Developing Effective Questioning In Teaching Games For Understanding (TGfU) Pearson & Webb, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative.
Advertisements

Importance of Questioning and Feedback Technique in developing 3 Cs
Teamwork Sport: Soccer
PE in the MYP.
Chapter 4: Movement: The Keystone of Physical Education and Sport
Active Learning and Your Child
Rationale To encourage all students to take a full part in the life of our school, college, workplace or wider community. To provide opportunities to enable.
Internship Seminar What will be covered: The internship context
Breaking and Building Football Skills John Morrison.
Structures & Strategies. Tactics As part of your game plan, you will include the use of tactics. 'Tactics' are quite simply the variations of play used.
Teaching Games for Understanding
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Build It And They Will Come
Guidelines for Best Practices in Educational Use of Virtual Instrumentation Presentation created by Adina Glava Babeş – Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca,
Individuals are then more motivated to learn specific skills, because they are able to see the connection between what is being learned and the positive.
Game Performance Assessment Shane Pill Flinders University School of Education Physical Education Studies.
An Integrated Approach to TGfU
Module 5 Teaching Games for Understanding Ever Active Schools: Physical Literacy.
Games Approach Workshop 3. Skill teaching Some suggestions for teaching skills in coaching sessions teach one skill at a time allow plenty of time for.
Playing for Life – what is it? Playing for life is an approach to coaching that uses games rather than drills to introduce the skills and tactics of the.
Sport Education Curriculum & Instruction Strategies Sport Education Curriculum & Instruction Strategies.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Educational Services for Individuals with Exceptionalities Adapted Lesson Plan.
Higher-Level Cognitive Processes
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
TEACHING SKILLS International Ice Hockey Federation Learn To Play Program Sheffield, England October 17, 2004.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
PROMOTING THINKING SKILLS IN THE LANGUAGES CLASSROOM 2011 AFTV Conference ‘Le français dans tous ses états!’ Friday 22 July 2011 Presenter: Maree Dellora.
The Areas of Interaction are…
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Developing effective questioning in TGfU Phil Pearson Paul Webb Presentation for the 1st Asia Pacific Sport in Education Conference, Adelaide, 2008.
Connecting Philosophy to Curriculum Am I Teaching What I’m Believing?
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Facilitate Group Learning
‘Game Sense’ RFL Coaching Workshop
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) As a Curriculum Model
TEACHING TIPS: FOSTERING CRITICAL THINKING THE WORLD TODAY NEEDS PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE ABILITY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS Richmond.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
Games in Practice Prepared by RLEF, July Why Games? It’s recommended that a players development in each training session should consist of learning.
Why is game sense important when teaching PE to students? Students who learn while playing develop : Decision making skills, game gratitude, and strategic.
Miss Loock SHMD 119 Sport Didactics & Coaching Unit 11 1.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
GAME SENSE COACHING & DECISION-MAKING Year 11 P.E Kate Grainger Chairo Chrsitian School “When are we going to play a game?”
Adopting a planned questioning process By questioning and challenging players, the coach creates an environment of thinking and problem solving, developing.
Timeline periods left before end of Unit 2 End of unit 2 – Friday, 7 th November (4 weeks from today) Exams 10 – 14 th November Transition classes.
Chapter 11 Assessment in Sport Education 11 Assessment in Sport Education C H A P T E R.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Shaun Morgan & Corey McKean PE 3310 Presentation Date: Dr. Lynn Johnson.
TEACHING STYLES TEACHING STYLES. LEARNING OUTCOMES To examine different teaching styles To evaluate how teaching styles can affect performance To begin.
FISETTE & MITCHELL, 2010 Frameworks for Diagnosing Student Performance Problems in Striking/Fielding and Target Games.
Game Sense Approach The new and improved teaching method By your faithful yr4 PE Teacher Mr Duckworth.
Teaching Games for Understanding
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
TEACHING MATHEMATICS Through Problem Solving
Games Approach Workshop 3.
The Games Approach Chapter 9.
Games Approach.
Understanding a Skills-Based Approach
GAMES SENSE DARTS AS A TARGET SPORT IS SUITED TO A GAMES SENSE APPROACH Produced by judy Taylor.
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Developing Effective Questioning In Teaching Games For Understanding (TGfU) Pearson & Webb, 2008

Introduction Emphasis Play Tactical and strategic problems are posed in modified game environment Usually drawing on students to make decisions Focus of a lesson On the student in a game situation where cognitive skills such as tactics decision making and problem solving are critical Approach to teaching that makes very effective use of active learning The students are learning though playing the games Use of questioning Powerful method of encouraging players to analyze their actions, Both individually, and as a team Questions will generally relate to a particular tactical aspect. Effective phrasing of questions can also help to guide the player to an answer

