2 Photodiode 6 Solar Cells MOSFET PCB Star Tracker Camera/baffle Flight String DE2 PCB

Baffle 7

Payload Attachment Washers will be used as the anti-abrasion brushings Washers will be attached to the acrylic frame. The flight string will pass through a ¼ inch plastic tube Metal wire will be run through the tube to limit rotation of the satellite. Metal wiring will also help prevent flight string line from slipping through payload.

Overview of Electrical System Arduino based system 2 types of solar panels PCB Photodiode array Star Tracker FPGA Camera and baffle Heating System 9

Solar Panels Two strings, one soldered and one epoxied Data read and converted by PCB 10V, 40mA max output 10

PCB and Arduino PCB of own design, based off of DANDE’s solar circuit Arduino Uno, with microSD shield for storage Provides us with all the analog and digital pins needed to control the whole system Each component powered by one 9V battery 11

Data Flow Structure PCB

Data Storage We calculated the data storage needed for the IV curves to be GB or MB We will use a microSD card attached to the Arduino to store all our data. All temperature and relativity humidity data will be Stored on the HOBO Data logger Current mission ops require flying an additional temperature sensor to determine altitude for the star tracker. However the reordered data for this sensor will not be logged since it is redundant.

Photodiode Array 6 Photodiodes Attached to analog in 3.3V power Data stored as a 6 bit integer to display position of sun 14

Star Tracker Consists of DE2-115 FPGA and camera board Star tracking software provided by ALLSTAR loaded on DE2 Camera board connected to and powered by DE2 12V power provided to DE2 Receives one line from Arduino to allow control of when pictures are taken Will start taking photos at 1 hour after launch 15

Star Tracker Positioning The Star Tracker must be positioned to maximize star viewing potential Must not be obscured by balloon or pointed at Earth. Calculated ideal Star Tracker tilt based on balloon dimensions and Star Tracker’s field of view. Maximum Balloon Diameter: 90 ft Distance Between Balloon and Payload: 50 ft Star Tracker’s Max Field of View: 25 ° Star Tracker will be tilted at a 37-41° angle above the horizontal. This provides a ° “buffer” on the balloon side for the minor variations in payload tilt. 16

Heating Circuit consisting of 6 batteries and 6 heating resistors Placed centrally to evenly distribute heat 17

Software Overview The software has four main functions. It reads the data from the analog ambient light sensors It reads the data from the ADC while varying the value of the DAC It stores all read data on the microSD card for processing later At a predetermined altitude the software turns on the star tracker camera for picture taking Since speed is of the essence for generating a lot of IV curves during flight the software has been designed and built to take a data point once every 2 milliseconds. 18

Quality Assurance During development, we put the payload through a series of tests to better prepare for conditions that will be encountered on launch day. Drop Test – Structural test simulating landing Whip Test - Structural test for strength flight string attachment Flat Sat Testing – Electronics test for individual component functionality. Day in the Life Test – Electronics test for long term success of all component functionality Cold Test – Systems test simulating cold environment 19

Quality Standards Secure Flight String Assembly(Whip Test) Structural Integrity(Drop Test) No damage to inner components Thermal Heating(Cold Test) Maintain temperature above 0˚C Component Functionality and Interface (Flat Sat Testing) Everything works Day in The Life Testing Electronics work for estimated duration of flight 20

Flight and After Recovery Payload rose to altitude of 89,000 feet. Program crashed ~30 seconds into flight. Faulty and Loose wiring caused the crash Recovery Structure performed extremely well No Cracks discovered in plastic skeleton Only a few exterior abrasions and cuts from landing 21

Organizational Chart Emily Proano Project Manager Sean Rivera Lead Systems Engineer Tully Baetz Structures Lead Caleb Ogg Systems Lead Raymond Dao Structures Vignesh Muralidharan Electrical Lead Edward Lowe Electrical Eric Jacobson Structures William Whiteneck Systems 22

Appendix Slides Included Testing Details Whip Test Drop Test Star Tracker Test Photo Diode Test Solar Cell Test Flat Sat Testing Day in the Life Testing Cold Test Trigonometric Analysis Memory Calculation 23

Whip Test TopicDetails Purpose Determines whether or not the current structure can hold on to the flight string and not detach from it. The flight string was attached using knots, ¼ inch diameter tube, and pins. Test Details Spin structure (by flight string) at high speeds to simulate forces during flight LimitationsComponents were simulated with masses and locations Results Flight String Assembly held on for the duration of the test. Test showed that the assembly was strong enough to hold the weight. 24

