The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Advertisements

MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Ex-Offenders and Housing
Denise Hinds, LMSW Associate Executive Director Foster Care, Juvenile Justice and Housing December 5, 2013 NON-SECURE PLACEMENT PROGRAMS AT GOOD SHEPHERD.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
HUD-VASH Case Management System Paul Smits, MSW Associate Chief Consultant, Roger Casey, PhD Director, Grant and Per Diem Program.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
JUVENILE REENTRY IN CONCEPT AND PRACTICE February 2, 2010 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D. Institute for Policy Studies Johns Hopkins University Models for Change.
Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.
Understanding Juvenile Reentry as More than a Public Safety Issue November 1, 2011 National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Thomas Murphy Office of.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Adair County System of Care Overcoming Obstacles to Helping Others.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
Infusing Recovery Principles Into Home-Based Services for Youth ICCMHC, Inc. Quarterly Meeting Summer 2011 Stacey M. Cornett, LCSW, IMH-IV CMHC, Inc. Director.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Offender.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Youth Services Institute Continuum of Care
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Juvenile Justice in America, 5 th Edition ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Bartollas/Miller Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 6:
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
1 Therapeutic Community Treatment in Correctional Settings The Call for An Integrated System George De Leon, Ph.D. Center for Therapeutic Community Research.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
A Valuable Bridge How Linkages Can Advance Other Initiatives Leslie Ann Hay, MSW Hay Consulting (206)
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Assessing Housing Barriers Donna Harrison Community Placement Coordinator Virginia Department of Corrections Welcome Home: Addressing Today’s Challenges.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
209: Family Reunification and Case Closure in Child Sexual Abuse Cases
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry

Section 62 Goals Examine three challenges related to juvenile sex offender reentry and aftercare Over-reliance on the most secure placements Insufficient reentry and aftercare planning Fragmentation across the system Clarify how these challenges can be addressed

Section 63 Over-Reliance on the Most Secure Placements

Section 64 National Statistics: Placement More than 100,000 youthful offenders in placement released each year Increase of more than 40% from

Section 65 National Statistics: Placement (Continued) % decrease % decrease 36 states

Section 66 Placement of Juvenile Sex Offenders While over time numbers have decreased, juvenile sex offenders in placement have increased % rise 2003 Approximately 8% (8,000) were sex offenders

Section 67 Placement of Juvenile Sex Offenders (Continued) Most (72%) of the nation’s specialized treatment programs are community- based 28% are in residential or institutional facilities But about ½ of juvenile sex offenders were treated in residential or institutional programs

Section 68 Tendency to Over-Rely on Residential and Institutional Placements Not all youth will benefit No strong evidence to suggest that placements result in substantial reductions in recidivism Interventions in a youth’s natural environment are more likely to result in positive outcomes Not all juvenile sex offenders in residential or institutional facilities need to be there

Section 69 Insufficient Reentry and Aftercare Planning

Section 610 Getting In Is Easy, Getting Out Is Difficult Compared to most other types of youthful offenders, juvenile sex offenders spend more time in placement One reason is a lack of or insufficient reentry and aftercare planning Tendency to assume that “more” is better

Section 611 Consequences Prolonged detachment from positive community supports and productive involvement in prosocial activities exacerbates reentry challenges Potential negative outcomes when delinquent youth are placed together for the purpose of intervention Maxing out with no aftercare programming or community supervision Movement to “low” level of supervision or care, with no gradual reduction in aftercare services and support Prevent early identification of needs and barriers

Section 612 Fragmentation Across the System

Section 613 Design of the System Establishes a residential or institutional dimension and a community dimension that can be mutually exclusive “In” or “out” Consider Treatment providers “in” and “out” Institutional or residential caseworkers or managers “in” and juvenile parole officers “out”

Section 614 Potential Solutions

Section 615 Reasons for Over-Reliance High stakes Insufficient assessment data Limited specialized management capacity Lack of confidence in existing community resources Negative community sentiment

Section 616 Strategies to Reduce Over-Reliance Assessment-driven decisionmaking at the point of disposition or sentencing Building community capacity Raising awareness and increasing confidence through specialized training and education Juvenile and family court judges and prosecutors The community

Section 617 Insufficient Planning Planning for reentry at the point of entry Start at intake! Early assessment is key Anticipate needs that youth and the family have that may hinder reentry and aftercare efforts

Section 618 Key Questions to be Answered What issues, concerns, and barriers need to be addressed at some point during the reentry and aftercare process? When must these be addressed? In the facility before release? When the youth is in the community? Or in both? Who will address them?

Section 619 Elements of a Comprehensive Reentry and Aftercare Plan Specialized treatment needs Mental health problems Healthcare concerns Family issues

Section 620 Family Reunification Challenges Limited placement options Requests from family members Concerns raised by victim advocates and service providers Expectations of child welfare and social service agencies, and juvenile and family courts Large caseloads Limited long-term influence of involved agencies and the courts

Section 621 Key Elements of Reunification Victim safety Early initiation of process Gradual and deliberate Out of home placement Treatment interventions Readiness assessments Supervised contacts in clinical settings Clarification Supervised contacts in natural environments Transition to family supervision Return home Flexible and responsive Collaboration

Section 622 Promoting Early Involvement of Families Approach parents and caregivers as partners whose input is valued Identify common ground and common goals Make family therapy an expectation rather than an easy “option” to decline Plan to incorporate therapeutic activities or assignments into visitation time Create “after hours” parenting skills classes, and education and support groups Plan to offer transportation

Section 623 Elements of a Comprehensive Reentry and Aftercare Plan Educational needs Vocational needs Life and independent living skills Community supervision strategies Community hostility concerns

Section 624 Importance of Continuity of Programming and Services Staff “in” and “out” must work together to ensure continuity of care Services provided should anticipate interventions that are to come or build upon previous programs Avoiding delays is critical Schedule appointments in the community prior to release

Section 625 Utilizing the Whole Continuum Planning early to avoid “all or nothing” Ideally, jurisdictions have a range of Community-based options Specialized supervision Non-residential programs Alternative living Day treatment Outpatient services Residential and institutional programming Group homes Halfway houses Transition or step-down

Section 626 Responding when Problems Arise Increasing supervision intensity Imposing a sanction that is treatment- based Requiring a temporary return to a residential or institutional placement

Section 627 Critical Factors to Consider Seriousness of behavior Risk level Degree to which community safety was jeopardized Juvenile’s disclosure Level of responsibility assumed by youth Awareness and disclosure of behavior by parents, caregivers, other community support network members Ability of parents/caregivers to provide structure and support Presence of other assets or services to assist juvenile to maintain compliance

Section 628 Fragmentation Across the System Importance of collaboration Inside Outside “In” to “Out”

Section 629 Conclusion To address over-reliance on the most secure placements Specialized and comprehensive PSIs and PDRs, and psychosexual evaluations Build community management capacity Provide specialized training Work proactively with the community Think about “reentry at the point of entry” and initiate transition and aftercare planning at intake Focus on youth, family, and other “environmental” considerations “In” to “out” requires collaboration!

Section 630 Intensive Aftercare Program Model Individualized case planning Continuity of care Collaboration Formal transition structures Small caseloads Balance Supervision and control mechanisms Range of programming Graduated rewards and sanctions