TATIONpRÆSEN Dubrovnik, April 2013 Disqualifying directors in the internal market of the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen, Professor, Dr.Jur., Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clarifying gold-plating - Better implementation of EU Legislation.
Advertisements

International insolvency law – basic principles within the European union.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF JUSTICE NATIONAL TRADE REGISTER OFFICE CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY.
The Law of the Lisbon Treaty. Our emerging European Criminal Process ? Professor Dermot P.J. Walsh School of Law University of Limerick.
Directive 2005/36/EC. GMC concerns  Single market freedoms provide access to skills, experience and opportunity  Current framework is focused on removing.
Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies in China
EU Cross-Border Care Directive from the Primary Care perspective Results of a simulation Rita Baeten Gothenburg, 3 September 2012.
1 Insolvency Regulation in Ireland Presentation to IAIR Insolvency Workshop Prague, 7 October 2004 Paul Appleby Director of Corporate Enforcement in Ireland.
Ten most common corporate governance sins And how to avoid them CIMA Dublin & District Branch Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
Detection and Confiscation of the property obtained by criminal means Dalian, 2012.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
HOW TO REGISTER A NEW FIRM??????? STEPS AND REQUIREMENTS!!!!
Corporate Mobility and the Costs of Regulation Marco Becht ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles and ECGI Colin Mayer Saïd Business School, University.
| | Seite 1 Basic Principles of Insurance Supervision Duties and Operation of a Supervisory Authority under Coordinated European Legislation.
INTEROPERABILITY IN LAND REGISTERS Jorge López Fernández Secretary General of ELRA Dublin 21th of June of 2013.
TAIEX Ana Maria DOBRE Chisinau, May 2012.
1 Federal Ministry of Justice Sharing Experiences of the German EU Presidency.
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Emergency Briefing Remote Gambling - European Update THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm.
East Asia and the Pacific Region
ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT IN VIETNAM Presented by: Le Thanh Vinh Vietnam Competition Administration Department – Ministry of Trade Seoul, 07/04/2006.
0 Overview of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Related Corporate Procedures (A312, A312A and A301)
Directors’ Duties in the OnLine Environment July 2001 Carolyn Reynolds.
Public Affairs Ireland Conference Governance, Accountability and Financial Management in the Public Sector in Ireland 10 November 2004.
5th European Company Law and Corporate Governance Conference Berlin, 27 and 28 June 2007 Company mobility – Does Europe offer the right framework? Stefano.
Interface between Leniency, Direct Settlement and Criminal Sanctions – A UK perspective European Competition Day, Brno Philip Collins Chairman Office of.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
TATIONpRÆSEN April 2013 Free movement of companies and the Vale judgment Karsten Engsig Sørensen, Professor, Dr. Jur. Department of Law, Aarhus University.
Annual seminar in Berlin – 27 th May Should EU corporate governance measures take into account the size of listed companies ? How ? Should a.
1. 2 The European Private Company (SPE) and the Cartesio case 11 June 2009 Judit Fischer – European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services.
1 On the Conspiracy Requirement of Cartels --through the analysis of a practical case Wen-Hsiu,Lee Fair Trade Commission of Taiwan April 5, 2006.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
CHAPTER 3 INTERNATIONAL LAW DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
“Foreign Official” under the FCPA means “any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
Nexia ETG Meeting Milan 2 October 2009 Harmful Tax Practices Kevin Renshaw.
Dr Marek Porzycki.  the debtor has some assets abroad  the debtor has creditors abroad  the debtor carries out his activities on a cross-border basis.
Group interest in Europe Martin Winner. SEITE 2 OVERVIEW  decision in the interest of the group not necessarily in the interest of the subsidiary  Cash.
Paola Lucantoni Economic and Financial Market Law.
© Copyright Allianz IIS Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk & Global Strategy July 9, 2007 Berlin Helmut Perlet, Allianz SE The Emergence of Solvency.
Slide 1 Corporate Accountability and Accounting Standards « Fourth Directive » - annual accounts 1978 « Seventh Directive » - consolidated accounts 1983.
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
Chapter 7 Theories of Social Responsibility, The Corporate Social Audit and Corporate Sustainability.
Outlining the minimum level of minority protection in Europe Mads Andenæs, University of Oslo.
Finance Directors Business Strategy Meeting 2003 Berkeley Court Hotel 18 February 2003.
Parshotam Lawyers Barristers and Solicitors Level 2 Mid City Cnr Cumming St/Waimanu Rd GPO Box 131, Suva, Fiji Ph: Fax:
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Task Force on Banking Crisis Resolution Procedures Assonime-CEPS-Unicredit Task Force on Banking Crisis Resolution Procedures Key issues in bank crisis.
LG538 Law Corporate Governance – Directors’ Duties.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Cooperative compliance at the crossroad of different legal frameworks – Cooperative.
Paolo Santella, Bank of Italy.06 July 2016Dias 1 Seminar Company Law and SMEs Aarhus School of Business – 10 November 2008 The Case in Favour of the European.
Regime to apply regarding financial services, such as banking, credit and insurance Audrius LINARTAS Deputy Chairman Insurance Supervisory Commission of.
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Roles and Responsibilities of Company Directors
Chapter 3 MANAGEMENT.
Roles and Responsibilities of Company Directors
By Krista Whitman Assistant County Counsel April 3, 2017
The Law Applicable to Companies in the EU: Status quaestionis
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
Chapter 13 Directors Duties: Remedies and Consequences
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 5 Management
Application of the Regulation No. 1346/2000: Lithuanian Experience
By Krista Whitman Assistant County Counsel April 3, 2017
Insolvency regime for further education and sixth form colleges
Human Rights Due Diligence as a mechanism for prevention and enhancing access to justice Claudia Saller European Coalition for Corporate Justice Access.
Department of Community Safety - 31 January 2018
Context (1) Digital Single Market Strategy e-Government Action Plan.
BOOK V: COMPANY LAW The term Company is used to describe an association of a number of persons, formed for some common purpose and registered according.
The European Anti-Corruption Report
By Krista Whitman Assistant County Counsel April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

