Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Plans at SLAC John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e + e - Super-B-Factory Workshop Hawaii, USA January 19, 2004.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department The PEP-II B-Factory Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director Particle and Particle-Astrophysics Division.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
SLAC Accelerator Department Super-B-Factory John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department Caltech Meeting.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
July 24, 2008Super-B Mini-MAC MeetingPage 1 Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
Linear Super-B Factory Progress John T. Seeman FPCP Workshop Vancouver BC April 9, 2006.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Accelerator Summary 1/22/2004 K. Oide (KEK). Accelerator Session: PEP-II IR Upgrade M. Sullivan (SLAC) Super KEKB Optics & IR Y. Ohnishi(KEK) Super-PEP-II.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
PEP-II Status and Outlook John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team SLAC EPAC Meeting June 12, 2003.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department The PEP-II Overview John Seeman SLAC Particle and Particle-Astrophysics Directorate PEP-II MAC Review January.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator Status and General Plans John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator.
SLAC Accelerator Department PEP-II Future Plans and Parameters John T. Seeman PEP-II MAC Meeting December 13, 2004.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
SLAC Accelerator Department PEP-II Super-B-Factory Collider John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II in Run 7 and Transition Planning John T. Seeman Assistant Director PPA/LCLS.
SLAC/PEP-II and INFN/LNF-AD Collaboration for Very High Luminosity Factories studies M. Biagini, LNF Commissione Nazionale Gruppo I, LNF 12/11/03.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
9 October 2003S. DeBarger PEP-II Vacuum Status PEP-II Machine Advisory Committee.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
PEP- II Linac Accelerator Systems Department Status and Plans for PEP-II John Seeman SLAC Particle and Particle-Astrophysics DOE HEPAP P5 Review April.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB Accelerator Overview and Status
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Beam-beam simulations
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003

Thanks Many people helped with the results here: –A few of them: M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, –S. Novokhatski, S. Heifets, S. Ecklund, A. Fisher, –Y. Cai, Y. Nosochkov, D. Hitlin, A. J. S. Smith, –J. Fox, D. Teytelman, Y. Yan, …

Topics Luminosity equations Lessons learned from the two B-Factories PEP-II luminosity keeping the present RF frequency 476 MHz but allowed to change IR and LER vacuum chambers. Luminosity with an RF frequency change (952 MHz) but allow a change to the IR, most ring magnets, and all vacuum systems. Power losses versus luminosity Total site power Conclusions

PEP-II e + e - Collider

PEP-II is a two ring e+e- asymmetric collider

Lessons learned from the present B-Factories Asymmetric beam energies work. Energy transparency conditions are weak. Interaction regions with asymmetry can be operated. IR backgrounds can be handled. High current RF can be operated. (1A x 2 A). Bunch-by-bunch feedbacks work (4 nsec spacing). Beam-beam tune shifts reached 0.08 (v) to 0.10 (h). Injection rates good. Continuous injection feasible! Electron Cloud Instability (ECI) ameliorated for now!

Luminosity Equation  y is the beam-beam parameter (~0.06)  I b is the bunch current (1 ma x 2 ma)  n is the number of bunches (~942)  y * is the IP vertical beta (~11 mm)  E is the beam energy (3.1 and 9 GeV)  Luminosity is about 6.11 x cm -2 s -1

New techniques of the Next Generation B-Factory Beam lifetimes will be low  continuous injection. Very low  y * (6 to 12 mm  1.5 to 3 mm). Higher tune shift (trade beam-beam lifetimes for tune shifts). Higher beam currents (x 10 or so) (Watch total power!). Higher frequency RF (more bunches). Bunch-by-bunch feedbacks at the 1 nsec scale. (Started  Fox) Very short bunch lengths (2-3 mm). High power vacuum chambers with antechambers and improved or no bellows. (Started) Reduce energy asymmetry to save wall power.

PEP-II parameters in about FY2008 with Standard Upgrades E+ = 3.1 GeV E- = 9.0 GeV I+ = 4500 mA I- = 2000 mA  y * = 6.5 mm  x * = 50 cm Crossing angle = 0 to 4 mrad (?) Beam-beam parameters = 0.10 N = 1700 bunches (every second bucket) L = 2-3 x cm -2 s -1

This talk will concentrate on power losses For the parameters in the previous slide : Losses due to synchrotron radiation are about 7.2 MW are the HER and 3 MW for the LER. The resistive wall losses for the whole ring are 56 kW for the LER and 15 kW for the HER. The cavity higher order mode losses are 14 kW for the LER and 3 kW for the HER. Total PEP-II power is, thus, about 25 MW and for the whole site 45 MW.