Introduction Effectiveness of TGfU Engagement and cognitive learning. Higher order thinking occurs from questioning and discussion about tactics and strategies Through the intelligent movements of the body during games (Light, 2002) Cognitive development through decision making and tactical exploration Combined with skill development within modified games to provide meaningful contexts One of the aims of TGfU Encouraging players to become more tactically aware and to make better decisions during the game Encourages young players to begin thinking strategically about game concepts whilst developing skills within a realistic context and most importantly, having fun TGfU has been shown to result in improved learning outcomes for students

TGfU Teaching games for understanding was found to: Encourage a holistic approach to the teaching of games Develop critical thinking and problem solving Develop deep knowledge and understanding of the game Promote high levels of participation and enjoyment for participants Promote player centered learning and relevance of skills and tactics Cater for varying abilities Foster efficiency in aspects of implementation (Webb, Pearson & McKeen, 2005)

TGfU And Questioning Developing critical thinking and deep understanding Elements of quality teaching in any domain The teachers’ role Facilitate students’ thinking, helping them to develop thinking skills and behaviours TGfU approach Challenges teachers and coaches to understand the deep intellectual structures of playing and learning to teach a game effectively (Hopper, 2002)

TGfU And Questioning Key to the teacher Is the questioning technique and the relevance to the student of the introduction of rules and technique. The focus is on the student and problem solving (Webb, Pearson and Forrest 2006) Questioning skills and the ability to develop appropriate activities to allow the questions to be answered Are central to the success of the Game Sense (TGfU) approach (Light 2003) Fundamental reasons for the approach being so valued as a pedagogical model of quality teaching (Pearson, Webb and McKeen 2005)

Types of Questions Teaching through questions Is an instructional format in which tasks are communicated through questions that pose problems that guide student activity towards particular goals or questions that pose problems to be solved (Siedentop & Tannehill, 2000) Questions can be organized into four types depending on the cognitive activity involved. Recall Require memory level answer, for example: ‘Where should your eyes be when they are dribbling? Convergent Aid analysis and integration of previously learned material require reasoning and problem solving, for example: ‘Why should you stay between your opponent and the basket? Divergent Require solutions to new situations through problem solving, for example: ‘What ways would you start a fast break off a steal?’ Value Require expressions of choice, attitude and opinion, for example: ‘How do you react? Developing effective questioning in Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU)

Effective Questioning Questioning provides Opportunities for the students to think for themselves Situations are created whereby the students learn skills and tactics inferentially through being placed in circumstances for them to apply these skills The use of a questioning protocol (what? where? when? why? with whom? how?) is a key pedagogical tool in TGfU (Griffin & Butler 2005) In virtually every game or practice teachers need to look at the scenario and ask students the following questions: What is going wrong? Where does the problem occur? When does the problem occur? They propose that questions fall into three categories: Time ‘When is the best time to?’ Space ‘Where is or where can?’ Risk ‘Which choice is safest and which is most risky?’ Effective questioning is a move away from the traditional teacher centred model of teaching to a more student centred approach as questioning provides opportunities for the students to think for themselves. In doing so, situations are created whereby the students learn skills and tactics inferentially through being placed in circumstances for them to apply these skills

Effective Questioning If questions are not challenging Then this learning process breaks down. Essential that practitioners and students Have practice and feedback given to them on their questioning technique Effective questioning should promote Reflective thinking, decision making and communication

Process To Develop Effective Questioning With TGfU A process for sport analysis and developing questions in TGfU 1.) List the elements to be an effective player in a sport. Pick a sport from invasion, striking/fielding, net/court or target games 2.) How did you determine which elements were needed to play the game effectively? 3.) Place each of the elements into one of the subsets listed below A. Technical B. Tactical/strategic C. Cognitive D. Rules 4.) List some games that you would use to develop the elements in each or in a combination of the subsets. 5.) Under each element list questions that would develop understanding in the sport. Give examples of the four types ; recall, convergent, divergent and value.

Process To Develop Effective Questioning With TGfU Complexity of questions Need to be progressive whereby a fundamental understanding of games within and across categories is developed by examining Principles of play Tactics Rules Techniques (Forrest, Pearson & Webb, 2006) Using this process across categories of games practitioners will be able to develop a bank of both generic and sports specific questions By comparing sports and games in all four categories Development of the understanding required provides opportunities for higher order thinking from players