Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
PRS and the Survey of Organizational Excellence Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services Using the Survey of Organizational Excellence in.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (CBCAP) 2006 Program Instruction Overview May 2006 Melissa Lim Brodowski Office on Child Abuse and Neglect,
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Multnomah County CCFC Commission Mtg Tuesday, Dec 8 th 2009.
OUR KIDS OF MIAMI-DADE/MONROE, INC. EDUCATION COLLABORATION PROJECT Presented by: Additional Key Project Team: Claudia Kitchens Robin Molan Director of.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
Strengthening Service Quality © The Quality Service Review Institute, a Division of the Child Welfare Policy & Practice Group, 2014.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Judge Mark Pouley Commissioner Michelle Ressa October 9, 2012 ICW Summit.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Department of Human Services
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Differential Response Oregon Safety Model Strengthening, Preserving and Reunifying Families Stacy Lake, Differential Response Manager Chuck Nyby, Differential.
Positive Outcomes for All: The Institutional Analysis in Fresno County’s DSS Catherine Huerta 1.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
Parents as Teachers © (PAT)  Vision All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  Mission To provide the information,
: The National Center at EDC
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Mark Washington, DHS Assistant Commissioner “Preparing for Tomorrow Today” Part II April 23, 2010 FY, FT The Transforming of a Culture and the Potential.
Child Protection Services Department of Health and Human Services Maggie Crawford State Manager Child and Family Services 3 April 2006.
Community Ownership of its Children Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Normer Adams, Executive Director.
Using the CANS – F to Support In-Home Child Welfare Services Tim Kelly, MS, Department of Social and Health Services Children’s Administration 11th Annual.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Overview of Child Welfare Reform in the U.S. Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare 2016 Spring Conference Crystal Collins-Camargo, MSW PhD Kent.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Bruce Grey Child and Family Services
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
Developing a System to Build Quality
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Presentation transcript:

Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation

2 Snapshot of Oregon 2012 Child Abuse and Neglect  69,096 Reports of Child Abuse/Neglect  30,085 Referred for CPS Assessment  6,332 (20.5%) Founded  26% Removed from Home  74% Remain Home (10.7% with in-home safety plan; 63% safe with no further child welfare intervention)  63% Involved Neglect/Threat of Harm Neglect

3 Why Differential Response Oregonians believe every child deserves to grow up at home in a safe and nurturing family. Through engaging and collaborative relationships with families and communities, we achieve the best possible outcomes for children and families. With customized services focused on child safety and family stability, the Child Welfare Program provides families the opportunity to address their challenges and the chance for our communities most at risk children to be safe and successful.

4 Differential Response Vision Statement As a result of Oregon’s implementation of DR, the following results will occur:  Children will be kept safely at home and in their communities; using the Oregon Safety Model and its core concepts and tools to guide decisions making.  The community and Oregon DHS will work in partnership with a shared responsibility for keeping children safely at home and in their communities.  Families will partner with Oregon DHS to realize their full potential and develop solutions for their challenges.  Fewer children will re-enter the child welfare system through improved preventative and reunification services for families.  Disproportionality will be reduced among children of color.  Private agencies and community organizations will experience stronger partnerships with Oregon DHS on behalf of children and families. 4

5 Safe and Equitable Reduction of the Number of Children Experiencing Foster Care in Oregon  Increase the number of children who can safely remain in the home.  Increase the number of children safely and successfully returning home.  For those children who cannot return home, increase the number who can exit the system to a higher level of permanency.  Tend to the health, education and overall well-being of children while they are in care.  Address the disproportionate representation of children of color in the system

6 Efforts Toward Safe and Equitable Foster Care Reduction Oregon Safety Model Fidelity Work Ensuring the right children and families are served at the right level of intervention. Statewide Implementation of SB964/Strengthening, Preserving and Reunifying Families Services Enhances the foundational Service array for Differential Response and provision of ongoing child welfare services. Implement Oregon’s Model of Differential Response Implementing within the child welfare program an additional track designed to give families greater voice in their services and less consequence from being involved with Child Welfare.

Years Implementation Takes Time Major Implementation Initiatives occur in stages:  Exploration (Sustainability)  Installation (Sustainability)  Initial Implementation (Sustainability)  Full Implementation (Sustainability & Effectiveness) Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace,

8 Exploration  Statewide scan of nationwide child welfare practices reducing foster care  Legislative and Gubernatorial engagement  Differential Response Design Team  Technical Assistance from NRC for Child Protection, Casey Family Programs, Ohio and Minnesota  DR Focus Groups  Visits with staff and tribes

9 Installation  DR Team Structure  Establishing enhanced service array  Developing model, including tools, communication strategies, procedures, etc.  Decision to do staged implementation  Choosing initial sites

10

11 Implementation Planning  Root cause analysis connected to system drivers  Developing measures and targets  Collaboration strategies 11

12 Initial Implementation  Readiness work in initial sites  Training  Go live  Coaching

13 Addressing Complex Family Needs The Legislative investment in the Oregon Child Welfare system helps us better address the complex needs and issues that challenge families who are struggling to keep their family safe.  Implementation of service array  Increasing the staffing levels to address workload  Strengthen the Oregon Safety Model  Implementation of Differential Response 13

14 Additional Resources/Communication Strategies  Differential Response Website response/Pages/default.aspx  Media: approach.html#.U5HT43JdWAhhttp://kobi5.com/news/local-news/item/oregon-dhs-takes-new- approach.html#.U5HT43JdWAh response-system/article_103d144c-ed34-11e3-89b1-001a4bcf887a.html model/ model/

15 We must not, in trying to think about how we can make a big difference, ignore the small daily differences we can make which, over time, add up to big differences that we often cannot foresee. ~ Marian Wright Edelman ~ Founder of the Children’s Defense Fund