RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Selecting and Training Evaluators May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3 Hilton Hotel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Sue Sears Sally Spencer Nancy Burstein OSEP Directors’ Conference 2013
© 2010 Learning Sciences International Bering Strait School District Demographic Information  Covers 88,000 square miles.
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Model
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
EQuIP Rubric and Quality Review Curriculum Council September 26, 2014.
Differentiated Supervision
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Using Formative Assessment and the Digital Library.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Ensuring Fidelity In the Evaluation System May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
July 2, :30 – 11:30 Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.
Curriculum Forum Secondary Tuesday 6 June 2017
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Classroom-based assessment to promote equity
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Reading Instruction: Moving forward in our practices
Model Demonstration Projects
Georgia Department of Education
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
REPORTING.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Coaching and Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Selecting and Training Evaluators May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3 Hilton Hotel - Anchorage, Alaska Session Leader: Al Bertani, RAPPS Senior Design Consultant

➜ Establishing criteria for selecting who can evaluate ➜ Preparing evaluators for inter-rater reliability ➜ Addressing issue of quality Session Objectives EE-4

ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR SELECTING WHO CAN EVALUATE

A Practical Guide to Designing Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation Systems; National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality; May 2012  Who will be eligible to conduct evaluations?  Will there be examples and explicit guidance in determining levels of proficiency and approval?  To what extent will training provide opportunities for guided practice paired with specific feedback to improve reliability?  Will evaluators be monitored regularly for reliability checks?  How will implementation fidelity be ensured? Selecting And Training Evaluators Selecting And Training Evaluators EE - 10

PREPARING EVALUATORS FOR INTER-RATER RELIABILITY

Observations of Teacher Classroom Performance – Guide to Implementation Resources for Applied Practice; Milanowski, Prince, Koppich; CECR; Start with an overview of the process — give evaluators the big picture. 2. Familiarize evaluators with the performance dimensions and rating scales. 3. Help evaluators recognize their own biases (e.g., for certain teaching styles). 4. Describe common judgment errors to be aware of and avoided. 5. Describe how to recognize and record evidence of performance. 6. Practice collecting evidence and observing. 7. Practice connecting evidence to performance dimensions. 8. Practice interpreting evidence relative to the rating scale. 9. Discuss rating conventions (e.g., What do you do if you do not have any evidence for a performance dimension? How do you interpret words like “consistently” or “frequently” when used in the rating scale?). 10. Practice rating samples of performance (e.g., videos, written scenarios, or cases). Preparing Evaluators

Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project; Danielson At-A-Glance EE-5 and 6

Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project; Marzano At-A-Glance EE-7, 8 and 9

Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment; California Department of Education (CDE) and Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC); Web Address for Resources Video Simulation – BTSA California Available on YouTube – BTSA Teacher Observation Videos Step 1Declare which framework you want for the practice round (D or M) Step 2Determine which grade and content example you want for practice. Step 3Join one of the four learning groups for the video simulation. Step 4Use the Danielson or Marzano rubric for practice purposes. Step 5Be prepared to talk about your simulation rating and evidence.

Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment; California Department of Education (CDE) and Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC); Web Address for Resources Video Resources – BTSA California Available on YouTube – BTSA Teacher Observation Videos 6 th Grade Math K Language Arts 9 th Grade L.A. H.S. Dance Class Over 400 videos include pre-observation conferences, classroom observations, and post-observation conferences.

A Practical Guide to Designing Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation Systems; National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality; May 2012  Will the state or districts offer specialized training for evaluators?  Will the training provide opportunities for guided practice paired with specific feedback?  Will the state or districts provide examples and explicit guidance in determining levels of proficiency?  Will evaluators be monitored regularly by the state and/or districts?  What opportunities will be provided for retraining evaluators? Preparing Evaluators

ADDRESSING ISSUES OF QUALITY

San Diego County Office of Education; Teacher Effectiveness and Evaluation; Web Address for Resources Video Resources – San Diego Available at IdentifyDefineCalibrateConductApply  Observations  Evidence vs. Opinion Training  Calibrated Walk-Through

San Diego County Office of Education; Teacher Effectiveness and Evaluation; Web Address for Resources Video Resources – San Diego Available at

San Diego County Office of Education; Teacher Effectiveness and Evaluation; Web Address for Resources Video Resources – San Diego Available at Demonstration San Diego Calibration Videos Grade 1 Grade 3 Grades 4/5 Grade 6 MS Science HS Algebra Directions for Calibration Videos

San Diego County Office of Education; Teacher Effectiveness and Evaluation; Web Address for Resources Video Resources – San Diego Available at Researching the Resources 1.Decide which example you’d like to explore. 2.Join that table for your chosen example. 3.View the video example. 4.Join your colleagues in discussing how the resource could be used. 5.Be prepared to discuss your suggestions for using the videos.