Advanced B Factory using PEP-II RF Frequency Keep present RF frequency = 476 MHz. Go to 8 x 3.5 GeV with 11 A x 4.8 A. HER current limited to 4.8 Amps using present vacuum chamber. New LER vacuum chambers with antechambers for higher power (x 4). LER current limited to 11 Amps to match HER beam-beam. Keep present arc magnets but add magnets to soften losses. New bunch-by-bunch feedback for 3400 bunches (every bucket) at 2 nsec spacing. (We are presently designing a feedback system for nsec spacing. [Fox, Teytelman,…]) Push  y * to 2.2 mm: need new IR (SC quadrupoles, [Parker, …])  Save on costs by adding to present RF, keeping HER/LER magnets (with some additions). Same HER vacuum system.

Advanced B Factory with 476 MHz RF Frequency E - = 8 GeV E + = 3.5 GeV I- = 4.8 A I+ = 11 A  y * = 2.2 mm  x * = 15 cm Bunch length = 2.5 mm Crossing angle = ~15. mrad Beam-beam parameters = 0.15 –(Needs some testing but 0.12 now!) N = 3450 bunches L = 5 x cm -2 s -1 Site power with linac and campus = ~120 MW.

IR for a B-Factory From M. Sullivan

Advanced B Factory with New RF Frequency Higher RF frequency provides for more bunches. Better for resistive wall losses, Touschek lifetime, single bunch instabilities, lower beam emittance, perhaps lower parasitic beam-beam effects, less peak synchrotron radiation heat stress, … Choose frequency related to linac frequency 2856 MHz: –238, 476, 714, 952, 1190, 1448, … MHz –For today we choose 952 MHz.

Advanced B Factory with 952 MHz RF Frequency E + = 8 GeV E - = 3.5 GeV I+ = 6.8 A I- = 15.5 A  y * = 1.5 mm  x * = 15 cm Bunch length = 1.8 mm Crossing angle = ~15. mrad Beam-beam parameters = 0.15 N = 6900 bunches L = 1.0 x cm -2 s -1 Site power with linac and campus = ~120 MW.

Calculation of the Total Site Power vs Luminosity and RF frequency Assume the Campus, SPEAR, Linac plus PEP-II magnets sums to 40 MW (~35 MW now). Beam power losses come from the resistive wall effect, synchrotron radiation, and higher order mode losses in the cavities and other chambers. Assume bunch lengths are fixed. Assume the number of bunches are fixed. Scale the currents linearly with the luminosity adjusting the emittance to keep the beam-beam parameters at Assume the RF power supply and RF klystron have a combined efficiency of 45% and that a klystron delivers 450 kW to each cavity.

Scaling of the power losses Luminosity ~ I beam (after correcting the beam-beam parameter with emittance changes) Resistive wall losses ~N bunches x I 2 bunch = I bunch x I total HOM losses ~I bunch x I total Number of RF cavities = total losses/(450 kW-100kW/cav losses-HOM losses/cav)  Three non-linearities!

HOM Calculation for a 476 MHz Cavity with a larger beam opening (Novokhatski)

Shintake Cavity

Further Higher Order Mode Calculations (Novokhatski)

Site Power including Linac and Campus for Two Different RF Frequencies for the Super-B-Factory 476 MHz 952 MHz (Linac, PEP-II magnets and campus power = 40 MW)

Future BF activities Planned workshops: –October 13-16, 2003 at SLAC: ICFA Workshop on e+e- High Luminosity Colliders. –Super-B 10^36 Particle Physics Workshop at SLAC October –Joint KEK/SLAC Super-B-Factory workshop in January 19-22, 2004 in Oahu, Hawaii. –

Conclusions The parameters of a Super-PEP-II were studied with RF frequencies of 476 MHz.and 952 MHz. At the present, for about 120 MW of total power, linac and campus included: 476 MHz provides a luminosity of about 5E35 and 952 MHz provides a luminosity of about 1E36 with beam-beam parameters of Coupled-bunch beam-dynamics effects, IR design, and vacuum systems will be studied next.