Uncovering the Promise of Faculty Success Online Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus NERCOMP Boston 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Copyright © Ben Hambelton and Kevin S. Wilson, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Salome Heyward & Associates Conference Services Program Accessibility And Emerging Technology April , 2014 Presented by Salome Heyward, JD Program.
NSE Assessment (Session 2): The Final Story Project
E-Learning Center Deanship of Academic Development.
Executive Report to Council
Challenge Question: Why is being organized on the first day of school important? Self-Test Questions: 1.How do I get my classroom ready? 2.How do I prepare.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
Course Management Issues and Strategies Simplifying the Complex.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Meeting the Challenges of Professional Development for Distance Educators Canadian Association for Distance Education May 2005 Lawrence Ragan PhD Daph.
Outreach Scholarship Conference 2004 Outreach Scholarship: Research Initiatives in On-Line Faculty Engagement Dr. Melody Thompson and Dr. Larry Ragan,
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Issues and Strategies for Faculty Development Michelle Robinson DMD, MA Director of Informatics Marquette University School of Dentistry.
HOW TO SUCCEED ONLINE BY REALLY TRYING: COMPETENCIES AND SKILLS FOR ONLINE TEACHING SUCCESS Lawrence C. Ragan Penn State World Campus 1.
New Faculty Orientation Needs Assessment Report
Dr. Judy Ashcroft, Associate Vice President and Director Dr. Rob Bruce, Deputy Director Ms. Shan Evans, Associate Director Mr. Michael Sweet, Graduate.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
2008 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Developing an eLearning Strategy at a Nigerian University By Jerome Terpase Dooga, Christopher Tony.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Human and Institutional Capacity Development Project in Rwanda (HICD-R) CORE TEAM KM WORKSHOP February 26, 2015 Delivered by Courtney Roberts.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
InTeGrate Assessment David Steer, University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Carleton College May 2012.
Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Institutional Considerations
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload A pre-conference workshop November 4, 2003.
Social Authoring Raising Quality and Access to Online Course Content Ruth Rominger Director of Learning Design National Repository of Online Courses Module.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Building Rubrics that Align with Standards & Documenting Candidates’ Effects on Student Learning Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Staying Relevant A examination of an effective online course. Staying Relevant Learning Team A E-Learning/AET 541 September 29, 2014 Dr. Mary Poe (Elizabeth.
Working With the Instructional Development Team Presented by Heidi King 20 November 2002.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY
Lawrence C. Ragan NC TLT Symposium. Lawrence C. Ragan Director of Instructional Design & Development From Full to Self-Serve: The World Campus ID&D Model.
Dances with Faculty: Empowering Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. & Marilynne Stout, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus.
Instructor Satisfaction with E-Learning David Dietrich, Ph.D. The University of Tennessee at Martin.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
© 2007 Capella University - Confidential - Do not distribute Charting the Course: Online Tutoring Guidelines Kathe Pelletier Director, University Learning.
Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D., Penn State’s World Campus Mount St. Vincent University April 12th 2005.
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FINAL QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Collaborative Leadership
February 21-22, 2018.
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Presentation transcript:

Uncovering the Promise of Faculty Success Online Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus NERCOMP Boston 2005

Program Agenda 1:00Program Introductions and Expectation Setting Presenter and Participants... 1:30Elements of Faculty Success 2:30Team Assignments I 3:00BREAK 3:30Team Report Outs 4:30Summary and Evaluations

Introductions Lawrence C. Ragan... Desired outcomes... Participants...

Elements of Faculty Success What are the critical elements that must be in place for faculty to succeed in the online environment?

To be successful in the OLE faculty need... BRAINSTORM ACTIVITY motivation...

The Right Stuff are sincerely committed to providing a quality learning experience for their students... are willing to take risks and carry through when failure occurs... thrive in new “dynamics” of online learning... interested in doing things differently

Skills and Competencies Pedagogical skills of online learning Technical skills Changing dynamics of the online classroom –Social (individual and group) –rules of balance (student-to-student and students & faculty) –time and place

External Motivation/Incentives Monetary rewards Academic rewards and recognition Promotion and tenure Self-serving (saving faculty time, increasing flexibility) Balanced/reasonable workload

Internal Faculty Motivation Understanding why/what brings faculty to the OLE Addressing motivational needs –experimentation –increasing quality of instructional experience –increasing financial returns

Internal Faculty Motivation Want to improve teaching and learning Want to address specific course issue Want to reach new audiences Want to increase income

Support Services Instructional design consultation Technical support (for both faculty & students) Advising/counseling Administrivia Infrastructure Teaching (GAs/TAs)

Team Assignment Challenges and solutions

Elements and Strategies Select one or more element –See next page for list Briefly describe the issue Identify potential solutions Report out...

Elements Internal Faculty Motivation Support Services External Motivation/Incentives Skills and Competencies The Right Stuff Faculty Workload Management Instructional Support Services (working w/faculty in course production)

Send Notes to:

Strategies for Managing the Online Workload Ways to keep faculty engaged

RESEARCH PROBLEM Real or perceived barrier to faculty participation in online learning: Online education is MUCH MORE WORK than face-to-face instruction

SMOW Project Purpose To identify and refine those strategies, techniques, and methods that enable faculty to manage their workload in the online teaching and learning environment

Workshop Outcome Create a document which captures the most effective workload management strategies for an online environment in order to help faculty manage the online teaching workload

Categories for Strategy Teams from Survey Authoring Strategies Teaching Strategies Revision & Improvement Strategies Institutional Strategies New category: Support Services

Review Team New teams were arranged to review the output of the prior teams Add/modify/refine strategies

Workshop Results Collection of strategies organized into four categories (8 to 11 strategies/category) Includes –Brief description of the strategy –Benefits –Limitations –Effectiveness rating

Authoring Strategies Adopting a course development model, Identifying and acquiring existing learning resources, Establishing and distributing reusable templates, Providing the course author with a sample online course, Providing students with specific instruction for assignments, Applying project planning and management methods to the course development process, Establishing a course development team, Designing balanced instructional activities Finalizing one module or unit before developing the remainder of the course, Developing rubrics for each graded student assignment, and Creating a learning object database

Teaching Strategies Clarifying and enhancing students’ technical skills before registration, Providing a detailed syllabus, Defining the operating parameters of the course, Creating feedback rubrics, Establishing a routine, Incorporating a learning management system for recording course transactions, Fostering group dynamics within the course, Beginning the course with an activity that encourages interaction, and Establishing consistent, effective methods of electronic communication

Revision & Improvement Strategies Projecting the volume and frequency of revision necessary and budgeting accordingly Conducting multiple evaluations of the courses, Conducting a pilot run or initiating an expert internal review before release of the course, Managing the revision cycle as an integral part of the course, Developing methods for managing dynamic course elements (updates), Inviting student feedback at the close of the course, Developing and maintaining a course history, Involving the original course author in the revision process, and Rewarding students for reporting errors in the course material

Institutional Strategies Ensuring faculty access to instructional design and systems support, Providing adequate faculty development opportunities, Providing technical support for faculty and students, Providing an adequate learning management system, Establishing institutional parameters for online operation, Integrating institutional administrative systems and tools, Providing clear institutional policies on intellectual property rights, Defining the role of online education in the mission of the institution, Developing institutional policy for compensating and rewarding faculty and academic units, and Providing copyright and permissions support and policies

Follow Fac Dev To download report, visit: