Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REM Shelby County Schools School Year. Current Federal/State Law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reauthorization of.
Advertisements

Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Special Education Compliance
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
IEP DEVELOPMENT Administrative Rubric Presented by: Jamillah Silver & Denise Simmons.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Surrogate Parent Training
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
Planning Interview Process March 2011
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
2012 Change Documents ARD Process Guide & Notice of Procedural Safeguards.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network (TASN) Overview and Preparation for.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Compliance Training Overview Principal’s Meeting February 2012.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
CHAPTER 16 Regulations Covering the Education of Gifted Students August 25,2009.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Special Education Meeting January 14th 3:30 ASC- Tennessee Room.
5/16/13 Special Education Meeting. Happy Retirement!!! O We wish Peggy Rochelle and Melodie Stice a Happy, Exciting, Wonderful Retirement…. Thank you.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
Students with Exceptionalities
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Post-Secondary Transition
Understanding the IEP Process
Notice under IDEA.
Post-Secondary Transition
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children

IEP Process 1a: IEP Revised Annually Accepted 1/27/12 Signatures of IEP Team Required “DRAFT” must be crossed through on the 1 st page and ALL following pages once the IEP team has accepted the document. The team must DATE and SIGN the first page. The remaining pages should be DATED and INITIALED with “DRAFT” crossed out.

IEP Process 6: Parent Received Copy of Written Report Used in this Eligibility There is documentation of parental receipt of the Written Report (e.g., Psychological Evaluation or Reevaluation Packet). When the parent was not in attendance, the date and name of the person providing the report MUST be documented.

CM Initial 11: Prior Written Notice for Initial Evaluation Prior Written Notice MUST be provided upon initial referral or the parent’s request for evaluation.

CM Initial 13a: Prior Written Notice for Initial Placement Prior Written Notice MUST be provided to the parent for the student’s initial placement.

CM ReEval 14: ReEvaluation Review Process Reevaluation Summary Report All applicable components of the Reevaluation Summary Report, Sections I through IV, should be completed. This is a review of existing data for the student. 1.Evaluations and information provided by the parents of the child (parent input). 2.Current classroom-based, local, or State assessments, and classroom based observations; and observations by teachers and related service providers. 3.Section III is the review of previous assessments and is completed by the school psychologist, SLP, or other assessment specialists.

CM ReEval 16: Parent Input for ReEvaluation The reevaluation MUST include evidence of current input from the parent (or from the student if he/she is 18). The input may be obtained in various forms: 1.Parent input form on EasyIEP 2.Notes from an interview with the parent 3.Completion of an evaluation scale by the parent 4.Anecdotal notes of the most current input from the parent such as parent notes to the teacher or telephone conversations with the parents.

CM ReEval 18: Procedural Safeguards for Triennial ReEvaluation (part 1) Section V of the Reevaluation Summary Report Applicable information for Section V has been checked and signed and is documented in the student’s file. If parents did not attend the reevaluation meeting, the special education teacher is responsible for sending a copy to the parent and documenting the date on Section V that it has been provided to the parent.

CM ReEval 18: Procedural Safeguards for Triennial ReEvaluation (part 2)

CM ReEval 19: Parental Consent for Comprehensive ReEvaluation If the IEP team decides that a Comprehensive Reevaluation is needed, the parent must sign Section V, giving consent for the reevaluation OR there must be documentation of attempts to obtain consent in the file if the parent did not attend.

CM: ReEval 20: Prior Written Notice for ReEvaluation Prior Written Notice MUST be completed after the Reevaluation meeting to document the results of the Team’s decision. A copy of the PWN is given to the parents and documentation of receipt by the parent is documented in Section V.

IEP Process 21: Invitation to Meeting The LEA MUST send home the Invitation to a Meeting to the parent at least 10 days prior to the meeting date. If the parent agrees to attend before the 10 day notification, this agreement should be documented on the Invitation to a Meeting by writing on the invitation that the parent had waived the 10 day notice.

