Understanding the National Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures (Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures) April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 To facilitate the implementation of employment equity and the communication to employees of matters relating to employment equity and diversity.
Advertisements

ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
W. Tyler Michael, CPA Assistant Director of Audit Services.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 UAA – ACCT 316 – Fall 2003 Accounting Information Systems Dr. Fred Barbee.
Copyright Eastern PA EMS Council February 2003 Health Information Portability and Accountability Act It’s the law.
Chapter 7 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1.
Ensuring Compliance Part 2 JAQUELINE REESE AND RICHARD SHEAFFER | MAY 12, 2014.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
The Audit Standards’ Setting Process
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Internal Audit Bob Franchini Paris June
The Islamic University of Gaza
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
HERD TESTING IN THE US AND THE ROLE OF QC– SIEVERT 2010 Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA/DHIA Services Manager, Quality Certification.
Chapter 7 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1.
SB 490 Amendments to the Kansas Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act Effective January 1, 2003.
Software Engineering Code Of Ethics And Professional Practice
1 Pertemuan 3 Auditing Standards and Responsibilities Matakuliah:A0274/Pengelolaan Fungsi Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2005 Versi: 1/1.
TRANSPORTATION IN A FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) EXAMINATION April 9,
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Purpose of the Standards
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
1 Certification of Medical Necessity (UPG 10.04) & Information about Changes to the Unclassified Leave Statements UW-Madison Sick Leave Policy for Academic.
Instructions and forms
05/31/2012 Page 1 Financial Management: Timekeeping.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Auditing Standards IFTA\IRP Audit Guidance Government Auditing Standards (GAO) Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) International Standards on.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Occupational Health and Safety
February 2007 Commercial Vehicle Drivers Hours of Service Module 24: Daily Log Audits.
Considering Internal Control
G. R. Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD M. A. Faust ABS Global,
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Money Handling Procedures Updated by Roger Sparrow, Karen Ramage & David Herbst April 2014.
1 Today’s Presentation Sarbanes Oxley and Financial Reporting An NSTAR Perspective.
Evaluation of Internal Control System
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
1 Certification of Medical Necessity (UPG 10.04) & Leave Statements UW-Madison Sick Leave Policy for Academic Staff, Faculty, and Limited Appointees.
2001 NAAB DSEC, April 2002 (1) Revision and Use of Termination Codes PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar General Session II September 9, 2003 Section 302/404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act What Actuaries Need to Know Jan A. Lommele, FCAS,
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 7-1 Chapter 7: Audit Planning and Documentation.
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Annex A.8 Asset management
Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Section 404 Audits of Internal Control and Control Risk Chapter.
An Overview THE AUDIT PROCESS. MAJOR PHASES IN AN AUDIT Client acceptance and retention Establish terms of the engagement Plan the audit Consider internal.
NCSLI 2007 Training Records from an Auditors Viewpoint Shawn Mason Boston Scientific.
©©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Considering Internal Control Chapter 10.
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
3 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Essentials of Auditing 1/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Professional Ethics Chapter 3.
Lecture 5 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 7-1.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education Chapter 2 The Audit Standards’ Setting Process.
Internal Control and Managing Cash
Calibration of Portable Scales
Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
Iowa Extension Council Association Iowa 4-H Youth Development
Iowa Extension Council Association Iowa 4-H Youth Development
Performance Management Training
Meter Center & Technician Update
Provider, Supervision & QC Codes
Access and Use of Data Field Service Advisory Committee Meeting
Field Service Update Field Service Advisory Committee March 5, 2019
An overview of Internal Controls Structure & Mechanism
Property Control Asset Forms
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the National Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures (Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures) April 2014

 Uniform Operating Procedures was last reviewed in 2002 and is currently made up of: ◦ Code of Ethics ◦ Uniform Data Collection Procedures ◦ Records Disclosure Policy  The Records Disclosure Policy will be moved into a separate document and reviewed by the Release & Use of Records Task Force in 2014  Revisions were made to Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures by the UOP Task Force Revisions to the UOP

Uniform Operating Procedures Code of Ethics Uniform Data Collection Procedures Revised and Adopted by National DHIA Board of Directors on March 9, 2014 Effective June 1, 2014

The Task Force focused on: ◦ Uniformity in DHI data and programs ◦ Relevance to today’s DHI program ◦ Inclusion of new technology and data  Organization and program needs  Electronic identification  Automatic milking systems and newer recording devices  Health and diagnostic screening data Scope of 2014 Revisions

