Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Advertisements

Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants
Fidelity Instruments and School Burden Patricia Mueller, Ed.D., Brent Garrett, Ph.D., & David Merves, C.A.S. Evergreen Evaluation & Consulting, LLC AEA.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development.
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
1 Implementing a Three-Tiered State Evaluation Structure Bob Putnam The May Institute Karen Childs University of South Florida 2009 National PBIS Leadership.
School-wide PBIS: Using Data for Effective Coaching Rob Horner University of Oregon
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3. Coaches Training Day 4 Follow-up from Coaches Training Day 3 The Why? Preparing your teams for Tier 1 implementation Coaching.
PBIS Assessments NWPBIS Conference March 9, 2010 Katie Conley Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
BoQ Critical Element: Evaluation. 49. Students and staff are surveyed about PBIS 50. Students and staff can identify expectations and rules 51. Staff.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Missouri SW-PBS Annual Reporting pbismissouri.org.
Chris Borgmeier, Dave McKay, Anne Todd, Celeste Dickey, Rob Horner October 2008
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
Designing and Implementing Evaluation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob HornerHolly Lewandowski University of Oregon Illinois State Board of.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
VTPBiS School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies Define.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Cooperative Educational Services March 18, 2015 Christine Peck, Psy.D, BCBA-D & Tracey Lamothe PBIS Coaches Network Session 2.
PBIS Assessment PCOE Coaches Training :. Today’s Agenda Overview of PBIS Assessment site Navigating PBIS Assessment o School User o Coordinator Practice.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
E VALUATION FOR S CHOOL - WIDE PBIS Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina: Charlotte Rob Horner University of Oregon December 9, 2011.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Collecting and Analyzing Student Behavior Data Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey Morris University of Oregon.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING STATE-LEVEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS BOB ALGOZZINE, HEATHER REYNOLDS, AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency.
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.
INITIAL TEAM TRAINING Presented by the MBI Consultants MODULE 7: Establishing Procedures for Data Collection.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
SW-PBIS Cohort 10 Spring Training & Celebration February and March 2016.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3. OUR NORMS Confidentiality * Active participation * Professional use of technology * Assume best intentions Agenda Welcome.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013

Overview of available surveys/tools on the PBIS Assessment website Developing an Evaluation Action Plan Decisions on which tools to choose Decisions on timelines Assessment Example Plans Developing Evaluation Reports Questions/Comments

School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Implementers' Blueprint and Self-Assessment Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., Algozzine, R., et.al. (2010). Evaluation Blueprint for School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions & Support Algozzine, R., Horner, R.H, Sugai, G., et.al. (2010). Fidelity Measures to Improve Implementation of Positive Behavioral Support Tobin, T. J., Vincent, C. G., Horner, R. H., Rossetto Dickey, C., & May, S. A. (2012).

“A hallmark of School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) is a commitment to formal evaluation.” “Evaluation is the process of collecting and using information for decision making.

Evaluation is the process of gathering data to Answer questions Make decisions Define the core questions/decisions, before selecting measures. Provide an adequate context for interpreting the data. Effective evaluation is cyclical (repeated) Use the evaluation process for improvement

Core Questions Evaluation Plan Data Collection Evaluation Report

Context What are/were the goals and objectives for SWPBIS implementation? (state/district capacity; school adoption; student outcomes) Who delivered the training and technical assistance for SWPBIS implementation? Input What professional development events were part of SWPBIS implementation support? Was projected level of TA capacity provided (training/coaching)? Who received the professional development (schools/ cohorts)?

Fidelity To what extent was Tier I SWPBIS implemented with fidelity ? To what extent were Tier II and Tier III SWPBIS implemented with fidelity? To what extent is the Leadership Team establishing core functions?

Leadership Team Active Coordination Funding Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Local School/District Teams/Demonstrations Behavioral Expertise Policy Sugai et al.,

Impact To what extent is SWPBIS associated with changes in student behavioral outcomes? To what extent is SWPBIS associated with changes in academic performance, and dropout rates? To what extent is district/state capacity established? (local training, coaching, evaluation, behavioral expertise) To what extent is leadership and policy structure established?

Replication, Sustainability, and Improvement To what extent do Fidelity and Impact outcomes sustain across time? To what extent does initial SWPBIS implementation affect Implementation with later cohorts? To what extent did SWPBIS implementation change educational/behavioral capacity/policy? To what extent did SWPBIS implementation affect systemic educational practice?

Fidelity To what extent was SWPBS implemented as designed? To what extent was SWPBS implemented with fidelity? “Are we doing what we said we would do?”

PBIS Applications.org PBIS Assessment PBIS Evaluation Help us answer the question: “Are we doing what we said we would do?”