TATIONpRÆSEN Dubrovnik, April 2013 Disqualifying directors in the internal market of the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen, Professor, Dr.Jur., Department of Law, Aarhus University

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 The topic To look at rules on disqualification of directors from a company law perspective and from a EU perspective  Which types of rules exist?  Are there cross-border issues which should be dealt with (in the EU)?  What role, if any, should the EU have here? 2

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 The presentation The impact of recent developments Harmonization efforts in the EU  In company  Outside company law Current national systems  UK, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Sweden  Conditions for disqualification (in cross-border settings)  Procedures for disqualification  Consequences of disqualification (in cross-border settings) Summing up 3

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 The impact of recent developments Financial crisis  Has increased the number of bankruptcies and corporate insolvencies  Has increased focus on bankruptcies speculations and reckless business behaviour Increased mobility of companies makes it easy to incorporate abroad  May form a company in the MS with the most attractive rules (e.g. lowest cost and most flexibility)  May use it for business in other MS even without activities in state of incorporation  Many service providers make it easy 4

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Harmonization efforts in the EU Not part of the 5th Company Law Directive, but SE Statute Article 47 Winter report 2002, pp  Argued that board members’ responsibility for financial and key non-financial disclosure should be sanctioned properly by MS  Argued that directors’ disqualification should be introduced across the EU  Criminal and civil liability sanctions are difficult to effectuate, come to late and differ in various MS  Disqualification from serving as a director of companies across the EU is sanction easier to effectuate and has a powerful deterrent and long-term disabling effect 5

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Harmonization efforts in the EU 2  Call for the Commission to make further review to use disqualification as a sanction not only for disclosure but also ‘more generally for misconduct by directors  Constitutional aspect should also be examined 6

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Harmonization efforts in the EU 3 Commission Action Plan 2003 accepted Winter recommendation but never took any action Public hearing positive European Parliament Resolution from 2006 calls for measures to enhance cross-border availability of information regarding disqualification of directors 7

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Harmonization efforts in the EU 4 Reflection Group supports this recommendation  Increased cross-border mobility makes it easy to carry on abuse in other MS  Suggests that information on disqualification is made available to the European public  Suggests that the registers are interconnected  Points out problems of language, need to specify reasons for disqualification, need to remove record when disqualification is lifted, problems of privacy, data protection and fundamental rights Commission Action Plan 2012, however, did not mention it 8

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Harmonization efforts in the EU 5 Outside company law  Normally sanctions are left for MS  ‘Fit and proper’ rules for directors in financial institutions  Combating corruption  Abuse of children  Violation of competition law?  Promoting mutual recognition of disqualification  Little has been achieved  Recognition of professional qualifications  Driving license  Mutual exchange of information on criminal convictions 9

