XCRI-CAP: From 1.1 to 1.2 Scott Wilson What’s changed since 2008? CEN Metadata For Learning Opportunities became an EU standard 14-19 regional pilots.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FpML Versioning An AWG Discusion Document. Namespace URIs & Versions An XML parser locates the schema for a document based on its namespace URI To be.
Advertisements

DC Architecture WG meeting Monday Sept 12 Slot 1: Slot 2: Location: Seminar Room 4.1.E01.
OLAC Metadata Steven Bird University of Melbourne / University of Pennsylvania OLAC Workshop 10 December 2002.
OASIS OData Technical Committee. AGENDA Introduction OASIS OData Technical Committee OData Overview Work of the Technical Committee Q&A.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: XML and the DCMI Abstract Model DC Architecture WG Meeting,
XML: text format Dr Andy Evans. Text-based data formats As data space has become cheaper, people have moved away from binary data formats. Text easier.
Cascading Style Sheets
HTML Overview - Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). Before We Begin Make a copy of one of your HTML file you have previously created Make a copy of one of your.
ISO DSDL ISO – Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) Martin Bryan Convenor, JTC1/SC18 WG1.
RDF Tutorial.
XCRI Judith Davison ASIS DIrector. Session Outline Introductions What is XCRI? Where did it come from? The technical bits! Benefits Hud-XCRI project Questions.
Pete Johnston & Andy Powell, Eduserv Foundation 3 October 2006 DC-Text:
1 Submitted to: NCI Center for Bioinformatics Prepared by: 101 West Renner Road, Suite 130 Richardson, TX September 22, 2004 Contact Information:
Scott Wilson, Assistant Director, CETIS Alan Paull, Information Management Consultant, APS Ltd 27 March.
JISC & CETIS JISC is the Joint Information Systems Committee of the UK Higher & Further Education Funding Agencies Enagages in: Sector-wide procurement.
TC3 Meeting in Montreal (Montreal/Secretariat)6 page 1 of 10 Structure and purpose of IEC ISO - IEC Specifications for Document Management.
We Need Smart XML Processing HTML has ultra-complex semantics XML has no semantics Something must bridge the gap  A program ?  A clear set of data semantics?
XSL Concepts Lecture 7. XML Display Options What can XSL Transformations do? generation of constant text suppression of content moving text (e.g., exchanging.
FHIR/RfH.....What is it? And what’s next? Furore Ewout Kramer.
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
Exchange formats and APIs Questions – how and when to access metadata? – lifecycle/status – how to access? can things disappear? – is CSV enough? – is.
UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.
Form Builder Iteration 2 User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Denise Warzel Semantic Infrastructure Operations Team Presented to caDSR Curation Team March.
An Introduction to Content Management. By the end of the session you will be able to... Explain what a content management system is Apply the principles.
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 4 1 XML Schema Tutorial – Carey ISBN Working with Namespaces and Schemas.
 ult.htm ult.htm  This website illustrates the use of CCS (style sheets)
Facets of Curriculum Modelling Mike Collett EDRENE Conference Den Haag December 2012.
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition Chapter 5 Advanced Data Modeling.
Creating Extensible Content Models XML Schemas: Best Practices A set of guidelines for designing XML Schemas Created by discussions on xml-dev.
Metadata: An Overview Katie Dunn Technology & Metadata Librarian
Alan Paull, Information Management Consultant, APS Ltd More information: 27 March 2009, Leeds, UK XCRI: eXchanging.
ISBD for the Semantic Web: namespaces, elements, vocabularies, application profile Gordon Dunsire Presented at Centar zu Stalno Stručno Usavršavanje (CSSU),
Emile Bartolé CEN/WS XBRL: Improving transparency in financial and business reporting CWA2 final deliveries 1CWA2.
CIS 275—Web App Dev I XML. 2 Introduction to XMLXML XML stands for ________________________. HTML was designed to display data. XML was designed to _________.
The LOM RDF binding – update Mikael Nilsson The Knowledge Management.
SAML 2.1 Building on Success. Outline n Summary of SAML 2.0 n Work done since 2.0 n Objectives of SAML 2.1 n Proposed Task List n Undecided Issues n Invitation.
1  Bob Hager Director of Publishing Standards Metadata Specification.
New Perspectives on XML, 2nd Edition
Creating an Application Profile Tutorial 3 DC2004, Shanghai Library 13 October 2004 Thomas Baker, Fraunhofer Society Robina Clayphan, British Library Pete.
1 NORMA Lab. 5 Duplicating Object Type and Predicate Shapes Finding Displayed Shapes Using the Diagram Spy Using Multiple Windows Using the Context Window.
The LDAP Schema Registry and its requirements on Slapd development OpenLDAP Developers' Day San Francisco 21 March 2003 Peter Gietz, DAASI International.
1 Introduction  Extensible Markup Language (XML) –Uses tags to describe the structure of a document –Simplifies the process of sharing information –Extensible.
WI 4 (CWA1): Guidelines for machine-processable representation of Dublin Core Application Profiles Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of Bath Thomas Baker,
[date]. … the UK standard for describing course marketing information … a way of describing information about learning opportunities … about eXchanging.
XML 2nd EDITION Tutorial 4 Working With Schemas. XP Schemas A schema is an XML document that defines the content and structure of one or more XML documents.
1 Tutorial 14 Validating Documents with Schemas Exploring the XML Schema Vocabulary.
Tutorial 13 Validating Documents with Schemas
1 Dublin Core & DCMI – an introduction Some slides are from DCMI Training Resources at:
Open Archive Initiative – Protocol for metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) Surinder Kumar Technical Director NIC, New Delhi
Practical RDF Ch.6 Creating an RDF Vocabulary DongHyuk Im SNU OOPSLA Lab. Shelley Powers, O’Reilly August 19, 2004.
1 CS 430: Information Discovery Sample Midterm Examination Notes on the Solutions.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2014 BasmahAlQadheeb. What is a report? A report is a clearly structured document that presents information as clearly as possible.
CETIS Educational Content SIG, Learning and Teaching Scotland, September 2004 Content Specifications Update Wilbert Kraan Lorna M. Campbell CETIS.
25 Copyright © 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved. Showing Results with Pivot Tables.
IEEE , PAPI Learner: Towards WD6, F. Farance, ©2000 Edutool.Com 1 PAPI: Public and Private Information PAPI Learner, Towards  WD
ADN Framework Overview A Collaboration of ADEPT, DLESE and NASA (2002 Nov. 19)
CASEY A. MULLIN WITH: LALA HAJIBAYOVA SCOTT MCCAULAY DECEMBER 8, 2008 FRBR in RDF: a proof-of-concept model 1 ©2008 Casey A. Mullin.
Dublin Core Basics Workshop Lisa Gonzalez KB/LM Librarian.
Attributes and Values Describing Entities. Metadata At the most basic level, metadata is just another term for description, or information about an entity.
Getting a Leg Up on OAI for the NSDL
XCON WG IETF-64 Meeting XCON Framework Overview & Issues
XML Schemas for Dublin Core Metadata
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
NORMA Lab. 5 Duplicating Object Type and Predicate Shapes
RS3G liaisons with the standards bodies
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
WebDAV Design Overview
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Composing Lifelong Learning Opportunity Pathways through Standards-based Services Raquel M. Crespo García.
Presentation transcript:

