K-2 Assessments by Tara Roy 6-8 Common Exams by Myra Holloway 9-12 Common Exams by Allison Castle CTE Post-Assessments by Lynn Hartley High School Graduation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduation Changes: Future-Ready Core
Advertisements

Senior Course Selection Wednesday January 23, 2013 Period 3.
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Career, Technical and Agricultural Education MICHAEL MAZE, DIRECTOR
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Career Clusters Debbie Grantham Instructional Management Coordinator
Career Diploma. (Incoming Freshmen and beyond) English - 4 Units * English I, English II * The remaining units come from the following: Technical.
Indiana’s Graduation Requirements (Class of 2016 & Beyond)
Helping Your teen become career and college confident
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
2 The ABCs of Graduation Requirements Professional School Counselors’ Conference December 1-3, 2009.
February 21, /6/ College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School Model Grades DRAFT Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Module 3 1. Using Local Data 2
NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Math Department Team Leaders’ Meeting.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
INSTRUCTIONAL SURVIVAL TOOLKIT HARNETT COUNTY SCHOOLS 1.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Junior Course Selection Thursday January 19, 2012 Period 2 and 3.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
What is College Credit Plus? College Credit Plus Replaces PSEO Replaces dual enrollment.
Using Perkins Data To Improve CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NCLA Conference October 1,
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
Fairfield County Professional Development Day September 28, 2015 Amy Orr Parker.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
Data for the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts February 2006.
Operation Inform Tests and Testing The State University of New York
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Rolesville High School RAMS
Pathways to Graduation
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
LCPS School Improvement Task Force Committee February 2015
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Diesel Tech Academy- Diploma Track
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Volusia County Schools
Michigan School Report Card Update
Environmental Scan Planning Retreat
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades
Student Success Metrics
Life High School Waxahachie 8th Grade Parent Night– Class of 2021
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

K-2 Assessments by Tara Roy 6-8 Common Exams by Myra Holloway 9-12 Common Exams by Allison Castle CTE Post-Assessments by Lynn Hartley High School Graduation Rate & ACT by Sharon Gainey Questions & Answers by Dr. Nancy Holmes

 Students are formally assessed by teachers 5 times each year (BOY, Oct., Jan., March, EOY).  Data is submitted at the end of each quarter.  Data reports are shared with principals quarterly (school and county).

August 29, 2013

Grade Common Exam Overall Percent Correct Number of Items 6Science53.53%29MC 3 CR 7Science57.67% 30 MC 3 CR 6Social Studies 49.09% 26 MC 3CR 7Social Studies 50.27%26 MC 3CR 8Social Studies 50.42%26 MC 3 CR

 Utilize school and district PLT’s to share best practices  More detailed pacing guides for Social Studies and Science  On going professional development on Social Studies and Science content, writing and lesson planning  Utilize more information on Common Exams from DPI

August 29, 2013

Course% of Questions Answered Correctly ELA I 53.2% ELA III 52.2% ELA IV 58.2%

COURSE % of Questions Answered Correctly Advanced Functions and Modeling 35.1% Common Core Geometry 32.6% Common Core Algebra II 30.8% Pre-Calculus 40.5%

Course% of Questions Answered Correctly Earth/Environ. Science 56.6% Physical Science 53.9% Chemistry 62.1%

Course % of Questions Answered Correctly Civics & Economics 62.4% US History 66.1% World History 45.1%

Harnett County Schools Career & Technical Education District Meeting Harnett County Schools Career & Technical Education

Celebrations  North Carolina’s Graduation Rate for CTE Concentrators is 94%. ( )  Harnett County’s Graduation Rate for CTE Concentrators is 89.4%. ( )  1,454 Workplace Credentials were earned by Harnett County High School students in

Certifications & Credentials Earned in Harnett County  Microsoft Office Word/Expert  Microsoft Office Excel/Expert  Microsoft Office Power Point  Microsoft Office Access  CPR  Fire Technology Modules  First Aide  Nurse Aide  NCCER Modules (Carpentry, Masonry, & Electrical)  NIMS Measurement, Materials, and Safety  ServSafe  WorkKeys