Research Tool Annual Assessment Tool Progress Monitoring Tool Universal System School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Early Childhood BoQ (ECBoQ) PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Team Implementation Checklist (TIC) Secondary & Tertiary Systems Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers (BAT) PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) Outcome Measures: School Safety Survey

Research Tool Annual Assessment Tool Progress Monitoring Tool Universal System School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Early Childhood BoQ (ECBoQ) PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Team Implementation Checklist (TIC) Secondary & Tertiary Systems Individual Student School- wide Evaluation Tool (ISSET) Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers (BAT) PBIS Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) Outcome Measures: School Safety Survey

A Tour of at

Decisions: Evaluation Tools Which tools answer your district/schools’ evaluation questions? Evaluation Timeline When/how often will you administer the tools? Evaluation Reporting How will you report outcomes to schools and to the District? How often will you report outcomes to schools and to the District?

Decisions about Evaluation Tools Does your District/School need a research tool? (SET/ISSET) Which annual assessment tool(s) will you use? BoQ, SAS, SSS, BAT, ECBoQ Which progressing monitoring tool(s) will you use? TIC, MATT Does your District/School need to evaluate Tier I or Tier II & III implementation or all three?

Evaluation Questions What is our baseline, and what has been our progress through the year? Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS? How do our individual staff members rate our implementation? Are our self-assessments consistent with data from outside evaluators? Newly implementing, grant needing specific research data as well as fidelity of implementation data

MeasureYear OneYear TwoYear Three FallWinterSpringFallWinterSpringFallWinterSpring SETXXXX TICXXXXXXXXX Safety Survey XXXX SAS XXXX

Evaluation Questions In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training? Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS? How do our staff members actually rate our PBIS implementation? How is our implementation of Tiers II and III? Implementing PBIS for three years, have been using the TIC/SET, and have been consistently over 80%.

MeasureYear OneYear TwoYear Three FallWinterSpringFallWinterSpringFallWinterSpring BoQXXX SAS XXX Safety Survey XXX ATTXXXXXXXXX

Evaluation Questions Which schools are not meeting the SET benchmark? In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training? How can we tailor our training and evaluation to meet the needs of various schools? Are we improving on our implementation of PBIS? How do our individual staff members rate our implementation? Implementing for five years, some schools are doing very well, but others are not making progress.

MeasureYear OneYear TwoYear Three FallWinterSpringFallWinterSpringFallWinterSpring SAS SurveyX SET XXX Safety Survey XXX TICXXXXXXXX X Schools still not performing well

MeasureYear OneYear TwoYear Three FallWinterSpringFallWinterSpringFallWinterSpring SAS SurveyX BoQ XXX Safety Survey XXX MATTXXXXXXXXX Schools performing well

Evaluation Questions In what specific PBIS areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more training? In what academic areas are we strong, and in which areas do we need more improvement? How can we tailor our training/evaluation to meet the needs of various schools? How can we schedule our evaluations so that we are not overwhelming our schools? The district wants to bring RtI Behavior and Academics together and create one evaluation plan.

Assessment Instrument Fall (August/Sept/Oct) Winter (Dec/Jan) Spring (April/May) Purpose Team Implementation Checklist (TIC) XXX Fidelity of Implementation Self-Assessment Survey X Fidelity of implementation School Safety Survey X Outcomes related to Protective and Risk Factors SET X Fidelity of Implementation AIMsWeb XXX Screening Progress Monitor SAT10 X Summative Evaluation DIBELS XXX Screening Progress monitoring Nieves Flores, 2012

Questions to Consider: Which surveys are your schools/districts currently using? Do they answer your evaluation questions: Are we implementing SWPBIS with fidelity? Is there more information that we need? Pbisapps.org > PBIS Assessment > Find Out More about Surveys Do your surveys assess the Tiers you are implementing? Do you need a research tool?

Are you “topping out” of the surveys you are currently taking? Do you need to customize your evaluation plan for different schools, or will one evaluation plan fit for all schools? Do you want to assess all tiers of PBIS implementation? Is your Evaluation Plan manageable for schools?

MeasureYear OneYear TwoYear Three FallWinterSpringFallWinterSpringFallWinterSpring

From the PBIS Evaluation Blueprint Context Input Impact on SWPBIS Fidelity Impact on Student Outcomes Implications for the Future

Define SWPBIS Define goals of the specific project Define stakeholders and evaluation questions

Who received what support and from whom? Leadership team Local Capacity Building Training, Coaching, Behavioral Expertise, and Evaluation School teams

Leadership Team SWPBIS District Leadership Team Self-Assessment Capacity Development Number of trainers/coaches available to support school teams/districts Behavioral expertise available to support Tier II and Tier III implementation Evaluation capacity School Teams Tier I Implementation (TIC, BoQ, SET, SAS) Collectively and/or by training cohort Tier II / Tier III Implementation (MATT, BAT, ISSET) Collectively and/or by training cohort

Behavioral Outcomes Office Discipline Referrals Suspension/Expulsion Attendance Drop Out/Graduation Disproportionality in ODR and suspension/expulsion Academic outcomes Curriculum Based Measures Oral Reading Fluency, Dibels, AimsWeb Standardized Measures State and National Math, reading, writing assessments

Advances to date Plans for next three years Areas in need of adaptation Narrowing of evaluation questions and concerns

State and District examples at PBIS.org Send in your district examples, so we can all learn!

Portal Support Section Search Function Community Forum Chat with us online Account Questions: Technical Assistance Questions: New phone number

When you leave the webinar, please complete the survey.