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Different disqualification regimes Criminal law regimes  Germany  Strict requirements as to proof? Bankruptcies/insolvency regimes (insolvency quarantine)  Main area of application of CDDA 1986 and Swedish rules  Rules in Norway and soon Denmark  Often used Fit and proper test in EU financial market law and insurance law Violation of competition law (UK and SE) Others 10

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Conditions for disqualification 1 Which companies?  Any company with limited liability  Also business without limited liability (DK, SE)  Also foreign companies, given competence for insolvencies proceedings  Regulation 1346/2000  Normally place of registered office, unless centre of main interest is elsewhere  Secondary insolvency proceedings  Consequences of transfer of seat?  Does disqualification have to be part of insolvency proceedings? 11

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Conditions for disqualification 2 Who?  Formal directors (managing and non-managing)  De facto directors (% Germany)  Disregarding nationality or residence  In Denmark and Norway it is a requirement that position is held within the last year before bankruptcy 12

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Conditions for disqualification 3 Different tests for unfitness  Some common elements (do not stop in time, do not perform duties vis-à-vis accounts, sell business at discount)  Clear focus on owner-managed SMEs  Is violation of company law relevant?  Is conduct performed outside MS relevant?  Does it matter whether there may be different standards abroad?  Problems with proof/investigations  Problems with incentives 13

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Procedures for disqualification 1 Requires insolvency proceedings Differs who can start disqualification proceedings  Criminal prosecutor  State (UK, SE)  Trustee (UK, NO, DK)  Court (SE)  Shareholders or creditors (UK)  Problem if the trustee is the main enforcer? 14

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Procedures for disqualification 2 Problems with EHRC Who decides?  Courts  Disqualification undertakings (UK) 15

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Procedures for disqualification 3 How often is the sanction used? UK: More than 1,500 times per year NO: times per year (10% of all corporate insolvency) DK: Expecting same level as in NO DE: ? 16

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 1 Must not be involved in management of a company  Only limited liability companies (however, partnerships covered in SE, DK)  All positions, even de facto 17

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 2  Foreign companies?  In DK also prohibited from being director in a foreign company (enforcement problem)  Must not be a manager of branch of a foreign company (SE, NO, DE)  UK: Foreign companies with established place of business in UK, sec. 22  Duty to register a branch  Restricting freedom of establishment 18

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 3 Must not be an employee in a company where related holds a position as a manager (SE) Must not be involved in establishment of company (% DK) Must not be an insolvency practitioner (UK) Must not own majority of shares (SE) Can get leave from the courts (UK, SE) 19

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 3 (continued) Periods  UK: 2-15 years  NO: 2 years  DK: 3 years  SE: 3-10 years 20

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 4 Sanctions  Fines and prison  Longer period  Personal liability  Liability for straw men (UK, DK)  Consequences of invalid appointment of director  Liability of shareholders (DE) Cross-border enforcement 21

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 5 Register of disqualified persons  UK: Online access  SE/NO: Access on request  DK: No public access  So far registers are not linked  EP and Reflection Groups proposal  Not covered by directive 2012/17  ECRIS – European Criminal Records Information System  Data protection  What would be the effect of linked registers? 22

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Consequences of disqualification 6 Mutual recognition of foreign disqualifications  Ensuring mutual recognition  SE Statute Article 47 and SCE Statue Article 46(2)  Extending sanctions – limiting free movement  Harmonization presupposes similar systems – are they similar enough?  Each MS can choose to do so  UK: CA 2006, sec and 1187 (can impose disqualification or personal liability  Can courts in other MS enforce foreign disqualification orders? 23

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Summing up 1 Current national rules do only to some extent take account of the effect of the internal market  Cannot impose disqualification on directors of foreign companies unless the insolvency proceedings take place in that MS  MS of incorporation may not have proof or incentives to enforce unfit behavior taking place abroad (requires cooperation)  Enforcement of disqualification against foreign companies limited to situations where branches are registered or bankruptcy proceedings take place there  No setup to exchange information on disqualifications  No mutual recognition of foreign disqualifications, e.g. disqualified persons can avoid order by starting business in other MS 24

Disqualifying directors in the EU Karsten Engsig Sørensen Dubrovnik April 2013 Summing up 2 Mutual recognition would ensure that disqualified persons are not ‘exported’ to other MS Mutual recognition, however, would require some harmonization Cross-border transparency less effective but could more easily be achieved Thank you for your attention! 25