2015 Legislative Conference Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Carmen DaughertyNaomi Smoot Policy DirectorSenior Policy Associate Campaign for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
Advertisements

POLICY REFORMS ON YOUTH JUSTICE: SUCCESSFUL CAMPAIGNS, STRATEGIES AND TACTICS LIZ RYAN CAMPAIGN FOR YOUTH JUSTICE.
Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Common Solutions & Success to Reduce DMC Heidi Hsia, OJJDP Please visit often:
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) Youth Justice Leadership Institute July 25, 2011 Dana Shoenberg, Deputy Director Center for.
2014 Legislative Conference Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Jessica SeitzElizabeth Ysla-LeightCarmen Daugherty Education Policy AnalystMemberPolicy.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Development of the Report Card Mothers Behind Bars Coalition Mothers Behind Bars Coalition Began with shackling and expanded to include prenatal care.
Background Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) authorizes federal funds to go to the states for juvenile justice. Expectation that.
Presented by: Carmen E. Daugherty, Esq. Policy Director, Campaign for Youth Justice.
Juvenile Sentencing Update Sarah French Russell Associate Professor of Law Quinnipiac University School of Law.
CHILDREN & FAMILIES IN NEED OF SERVICES Amy Howell Southern Juvenile Defender Center Emory University School of Law.
Compliance Monitoring 101 OJJDP FACJJ Training Washington, D.C. April 7, 2008.
Jailing Juveniles and the Reauthorization of the JJDPA AJA 'S 30TH ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE & JAIL EXPO CINCINNATI, OHIO ♦ MAY 15 – 19, 2011 Liz Ryan,
The JJDP Act Core Requirements ___________ CJCA New Directors Seminar August 4, 2011 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator USDOJ/OJJDP.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Racial Disparity in New York’s Juvenile Justice System NYC Task Force on Racial Disparity in the Juvenile Justice System.
Trends in Juvenile Justice State Legislation Meeting of OJJDP's Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice October 19, 2012 Sarah Alice Brown Director,
NURS 533 Victimology A. Student Introduction n Who is a “Juvenile”??? –Each state defines by age (15-17) –exceptions include violent crimes –For violations.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National.
Chapter 21 Juvenile Justice. Introduction Juvenile Delinquency – actions of a juvenile in violation of the criminal law. Juvenile Delinquency – actions.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System 18 th National Symposium on Juvenile Services October 16, :00-11:00am.
Chapter 15 Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System  When first created was viewed as quasi-social welfare agency  Parens patriae – system.
Understanding the “System”
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Justice Grantmaking  Background and History  The MacArthur Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
JJDPA Reauthorization 2009: An Update DMC Action Network Annual Meeting May 15, 2009.
Juvenile Courts Chapter Nineteen.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Justice System
A Strategic Partner in Advancing Training and TA Excellence.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Mainstream and Crosscurrents, Second Edition Chapter 14 Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice.
Chapter 13 The Juvenile Justice System
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Offender.
The Juvenile Justice System
CHILDREN DON’T BELONG IN JAIL! ●In Florida, a 17-year-old mildly retarded boy who was pleaded guilty to sexual battery was strangled by his 20-year-old.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2008 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2008.
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Assessing and Addressing Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) in Juvenile Justice Bill Feyerherm, Ph.D., Vice Provost for Research, April 9, 2007.
Juvenile Justice in America, 5 th Edition ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Bartollas/Miller Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 6:
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2009 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2009.
Juvenile Justice A GUIDE TO THE SYSTEM Why do we have it?  Children and adults were incarcerated together  Judges had to sentence a child by:  jail.
Compliance with the Separation Core Requirement: The Oregon & Missouri Experiences JJDPA Today: CJJ Summit on Reauthorization of the JJDP Act Washington,
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance Strategic Plan
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
The Juvenile Justice System. When first created was viewed as quasi-social welfare agency Parens patriae – system acts as a surrogate parent in the interests.
JJDPA Today: CJJ’s Summit on Reauthorization of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) June 11, 2007.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
7X Wednesday MN Juvenile Justice System Describe the goals, offenses, penalties, long-term consequences, and privacy concerns of Minnesota’s.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Compliance Monitoring Overview
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Sarah Alice Brown, Group director criminal justice program
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
Presentation transcript:

2015 Legislative Conference Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Carmen DaughertyNaomi Smoot Policy DirectorSenior Policy Associate Campaign for Youth JusticeCoalition for Juvenile Justice

Agenda 1.PTA & Juvenile Justice a.History and Position Statement 2.Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) a.Overview b.Core Protections c.JJDPA Reauthorization-Recommendations to Congress 3.Juvenile Justice Updates a.On the Hill b.In the Courts c.In the States 4.Q&A