The Code of Ethics provides guidelines for appropriate conduct in the production, collection, and distribution of DHI information for all individuals and organizations involved with these data. Code of Ethics

A. Impairing the reliability of DHI data. B. Not cooperating or interfering in the use of the Uniform Data Collection Procedures to record DHI data. C. Intentionally providing inaccurate data or withholding necessary data resulting in misrepresentation of DHI information. Unethical Procedures

D. Engaging in management practices with the intent of misrepresenting the performance of individual animals and/or the herd. Are the movement of animals between herds, Influencing the relative performance of herd mates, and/or Selective use of management techniques in an effort to bias DHI data. E. Permitting the collection of supervised data by a technician with a direct financial or family interest in the herd being tested without notification to and consultation with the field service auditor. Unethical Procedures

The purpose of these procedures is to provide the framework for a uniform, accurate system that will enhance data reliability. The data are used for Uniform Data Collection Procedures Dairy Management Decisions Genetic Evaluations Education & Research Promotion & Sales

DHI Service Providers, DHI personnel, and dairy herd owners and their employees are responsible for adherence to the UOP. DHI Service Providers Field Service Providers Laboratories Meter Centers Meter Technicians Dairy Records Processing Centers

DHI Technicians & Sample Takers Training by Field Employer Required Annual Training Required Annual Auditing of Field Service Activities Field Service Provider Employee Field Techs Sample Takers County Association Field Techs Sample Takers Independent Service Providers Sample Takers

Data Collection Procedures Supervised Test Unsupervised Test Partially Supervised Test Automatic Milking – Robotic Test Supervised Test with Electronic Meters Unsupervised Test with Electronic Meters Partially Supervised Test with Electronic Meters Proper Collection of Milk Weights & Samples

Standard Equipment DHI Field Service Equipment Portable Meters Scales Weigh Jars Dairy Producer Equipment Electronic Meters Must be: Approved Model Includes Meter, Sampler, and Software Calibrated Annually Marked with Calibration Tag

Approved Test Plans

Data Collection Standards Must test all cows in the herd. Cows must be visually identified with permanent identification number or registration number. Milk shipped (also known as bulk tank measurements) totals must be reported.

Data Collection Standards Fresh Cows Cows fresh four or more days beginning the evening milking of the fourth day after calving or the morning of the fifth day for AM- PM herds Dry Cows The dry date is the 1 st calendar day the cow is not milked. Cows Leaving the Herd Last calendar day cow was in the herd. Cows entering herd Calendar day following the last day of credits in former herd.

Data Collection Standards Sick Cows Actual production recorded and coded as abnormal (CAR Code) Cow’s record will be adjusted accordingly.

Data Collection Standards Code aborted cows If carried calf less than 152 days record will continue. New lactation if calf was carried 152 days or longer. Cows calving without going dry Record ends on day prior to calving. New lactation begins on calving date. Prepartum milk is not counted.

Data Collection Standards All estimates for missing milk weights and sample component results are done by the DRPC. Transfers between field service providers must be completed within 15 days Transfers between DRPC must be completed within 48 hours

Adjustment of Milk Weights to a Verifiable Source If the DHI Field Service Provider has verifiable source for both milk shipped and milk not shipped, the test day milk weights are adjusted at the herd level to sum of both milk shipped and milk not shipped. Milk Shipped and Not Shipped Known If the DHI Field Service Provider has verifiable source for milk shipped but cannot account for milk not shipped, the test day milk weights are adjusted at the herd level to 102.8% of the milk shipped weights. Only Know Milk Shipped In the absence of both milk shipped and milk not shipped, the DHI Field Service Provider shall not adjust the test day milk weights. The normal application of both the 24-hour adjustment and AM/PM adjustment factors by the DRPC shall apply. No Information

Automatic Milking Systems Test day milk weights will be obtained as 24- hour yield obtained from the automatic (robotic) milking system software. The average 24-hour milk yield reported should represent a minimum of three consecutive days and not to exceed ten consecutive days. Milk samples shall be obtained using National DHIA accepted sampling devices for one of the milkings during the test day. There will be no application of AM/PM factors on milk samples. Data obtained from automatic milking system software may not be used in genetic evaluations unless the system meets National DHIA/Quality Certification Services standards

Data Collection Rating Test Plan Daily 10 day LER 5 day LER Supervised All Supervised 2 of 3 Supervised 1 of 2 Supervised 1 of 3 Unsupervised All Unsupervised 2 of 3 Unsupervised 1 of 2 Unsupervised 1 of 3 Test Days per Year Weight (%) DCR