Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
A Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models Xin Ye Wen Cheng Xudong Jia Civil Engineering Department California State Polytechnic.
Denver’s Activity-Based Model Project: Status Report Erik Sabina, P.E., DRCOG Thomas Rossi, Principal, Cambridge Systematics TRB Transportation Planning.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
Modal Split Analysis.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
San Francisco Bay Area Activity-Based Models Specification & Training Study Chuck Purvis Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California Workshop.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Making advanced travel forecasting models affordable through model transferability 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9,
Modelling Intermediate Stops Presented at 15 th Applications Conference Atlantic CityMay 2015 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant, Windsor, SC Anna Hayes.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
TRANSCAD MODELING AT NCTCOG: HOW WE DID IT Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP for Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 12, 2003.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
From Academia to Application: Results from the Development of the First Accessibility-Based Model Mike Conger, P.E. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
ARC ABM Visualization & Reporting ARC – Nov 12, 2010 Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
Importance of Modeling Bicycle Ownership at Individual Level to Predict Travel Mode Share May 18, 2015 Nazneen Ferdous and John Gliebe, RSG Richard Walker,
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Comparing a Household Activity-Based Model with a Person Activity-Based Model 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9, 2013,
1 FlexTraining in a Nutshell Welcome to a brief introduction of the FlexTraining Total e- Learning Solution. This short sample course will outline the.
“An Iterative Capacity Constrained Parking Methodology for Ridership Forecasts for BART Extension Stations” Mike Aronson May 19, th TRB National.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Activity-Based Modeling How does it work?. CT-RAMP model Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP) for the Atlanta Region.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
Systems Analysis Group One ABM for Four Cities: Experience of ABM Estimation on a Pooled Dataset of Multiple Surveys Surabhi Gupta, Peter Vovsha, Gaurav.
Point-Base Household and Job Geographic Datasets Jill Locantore, Land Use Planner Jeremy Papuga, Demographic Analyst Erik Sabina, Regional Modeling Manager.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FOUR Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Aktivitetsbaseret modellering af transportefterspørgsel
Statewide Mode Choice Models for Tennessee
Testing the Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Congestion and Time-Of-Day Forecast Outcomes of an Activity-Based Model
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson

Erik’s recommendations (and the price you’ll have to pay) Get into the critical path –Though it will put the hurt on schedule Software is the hardest part –Steal someone else’s if you can –Modelers must program WELL! –The custom versus vendor conundrum Estimate a few models –Some basic skills are indispensible –Why let a few consultants have all the fun?

Expertise we started with Discrete choice model estimation –Decent theory, limited practice Programming/software development –Very strong in IT, modelers good programmers Math, stats, econ, etc. –Pretty strong across the board Trip-based modeling –Very strong

Levels of Knowledge Sensitivities Limitations and approximations Fix/update variables Re-calibrate Re-estimate some components Re-design the theoretical structure Re-design or extend sw structure

Model sensitivities What (example) - non-motorized mode choice Blend point-based and skim distances Point locations for households and jobs Intersection, retail, mixed use density How – programmed all utility function variables Why – can’t apply model without it!

Limitations and approximations What (examples) - Little: simpler logsums skims Little: Twice O-D, rather than O-D + D-O Big: sequential TOD and mode choice Big: Implicit intra-household interactions How – programmed all utility function variables Why – know what model can/can’t do

Fix/update variables What (examples) – Simple: changes to input data/ GISDK Simple once you get used to it - change SQL Server table / variables in C# Pretty hard - understand how component works (older sibling school, logit solver) How – wrote GISDK/ C# model components Why – changes to variables over time are very common

Variable example //Additional created in code variable, Older Sibling's school district if (householdID != currentHouseholdID) { currentHouseholdID = householdID; //Clear Sibling's school zone variable foreach (string choice in OlderSiblingSchoolZoneChoice) { this.UtilityFunctionParameters.AlternativeSpecificVariables[choice]["OldSibSchZone"].Value = 0; } OlderSiblingSchoolZoneChoice.Clear(); } else { //take choice and add a 1 to the OldSibSchZone variable in the choosen zone. tempList = choosenAlternative.Split(' '); zoneID = int.Parse(tempList[1]); if (universityStudent != 1) //Doesn't matter where an older sib university student went to school { if (zoneID != 0) { this.UtilityFunctionParameters.AlternativeSpecificVariables[choosenAlternative]["OldSibSchZone"].Value = 1; }

Variable changes in Database

Recalibrate What (example) - work location choice model calibrated five years ago is not matching new ACS journey to work data. Model has too few people working at home. What knobs can you turn? Some Examples: 1. Change coefficients to variables related to working at home. 2. Trace back issues to the land use or economic forecasts. How – checked model estimation reports, programmed variables and model input code Why – frequent “tweaks” expected!

Recalibrate (2) Another example - Observed boardings on light rail are lower than modeled boardings. What knobs can you turn? Possibilities: 1. Mode choice coefficients / alternative specific constants. 2. Too few university students on light rail? Trips too short, so walk/bike mode share too high. Adjust school location choice model: coefficients on the distance to school variables.

Re-estimation What (example) – added variables to school location choice: Zone in School District Older Sibling’s School Zone How – estimated several models ourselves: Estimation software syntax Various levels of theoretical knowledge The “expert coach” approach Why – expecting frequent “tweaks” again!

Re-estimate: data issues Oops! You need to re-estimate. The colors on the picture signify where education employment was geo-coded but there was no school enrollment geo-coded.

Re-estimate High School Location Choice

Redesign model What (examples) - Swap out a component Estimate joint models Explicit joint tour formation Daily schedule interaction Activity generation and assignment How – thorough study of your design (among other things!) Why – next round of model upgrades

Redesign software What (examples) – Model component design Upgrade key functions (e.g. MakeChoice) Enhance distributability ( modifications to“plumbing” code) How – designed/wrote most code -The “coach” model Why – open source versus vendor again!

Redesign Software (example)

What we did: estimation Component Name Synthetic Sample GeneratorTour Primary Destination Choice Regular Workplace Location Regular School LocationTour Main Mode Choice Auto Ownership Area TypeTour Time of Day Choice Parking CostIntermediate Stop Generation Daily Activity PatternIntermediate Stop Location Trip Mode Choice Exact Number of ToursTrip Departure Time Work Tour Destination Type

What we did: software Wrote our own (bigtime!) That coach model again Had to learn a lot to do it: Logit math OO/C#/.Net programming SQL-Server database Wanted to use industry-standard tools Led by strong IT department

Future training Explicit intra-hh interaction –Many flavors Selection of choice set from a larger set “Doubly constrained” location choice –Enforced quota –Shadow price Ties to DTA Enhancements in population synthesis

Authors Erik Sabina, Jennifer Malm, Suzanne Childress, -Denver Regional Council of Governments John Bowman, - Bowman Research and Consulting DeVon Culbertson, - DeVon Culbertson, LLC