XCRI-CAP: From 1.1 to 1.2 Scott Wilson

What’s changed since 2008? CEN Metadata For Learning Opportunities became an EU standard regional pilots Lots of mini-projects HEAR KIS HEDD

What’s changed from 1.1? Harmonization with MLO Some new elements (especially for non-HE) Some Terms moved into main spec Some elements removed that weren’t being used Improved temporal (date/time) elements Improved engagement type elements Specification developed as a single W3C-style document Factoring out the update model

CEN Harmonization Added Contributor, Date, and Type properties to Catalog, Provider, Course and Presentation Replaced Relation with HasPart, and allowed both by- reference and inclusion Venue property of a Presentation now contains a Provider instance for the venue Location Added Location property to Provider, containing the information previously supplied in OrganisationDType Replaced Credit with CEN CWA Added engagement as parent of studymode etc Uses MLO namespace wherever possible MLO conformance table Some renaming (e.g. assessmentStrategy -> assessment)

New Elements in Intended age range of the presentation (e.g ) in URL for information about the location in Supports provider types (e.g. college, university) in Abbreviated name of a qualification (e.g. BsC, HNC)

Simplifying common descriptions Common descriptive elements - moves common Terms into the core namespace:,,,,,, This makes it much easier to use these elements as you don’t need - they also go into the BSI standard.

Simpler engagement terms are all now in the main specification and namespace. They are also defined as refinements of mlo:engagement The optional identifier attribute is used for referencing vocabulary terms: NK [Not known] FL [Flexible] FT [Full time] PF [Part of a full time programme] PT [Part] Full time

Improved temporal elements I Support for both machine-readable and human-readable temporal information. Human-readable information goes in the element content Machine-readable data goes in the optional dtf attribute September 2011 May 2012 As soon as enough students have enrolled, usually once every four weeks

Improved temporal elements II follows the same pattern, but uses the interval attribute: Three years (The interval format uses the ISO 8601 interval specification)

Simpler Subject handling Same as for studymode (etc) we added an identifier attribute to make it easier to distinguish human-readable subject labels from vocabulary identifiers <dc:subject identifier=“ “>Beer <dc:subject identifier=“ “>Porter (Note the use here of an LoC URI)

Removed wasn’t used (we may revisit as a separate spec) was a duplicate of and were confusing, and can be handled by improved and

Refactored Attributes supporting delta update processing (recstatus) have been removed and a new draft specification started: The idea is that this spec can be developed and maintained outside of the BSI standard and can take account of changes in implementation practice.

Namespace Soup The College of Art, Bolton Deane Road Bolton BL3 1EX Note the use of DC, XCRI and MLO namespaces. Aggregators may need to be tolerant of mis-applied NSs in document instances.

New documentation style Uses W3C-style specification formatting About 25 pages long Much easier to read and navigate than the old wiki-style spec. This is the FINAL version of XCRI 1.2

BS/EN XCRI UK residual standard for CEN MLO; adds extensions from XCRI and XML binding for implementation in UK context