IEP Process 23: Parental Concerns During the IEP meeting, ask the parent or student (if age 18) what their main concerns are relating to his/her education. Document their concerns on the IEP. If the parent and/or student does not attend the meeting, gather this information prior to the meeting by phone, conference, or notes from home. Do NOT leave this section incomplete, blank, or use NA.

IEP Process 26: Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance: All Areas Assessed The Present Level of Performance (PLOP) is recorded in the IEP for each area assessed. Include only academic, prevocational, and other functional skills. Do not include cognitive skills or IQ scores, as cognition/IQ does not represent an academic goal.

IEP Process 30: Annual Goal and Short Term Objectives: Address all Present Levels of Performance Areas All areas marked as exceptional in the “Present Levels of Performance” section MUST be addressed with goals and short- term objectives. For example, if a student had exceptionalities (“yes”) in the areas of Math and Reading, then the case manager would develop an Annual Goal and Short Term Objectives for both areas.

IEP Process 32: Annual Goal and Short Term Objectives: Measurable The goals and objectives should be measurable statements of what the student can reasonably accomplish within a year. Annual Goal (sample): Karen will use active comprehension strategies to analyze text for fact and opinion, cause and effect, inferences, and conclusions. Short Term Objective (sample): Given evidence from a dataset, Karen will determine cause and effect relationships that explain a phenomenon.

IEP Process 35: Program Participation The IEP MUST include accommodations that allow student demonstration of knowledge and skills during instruction, class work, and/or classroom assessments and are aligned with the student’s district and statewide assessments. When no accommodations are needed, this must be documented in the IEP. If there are no accommodations needed for either the TCAP or other assessments or for the classroom, note with “NA” or “No Accommodations” under Program Participation.

TCAP-Alt 38: TCAP-Alt PA Participation Requirements The student’s TCAP-Alt Participation Requirements are completed and documented in the IEP. The Principal’s signature is required and agreement MUST be indicated by a “yes” check mark.

IEP Process 53: IEP Team Composition- Interpreter of Test Results If an initial evaluation or comprehensive reevaluation was required at the IEP Team meeting, there MUST be evidence of staff to interpret evaluation results. The interpreter of test results may answer questions and help the team understand the test results as it relates to the student’s learning style and the academic development of the IEP.

IEP Process 55: Informed Parental Consent- Proposed Program in IEP The Informed Parental Consent section MUST be completed and signed by the parent at the IEP meeting. If the parent does not attend the meeting, there is evidence to include the parent. The parent should check all four boxes. If the parent participates in the meeting by telephone, the Informed Parental Consent boxes can be check off during the meeting. Be sure to write into this page that the parent participated via phone conference.

IEP Process 56: Parent Notification: Transfer of Student Rights Prior to the student’s 18 th birthday, parents must be informed that Tennessee law recognizes that a student has reached the age of maturity and all rights afforded to the parent under IDEA & FERPA transfer to the student. When appropriate the student must be invited to the meeting. The parent should sign and date agreeing he/she has been informed.

IEP Process 57: Student Notification Transfer of Student Rights The student has signed and dated agreeing the he/she have been informed, when appropriate. This must occur at least one year prior to the student’s 18 th birthday.

IEP Process 58: Date IEP was Provided to the Parent The date a copy of the written IEP was provided to the parent MUST be documented on the IEP.

IEP Process 59: LEA Person Responsible for Providing IEP, if Parent Did Not Attend The name of the person responsible for providing a copy of the written IEP to the parent should be documented on the last page of the IEP or the parent was in attendance at the IEP meeting.

IEP Process 60: IEP Review by Teachers Not in Attendance When the review is completed each of the student’s teachers not in attendance at the meeting MUST sign and date the last page of the IEP. If all teachers responsible for implementing the IEP are present at the meeting, indicate “all teachers were present.”

Secondary Transition 63: Transition Student Invitation to Meeting A separate Invitation Notice providing written documentation that the student was invited to the IEP meeting when the purpose is the consideration of post- secondary goals and transition services needed to assist the student in reaching these goals.