Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Education Program at Westmont
Advertisements

General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
Arts Department Criterion VISUAL ART MUSIC DRAMA  A - Knowledge & Understanding (8 marks)  B - Application (10 marks)  C - Reflection (8 marks)  D.
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program Sutton Middle School August, 2009.
Ivy Tech Community College
MISSION, PURPOSE, & COMPETENCIES GENERAL EDUCATION REVISION
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
Aims of MYP Technology Thornton High School “…the know-how and creative processes that may assist people to utilize tools, resources and systems to solve.
October 22, 2009 Report to the Faculty Senate Professor John Stevenson Senator Sandy Jean Hicks UCGE-Subcommittee on Assessment of General Education (SAGE)
Lindsey Wilson College October, In 2010, the LWC faculty adopted new institutional student learning outcomes including: Lindsey Wilson students.
ICT Scope and Sequence Sekolah Ciputra 2010.
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
Student Affairs Strategic Planning Team NASPA FL Drive-in Conference 2013.
1 Writing Outcomes Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.
 What is it?  Summative process of collecting evidence to provide the learner, teacher, administration, parents, etc with information about student.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Welcome! Find a desk with a chair and quietly have a seat! Once seated, make a Name Tent Once seated, make a Name Tent Fold one sheet of paper into a “tent”
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Assessment Report Criminal Justice Department School of Education and Human Services Korni Swaroop Kumar, Chair Melchor C. de Guzman, Assessment Coordinator.
Portfolios. Why use portfolios? To encourage students to be reflective and responsible To allow students to make choices To give students evidence of.
What do our students know?. What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Cycle #1 Assessed in: Cycle #2 Assessed in: Cycle #3 Assessed.
Education Department NUIM GJ1 Civic, Social and Political Education Junior Certificate Syllabus OUTLINE.
The Portfolio ProcessThe Portfolio Process. Why do we think portfolios are the right choice?  Teacher developed and driven  Embedded professional development.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: That students do not.
Assessed: 2007, 2010, 2011,  PHIL 101 (Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics)  GE elective choice  BA 300 (Ethical Decision Making in Business)
“ I'm still loving the fact that I share a virtual classroom with such a mix of students from all over the world. Other strengths include: engaging, up-
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round IV,
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
DP, Language A Year 1. AIMS introduce students to a range of texts from different periods, styles, and genres. develop in students the ability to engage.
1 Cultural Competencies Maggie Rivas November 17, 2006.
College of Education and Allied Studies Office of Semester Conversion Academic Programs and Graduate Studies February 4, :00 pm – 4:00 pm Oakland/Concord.
MYP IB Posters. International Baccalaureate Learner Profile.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Curricular Assessment: Update & Discussion Lisa Lenze Director of Learning Initiatives IST All-Faculty Meeting May 11, 2009.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
English Extension 1 Preliminary Course. A Word From BOS  2 English (Extension) 12.1 Structure  The Preliminary English (Extension) course consists of.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Integration of generic competencies and content in the Skills for a Changing World Curriculum Key Issues to Consider.
Good teaching for diverse learners
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Closing the Assessment Loop
Research Methods for Business Students
Assessment of Student Learning
Rice Pilot of IDEA evaluation system
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Inquirers Acquire the needed skills to conduct inquiry and research.
The Portfolio Process.
Course Overview meeting February 8, 2018
AY College-Wide Learning Outcomes Results
Student Course Evaluation Revision Task Force
Quantitative Literacy at WOU
KEEP2 Training and Updates
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
My Attitudes What I Show!.
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Writing Non-Instructional Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee

 cultivate intellectual and practical skills  introduce students to the range of intellectual traditions and perspectives expressed in the disciplines represented by our major programs  educate our students in the knowledge of human cultures and the physical and natural world  encourage the development of personal and social responsibility”

Pilot Testing of Learning Goals

Learning Goal 1: Intellectual & Practical Skills Learning Goal 2: Knowledge of the World & Human Cultures Learning Goal 3: Personal & Social Responsibility

 3.1 – Local and global civic knowledge and engagement  3.2 – Intercultural knowledge and competence  3.3 – Ethical reasoning and action  3.4 – Personal qualities and attitudes such as curiosity, self-confidence, imagination, cooperation, commitment, and support for life-long learning

 This is not an assessment of a specific instructor, course, or program.  This is an assessment of a specific aspect of one General Education goal and the General Education program.

 The GEAC will combine findings from various courses to determine how well students are achieving the General Education Learning Goals.  The Performance Levels reflect the idea that educating students for the learning outcome is developmental in nature.

Domain 3.2 Your course Another Course

Spring 2014

Step 1 Examine the domain to pilot test and review the Performance Levels listed on the Reporting Template.

Domain Performance Level Sample of 3.1 Reporting Template

Domain Performance Level Sample of 3.2 Reporting Template

Domain Performance Level Sample of 3.3 Reporting Template

Domain Performance Level Sample of 3.4 Reporting Template

 For your course, which of your existing assignments best corresponds to the domain being assessed and how will you determine when students’ performance falls within one of the established Performance Levels?

 Pre & Post Tests  Papers  Projects  Presentations  Specific items on Exams (Essay & Multiple Choice)

 Consider the Performance Levels as absolute standards for a university- educated person, not one that is relative to your course or major.  In lower-level or introductory courses, a performance level of 3 or 4 might be extremely rare, although not impossible. Students scoring at levels 1 or 2 may be expected and appropriate.

Step 2 After the assessment is given, compile numeric results on page 1 and then complete page 2 of the Reporting Template.

Assessment Method Executive Summary Recommendations

 This provides the context for the specific assignment and assessment.  The reported assessment data is aggregated at the domain level.

Report your findings and interpretations of the findings.

 Provide suggestions for closing the loop Adjustments to the course Changes to the assessment method Changes in KU’s approach to the goal and/or domain

Step 3 Submit the completed Reporting Template to GEAC.

Early Submission Appreciated! Submission Deadline of Final Report to GEAC.

Thank you for your participation.