CoPs in Information Service Organisations: a wild goose chase? Paper Presentation by Johann van Wyk at the HICSA Meeting held on 2 November 2005
Introduction Knowledge:Tacit or Explicit Knowledge Management Learning Organisation Communities of Practice (CoPs) Stages in the development of CoPs CoPs in an Academic Library: Case Study: Academic Information Service, University of Pretoria
Knowledge Explicit knowledge Tacit knowledge
Communities of Practice Knowledge Management Learning Organisations
Knowledge Management Definition: -Utilisation and exploitation of all knowledge assets of organisation -Including all its info and its human experience and expertise -Ensure sustainability and competitive advantage
KM Definition (Cont.) -Utilises its culture, processes and infrastructure to -Create, identify, capture, share, use & re- use knowledge -Adding optimal value to client’s knowledge base
Learning organisations Definition: “An organisation that can identify, develop and utilize its tacit and explicit knowledge capabilities, enabling the organisation to expand its capacity to learn and grow, and to modify its behaviour to reflect new knowledge and insights, and in doing so to improve its performance and success”.
Communities of Practice (CoPs) Background: -Social groups: e.g. Drinking clubs, Roman Collegia, Guilds, Caste System in India, regiments, old-boy-networks, peer groups and gangs. -Academic groups: e.g. Royal Society, American Philosophical Society -Informal Academic Groups: Invisible Colleges -Xerox: Communities of Professionals -Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger
What is a Community of Practice? “A Community of Practice is a network of people emerging spontaneously, and held together by informal relationships and common purpose, that share common knowledge or a specific domain, expertise and tools, and learn from one another”.
Communities of Practice Knowledge Management Learning Organisations
Capturing knowledge through CoPs Storytelling Role-play/scenarios
Capturing knowledge through CoPs (Cont.) Knowledge Mapping orgnet.com
Case Study: Academic Information Service (AIS), University of Pretoria, South Africa Background Respondents Method: Literature study and Interviews
CoPs identified in the AIS
Cross Organisational CoPs CoP Academic department at other University Academic Department Other library Government Department AIS
Knowledge Management Practitioners Group of Pretoria
GCATS (GAELIC Cataloguers)
Maritime Archaeology Group Maritime Archaeology Lecturer Researchers from Cape Town Students Information Specialist
Virtual Group on Water Research
Virtual Group on Architecture
African Goats Group
Internal CoPs in the AIS
Information Specialists Group Humanities Natural & Agric. Sciences and Engineering Economic and Management Sciences Law Groenkloof (Education) Theology & Sociological Sciences Medical Sciences Veterinary sciences General Information Specialists Group
Digital Repositories Group
Informal Network for E-Information Experts
Stages in development of a CoP
Results
Role of Management
Time to participate
Workload
Rewards or Incentives
New Members
Size of the CoP Ideal size: 15 – 20 members
Trust
Coordination or Facilitation role in the CoP
Formal v Informal
Information Technology and Listservs Telephone and Teleconferencing Web Pages Virtual Workspaces on Portals, e.g. InfoPortal of UP
Conclusion Are CoPs in Information Service Organisations a wild goose chase?
Stages in development of a CoP
Potential DefinitionThe possibility for the formation of a community exists. Fundamental functionConnection. Possible role of information specialist/librarian Identify suitable candidates to join; Market CoP to potential members; Identify existing communities; Sell CoP to management for support; Conduct interviews and facilitate group dialogue; Act as Community Champion or coach a Community champion.
Formation DefinitionThe members come together, form a community and set out its operating principles. Fundamental functionCapturing memory, context creation and structuring. Possible role of information specialist/librarian Act as facilitator; Set up, facilitate and document informal meetings; Map knowledge flows and knowledge relationships; Build group identity by setting up a homepage or designing a virtual workspace.
Commitment DefinitionThe community executes and improves its processes. Fundamental functionAccess and learning. Possible role of information specialist/librarian Design knowledge capture and documentation systems; Design, convene and facilitate seminars and conferences; Develop support strategies for the group learning agenda.
Active DefinitionThe community understands and demonstrates benefits from knowledge sharing and the collective work of the community. Fundamental functionCollaboration. Possible role of information specialist/librarian Encourage members to stay committed; Make online links to members' papers; Publish stories on individuals or communities in newsletters or other corporate-wide publications; Address organizational issues that are helping or hindering activity; Help negotiate role of CoP in organizational decision-making; Forge linkages with other groups and communities.
Scenario 1 – Adaptive DefinitionThe community adapts to changes in the environment Fundamental functionInnovation and generation Possible role of information specialist/librarian Mentor/teacher Facilitator Innovator
Scenario 2 – Disengage and Disperse DefinitionThe usefulness of the community for its members and supporting organization has been outlived, and its members move on Fundamental functionDisengagement Possible role of information specialist/librarian Facilitate Convene reunions Maintain directory
Conclusion