Drop Test TopicDetails PurposeDetermines whether or not the current structural design can withstand impact with ground while keeping components functional and undamaged. Test DetailsDrop payload from 6 meters onto concrete surface to simulate worst case landing. LimitationsPayload landed on bottom, which is not guaranteed during real landing. Mock Ups were used for the components ResultsFoam core and insulation remained intact. Acrylic frame was shattered into only a few places 25

Drop Test Pictures Exterior after Drop TestInterior After Drop Test 26

Star Tracker Testing Not tested with DE2 because ALLSTAR is still working on star tracker Arduino system emits +5volt at 1 hour after launch on the attached pin to tell DE2 to start taking photos Tested with multi-meter This means our project has been tested to meet ALLSTAR’s requirements 27

Photodiode Test Photodiodes were taken into direct sunlight Slowly moved from direct sunlight to only receiving ambient light Once in ambient light the distinguishing constant was changed accordingly A baffle and grate will still be needed to limit exposure to direct sunlight 28

Solar Panel Test Solar Panels emit voltage + current when hit with sunlight Tested using multi-meter Already tested previously to be operational by ALLSTAR team Load is varied by the Arduino and works 29

Flat Sat Testing Flat Sat Testing has found the photodiodes to work Photodiodes have been calibrated to detect sunlight no longer detect ambient light Flat Sat Testing has gotten the PCB to output the correct voltage and current 30 minute data trial test showed all systems to be operational and the data was checked to be correct Flat Sat Testing has shown the microSD card can store data All data was stored correctly and did not exceed memory limits 30

Flat Sat Test Sample data is shown below showing data is recorded for 3.3 hours, until which the old battery died. This was replaced by new batteries 31

Flat Sat Testing Details Flat Sat testing included all components required for measuring solar cells: PCB Board + Arduino + Internal Power Source + SD Card shield. Flat Sat testing did NOT include any components related to Star Tracker. DEMOSAT has tested that we can provide the Star Tracker with a +5 volt signal and power it with our linear regulator. We were not provided with the Star Tracker in time to incorporate it into flat sat testing. 32

Day in the Life Testing Flat Sat was operated for 4 hours to make sure the program didn’t crash or components didn’t fail after being continuously operated. Day in the life Test passed while powered externally. Day in the life failed while powered internally. Corrected, was due to insufficient power. 33

Cold Test TopicDetails Purpose To simulate the low temperature conditions the payload will experience during flight. Test Details -20 lbs. of dry ice placed in a 6 ft 2 thermally isolated box. -Climate will be simulated to -65˚ C Success Criteria The inside of the payload must stay above 0 ̊ C. LimitationsComponents were simulated with masses and locations ResultsResults will be shown after cold test 34

Specifications for Cold Test All relevant electrical components functioning and placed inside payload for Cold Test Baffle Hole and Baffle were cut and created. Foam Insulation was cut precisely to seal vertices. Flight String Assembly accounted for 35

Cold Test Minimum Interior Temperature reached: -45 ̊ C Total Time Elapsed: 5 hours 36

Results of Cold Test Temperature was at zero only after three hours Expected flight time in high altitude is far below 3 hr. Showed that enough heat was on board The external temperature sensor was placed at the very top of the box, thus having a lower than actual reading Internal Temperature drops below External Temperature External Temperature Readings were only at -5 ̊ C 37

Trigonometric Analysis m m Arc of View: 25 ° Horizon 64 ° ° ° 38

Memory Calculation Each port on the ADC has 12 bit accuracy in the returned data. 12 bit data, if converted to an integer, can give numbers up to 4 digits large. Each digit will the be converted into a char to be saved by the program in a text file. Therefore, every millisecond we will receive at most 32 different chars since there are 8 ports with a possibility of 4 digit numbers from all of them.

Memory Calculation The photodiodes output will be taken as at most a 2 digit number since there are only 6 of them and they are treated as single bits (ie. return 1 if facing the sun, otherwise return 0) Therefore the maximum amount of digits created in a millisecond is 34 Each data point shall be broke up with a comma, and a millisecond will be broken up with apostrophe With identifiers, which allow for easier data processing, the total comes to 43 digits created every millisecond Therefore there are digits of data created every second

Memory Calculation digits/second = digits/hour digits/hour = digits over the course of the flight. Each digit of data is a byte in size Therefore, we generate bytes of data or.4644 GB of data total.