By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fallacies for Persuasive Writing Part I Ad Hominem Appeal to Emotion Appeal to Authority Bandwagon Straw Man Slippery Slope.
Advertisements

Understanding Logical Fallacies
Ad Homienem By: Katie Wilmes and Matilde Bellocchio.
Refutation. Refutation is… not just saying “no” not just saying “no” the process of discrediting someone’s argument by revealing weaknesses in it or by.
Capstone Seminar Mr. Dana Linton. Logical fallacies are common errors of reasoning. If an argument commits a logical fallacy, then the reasons that it.
Rhetorical Fallacies Appeals to Tradition & Begging the Question.
 In this argument the one arguing states that something is true or better because it is old and/or traditional.  In other words, how true a statement.
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy 1 Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 11 Analyzing.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position, or tries to persuade someone else to adopt.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position, or tries to persuade someone else to adopt.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Critical Thinking C Wiseman. Arguments -- Fallacies Description of Fallacies  What is an argument ? Two or more propositions: One or more premises.
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
Critical Thinking: Science and Citizenship A.Selective Use of Evidence Even a false theory is likely to have some support Critically evaluate the evidence.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Or How I Overcame My Addiction to Illogical Conclusions and Persevered in the Age of Reason Logical Fallacies.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Let’s see some more examples!
Ad Hominem Or argumentum ad hominem. Definition Also known as, argument to the man, Ad Hominem is “…a general category of fallacies in which a claim or.
Logical Fallacies: Or, How to Really Fail at Argumentation “Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end.” – Dr. Spock, Star Trek.
Persuasive  To convince someone to believe in something or do something.  Writers may use language that appeals to the reader’s senses.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
By Nat Murphy.  Involves drawing conclusions about something based on a physical sign  Mystery Novels  Conclusions based on such reasoning are based.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
LOGICAL FALLACIES.  What is a logical fallacy? A logical fallacy is a mistake made when arguing a claim or argument because the speaker/author has incorrectly.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Logical Fallacies Engl 1302 Heilig. What are logical fallacies?  Bad!  Common errors in reasoning  Often substitute emotion for evidence  Often oversimplify.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Part 4 Reading Critically
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Understanding Fallacy
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Errors in Reasoning.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Errors in Reasoning.
Cody Lyles Cheyenne Milan
Informal Logical Fallacies
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Logical Fallacies Part 3.
Rumessa Naqvi November 22, 2018
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Fallacies of Reasoning
Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies Part 3 “Non-logic”.
Logical Fallacies English III.
Living in the Media Age (Fallacies)
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska

Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty Generalization- when your general observations are later proved wrong  “When educational standards are lowered, the quality of shows on television worsens. So if we see television getting worse over the next few years, we'll know that our educational standards are still falling.”

Ad Hominem Arguments  Ad hominem- is “against the man”  Ad hominem are arguments made against the person, rather than against the person’s arguments  Example: Person A: …as you can see, it just makes sense for us to protect the environment.” Person B: Just look at that tie, it is hideous, are you really going to listen to a person who can’t even dress themselves properly?

Ad Hominem Continued…  Ad hominem happens in two steps  -an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made  -this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making

Ad Hominem Setup  Person A makes claim X.  Person B makes an attack on person A.  Therefore A's claim is false.  Example: Bill: "I believe that abortion is morally wrong." Dave: "Of course you would say that, you're a priest." Bill: "What about the arguments I gave to support my position?" Dave: "Those don't count. Like I said, you're a priest, so you have to say that abortion is wrong. Further, you are just a lackey to the Pope, so I can't believe what you say."

Appeals to Opinion vs. Appeals to Tradition  Appeals to opinions suggest that the argument is true because we everyone thinks so.  Politicians often rely on opinion polls to help them make decisions.

Appeals to Opinion  This fallacy assumes that because many people believe in something, it must be correct or the best way something can be done.  This is not necessarily true:  Columbus – earth not flat  Roger Bannister – 4 minute mile

Appeals to Tradition  Appeals to tradition is when you argue that this is the way we have always done it.  This is known as the status quo. To maintain the status quo is to keep the things the way they currently are.  Appeals to tradition shouldn’t be relied on because times are changing.  Examples- Technology and Knowledge

Begging the Question  Begging the question is a fallacy and a rhetorical device  Begging the question uses circular reasoning  Circular reasoning is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stronger terms.

Begging the Question continued…  Example  Bill: "God must exist." Jill: "How do you know." Bill: "Because the Bible says so." Jill: "Why should I believe the Bible?" Bill: "Because the Bible was written by God.“  Key point: You need to prove an assumption like this before you or your audience accepts it.

Questions 1. What is a fallacy? What are some examples of fallacies? 2. Define the term Status Quo. 3. Why is it bad to use appeals to opinion and tradition? Why might politicians use them anyway?