PTA & Juvenile Justice: History 1899: PTA convention delegates pass first juvenile justice-related resolution supporting the extension of juvenile courts and probation systems to prevent children from being incarcerated with adults 1903: PTA establishes Committee on Juvenile Protection 1950s-1960s: PTA mobilizes members to advocate for policies that place less emphasis on incarceration, calling instead for increased supportive services and protection of all children

PTA’s Position Statement on Juvenile Justice Promote initiatives to address racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities in the juvenile justice system. Encourage collaboration between law enforcement, the judicial system, and child welfare agencies. Promote alternative dispute resolution techniques that provide a range of possible sanctions. Prohibit youth who are charged with a serious crime from being tried in the adult court system unless there has been an opportunity for a judicial hearing and appeal. Prohibit the incarceration of youth in adult facilities. Assist youth leaving the juvenile justice system and prevent their return. Support research and data collection regarding youth offenses.

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA): Overview and Key Dates 1974: JJDPA enacted 2002: Most recent reauthorization of the JJDPA 2007: JJDPA becomes eligible for reauthorization 2014 Most recent introduction of JJDPA reauthorization

JJDPA Core Protections 1.Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) (1974) 2.Sight and Sound Separation (1974) 3.Jail Removal (1980) 4.Disproportionate Minority Contact (1992)

JJDPA Core Protections Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) Definition: Requires that youth with status offenses not be placed in secure detention or confinement. Limitations: Valid Court Order (VCO) exception Recommendations for DSO Improvement: 1. Eliminate the VCO exception to ensure that youth who commit status offenses are kept out of juvenile corrections facilities. 2. Update the JJDPA to decrease overreliance on youth incarceration and out-of-home-placement by promoting family- focused and community and school-based interventions for children who commit status offenses.

JJDPA Core Protections Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups (“Jail Removal”) Definition: Prohibits, under most circumstances, the detention of juveniles in adult jails or lockups. Limitations: Does not protect juveniles that are waived to adult court Juveniles can be held for up to six hours for processing and for 24 hours (plus weekends and holidays) in rural areas

JJDPA Core Protections Juvenile Sight and Sound Separation Definition: Requires that accused and adjudicated delinquents, status offenders, and non-offending juveniles be kept out of the “sight and sound” of adult inmates. Limitations: Does not apply to youth prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system.

Recommendations for Juvenile Sight and Sound Separation & Jail Removal Improvement 1.Codify the definition of “adult inmate” in the JJDPA to allow states to place children convicted in adult court into juvenile facilities. 2.Extend the Jail Removal and Sight and Sound Separation core protection of the JJDPA to all children under 18 years of age who are held pretrial, regardless of whether they are charged in juvenile or adult court.

JJDPA Core Protections Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Definition: Requires states to take measures to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. Recommendations for DMC Improvement: Strengthen the DMC core protection by requiring states to take concrete steps to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system

Other Juvenile Justice Recommendations: Reauthorize the Second Chance Act–an important source of funding for youth reentry programs across the nation. Promote programs that encourage the use of evidence-based disciplinary practices, such as positive behavioral interventions, over zero-tolerance policies and out-of-school suspension practices.

JUVENILE JUSTICE UPDATES On the Hill and In the States PTA Takes Action

On the Hill: JJDPA Reauthorization JJDPA Reauthorization introduced in the Senate at the end of last Congress— optimistic that it will be introduced Spring Sponsors: Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) Contained improvements to the core protections

In the States: Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System

Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System: Key Trends Trend 1: Removing youth from adult jails and prisons Trend 2: Changing the age of juvenile court jurisdiction (“Raise the age”) Trend 3: Changing direct file, waiver, and transfer laws to keep more youth in the juvenile system Trend 4: Modifying youth sentencing laws

Eleven limited the state’s authority to house youth in adult jails and prisons: ColoradoTexas HawaiiVirginia Idaho Indiana Maine Nevada Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania

Five expanded juvenile court jurisdiction so that older youth who previously would be automatically tried as adults are not prosecuted in adult criminal court (“Raise the age”) Connecticut Illinois Mississippi Massachusetts New Hampshire

Fourteen states and DC engaged in transfer reform making it more likely that youth will stay in the juvenile justice system: ArizonaOhio ColoradoUtah ConnecticutVirginia DelawareWashington DC Illinois Indiana Maryland Nebraska Nevada New York

Twelve changed their mandatory minimum sentencing laws, allowed for post-sentence review for youth facing juvenile life without parole, or passed other sentencing reforms: CaliforniaWashington ColoradoWest Virginia Florida Georgia Hawaii Indiana Iowa Missouri Ohio Texas

Questions?