CTE Post-Assessment Trend Data

CTE Post-Assessment Data for SchoolFall 2012Spring 2013Overall Harnett Central83.8%86.9%85.4% Triton79.4%85.1%82.2% Overhills82.8%83.8%83.3% Star Academy40.0%30.0%35% Western Harnett78.1%72.3%75.2% District’s Overall Performance for 81.5%

CTE Secondary Placement Trend Data

 Increase the numbers of job shadowing experiences, internships, and apprenticeships across the district.  Increase the number of articulated credits, community college credits, certifications, and credentials earned across the district.  Increase Technical Attainment  Increase Secondary Placement of our graduates Increase the district’s graduation rate Moving Forward in CTE

“Pathways to Prosperity” Charts the course for CTE Our Vision is Simple

Harnett County Schools Graduation Cohort Presentation to the Board of Education August 29, 2013 Sharon M. Gainey LEA Test Coordinator

 Data Report required by the NCDPI to satisfy the NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Bill  4-Year Cohort**** (students who finish all State requirements within four years)  5-Year Cohort (students who finish all State requirements within five years)  A system that requires schools to track students progress through their senior year

 Students who were enrolled in the 8 th grade for the first time in 2008  Students who were enrolled in the 9 th grade on the 20 th day of school in  Students who transferred in to our schools and were on track to graduate within four years  It is not based solely on the number of seniors who receive a diploma on graduation day/night

 In late January, early February, the NCDPI sends (electronically) the LEA Test Coordinator a list of students who, according to their records, are a part of Harnett County Schools graduation cohort based on the data in their system  The information is shared with the school counselors and the search begins. If students on the list are not currently enrolled in school, we search for them in the following ways: ◦ Counselor school records ◦ Facebook ◦ My Space ◦ Spokeo ◦ Judicial System ◦ The NCDPI Search System

 Students who dropped out of school  Students who transferred to a community college  Students enrolled in the OCS (Occupational Course of Study Program) they can remain in school until they are 22  Students who will not graduate within the four year period-if they graduate in summer school or the next year, they count toward our five year cohort rate.

The State requires an LEA to reach 80% OR increase their 4-year grad rate by 2% from the previous year  Harnett County increased the 4-year cohort graduation rate by 2.6% for compared to !  Harnett County increased the 5-year cohort graduation rate by.5% for compared to !

 Triton High School led Harnett County with the highest 4-year graduation rate of 82% for ! This was an increase of 5.9% from ’s 76.1% rate!  Go Hawks!  Overhills High School led Harnett County with the largest 4-year graduation rate increase for ! They increased 6.2% from ’s 72.5% rate!  Go Jaguars!

 LEA-77.9% ◦ HCHS-85.6% 5.2% Increase ◦ OHS-77.3% 4.8% Increase ◦ THS-78.2% ◦ WHHS-81.1%  LEA-77.4% ◦ HCHS-80.4% ◦ OHS-72.5% ◦ THS-82.1% ◦ WHHS-81.3%

Documentation is Required to Remove Students from the Data Report  Students who withdrew for homeschooling  Students who transferred to another public LEA in or out of state  Students who transferred to a private school  Students who are deceased  Students who transitioned to a correctional institution

SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Academically Gifted 142->95 SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort. * Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value. The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Academically Gifted 142->95 SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort. * Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value. The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Academically Gifted 142->95 SubgroupDenominatorNumeratorPercent All Students Male Female American Indian Asian*** Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Subgroup information is based on data collected when a student is last seen in the cohort. * Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value. The percentage is not shown if it is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.

 “North Carolina’s average ACT score fell in In past years when approximately 20 percent of North Carolina students selected to take the ACT, the state’s average score was higher than the national average. With a 100 percent participation rate, the state’s average composite score fell from 21.9 points (Class of 2012) to 18.7 points (Class of 2013). The national average composite score also fell from 21.1 in 2012 to 20.9 in 2013.”  Harnett County saw growth in ACT scores when we compare our th grade students to our th grade student results.  “Summary results from the recent assessments show that students in the Class of 2014 are likely to earn higher ACT scores than the Class of 2013.